What the fuck is wrong with libertarians Sup Forums? They're just liberals but with autism

What the fuck is wrong with libertarians Sup Forums? They're just liberals but with autism.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PW4OIHDsWsM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>libertarian
>pedophile
Not surprised

Hard to believe Sup Forums used to be overrun with these people, christ

Unfortunately, retards and fags try to into politics like the rest of us.

Consider OP for instance.

I think the term minarchist would come in handy to distance us from fags like him.

>implying Sup Forums isn't an ancap board

>implying Sup Forums isn't a PaleoCon board

>implying there's a difference

>implying ancaps care about borders and western identity

>implying Sup Forums isn't a Monarchist board

>used
We are the people who actually attack shills with logic, IE the only reason nazi asspies have a platform to stand on.

>implying Sup Forums isn't a Techno-facist board

>implying ancaps aren't western identity incarnate
the only borders actual ancaps don't care about are those balkanizing western lands

You just cherry picked a bad example and then sought to conflate libertarians with liberals to confuse the impressionable kids that populate pol.

Libertarians want a small government. Everything libertarians do make government obsolete or less relevant. This scares the shit out of the government and authoritarians who then need to ridicule libertarians and AnCaps to stop people finding out more and adopting the ideology. Libertarians are 100% for self-responsibility and self-dependency.

And Libertarians want an honest money system rather than a debt based money system - which is going to fuck up (((their))) plans.

>implying this isn't an obscure canadian frog racing forum.

>implying anything British is relevant
Your ways are over, dad.

>facist

>but what if the child consents though.

Lolbergs also go on the day of the rope.

Except for all the retards that literally want no borders because "government shouldn't own land"

...

>implying they don't

If there is any need for a state its in having a force that is able to identify and kill pedos and defend the nation, for this force to exist it requires taxes so it may have a reasonable access to manpower and equipment.

Libertarians want a smaller government sure but they always go full retard.

>tfw no Paleo Libertarian leaning white nationalist gf to crush my head like a watermelon with her thighs

Jfmsu

>implying these are common opinions in the libertarian community
Please, most libertarians would just get rid of consent laws and let it be up to the parents before 18. That's the problem with libertarians, they're so blinded by muh freedom that they let degeneracy run rampant.

Libertarians = conservatives who want to smoke pot

>Mounting scope on detchable carry handle

Your Empire is doing great son there is nothing you can learn from an Empire that has already declined.

>you're not allowed to fuck her
>literally radical feminists who pushed age of consent laws
you're all faggots anyway so I don't give a fuck what you people want.

>"MUH DICK" the post

>implying any sane person listens to someone suggesting pure lassiez-faire capitalism wouldn't be as bad if not worse then muh commie leftists

Maybe he wants to use those sights too in that configuration. Psshhht... you must be ignorant about guns.

>it requires taxes
No - it doesn't.
If the government needed revenue to operate they would have disappeared a long time ago. Our government is insolvent isn't it? They banking system is insolvent isn't in? they got bailed out didn't they? The government just creates bonds, and the bank of England creates the money. Its not dependent on taxes at all.

In fact in the UK, our state ARE the pedos.

Is it actually that bad, the concept of marrying off your daughter at 12-14? As long as the age of consent remains higher? To me it makes perfect sense that women should be tied down before they get the chance to go and "find themselves" with 37 Chads.

you start getting death-threats from faggots across the sea if you explain why it should be fine. Ill start with one, nobles fuck whoever they want because they're better than caring about faggoty commoner's cultural norms.

If you think freedom will result in greater degeneracy, you are letting us all know what passes for thought through YOUR mind.

The point of libertarianism is to be SELF-responsible. If you think that will lead to pedophilia, you are merely letting us all know what YOU would do if there were no consent laws.

Good job, Randy.

That's because you're too much of a faggot to try it

>A country can sustain its army without taxes
>A country can sustain its police force without taxes
>A country can sustain its roads and street lighting without taxes
>A country can sustain its borders without taxes
>A country can sustain its culture without taxes
>A country can sustain itself without taxes


Libertarians are halfway to being literally retarded

whoa you really argued your point there

Our Government does operate on money and yes they are insolvent, do you want me to explain debt backed governments to you? Its retarded and should be stopped but it does work (With some horrible side effects)
And I agree we should be killing most of the government, I am sure some of them are okay people, but we should detain, tried and if they are guilty of fucking over the nation, hang them all.

