>"user, we overheard you saying women suffrage was a mistake. Can you defend your opinion on why citizens who work and support their nation don't deserve the right of voting without using sexist terms and thoughts?"
Wo
no because the reasons are sexist by definition. the false assumption here is that anything that is sexist must automatically be untrue because the truth could never ever hurt anyone's feelings, right?
1 vote per family, otherwise Politicians will use it to further divide people against each other for their own gain. Men versus women, black versus white so on and so forth. Prove that it wasn't sufferage that has lead our country to ruin by international interests.
Sure. Don't take it the wrong way, but women have consistently voted for policies that can only be described as suicidal for a nation, including an increasingly powerful state, rampant welfare programs, and open borders and mass immigration. Furthermore, the so-called sexual revolution has devoured the nuclear family which is evident in divorce rates across the West. There are many statistics that prove that "sexually liberated" women are far less happy than their traditional counterparts as well as more disease ridden and likely to fail at future relationships, and this applies to men as well.
So, while men may rightfully be blamed for setting the world on fire multiple times in the last century alone through vicious wars, women also deserve some of the blame for their inside role in the whole thing including their voting patterns. There are many possible solutions to this problem that have been offered such as voting as family units, to list one.
>citizens who work and support their nation
That would be almost entirely white males
Nearly every other demographic has a net negative fiscal impact on the economy
-said no women ever because they can't have such an articulate phrase structure.
Also
>without using sexist terms and thoughts
>without using thoughts
Liberals.
what the fuck are they holding? ?
sexist
This. What is it OP?
They make bad decisions which directly impact their quality of life.
A child may do chores around the house, but he doesn’t get to make bad choices that affect all.
what does kfc sell that lookslike that
>>"user, we overheard you saying women suffrage was a mistake. Can you defend your opinion on why citizens who work and support their nation don't deserve the right of voting without using sexist terms and thoughts?"
Can you first post a question that isn't leading in a way that a priori presumes your own opinion is correct and all others are wrongthink?
And the answer is simple: nothing in nature is equal, and we must strive towards allowing the best to rule instead of the common. That's why I am against the suffrage of any gender as a monarchist.
Ice cream dip
Yanks put it on nachos and shit
kfc buckets filled with sherbet
KFC bucket slurpees, suprised a swede cuck wouldn't know. Now go stand in line for your subsidized bread Felix.
What the fuck is in those KFC pales?
It was "Bring your own cup" day at 7-11. People would bring any container and fill it with slushie.
7/11 bring your own slurpee cup. You bring whatever you want and fill it up. People do goofy stuff like this.
Only insecure virgins want to take their rights away. Virgins want complete power over women because they can't talk to them or get them to be their gf's so they want to control women by force.
It's a small-sized ice-cream in America
They are called Slurpees, from the convenience store called 7-11. On august 11 (7/11) u can bring ur own container, fill it up, and pay one flat fee
Why/when/how is this a thing?
In this roleplay, am I a 7-11 employee? Because if so, I would respond with something like:
>Ayo hol up!
Both those slags are Prawns.
Throw away the head, keep the body.
All government is a mistake.
If you support government you support violence against peaceful people for the sake of political goons who deserve nothing less than hell.
In america, we have fast-food/gas station hybrids. This picture is of a KFC/7-11 hybrid. The girls's used a KFC chicken wing bucket to hold their 7-11 slurpees. This option is "off the menu", and the manager probably told them to leave.
What is the point of 2 gallon slurpees?
this is the most nauseating shit i've seen in a while.
>sherbet
Of course. You shouldn't be working.
But why kfc?
Women pay only 29 percent of taxes, they are a parasite on the system, so they should not vote. Just like niggers should not vote.
Pigging out or sharing with friends and family for a cheap price.
nevermind, just heard about bring your cup day.
If they pay does it really matter?
To be "smart" and outwit the stupid 7-11 slurpee policy, while giving yourself diabetes and a massive headache.
Dude dick in vagina dude
idk, frozen slop from the gas station i guess.
Except some NIGGER ruined it for my local 7-11 by bringing his fucking inflatable swimming pool and waiting hours until midnight so he could he the first. He took all of it and all the other nogs thought it was funny. Now they don't allow you to have anything larger than 44oz in my town.
Slushies are like a fucking dollar per cup
I think one day a year during the summer or some shit, 711 lets you bring in your own container to fill up with a slush for really cheap or free, I forget.
>their nation
Women don't understand this concept
>august 11
>not the 7th of November
July 11 you fucking moron
You support your nation by finding a good man and having children. Everything else you do is borderline destructive at best, and actually destructive at worst.
FUCKING EXPLAIN YOURSELVES
RIGHT
FUCKING
NOW
DOTARDS
WHAT IN GODS DAMNED FUCKING EARTH ARE THEY HOLDING ???????
Although they deserve it, it made the center of politics move towards the left in all western countries.
Fuck off biotrash
Did he drink it from the swimming pool?
Only net taxpayers should have the right to vote, regardless of gender. If you are not a net taxpayer, you should shut up and be thankful that you can live off of our generosity.
You sure about that buddy?
