youtube.com
I ask this as a communist. What does Sup Forums think of him? He wasn't only a communist but also NazBol in the Duginian sense, i.e. he sought to fully decolonize Kampuchea by returning to the social structures and ideology of its Golden Age and throw off all forms of western/colonial influence. In this regard, he was a traditionalist and anti-modern as he and the Khmer Rouge held modernity was something imposed on them from colonialism.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It's pretty simple Ivan: No communist of any variety in the history of the world has EVER come 10 miles close to being referred to as "Red Pilled". Ever.
>No communist of any variety in the history of the world has EVER come 10 miles close to being referred to as "Red Pilled". Ever.
Elaborate.
>hitler
>didnt need to ask the JQ
faggot sage, why is this on the front page?
He killed a quarter of his own people, some of whom were killed for having glasses. He is the worst leader in history. Nothing was made better because of him.
>some of whom were killed for having glasses.
No evidence for this. Pol Pot himself wore glasses.
Literally the worst commie
He killed the most educated people in his country then wondered why it went to shit.
You convinced me. Pol Pot was a good leader.
No he didn't. He sent the urban elite into the countryside because 1. Kampuchea needed the extra labour, 2. the contradiction between city and country needed to be abolished (it's also a class relationship), and 3. their minds needed to be decolonized from the western influence.
They also had a overpopulation problem from all their people being killed in US bombings.
*underpopulation
That too.
>the commie was so bad that the murderous, psycho commies next door decided to deal with him
when you fuck up human rights so bad even the fucking COMMIES come to get you you know you fucked up.
They had both.
That had everything to do with the Sino-Soviet split. The USSR supported the Viet Cong, China supported the Khmer Rouge.
Yes. He killed intellectuals, journalists, and other worthless scum. Pol pot did nothing wrong.
>levels of retarded that shouldn't even be possible
>He killed intellectuals
He was an intellectual.
And he was also a thinker too.
Yes he did you marxist faggot, quit trying to make it like he was actually a good person. He butchered his own people and he was a fucking retard
>He butchered his own people
>implying Sup Forums wouldn't also kill 85% of the white race for being cucks, race-traitors, etc.
He had a good dream irt traditionalist pastoralism, but you can't just rip the band aid off.
He killed a shit ton of his people because he was an inept leader. He may have been in the general vicinity of a few red pills but he lacked both the intelligence and the hunger to reach them.
He was pathetic.
No he wasn't. He was a man of action. Intellectuals are worthless losers who debate the number of angels that can fit on a pin, in other words masturbators.
I see.
Kys faggot.
>redpilled communists
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDdddddddddddddddDDDDDDDDDddddddddddDDDDDDDDddddddddddDDDD LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO XAXAXAXAXAXAXA REDPILLED [B]OMMUNISTS COMRAED XAXAXAXA)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
COMMUNISM SO REDPILLED COMRAED XSXAXAAAXAXASAAXAXAXAXA XDXDDXDXD U SEE FUD BURNY SANDALS MAEK YOU FREE FUD XDXDXD REDPILL NORMEI XDXDXDXDX GOMMUNISM IS THU WAY [B]OMRADE AXAXAXAXAXAXAAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAAAAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAAXAXAX
You are retarded. People like Pot butcher the people they want to protect and enrich through their own ineptitude and blind ambition.
Actual intellectuals and men if action bring about change and accomplish their goals without these nigger-tier errors.
Is me. Phone posting.
So what?
I hate commies but you have to imagine people like stalin that managed to take control of the various commie parties, purging all rivals along the way can't have been naive.
So what? The outcome of his leadership was the exact thing he set out to avoid. He was inept and not red pilled in any capacity.
you cant be seriously implying that hitler was a commie
hitler had a private army used to fight and kill commies
commies were literally executed upon discovery in nazi germany
>hitler was a communist t. retarded american
>fully decolonize Kampuchea
yeah emptying the capital and forcing everyone to work in rice fields or join the army and fight the vietnamese
psycho madman that was never brought to justice and died of old age.
fucking hate commies
So what would Sup Forums's traditionalists do in order to set up their perfect society?
Pol Pot = /Pol Pot Confirmed
Fortunately none of the inbreds inhabiting this board won't even get close to ruling any country on the planet.
youtube.com
"Everyone knows that much – or maybe even most – of what is now being said and written about Cambodia are lies and speculation.
It was completely necessary to evacuate Phnom Penh. It was necessary to rapidly start the production of provisions and it would require large sacrifices from the population.
But that's not what currently is our problem. The problem is that we really don't have knowledge, direct testimonies, in order to reject all lies that are spread by the enemies of Cambodia"
This is a manipulative and frankly low IQ response. You don't have to try your hand at leading fucking Cambodia to point out how much of an idiot Pot was. Its irrelevant. Pot sucking at leading a nation is totally irrelevant of our ability to do it.
Try coming up with an actual counter argument.
>I'm just going to muddle my terms until words have no meaning
Hitler killed Bolsheviks. The Nazis were Socialists. These words all have precise meanings and you don't understand shit.
Sup Forums would do the same if they could.
Well, Sup Forums is more than one person, and many people are addle-brained retards, but I'll attempt to give you some clarity and speak on behalf of the general board.
Since Nazi Germany is generally held in high regard here, I think you should look to that as your answer. Sup Forums isn't against all forms of modernity, they aren't Amish. Technology like electricity and steam engines are perfectly fine and they advance humanity.
The traditionalism espoused on Sup Forums is more about the culture and virtues held by society. They want women to be mothers and caretakers primarily, they want there to be a large amount of inherent trust and sense unity throughout the nation. Things like propaganda for national pride, a shared religion, as well as a shared genetic heritage are ways of achieving these things. These religious virtues and cultural heritage should be derived from the nations past.
You can contrast it with Soviet Russia, which directly sought out to destroy the former culture of Russia in order to make its citizens more malleable and become the ideal workers with no true bonds to their ancestors or each other.
Totally irrelevant point. All that matters is that Pol Pot was an objectivly shit leader.
>You can contrast it with Soviet Russia, which directly sought out to destroy the former culture of Russia in order to make its citizens more malleable and become the ideal workers with no true bonds to their ancestors or each other.
You'll note this is also exemplified by Mao in Socialist China.
For me personally, that's the biggest difference between Hitler and other Socialists. He attempted to create an idealized form of Germany's historic culture, whereas Mao and Stalin largely tried to destroy their nation's cultural legacy and start anew.
He is very red pilled. His way of thinking is similar to the unabomber. Technology will eventually destroy tradition.
...
this demonic maggot murdered 1.7 MILLION of the Cambodian people, that's 1/3 (one-third) of the population!!!!! Look up their political prison, Tuol Sleng... Communism/Marxism is to be resisted and defeated and 'aborted' to use (((their))) term, with extreme prejudice!!!!!! Give NO quarter to communists/Marxists, EVER!!!!!!
No.
pol pot was redpilled as fuck
this is coming from a wn
Reminder that a lot of those he killed were champa muslims and vietnamese colonists who had no place being in a mon khhmer ethno state.
Yes. The Vietnamese have historically been chauvinist to their neighbors.
I'm starting to warm up to this feller, are you sure you're not trying to advertise him to me?
does the same logic apply to how Adolph handled the Khazar ' Talmud colonists' in Europe???!!!
how are the Kenite Khazar Talmudists to (((their))) neighbors in the Middle East, the Holy Land to be precise???!!!
He was a great man.
Israel isn't the victim all the time.
communist are redpilled in the sense that they are very good at killing communists
...