KOKSAN means nasty in Korean. Also looks like cock. KJU master shitposter?

KOKSAN means nasty in Korean. Also looks like cock. KJU master shitposter?

Other urls found in this thread:

meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

good i hope SK gets nuked

Kys faggot.

Is that camouflage or rust?

looks like a rusty piece of shit from the 60's.

Looks like it needs some WD-40 and Naval Jelly. Maybe some paint, and a few gallons of Hoppe's #9.

155mm?

this. don't fuck with my starcraft.

That pic looks like a scrapyard in Iraq or somewhere

Looks like a decommissioned piece.

Rate of fire ~1-2 rounds per 5 minutes

Fuck off expat.
Artillery piece looks like a 40 year old piece of shit reversed engineered Soviet weapon.

koreans made starcraft unplayable

Nah, looks a bit larger.

Just noticed, no track, either.

Other than numbers, for a conventional war, why are we afraid of these guys?

looks a tad rusty, need wd40

Git gud scrub

170mm

170mm

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the purpose of a muzzle brake, but isn't having openings all around the muzzle kind of defeating the purpose of even having it? It's only going to be marginally more stable than just not having anything on there at all.

Because the last high-intensity war US fought was Vietnam, which you lost? And the last war against a proper organized army was Korea, which was a stalemate?

Meanwhile, in the first world.

A hugely expensive railgun that melts after a few shots. Woooo.

wew, is this a fucking joke. Do they think some guy with binoculars is gonna be able to stand there and and correct the targeting? Do they think it 1945?

>which you lost?

Can't win a war we never had intentions of doing so. VietNam was a political statement.

Impossible ROI, micromanaged from DC instead of the Generals on the ground, bending over backwards to not piss off the Chinese. It was a clusterfuck in rice paddies.

Hey guys

>that melts after a few shots
Isnt that just a proof of concept still?

>the virgin railgun
>the chad koksan

Camo or rust? The damned thing lost its tracks!

kek

Did you know South Korean troops don't get optics for their rifles?

I was floored by that when my buddies told me about their military experiences.

A pure ground war would be favorable to NK in all honesty. Thank God for air superiority.

check out the barrel:

>bae systems

That thing doesn't look even remotely functional.

high technology from 1940

big bangers go long-long now boys

My relative Gerald Bull...murdered by kikes.

>BAE systems
The same guys who named their guided missile system the "Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System"
I can't even imagine what kind of retarded name this has.

Meanwhile, in Japanese anime.

>Fast Autonomous Gun - Gust Over Target
>F.A.G.G.O.T.

That picture is on the koksan wikipedia page as an Iraqi piece.

rust camo

Rekt

that hunk of shit would get tamahawked in 10 seconds

wow look at that dilapidated piece of shit
it doesn't even have treads on

But isn't Seoul really close to the border? That doesn't seem that impressive.

Wrong. Iraq was considered to have one of the better armies in the Middle East and they were taking off their unis and running like women in a matter of days.

I hate retards like this. Just because you're biased and have an axe to grind doesn't change historical fact, you realize right?

>arab armies
>good
AYY FUCK LMAO

meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars

As a concerned mom of 2 kids in Newtown Connecticut, this terrifies me.

>Can't win a war we never had intentions of doing so

>not knowing of LBJs escalation of the war

>What is the f-22, f-35
Advanced weaponry is very expensive.
Poorly designed, unreliable and high maintenance advanced weaponry is very profitable.

The norks have had that gun for decades.
Nothing new here

>>not knowing of LBJs escalation of the war
LBJ escalated for his war contractor buddies in texas. ANd what the fuck did he know about picking targets. exactly my point. targets were political, not military decisions.

Nicely done user

>noob who cant micro

Most soldiers don't get optics. All that shit you see in movies and games isn't given to your standard grunt. Pretty much all irons and an ACOG for the marksmen.

>f-22 has the highest kill rate vs the F 18 Superhornet and F 16 and F 15

Try again noguns, no knowledge having cuck.

OH AND 30:1 Kill to Death ratio in mock dogfights against NATO Fighter Jets of all types.

but thats perfect tho
who wouldn't want to humiliate our enemies with a faggot gun?

>be designated marksman
>have nozoom
What

>KOKksan
>TaepoDONG
>No-DONG
>KUMsong-3


JUST NUKE THESE FAGGOTS ALREADY!

China was fucking hostile to Vietnam because Vietnam was pro-soviet and anti chinaman. It was failure of your bombing campaing to stike north out of war because Russian supplied planes, pilots, anti-air and ground crews. Your aircraft losses were rising way too high. On ground warfare South Vietnamese army was shit compared to North Vietnamise. Vietkong wasnt that effective in real battles but it was attrition for you. West had reached point where it could not take anymore big casualities in wars. Risk of ending into real war in vietnam against actual army would have increased casualities way too much. So your goverment decided to leave before that happens.

