How do you solve the problem of economic illiteracy among the general population...

How do you solve the problem of economic illiteracy among the general population? Public opinion is almost opposite the economic consensus on every issue. For example:

- The average person thinks "consumption drives the economy" (whatever that means) but economists believe that sustained growth is determined by savings/investment and technology.

- Economists generally favor free trade and think restrictions against immigration should be relaxed. The average person usually has a negative opinion of free trade and immigration.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=NWbDL495cMg
frenchamerican.org/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Easy. Let the government handle all finance and economics. The people will be free to pursue happiness however they see fit.

The State loves you, user.

>economic illiteracy among the general population
It's not a bug, it's a feature.

How do i get a qt like that

Be sexy, funny, decent money and be grounded in your beliefs that women aint shit.

just talk about property and human interaction if they call for state interference just kall tehm jews and move on
also

kill all the niggers

>The average person thinks "consumption drives the economy" (whatever that means) but economists believe that sustained growth is determined by savings/investment and technology.

Look man, I'm not economiconalist, but consumption (of services/products) drives the economy. What do you think people are doing with their savings? Investments are a source of security. Technology is directly correlated to consumption. (Smart phones have been the reason we have been out pacing Moore's Law)

You can overthink or critically break this down into some bullshit off shoot, but it's consumption drives the economy at it's simplest and most complex basis.

kill all the economists

and Jews.

kill them all, let the free market sort them out

jews are niggers are economists are jews

I'd also like to add, do you think it's a coincidence that the American population is the largest consumer market in the world, and we are also the only Hyperpower.

gas the innumerate
iq wars now

My question is, where are the niggers that converted to Judaism that just happen to have chosen a career in economics? Right Wing Death/Market Squads NAOW!

>if they call for state interference just kall tehm jews and move on

Sup Forums can be so closed-minded sometimes... this is a horrible way to have a discussion, and it seems like its all we ever do.

>qt
>flat moon faced gook
pick 1

Economists are solving the wrong problem. Everything today is "growth economics", looking to maximize growth. In such a formulation, for example, leisure and quality of life don't matter. They aren't even considered.

In the old old days the standard was "welfare economics" which considered both purchasing power and quality of life (utility of leisure.) You could analyze lots of different things that way, although it missed some effects the modern growth theory includes.

Interestingly Krugman does some welfare-economics stuff in his popular NY Times articles, but it seems only when he wants to prove a left-wing point.

t. used to teach related stuff.

good one less who is interested in qt asian girls should lower their market price and maybe I can afford one too.

When has state interference in the market been beneficial? Solyndra?

Stop meme flaggin nigger.

>economists believe that sustained growth is determined by savings/investment and technology.

For nearly 20 years, 'sustained growth' has been facilitated by relatively low interest rates and the removal of depression-era legislation (the Glass Steagall act) designed to prevent catastrophic levels of debt.

This massive expansion of (mostly corporate) borrowing has resulted in a synthetic - not organic, consumption cycle. So, debt-fueled corporate expansion = jobs = $ in pockets = consumption remains strong.

The implicit "safety net" provided by the Fed has also synthetically boosted stocks. Soft earnings reports are ignored and indices march higher because at the end of the day, fear of a genuine correction has been mostly removed. Too big to fail, etc.

And with the announcement that the Fed is willing to go buy CORPORATE debt / equities to "stabilize" markets during periods of volatility, investors are emboldened to take way more risk.

This is all going to come crashing down at some point - though don't underestimate the Fed's ability to create new bubbles and kick the can down the road for years if not decades.

And when it does, the problem of "economic literacy" will clear right up as people wait in lines for government supplied rations.

>inb4 reddit spacing
Fuck off, that's how I write.

pls stop stealing our women :(

Economists should be bullied relentlessly because they're basically professional bullshitters

there is no point in talking with anyone who interferes in a transaction between two people, if he is for such actions he is no more than a criminal and deserves the rope.

>pls stop stealing our women :(
no worries I don't think I will ever be able to get one

Just give up and let the jewish/asian technocratic elite enslave us cattle. That's how we solve it.

What's your view on the fact that physical war is archaic? True strength comes down to markets and population manipulation. We're either at a staircase or a ledge.

that's wrong though see Cuba, North Korea, etc...

Economics is bullshit
they've sold you
for shmeckles

>there is no point in talking with anyone who interferes in a transaction between two people, if he is for such actions he is no more than a criminal and deserves the rope.

>interferes in a transaction between two people

Taxes=voting=you need to vote for the simplest of positions anons.

I took a economics class and it's what we are taught, 80's era consumerist culture even though we know it leads to a more volatile economy.

>peak keynesianism

Have you not noticed that the only wars are wars for stability and ideals?

There is no big war to come. China, Russian, America, and the EU are pacified. The still obey their populations, and their populations are quailed.

that's literally what people were saying in 1913-1914 and 1938-1939

>Canada

À condition of Asian immigration includes full access to Asian qts

Make it simple, because it is. Make it about race, because it is.

