Crapitalists will defend this

>crapitalists will defend this

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646771/pdf/amjph00269-0055.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_parliamentary_election,_2014
cubaarchive.org/home/images/stories/truth and memory/victims_of_che_guevara_in_cuba_9.30.2009.pdf
addictinginfo.com/2015/04/01/robert-reich-the-wealthy-are-the-real-lazy-people-in-our-society/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

rising tide lifts all boats. people don't starve to death in capitalistic countries. just because the rich get richer doesn't mean the poor get poorer. show me evidence that poor people are worse off because rich are richer.

Higher profits = lower wages

What has happened since 2009 then?

>people don't starve to death in capitalistic countries.
lmfao

>Communists hate successful people

What else is new.

>just because the rich get richer doesn't mean the poor get poorer. show me evidence that poor people are worse off because rich are richer.

See:

Profit increase is directly correlated with wage decrease. The more workers' wages are decreased, the more profits a capitalist acquires.

Forgot pic

fine, instead of arguing this point, I'll concede, but I want you to show me data that poor people are worse off in capitalistic countries when rich get richer. every nigger in the ghetto has running water, internet, and a fucking iPhone.

>bolshevik revolution
>no color
>event that happened during a communist rise of power

wage doesn't mean shit. show me quality of life. have you seen communist countries? they live in dirt

>lower class going up and better off than the beginning
What's wrong with this exactly?

Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money.
Of course the rich get richer over time, infact everyone with a little success in a capitalist country does.

Bottom 50% include: BLM thug niggers and feminists with degrees in pussy studies. Of course they make less money than white males and they should

>The poor are getting richer over time but I'm gonna make this infographic showing that it's unfair that the rich are getting richer at a faster rate than the poor people because I'm mad jelly

I think laziness and jealousy are the two key components that can describe any leftist.

...

Because communists are idiots that don't understand the purpose of having better wages and less wealth disparity is for the populacve to engage in the free market.
Why would you care about this if you want a global centralized economy?

wow why are all the africans starving, don't they have white people to show them how to farm?

show me how the proletariat's actual life is worse off in capitalism. not fucking wages, shit they have and quality of life

if you wanted the minimum wage to increase maybe you shouldn't advocate mass importing labor to hurt the lower classes, you dunce

>every nigger in the ghetto has running water, internet, and a fucking iPhone.

Most of the world's population which lives in crapitalist countries lives like that

>Includes years before Marx was born.
> Includes years before communism was tried on a national level
>Includes concentration camps
>Includes Axis occupied warzones
>Colors China blue after 1927
>Africa lol,

Socialist countries provide higher quality of life than capitalist countries with similar levels of economic development 93% of the time.

Source is a US government study by the Biomedical Research Institute

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646771/pdf/amjph00269-0055.pdf

Hold on my dude.

There's less cases of people starving in capitalistic societies. You gotta take the niggers choosing not to work into account.

Slaves were better off in the 1800s than in the 1700s. I guess you wouldn't mind being a slave then?

What a pathetic cuck mentality. "I don't care if wealthy, mostly Jewish elites assrape me 24/7, as long as I get enough scraps to survive." Fucking gross.

> Most people on the planet would literally kill to have the same living standards as your typical Baltimore gangbanger.

lol commies actually believe this because their ideology is inherently tainted by eurocentrism

poor people have more spirit than you, rich people have more power than you, but you won't attain either while you live a life of envy, seeing a new world and believing it belongs to the fictional "population" you think actually want you to speak for them

people flee communism

literally not an argument against 1st world capitalism. that's corrupt government's doing against the lower 3rd world class. that's way closer to communism, so be careful with that point.

> Slaves were better off in the 1800s than in the 1700s.

thanks, Capitalism

>I don't care if wealthy, mostly Jewish elites assrape me 24/7, as long as I get enough scraps to survive

literally Russia, 1920 onwards

Commies need people to be poor, miserable and angry so they can sell them their retarded ideology. The average worker is more concerned about changing his car than changing the system.

The poorest region in the US is Appalachia - which is overwhelmingly white.

Despite your claims of being a "white nationalists", you actually don't give a shit about these people.

>defending crapitlism
>not being a national socialist

> 93% of the time.
what does this even mean?

> Despite the most brutal sanctions in history, the DPRK has a far higher quality of life than most crapitalist Asian comprador regimes, like the Phillipines, Indonesia, etc.