Railguns are feasible, and have been accelaterating in development at a promising pace. They are a viable technology, and for their application, no cheaper, less efficient, or less effective than launching guided missiles from ships.

When you think about a guided missile it is an incredibly expensive and intricate device. It makes alot more sense to front end RD on a complicated gun that can fire cheap ammunition. Compared to a guided missile which is like a million dollars a pop, even if the railguns are expensive and complicated, it doesn't take launching too many missiles before the rail guns, complicated as they may be, start looking attractive.

Fans of traditional military ordinance like artillery should appreciate the rail gun, because it represents technology going full circle, from discontinuing the serious focus on artillery via airforce developmemt, 360 degrees to reintroducing it via electromagnetic guns (possibly).

>because Russian supplied planes, pilots, anti-air and ground crews. Your aircraft losses were rising way too high.


American pilots knew where the Russian anti aircraft missiles were stored, and which depots were active, but they were explicitly ordered not to fly north into NV and bomb them because it would annoy the russians.

SPECIAL BEAM CANON!!!!!!

SK is a feminist shithole.

lmfao its rusty af. Also other user was right about it missing the belt for its wheels. The US would probably scrap this.

But you fucking bombed northern vietnam. You tried to stop their support to Vietkong and put them out and submit. Your massive bombing campaing could not do that and high casualities because NV and Soviet AA and fighters.

EMP fucks up railgun

If you've ever fired a real gun, ironsights are incredibly useful in they're own right. That said, most marksmen have an optic anyways.

Its called tracks you fucking mongrel

Heres an idea.

What if trump captures north korea and gives it to the jews.

Then we force the jews to live there instead of israel so the muslims can go back to their desert shit hole.

The jews get to subvert china like they wanted being next to them now.

Everyone wins.

Arent the Hapsburgs the peasants enemy? What made them rich? Dirty fucking commie peasant.

Pleb tier. Go with Krupp next time.

If an EMP is dropped, its going to kill the guided missiles too. That's the role that the rail gun is supposed to fill, so it's really not a negative thing compared to its predecessor technology.

It would be easier to shield railguns and capacitors etc on board a ship than it would a whole payload of tomahawk missiles or whatever.

Doesn't it also fuck up guided missiles?
And everything else for that matter?

Unless your weapon is pure mech, it will take damage
And idk what would happen to solid metal in the EMP's range, but I'd probably wouldn't like to be holding it at the moment.

This is why we need Project pluto implemented. Fuck this earth. And all the people on it

Or just have your silos, payloads, launch systems, and guidance in protective cages.

Serious question. What does an EMP do to a nuclear submarine? Any difference in effects if it was submerged?

...

That's not the shwerer gustav.

That's the Paris Gun.

Also, the Paris Gun would have been far more effective if it had used subcaliber sabot rounds, which was actually discussed, but the project head shot the idea down. As a result the barrel life of the Paris Gun was extremely low.

Gerald Bull used the Paris Gun as the inspiration for his plan to build a Supergun that could shoot small satellites into orbit.

However after Iraq hired him to build a Supergun for them, the Mossad killed him.

So just think. We might have a cheap orbital delivery system if it weren't for the jews.

Im sure that much water would affect the strength of the blast. On a side note Can an emp stop a tungsten rod loaded satellite a la rods from god

Ok.
I wasnt even a dm and EVERYONE had optics. Tied to the rifle.
Do you even deploy you NEET fag?

...someones never served after 2007....

shut your mouth, heathen. we'd lose all those kpop cuties. we are going to have to take out dprk though, so take cover sk bros.

irons are infinitely better than pleb tier meme optics.

you can shield against EMP
satellites suffer constant radiation bombardment, and function for years

is this a fucking joke?

>Koksan

More like "keksan".

...

>'gun'

dumbass journos, why do we even allow them to live

Matter of fact we won, and the shit ass south gooks lost after we had signed a treaty with the north gooks and left.

>all dem dead gooks

The whole world won that war either way you wanna cut it.

Fuck off POG

...

>using Tomahawks on conventional nork artillery

We would run out in opening stages of the war.

looks like a old old ww2 88 anit air/tank gun... good gun but. not a country killer.

we can kill commies with that from some hicks back yard in the USA lol

thats the first ones.... production units on ships now.

>VietNam was a political statement.
sadly yes to that... if we had been allowed to do our thing there would be no farmer asians now.

That's a big gun.

...

technically we are still at war with NK, its just in a "stand by mode"

They don't need optics. They have superior squint abilities.