>tax corporations!
Employers open facilities where corporate taxes are low. Taxing employers highly in metro areas is why there are no good jobs for unskilled black workers there.
>free trade!
Same thing, but with the added bonus of free trade making it easier to employ a Malaysian slave than an impoverished black American.
>It's leftover from Obama!
A rich man doesn't say "Well, I've got $30M, and because Obama was president last year, I'm going to open a factory in America today.
>Drumpf!
Black unemployment is at a 17 year low.

And if they're not too stupid, break down Carrier.
-Carrier employed 800 people - 500 of them were minorities
-Average pay was $23/hr, about $50K/yr
-Wanted to leave for Mexico
-Trump gave $7M in tax cuts to stay
-800 workers making $50K is $40M/yr
-$40M taxed at 25% is $10M/yr
-That means that by giving a company a 7M tax break netted the USA a $3M profit in just the first year, $30M to the local economy, and 800 families were saved from losing their livelihoods.

>friends all broke and buy $30 of weed a day among other junk
>complain that they're broke while they hit the bar

Been saving since I was a kid, making great career moves while they all sit at home on their weekend. I like that most people are clueless about how to further themselves because it's less competition for me

>(((Economists))) generally favor free trade and think restrictions against immigration should be relaxed
Someone explain to me how letting in more low IQ immigrants that leech off welfare, leading to higher taxes to pay for the welfare state, and if they do have jobs said jobs will soon be automated, is good for the economy.

And I'm sure they had access to a Cambodian Gerbil Fight forum + other websites to figure things out.

Look at the highest paid jobs and the highest paid criminality.

Castro just died (in respect to him ruling over Cuba for how fucking long?) and North Korea wants a nuke to solidify their existence. Who else is beefy? Antifa is spread across continents and Sup Forums is the White House...

Anyone that is anyone has the capacity to destroy history. There will be no big wars for one's own benefit. Big brains are the rulers now.

I wish all the welfare queens get deported to chinese slave camps and we import asian qts for them

>implying Trump is Sup Forums and antifa is relevant

Feelings, communism, women, Jews.

implying California's economy isn't larger than yours.

That's only one state user.

you're economically illiterate yourself, so
looks like the solution is the same as always, force everyone to attend public school, that way everyone will be just as economically illiterate as your public school "educated" ass
fuck off kike

French economy was ruined by America

fuck off niggerjew
>>>/wurlstah/

Holy shit you are a fool. If consumption drove the economy then quantitative easing by the Fed would yave gotten us out of the 08 recession much earlier in the Obama years. Lowering interest rates makes spending cheaper and more worthwhile in the present as saving is unattractive since the interest rates are so low that you don't even get a modest return on investment.

It is saving and investment from high savings that drives an economy. Think basic production possibility curves (look it up if you don't know). Only two things expand the curve: high investment through savings since savings allow you to spend more in the future since you built up wealth or technological innovation which comes from, you guessed it, savings since stocks, bonds, and even the money you drop into an account are all converted to income for a company to expand its capital which it THEN uses to attract higher consumption by making goods cheaper. This is one of many reasons why China has boomed so fast. The average Chinese person saves a ton of money because there is no government safety net like Social Security for them. If consumption truly drove an economy, China would not have grown so quickly as a result.

This should be basic shit. Kenyes has been proven wrong many times while Hayek and other classical economists proven right.

Be white, be successful, be above average looking, share her interests, make her laugh

Yeah, "refugees" 'll fix that...

Marcon is in office, enough said. Your population is filled with bullshit and pleasantries. You fucked yourselves.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=NWbDL495cMg

Watch my videos goyim. Been lazy since I have a job but going to put a few more up this weekend hopefully

Why did you post a pic of an Asian? We have the least illiteracy rate in the world.

>credit card arrives in mail

How use credit cardz?

...

all our presidents since 1970 have been american plants and Macron is the second biggest after Sarkozy, and the refugee crisis was caused by america

Also, purchasing. How can we sit back, do nothing, and make money off of this?

The Refugee Crisis was caused by the E.U. and your population's feelz. They didn't have to accept that bullshit. America's role was only fucking up sand wads that fucked with us first.

Economists want to get rid of welfare.
Pyramid schemes are bad, son.

Whatever, (((Economists))) might as well be slaughtering chickens and reading their fucking bones at this point.

>(Economists) is one person

the structures and the people who caused it and made it possible are all american or american backed/controlled

>In the French Caliphate surrender state of pissmonkey commies, America are the Jews

Keynesians aren't economists.

So, what you're saying as a Frenchmen is that you have no responsibility for you country's actions? Ok fine.

So why did your country loose so much prestige and strength to be controlled by a foreign power?

Kek, you could also say they arent people too

>pissmonkey commies
>all part of structures controlled by the US of A
look at yourself in a mirror my subversive circumcized mullato friend

>You control us, fool, look what you've done!

My fucking sides

...They aren't.

Most economists are Jewish. I would never take their word.

frenchamerican.org/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due

Can one say that the sole purpose of keynesian economics is getting power trough demagogy?

jej

Right, right, France isn't the laughingstock of WW2 and piss smelling failure of Europe, it's all the mean ol' Americans fault.