Southeast asia is a shithole but at least they have electricity

DPRK quality of life, bet those stats are super reliable once the surveys come back from the concentration camps

100% of us vote for Kim!! (please dont kill famiriy)

Please don't confuse liberals and Communists. Most Communist parties in the world are totally against mass importation of low-wage labor.

It's actually crapitalists who push for mass immigration, because benefits them enormously. In some cases, you can pay a newly arrived immigrant from the third world half of what you can pay a local. This effectively doubles profit. If you were a crapitalists, why wouldn't you bribe government officials to allow mass immigration? Since you live in gated communities, you literally don't lose or risk anything, all while gaining massive profits.

ITT: communist niggers that don't understand basic economics or the difference between wages and quality of life.

>b-b-but muh boss makin' mo monay dan i is

Yeah, no shit you stupid nigger.

>what is the Pareto Principle

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

Big boss getin' paid mo 'cause he do mo to mayk dat green green for da makin' mo gibs fo when yo ass go on da unimploymet cuz ya caint get da ordas rite, shieeeeeeeetttt niggaaaaaaa.

Wait, maybe if I translate it further you'll understand.

Ooooga booogaaa oog oog worka booga ooga booga.

How's that?

>rising tide lifts all boats
Assuming everyone has a boat

...

wtf now i'm a commie sympathizer

Maybe if you fags didn't keep importing people that have absolutely nothing to their name then the debt owners wouldn't be getting richer while the poor stay level as they take on debt just to live ..IDK Just a thought

shit trade deals result in shit result no mater the system.

Didn't get shit like this back in Apartheid.

At the time the Bolsheviks were nowhere near Turkestan, they didn't even establish control over Russia proper. They only held a few major cities on the European side of the country. Blaming them for a famine thousands of miles away is beyond retarded.

/thread

>have you seen communist countries? they live in dirt
Conditions in Cuba are poor compared to those in the US or Canada, but they're much, much better than those in most other poor countries.

They aren't asking for reparations.

>commies so jealous of others' wealth that they want to steal it for themselves
literally nigger tier

The further society goes into the future, the more and more useless working class people become to the economy. Capital outcompetes labor, therefore we're seeing a massive spike in the wealth of the capital owners, and a massive depression in the wealth of the working people.

Your machine puts 10 million people out of work, you are worth the labor of 10 million people. Congratulations, you have a massive salary, but working people are fucked over.

There's less and less value a human working with his body can add to the economy.

The DPRK is known for making illusions and facades.

>that's corrupt government's doing against the lower 3rd world class. that's way closer to communism, so be careful with that point.
>not real capitalism

Now show us how people lived in communist Cambodia.

based tankie

Quick question. How many people went from the bottom 50% to the top 50% between 1980 and 2009. People generally start making more money later in life.

Cuba wasn't dirt before communism... Africa was always dirt

>muh it wasn't real capitalism
lmao. How is this different from leftcoms saying Mao, Stalin, etc, "wasn't real communism"? It's the same lazy, intellectually dishonest copout.

1st world capitalism wouldn't exist without 3rd world capitalism. Most of the clothes you're wearing right now are made by child slaves. If economic relations between the First and Third world were severed, the economy would collapse literally overnight.

Depended on the area. The developed areas reserved for whites and some coloreds had some of the highest living standards in the world, but some of the Bantustans were miserably poor.

From your source:
>While capitalist countries at higher levels of economic development have enjoyed the fruits of public health and educational improvements, poorer capitalist countries seldom have succeeded in implementing such drastic changes in policy, although there are some notable exceptions to this pattern. For example, among low-income and lower-middle-income countries, Sri Lanka and Costa Rica have achieved substantial improvements
in health-care services and PQL indicators.7 The experiences of such countries show that adequate budgeting, planning, and commitment can lead to important advances,

Basically, Poor countries are poor, rich countries are rich; as there are so few socialist countries compared to capitalist ones, there is a narrower range they occupy.

The Matthew principle faggots

>Cuba wasn't dirt before communism
Outside of Havana, much of the population was very poor and lived in wooden huts with palm leaf roofs.

what does the man talk about
why does the chart look
third grade like
there's no legend.
Hot dogs vs hamburgers?
u need to eat protein
your brain no work

Better some coons who've never seen money in their life go out and hunt than the majority of the population consist of roving gangs of cannibalistic rapists.

if you're gonna try to defend Castro's brutal reign of terror as a good thing, you're completely insane

>Thinking this is bad when under communism the central party members own everything while the whole population lives as serfs

Also

>Pay attention to the blue... from 80 to 2008 the blue is up over 100%...

