where are all ANTIFA's e-celebs Sup Forums? ill tell you where, NOWHERE.
you know why that is? because Insurrectionary Communism is not one more ideology on the capitalist market place of "ideas". Insurrectionary Communism is the end of that Spectacle, its the end of all celebrities and E-celebrities.
the closest thing you will get to an antifa e-celeb is goldilocks, and she dont even sells "anarcho-communism", she sells her pussy like a normal, everyday unpretentious whore. which is more i can say about Faith Goldy, Brittany Pettibone and Lauren Southern, you chumps
Antifa is corporatist, not communist. They only attack nationalists and enemies of the globalist-corporatist order.
Carter Richardson
>only attack [...] enemies of the globalist-corporatist order.
Berlin88 Paris89 Madrid94 J18 Seattle/N30 Washington A16 Washington D.C. 2002 Genoa
those guys were fighting Globalization before Globalization was a thing
Jordan Richardson
You're talking about the deep past. Give us something recent. Something in the US in the past year or so. Hell; antifa claims to have thousands of members in the Bay Area alone - why haven't they protested any of the mega-conglomerates at their "corporate campuses" in that region?
Eli Thomas
Antifa doesn't need e-celebs because they have the mainstream celebs on their side. Next question.
Daniel Torres
idiots larping as violent revolutionaries are too big of pussies to broadcast the shit they know will get them arrested
Anyone with any leadership experience in the public sector can tell you the problems with communism and why it always withers and dies. Thomas Sowell was a marxist until he worked for the dept of labor. Im betting like all other communist idiots you have zero executive experience and thus are unable to identify systemic flaws in organizations.
1. Recent (as in, the past year to 18 months) 2. From the US 3. Where "antifa" groups attacked globalists, neoliberals, and/or corporatists
Go!
Jayden Butler
they attacked the alt right, the larp Bannon bots who attempt to divert popular rage from the rich 1 percent minority to the poor minorities, this is what fascism is
Nathan Anderson
Oh for fuck sake. I don't feel like typing out an essay that's going to fall on deaf ears so just answer the question in this video instead please.
what are you trying to say? that black people are dumb? why did decolonization took place? how is that that the Algerian Africans defeated the french Europeans? the Iraqis the americans? the Vietnamese the americans AND the french? there are countless victorious wars fought by "inferior races" against intelligent white people. how?
Jackson Bell
>there are countless victorious wars fought by "inferior races" against intelligent white people. how? the video explains exactly how if you payed attention. have you noticed that the "inferior races" (your choice of words, not mine) win wars in their own country (or in other words, their environment).
nice video, by the way. thanks for the link.
William Roberts
>what are you trying to say? With that per capita graph? Nothing in particular, just sharing some data. Don't you find it interesting at all, that even when groups are thrown into an environment with different selection pressures than their native environment, they exhibit similar, if not identical, behaviors? This is even more interesting because we still have relatively good controls with Europe and Africa. >why did decolonization "took" place Where? >muh military victories You don't know fuck all about history or warfare, don't pretend like you do.
Blake Nelson
Agree :)
Christian Long
...
Evan Hill
There's that Jason guy with the stupid hair and alleged sugar addiction, the Chapo guys, Slavoj Zizek, and that's just the ones I know without having any interest in it.
Carson Sullivan
>we're better because we have no thought leaders
hmm, exactly what a globalist funded useful idiot would say
Lincoln Green
Two words: Russell Brand
Logan Ross
>Where?
i just told you. in Algeria, for ones. can you intelligent being not google "decolonization wars"?
You have CNN and huffpo. The reason antifa doesn't have any real people ecelebs is because it's entirely manufactured by giant capitalists like George Soros and astroturfed by literal shills. There is no real popular support, otherwise you would find people spontaneously ecelebing for it. You're a useful idiot for anti-white, amto- West racists. Literally tricked into fighting for someone else's interests against your own self-interests. Fucking cattle.
Do you understand what decolonization means? Is english your first language you fucking dolt? I'm not feeding you historic geopolitical conditions and pressures that lead to particular outcomes. It's complicated and not worth my time to attempt to spoonfeed a subhuman information and a view that you couldn't understand if you wanted too.
Carson Long
Mon Dragon is a socialist enterprise in Spain and they train Microsoft and other capitalist enterprises. You're just talking out of your butt
Kevin Jenkins
but you are not those guys in fact you are the enemy of those guys in the past because you are literally nothing more than whores/footsoldier for the globalist bourgeois provably so.
Ethan Russell
yeah wow, he's just about the least intelligent "pseudo intelligent" man i've ever heard open his mouth
> er yeah there's got to be a different way, there simply has to be, because this one isn't working, but i don't know what it is
you're either too fucking stupid to realize you're a marxist, or too much of a coward to stand by your beliefs.
and people listen to this moron?
Parker Wood
you're full of shit
>we superior
>we lose wars against inferiors
i dont give a shit how much your brain weighs - if you dont see the paradox in that then you dumb as shit honey
Jeremiah Torres
>Insurrectionary Communism is not one more ideology on the capitalist market place of "ideas" Then how come from 1917 to 2017 it has been almost exclusively financed by jewish bankers?
Eli Sullivan
All y'all alt-rightists are gonna get gulaged.
Nathaniel James
LARPERer's get the bullet first, fuckwit.
Nicholas Hughes
How are we larping?