>"Can you give us an argument without using perfectly logical arguments I cannot counter?"
What the fuck is wrong with my fellow Americans
DELET THIS
This hurts our world standing
REMOV
You're just one step away from the truth:
>women have consistently voted for policies that can only be described as suicidal for a nation
Yet you white men put drumpf in :)
What are talking about...? lol
That is pretty funny though. He was probably sent there by a competing convenience sto'.
>>>/reddit/
*starts breathing heavy over how hot and close to me they are*
*reaches out out and starts whispering gimme gimmee while squeezing my fingers for boobies*
Slurpees. Think kool-aid with the texture of freezer burn.
>user, we overheard you saying women suffrage was a mistake
I wasn't talking to you, so it's none of your fucking business. Now take your future stripper friend, and fuck off.
What about men who don't have families? Should they be banned from voting too?
"Can you do x, y and z without math?"
Free. They do it with coffee, too.
>sucking down a tub of sugar
>swedcucks don't know this feel
MUH FREEDUMB!
Your nation is literally 33% obese, meaning sickly over weight, meaning you will have health problems like diabeetus and die early from being a gross pig fatass retard.
Another 33% is over-weight meaning risk zone
>another fucking post trying to instill subconscious fear of women into young men who browse Sup Forums
And afterwards we take the buckets outback and unload our fucking America guns on them while we drink nacho cheese from fucking dixie cup sleeves just for the fuck of it you sad foreign sacks of monkey nigger faggot shit.
...
>The problem is not you sweeties, how could it be you are so perfect :D (hugs and kisses to each of them) it's universal suffrage to both man and women
Yes, nigerian cum is filled with protein and bacteria that helps your immune system get stronger, which is why swedes suck down buckets of that instead.
>Net loss on 1.9 extra gallons of water and chemicals (that they're not even going to drink and only bought so they could post pictures of it on instagram): about 5 cents
>Net extra profit on the one snickers bar they bought while they were there to go with it: $1.25
Yes
What the hell is that vat of sugary shit?
Who in the name of Jesus could think slurping down all that mess would be a good idea?
Crazy yanks
damn dude i think were on to something here. only families allowed to vote boi. no single degenerate bachelors
GET BACK TO INVADING SWEDEN ABDUL. TRY IT HERE AND YOUR LINEAGE WILL END AT THE DOOR.
you'd be just as fat if you were fed the stuff on the shelves here. food/beverage companies make a killing selling terrible food at low prices, and big pharma makes a killing when people get sick from eating it. food and drugs are big business here.
because
Sure, I will now present you with the distilled essence of Sup Forums: Muh Feels.
>TRY IT HERE AND YOUR LINEAGE WILL END AT THE DOOR.
Yeah it'll become black or mexican
Look, they're savvy consumers cleverly exploiting the Bring Your Own Cup promotion at 7-11. They're saving almost three whole dollars by going to that convenience store on that particular day to purchase something they probably wouldn't buy otherwise in a quantity they probably won't consume. That's just smart shopping.
Is biology sexist?
Can you repeat that question without using buzzwords?
>>sucking down a tub of sugar
>>swedcucks don't know this feel
Should have stoped with this, people would have keked and you would have gotten quads
Because votes are typically reserved for people.
>without using sexist terms and thoughts
sexism isn't real, its a made up concept to restrict your ability to think
>yeah ok but first you both need to take it in turns at riding my dick and my face, then let me jizz all over your faces, then and only then can we talk about other shit, but if i get tired just fuck off and let me sleep
Shut the fuck up and suck my dick bitch
Was going to try and paraphrase this, now I needn't bother. Well done user.
So, you're saying our women aren't people? That men are animal fuckers? I guess this sums up the average pol mindset.
women are better suited in a supportive, or submissive role, voting is taking leadership by participating in important decisions. women are too soft and vote with their emotions to make good decisions when it comes to issues that affect society. people under 30 shouldn't even be allowed to vote, because many men at this age are also emotional, unstable boys at that point in their lives. many of the decisions women make undermine the fabric of society, because it is often some kind of emotional, angry reactionary vote, or selfish vote that is anti-family and anti-woman. for instance, women will vote in favor of abortion because they want to have lots of sex outside of marriage without consequences, but if they do that then it undermines the family, because the woman becomes a far less desirable mate for any prospective husbands and it is more likely statistically that her marriage will fail. women make decisions that hurt themselves and hurt their societies. also they are more likely to sympathize with the enemies of a cultural out of a weak bleeding heartedness that is counter productive to their nation's safety and stability.
Every single stage of Feminism has been bad. Every single idea that it pushes is bad. Every single goal it had was bad. Thanks mostly to Second Wave Feminism, which covered an enormously broad range of topics, it is beyond the scope of even an effortpost to address all of it. But I can address the two main points of it, and I will.
• Women Should Have The Right To Vote!
No, they should not. I can give you three very good reasons women should not have the right to vote. One, it allows politicians to drive a wedge between men and women and ph husband and wife against one another. They can use gender identity politics to attempt to appeal to men or women exclusively, pitting half of the nation against the other half while giving them an out on addressing the real issues. It gives politicians in Washington the power to get between a husband and a wife emotionally and intellectually, which is outrageous and should not be allowed.