This ends in Commoners killing nobles, well done.

Libertarians don't believe in borders though so that solves those problems and creates a bunch of new ones.
Central America is essentially Lolbertatian (effectively no government or taxes) and it's a complete shit hole.

before 1913 america didnt have income tax and had roads, rail, schools, and a military.

Yeah, totally. I guess knowing that legalizing drugs will lead to more addicts means I'm really just thinking I will do it?
Giving more freedom to degenerates will always lead to more degeneracy. You don't have to be a degenerate to know that. Don't be so daft.

>more death threats
your kind literally let any muslim fuck your children until they're pregnant, but a person in another country can't? You're delusional, its no wonder you're empire is dead.
>commoners killing nobles
the whole mob and the town would get holdomored whenever that happend

>"Wow, I am just saying we should stop all consequence for what is currently a crime and happens sometimes and now you are saying that if we do that some people will do it? That makes YOU sound guilty! Clearly you need to stop complaining about pedophilia or people will think YOU are a pedo, heh"
You are legit a fucking pedo you scumfuck.

Thought this too. Only acceptable if you are recreating Danny Archers gun from Blood Diamond tbhfam

you have shit taste.

you're the counter argument which refines the liberals

You are legit retarded mate
>WOW NOW YOU THREATEN MY LIFE WEW WOW WEW!
No you retard, you fuck with someones family then they are going to come after you and they will try to get as many people to come after you as they can.
>B-but I am a powerful noble! I WILL KILL THEM ALL!
In the age of Firearms? You are retarded.

Private property has borders you retard.

>capslock
your going to have an aneurism at this rate user. Keep eating the shit your government gives you though, I hear that MGTOW is pretty popular.
>we will form a mob and kill you with guns
you have no guns you plebshit britcuck your government doesn't let you own them. You gonna fight past them when Jamal rapes your kids? I don't rape personally, but so far your bitch-faced people have done jack-shit about pedophilia-rape.

>marry cute 12 year old
>have many white children
>she values your opinion
>grow old together
>live happily ever after
>stick it to the jews
Vs.
>marry ancient 20something year old sloot
>be forced to inhale nigger semen by just getting close to her rotten China
>get cucked
>have many black children
>values colberts words more than yours
>get divorced
>get forced to pay for her
>get forced to pay for her kang chillun
>obey every command issued by your jewish overlord

makes one contemplate

I'm obviously not defending pedos you fucking idiot.
I'm saying if there were no consent laws it would make any difference to my life because I have no interest in anyone under age.

I murder as much as I want : ZERO
I rape as much as I want : ZERO
and I pedo as much as I want: ZERO

not because there are laws against it, but because I recognize right from wrong.

If you need the government to tell you right from wrong, you are not going to understand libertarianism.

>Y-YOU ARE USING CAPS! YOU MUST BE MAD!
Reaching a bit there yank
>BRIT WITH GUNS?! This can't be true! Here are my memes!
Man I have a shit ton of guns.

If you have no desire to murder rape and kill why do you have a problem with people all getting together and saying "Oh if you do this shit we fuck you up kay?"

why dont you go kill some muslims then you pussy-bitch. Raping bitch-faced brits like yourself right now. HAve you calm down some? BEcause you're going to get so mad you'll cut yourself if I keep explaining why nobles fuck children and wear dresses when they're men.

>1913
>Model T was made in 1908
>everybody used horse
>government used excise taxes to collect funds that where hardly needed
>military
>men wore regular clothes
>had one gun
>schools
>privately owned
>rail
>made by monopolies who literally ran the country
>were pawns of the jews

>modern day
>space exploration
>advanced military
>everybody owns a car
>roads more necessary then ever

>comparing what was actually needed 104 years ago versus modern day

ITT: pedos vs faggots

Thats not what governments do - in fact governments do exactly that.

Governments only protect themselves - not the population.

You are very naive and need to grow up a lot.

Because there are no Akbars where I live and they are not even in the city close to me, they are all up the line raping northerners and that is there problem. Are you just memeing me? Or are you actually this retarded? Its like you think life is nothing but internet memes.