Robert Brown
yeah and the new elite's initial handymen are second in line, as is always the case
we'll see you there
Ayden Gutierrez
lol you talk about paradox when you 24/7 fight against your own declared goals and literally project your failures on others. Again you are the literal foot soldiers of the globalist bourgeois you cant even deny this fact. You take money from them, they pay ads so others come to your idiot "protests", you had the media shilling for you, you have every single soros paid globalist movement foundation pushing support for you, you have literal enemies of the united states support you and you support a north korean dictator over the US president, again you support a dictator that has concentration camps and gas chambers right now that would have made the Nazis jealous. You are all over the place, uninformed and routinely shoot yourselves in the foot hoping billionaire globalist senpai will notice you even more and shove even more money up your ass for being such a good whore. Prove me wrong, you cant.
Aiden Clark
Agreed, whites are inferior and oppressive so they should be segregated away from everyone else so they can't inflict their ill-will on POC and other marginalized groups.
Xavier Jackson
...
Jose Johnson
I see no problem with this.
Connor Gutierrez
bla bla bla
>muh jews
>muh niggers
>muh conspiracy theory
>muh superiority
>muh IQ
>muh white genocide
>muh globalists
>muh cultural Marxist
>muh comfy 50's
put some new record on, its getting old man. like any commodity, you play with it for some time then get a new one.
Kevin Jackson
Because there is something missing in you that most humans possess. Compassion. A heart. A conscience. Honour. Dignity. Some essential evolutionary brain function that enables society and civilisation to function. Something is missing. You are less than human. A subhuman.
>In his book, Unnatural Deaths in the U.S.S.R.: 1928-1954, I.G. Dyadkin estimated that the USSR suffered 56 to 62 million "unnatural deaths" during that period, with 34 to 49 million directly linked to Stalin. >In Europe A History, British historian Norman Davies counted 50 million killed between 1924-53, excluding wartime casualties. >Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, a Soviet politician and historian, estimated 35 million deaths. >In his acclaimed book The Great Terror: Stalins Purge of the Thirties, Anglo-American historian Robert Conquest said: We get a figure of 20 million dead [under Stalin], which is almost certainly too low and might require an increase of 50 percent or so. ibtimes.com/how-many-people-did-joseph-stalin-kill-1111789
Chase Anderson
No. The ugly truth is going to be drilled into you until you stop spouting your pretty lies.
Daniel Cruz
Let's stand side by side to demand that whites are separated from POC. We won't stand for injustice any longer! We must demand separate regions for blacks and mexicans, place where the white man wont be allowed in.
Blake Torres
They are ppl like Heiko Maas, Anette Kahane, the RAF, etc.
They don’t have Internet celebs cause they’re all in the media and universities. Why would they even need to use social media to get their message out?
You’re an idiot.
Gavin Rogers
So that explains why Bannon is going after the mainstream republican class and why he said the elites in Davos have committed “economic hate crimes” against regular people.
You must be German to be this retarded. On heroin at the Rot Flora?
Carter Young
and yet you cant dispute even one thing least of all that you are not fighting against the elite you are supporting it you are nothing more than the whores of elites, you are again foot soldiers for the people you pretend to fight against. You cant disprove this fact i am afraid. Btw all the idiot things you just pointed out are not even in what i wrote, but i understand you have to distract. I focused exclusively on antifags and anarchist movements that literally do the opposite of what they are preaching, if you actually would do what you preach you would have thousands of people on the center right supporting you btw. kinda unfortunate for your ideas dont you think?
Christopher Edwards
an America made great again through racialized economic nationalism, preserves in its heart the very conservatism it pretends to expel. The means with which Trump and his coalition would remake American capitalism are the technocratic tools of his predecessors, Reagan and the Bushes, Obama and the Clintons. His infrastructure project is not a return to the government-funded building projects of the New Deal, but instead imagines that roads, bridges, internet bandwidth, and power plants will magically appear as the result of tax breaks and deregulation, something that challenges reigning macroeconomic orthodoxy not one iota. Why it would succeed now, having failed under more propitious conditions back when it was called “supply side economics,” remains unexplained, necessarily so. Similarly, his plan to bring manufacturing jobs to the US imagines that lowering the tax rate, deregulating industry, and smashing unions is all that it will take to encourage the repatriation of capital and spur investment. This is the very assumption that Bush and Obama made in response to the economic crisis of 2008: if you bail the banks out they will begin lending again and, with lending, capitalists will invest and said investment will create jobs. But builders won’t build and corporations won’t invest if the roads go nowhere and the plants can’t make things people need — in other words, no one will build capacity if there’s already massive overcapacity, which there is. Labor costs have a long way to fall before it’s cheaper to manufacture here, and if firms do invest, it will likely be in totally robotic factories. In other words, Trump’s economic proposals seem, at first pass, as if he plans to make America great by employing the very same methods that have accompanied four decades of decline.
Ian Powell
t’s always possible that he will change course, and break with such orthodoxy, economic and otherwise. The situation is dire and we can expect experimentation. Trump assembled an administration that seems split between those who offer a more radical extension of the status quo and those who seem committed to breaking not only with economic orthodoxy but with democratic governance in general. On the one hand: the CEOs of oil companies and fast food empires who would continue in the ruts of the long declension, cutting taxes, deregulating, privatizing, and union-busting. On the other: true counter-revolutionaries like Steve Bannon who would raise tariffs, destroy trade relations, and attempt an economic isolationism of the sort that can only hurt the bottom line of multinational companies like Exxon and Carl’s Jr, not to mention financial firms whose entire trade is in hot money. We might think of the former as hyper-neoliberals; the second are close enough to the project of historical fascism to deserve the name.
But this alliance between billionaire CEOs and the second-rate generals’ junta-in-waiting can hold only for so long without one side dictating terms to the other. Trump probably knows that if the Koch-bred austerians and privatizers are allowed to have their way, we’ll never see growth or jobs; as yet he is unable or unwilling to act without them.