You are never going to beat human stupidity, it would be far better to remove the franchise from anyone not white, male and earning over the minimum requirement to make a net contribution.

pretty much since you are the admiral shit of jewish finance and since the late 80's also the admiral ship of post-marxist subversion

I trade ForEx. You're literally a buttblasted meme France. Do something with yourselves, for fuck sakes. Dollars--> Euro= PROFIT AGAIN!

French butthurt knows no bounds.

You even had a wall.

masturbate some more to (((benoist))) you cryptosocialist.

The first point is a matter of economic literacy. The second point is not. It is a matter of values. Not everything is about muh economy.

I'd say the biggest problem with modern economics in general is the idea of infinite growth.
Sustainability has been cast aside because of greed taking over.

When that pendulum starts swinging the other way, it's gonna be a whopper.

how is it cryptosocialist to mention the facts that all the shit plaguing the west, from third wave feminism to LGBT and transgarbage, to nigger/white trash culture all come from the USA ?
Also wasn't Benoist an LGBT militant himself ?

If you want a western one, move to Hongcouver. It's what I'm considering, since a swede is allowed to stay in Canada for six months at a time. Second option is to go to the richer parts of China (or Japan, but I think you need to be legitimately rich to live there casually like that), but you need some money. The last option is to get a brown(er) version by having (any amount of money at all) and going to SE asia (thailand, vietnam etc).

In the first case, you're mostly looking for a normal girl that happens to be asian. Good deal if you're mostly in it for the appearance, and wants someone who understands what the hell you're saying and isn't just nodding along to be polite. She'll understand what you say, but she's been raised in the west (or have lived for long enough to acclimatize) so there's that.

Second case, asian native woman who either "falls" for you just because you're a ""handsome"" white man (equivalent of a coalburner here) or because you have a bunch of money/can provide for the family every asian woman desperately wants as early as possible. You still need some personality at this level. Will likely have trouble understanding the finer nuances of your language (english, forget other ones - I assume), but will have some familiarity and can learn enough to be fun.

Third case is something even middle-aged fat men can manage: pick up something like a vietnamese (doesn't have to be brown, they can look pretty good as well), thai, cambodian or similar girl. They just want out of whatever third-rate swamp they currently live in. If you bring one home, you might have to pay her family or at least expect her to pay some of whatever she earns back to them. Kind of a discount version of #2, and the language(s) sound like ducks quacking.

This is just guessing based on collected information and some anecdotes, anyway. Make of it what you want. I think I'll try for Hongcouver I think, unless I become a millionaire and can just move to Japan.

It wouldn't be if we still had natural disasters which regularly (and somewhat randomly) wiped out a large number of people, e.g. plagues.

Plagues serve as a great churning of wealth. With that mechanism absent, market economies become shitty.

Everything is actually about the economy because the economy allows to you be "you". If your kids are starving...

Events that kill large groups of stupid worthless shitheads.

That's why strong countries make weak men and then fall.

just be yourself

You have information how to approach a qt chinese girl (not the whore type) who lives in europe?

>Events that kill large groups of stupid worthless shitheads.
because of the relationship between capitalists and the agents of the state, worthless shitheads are pretty well distributed

LMAO. have a (You).

Well, there are a lot of 3 world nations that are far away from their prime so there might be margin for growth
I think that the economy is nedlessly too much interwined making it so that something fails somewhere and all goes to the shitter

>The average person thinks "consumption drives the economy" (whatever that means) but economists believe that sustained growth is determined by savings/investment and technology.

Which is true, savings and investments merely increase the rate of growth, have you ever heard of an economy where nobody spends any money?

> Economists generally favor free trade and think restrictions against immigration should be relaxed. The average person usually has a negative opinion of free trade and immigration.

Yes, because importing a boatload of brown people to perform a job for half the wage of the native population is good. It sure does help the CEOs' bank account but not the average worker.


You sound like someone who just took Econ 101 (full of Jew lies and propaanda) and think you're smart because of it. Fuck off.

Nothing more than "language exchange websites", tip from a friend of mine, and something I've read on the internet as well. So a site where you learn a language or something, by talking to a native/someone who speaks it really well. A lot of that is supposedly used to meet people. As for an asian specifically, that's more chance. Prepare a decent picture that you can send, and I think you'll have some success. Just pretend you're learning some language - Ni hao!

It's not easy, finding a girl in europe, though. Try to figure out if your country has some community, then try to approach that I guess. I don't know enough about this unfortunately. There are some thai women around here for example, but it's difficult to approach. I know some countries have ex-colonizers, indians (not what you were looking for) in the UK/Ireland, and Indonesians in Holland. But really, I don't know. There's a distinct lack of asians and south europeans in europe, everything geographically close(r) will of course be the easiest to find. Except in a case like Canada, where they've actually travelled pretty far because so many others settled there, which is why I mentioned that specifically.

i already have one in mind, but while we work at the same facillity we work for different companies and so i only see her in the morning when she passes by and she greats me with a friendly smile, but I can't tell if it maybe is just out of politeness since she is chinese
also I am to afraid to stop her and actually say something