So we agree then that corporations have benefited massively from mass migration and cheap labour and the workers have lost out big time from it, guess this explains brexit and trump huh

I'm not a capitalist. But I'm also not a communist

>1st world capitalism wouldn't exist without 3rd world capitalism.
This literally contradicts one of the tenents of communism which is the abolishing of classes and creating a classless society.

>100% of us vote for Kim!!!

Fun fact: the DPRK has three major political parties which compete with each other.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_parliamentary_election,_2014

One of them is social-democratic, the other proposes a right-wing shamanic/confucian traditionalism.

This means the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) is 50% more Democratic than the USA - which only has 2 major political parties.

Poor people are uncreative, unlucky, lazy or unintelligent.

Boom, there you go.

Castro's reign of terror was bloody (especially in the first several years), and Cuba is still repressive, but there's no doubt that ordinary Cubans saw substantial improvements in their living standards until the "Special Period" of the 1990s.

>regulation
>globalism
>what are the top 50% doing that the bottom aren't
Shut your filthy mouth commie

>the DPRK has three major political parties which compete with each other

When this is the alternative

>Fun fact: the DPRK has three major political parties which compete with each other.

LMAO

>Capitalists don't know when their about to lose everything

What else is new?

IIRC they're still under control of the Choson Rodongdang.

dis help understand chart

>Communism literally abolishes borders by forming a worldwide market where no external forces can influence the admittedly inefficient system

> communism literally throws the value of the market away so that everyone can get moldy bread because no one knows how to allocate anything at all

I will never understand why people go online and larp as retarded people.

The income of the poor is rising, and you're complaining? The rich will always make more, get over it.

1) the argument doesn't show how first world capitalism is bad for lower class
2) communism always makes in worse, even in African countries. (Congo, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Somalia, and South Yemen)

>Fun fact: the DPRK has three major political parties which compete with each other.

Well at least they have manners and dont loot foot locker

> opportunity across markets goes away
> oh no whatever will we do with all the infrastructure and prosperity our system has given us, we'll just have to reorganize our economy because we can actually allocate resources automatically instead of through stupid decrees like Mao and Stalin had retarded yes-men bureaucrats execute that killed 100 million workers for no reason

>Castro's brutal reign of terror
lmao

> lmao

cubaarchive.org/home/images/stories/truth and memory/victims_of_che_guevara_in_cuba_9.30.2009.pdf

What are you talking about retard?

>>Fun fact: the DPRK has three major political parties which compete with each other.

And which one of them, if elected, would depose a Kim?

remember kids, if you make anything of yourself without exploiting others, communists will claim it belongs to them and you are the reason they are not powerful

oh look, a nigger

Some of those were only nominally communist. They joined the side of the communists in the Cold War because the communist bloc was willing to help them during and after independence.

Communism

I don't know, ask the commie.

>The poorest region in the US is Appalachia - which is overwhelmingly white.
>Despite your claims of being a "white nationalists", you actually don't give a shit about these people.
God I'm triggered.
Why do u little cuckfags have to come to Sup Forums to show us there cool hipster ideologies
just so we can unbainwash them every year.
just go fucking shoot yourselves or move to a desert island and spare us. desert island u can distribute the wealth however you like! one coconut for you, one for wilson, one for hermit crab.

lol remember when jacob schiff financed trotsky with cash and an american passport and he got in Russia and tried to implement communist reforms with a cashless society and it completely failed so they had to go back to banks even though he followed Marx to the letter but it wasn't real communism :DDDD

A few thousand are documented to have been killed.

ok... and the others just failed because communism doesn't work.

>“In reality, a large and growing share of the nation’s poor work full time — sometimes sixty or more hours a week – yet still don’t earn enough to lift themselves and their families out of poverty.

addictinginfo.com/2015/04/01/robert-reich-the-wealthy-are-the-real-lazy-people-in-our-society/

Meanwhile, most crapitalists don't work at all, instead living off of rent and inherited wealth.

>1810 china
>capitalist
don't you faggots have your own board to circlejerk in

> most capitalists don't work at all, instead living off of rent and inherited wealth.

stop this rampant antisemitism now!

Many of them failed because of war.

>instead living off of rent and inherited wealth.
do u have ANY idea what it takes to run a successful housing complex to charge ppl rent?
No you don't.
Because your communist and you've never had to build anything. You just want to steal from working people.

This is why you never compromise with Librals. They will get further to the left and get more extreme.
They will soon seek the top 10% and then the top 20 all the way to the top 50%.

CUT THEM OFF NOW!!