>Used to
Thread on me motherfucker, and see what happens

Fpbp

>ive never killed a single rapist, but if a pedo were to ever appear my inbred town of hicks will kill him!
you're pathetic. Stop larping like you know anything about people when no-one cares except radical feminists like yourself. Bet you were taught in school some shit about this by your 5 female heads of state, minsters, education whatever-you-fucking-have. Its just sad.

>I don't understand how things work the post.
Government is not a monolith.

go back to africa ancap faggot

most of africa is some form of socialism

Our government is literally implicated in pedo behavior.

If anyone is the pedo defender here - its you

I don't even know what you are trying to say, you where going on about how you are a badass noble and would loving raping commoner children (Nice larp) and I just pointed out you are retarded.
As for me larping? I have guns there are no sandniggers about and I know all the local police and I am on the local council. How the fuck am I a larper?

this isnt bongland

Government are the pedos

Because OP, the Libertarian philosophy is that all is allowed so long at it doesn't hurt other people. There are two things wrong with this.

1. It perfectly allows them to hurt themselves. (Drugs/suicide)

2. The term and specifics of "does no harm" becomes very subjective to things like abortion and gun rights.

Yes it's YOUR body, and (according to libertarian doctrine you have the right to do with your body as you please) but you also would be hurting someone else. So at that point you have to pick a side.

Yes people DO have the right to own guns, but if they use these guns to do harm to others, do we have a duty to try to prevent such?

The purposeful Neutrality of Libertarians is extremely limited and weak when you put it to practical use. It would be better if you chose black or white rather than remaining grey all the time.

The establishment are the pedos, and the establishment are NOT libertarians

Remeber that famous libertarian AnCap who raped all those kids?

neither do I

chu sayin?

you're illiterate and two-faced too you faggot-bitch. Enjoy paying for rapist's healthcare bills and your familiy's abortions though. You fucking joke
>I have a lot of guns
>if you fuck with someons family they get together with everyone they can to 'fuck with you'
nice joke. Every noble who ever lived had good taste, you just stuck to finger-fucking some shit-piece that isn't even used on the batte-field. You gonna kill ISIS with a fucking semi? you're a LARPing joke
>you said you're gonna rape commoner children
you're pathetic and illiterate

the kid is like 14 himself

No. 10 Downing street are not libertarians

Why are you upset?

bruh ur taking the bait

The royals are not libertarians

libertarian is for people who want to rebel against democrat/republican but are also retarded

>>pedophile
hebephile*, pedos go for younger and prepubescent. While i dont think it should be 12, 14-16 seems resonable. Most kids end up having sex around that time and humans are able to mate as soon as puberty. I dont see the logic in making the age 18, arent we suppose to be staring white familes asap?

because you're supporting lynchings, demagogourey, LARPing, turning a blind-eye to rapists in your own country, hubris, and redical feminism/.

yeah, I know.

But their intention is to conflate pedos with libertarianism and my intention is to demonstrate ontherwise to anyone who may be reading

My favourite thing about pedo threads is theres never any German posters.

>The age of consent in Germany is 14.

>Paedophilia

A term to describe sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children.

>implying Sup Forums isnt an autistic board

I take issue with the Larping and feminism.

>Techno-facist

youtube.com/watch?v=PW4OIHDsWsM

14 year olds are not pre-pubescent children

They experienced period and are able to give birth to children.

This judge was NOT a libertarian

We still are here, were just in a temporary special mode right now.

William Hague was an authoritarian and NOT a libertarian

Westminster are NOT libertarians

>You just cherry picked a bad example and then sought to conflate libertarians with liberals to confuse the impressionable kids that populate pol.

Seems user is ready for a career in journalism. I suppose the Guardian would a great fit; every bit of its punditry is outlier anecdote extrapolated to all.

The political establishment are NOT libertarians

This is very true. OP will get far spinning that narrative.

>um.... warlords can you please stop taking over mines and selling resources illegally?
no
>ok sorry

you wanna throw them in jail?

If men kept their daughters in check they would not have to worry about their 14 year old girl fucking an older man.

The problem is 14 year olds having sex not 14 years having sex with older males.