1/
Two, it is the most destructive thing to the family. Before Feminism, only men had the right to vote, and almost all men got married. In practice, this meant that there was, as a trend, one vote per family, not one vote per person. If we assume the lowest possible trust in politicians, then we assume that their political rhetoric will always reflect the bare minimum of when they can get away with. When 95% of American voters were men casting votes for their families, politicians had no choice but to pitch policies and laws that were conductive to family values. But when all adults have a vote, politicians no longer have to careabout family values. The level of discourse can be lowered to simply being individual friendly instead of being family friendly. We can see the transformation this has on political rhetoric in action by simply looking at how talking points were changed. ''Homosexual marriage is bad for the family stopped working as an issue. Why? Because of the individual friendly rebuttal, what somebody does with their own body, or what they do behind closed doors, is no business of yours. The family gave way as an issue to the individual. This counter to anti-homosexual sentiment did not exist until women were given the right to vote. And finally, related to two but still a seperate reason on its own to count it as three, Conservatives and Liberals have a very fundamental split on how they view the world. The molecule is defined as the smallest possible unit of an element that still retains all of the traits of that element. So a water molecule is the smallest possible amount of water that still behaves chemically and physically like water. If you break it down any further, it stops being water.
fpbp
One of the most fundamental splits between Conservative viewpoints and Liberal viewpoints is what they view the molecule of society as being. The Liberal views the smallest possible unit of society as being the Individual. Thus, all of their policies and issues stem from this fountainhead. To the Liberal, it makes perfect sense that all of the rights and freedoms and powers should belong to every single individual. Even their more radical stance, which is the Communist reconfiguration of wealth and social structure, is nothing more than a relatively basic and logical extrapolation on this theory of the Primacy of the Individual. Communism takes 'at Individuals should have the same powers, freedoms, and rights," and extrapolates this into all Individuals being totally equal in all things is the only true form of fairness and justice, because any difference between Individuals must be injustice. Thus, we have the creation of things like Social Justice and Cultural Marxism, and we come to understand why Communism, in spite of being referred to as a "radical" politic, is in actuality only a single step away from when we consider basic modern talking points for Liberals.
This is, by the way, how you can tell, rhetorically, that at Neoconservatives are just Liberals with red has on, and h is also how we can accurately identify Libertarianism as being inherently and fundamentallyleft wing. Both Neocons and Libertarians accept and agree with the core Liberal framing that the Individual is Prime.
3/
Well, no. Because that would imply women are animals and not objects.
What is the deal with these threads? Am I supposed to hide my real political opinions because some roastie confronted me and there's a chance to get laid? Fuck off, I don't care how women feel about politics nor should any of you.
The Conservative, however, disagrees. To the Conservative, the molecule of society, the smallest possible unit of civilization that still retains at of the qualities and traits of civilization, is the family, not the individual. A family is a group of people who share blood ties, live in the same space, speak the same language, have the same culture, and share the same experiences. To the Conservative, a family is a microcosm of the nation itself, because it shares at the same traits that a nation does, and even the same general defination, but if you were to break the family apart into individuals, they no longer exhibit the traits of a nation, because they are alone.
This is the fundamental disagreement between Conservatives and Liberals over the identity of a nation in a nutshell, and it is why the Liberals have lost the argument. An individual is a lump of experiences and traits without context or frame. To base a nation off of individuals is to base a nation off of nothing, because individuals have next to nothing in common with one another. This is the reason why Liberalism, having fully incubated into it's final rhetorical form, is agitating for the dissolving of all boarders and the inclusion into any nation anyone who wishes to be a part of it. To a non-Liberal, it seems like madness, but to the Liberal, it is simple logic totally in-line with their core assumption that Individualism is Prime.
4/
Conservatives, by contrast, have an infinitely more authentic depiction of a nation. A nation is blood, soil, and the shared culture and experiences of the people who 1We in it. A family is also shared blood, shared soil, and the joint culture and experiences of the people who are a part of it. Conservatives define a nation not by the individuals who make it up, but rather by the bonds that hold those individuals together. A group of individuals is a family, the smallest unit of a civilization that still retains all of the traits and qualities of civilizations. A group of families is a neighborhood or locale, a group of neighborhoods or locales is a district, a group of districts forms a state, and you can either stop there with the Nation State, or take it one step further with a group of states creating a greater Superstate.
This is a very long explaination for a very short statement, butt was needed to appropriately justify it. The third reason women should not vote is because, simply, it distributes the vote to individuals over families, which creates a system that will always sacrifice the family and always destroy family values in the name of pushing individual values. In pure cause-and-effect, a system in which only women could vote and at women were married would be better than a system in which men and women can both vote. The vote MUST go to the family, it is absolutely paramount, and prior to Feminism, it did. Women's voting rights destroys that.
5/
Women's rights were a mistake - a mistake such as why in the hell are you more than 10 feet from your home, the stove. Time to get the belt.
Yes.
False premise for an argument, the whole reason for being against women's suffrage is by definition sexist, and so we need to use sexist terms such as the fact that women love the welfare state.