What would US civil war 2.0 look like?

Hypothetically speaking, if the US devolved into an all out civil war, what do you fagots think it would look like? How would it start? How would it end? Who/what would be the main targets for each side? How would the organization occur? What would the military and police’s roll in it? How long would it last?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/stK3YPz6WTc
youtube.com/watch?v=y_gx7IJ2EmA
youtube.com/watch?v=hMkz-Mrxs-c
youtube.com/watch?v=4Zt7bl5Z_oA
belliresearchinstitute.com/the-savage-peace-introduction/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Code
archive.4plebs.org/_/search/boards/pol.x/subject/Knowledge Bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

like a goddamn /DIXIE/ GENERAL SON WOOOOOO


ALL STATES REEEEEEEEEEEEEPORT THE FUCK IN
ARKANSAS STANDING BY

Floridian master race reporting

Here is what it will look like

youtu.be/stK3YPz6WTc

We dont want no Civil War 2. It'd just be white guys killing eachother while nogs fucked off and left the heavy lifting to us.

No, I want peace for my white brothers, North or South.
youtube.com/watch?v=y_gx7IJ2EmA

It would look glorious

It would be a lot more messy than the last one.
The first one was neatly split up into X Alliance of States vs Y Alliance of States.
The 2nd Civil War will be based entirely around culture and class, so each individual state will have its own theatre and struggle between the city elites and the rural folk who live around them.

>nogs would be left in peace
I don't think you've put much thought into this

>left in peace
Fool dont put words into my post. I said they'd fuck off.

Would look like this: youtube.com/watch?v=hMkz-Mrxs-c

>What would US civil war 2.0 look like?
It would look like thousands of libtards mysteriously going missing in my town.

>gators
I do love fried gator tail.

It's already started.

We've got the leftists allied with the shitskins and the republican corporatists trying to regain complete control of the federal government to enrich themselvs. Meanwhile, Trump is trying to keep the feds in the hands of people that actually care about their duty to the nation and the people.

It's just a matter of time before it evolves into a shooting war between the feds and those loyal to the people and the states.

Southern California outpost reporting in. It's hell out here boys, we need food and ammo fast.

San Diego is /DIXIE/ clay as far as I'm concerned.

Take up arms. Do everything possible to make their use unnecessary. Against the army, the only victory is political.
There is no such thing as a peaceful insurrection. Weapons are necessary: it’s a question of doing everything possible to make using them unnecessary. An insurrection is more about taking up arms and maintaining an “armed presence” than it is about armed struggle. We need to distinguish clearly between being armed and the use of arms. Weapons are a constant in revolutionary situations, but their use is infrequent and rarely decisive at key turning points: August 10th 1792, March 18th 1871, October 1917. When power is in the gutter, it’s enough to walk over it.

Because of the distance that separates us from them, weapons have taken on a kind of double character of fascination and disgust that can be overcome only by handling them. An authentic pacifism cannot mean refusing weapons, but only refusing to use them. Pacifism without being able to fire a shot is nothing but the theoretical formulation of impotence. Such a priori pacifism is a kind of preventive disarmament, a pure police operation. In reality, the question of pacifism is serious only for those who have the ability to open fire. In this case, pacifism becomes a sign of power, since it’s only in an extreme position of strength that we are freed from the need to fire.

From a strategic point of view, indirect, asymmetrical action seems the most effective kind, the one best suited to our time: you don’t attack an occupying army frontally. That said, the prospect of Iraq-style urban guerilla warfare, dragging on with no possibility of taking the offensive, is more to be feared than to be desired.

youtube.com/watch?v=4Zt7bl5Z_oA

belliresearchinstitute.com/the-savage-peace-introduction/

It would be the rural and suburban retards vs. the educated city dwellers

It would end with Canada and Mexico being the U.S. states.

>What would US civil war 2.0 look like?

A whole bunch of young male vidya playing Nazi-larpers crying in the trenches that they can't achieve shit without cheats and aimbots.

Yugoslavia 2.0 but larger and worse.

Louisiana checking in

>Rural and suburban retards who have been firing guns their entire lives VS soyboys and hambeasts with purple dyed hair that can't tell which bathroom to use

Yeah, the odds aren't looking good.

I'm an Australian so correct me if I get anything wrong.

IF a civil war breaks out in the US it will be due to a few reasons, mostly due to the division in a multicultural society & the media baiting a race war.

BLM and terrorist organizations like Antifa etc are very close to becoming as dangerous if not more dangerous than ISIS.

If the trend continues to snowball, the Federal Government will have no choice but to declare martial law, this will result in gorilla style warfare and terrorism accross the nation for a few months.

The Patriotic far right wing groups will fight back against the rise of terrorist organizations, attempting to aide the military.

This will result in the vast majority of blacks and leftists to take up arms, as a result of seeing white Nationalists and the military taking out BLM and Antifa.

This will last at most 2 months, and it won't result in major destruction, other than in places where it doesn't matter because... well...

There's also a strong chance that Mexicans would help out BLM and a total annexation of Mexico :D

Look up Civil War Two by Thomas Chittum, I think he does a reasonably good job of describing the decline of the US.

Yugoslavia with ARs and nuclear weapons.

If the rural areas were able cut off the supply routes into the cities that they surround, the siege would last less than a month in a rather bloodless, but distinct victory. The unknown here, however, would be the response of the police/military. I’m assuming guerrilla tactics would have to come into play.

Oregon reporting in. The liberals are isolated in the northwest toward Portland and Eugene. All the water, electricity, and food production are in Republican country.

North Carolina. Reporting in.

>no guns
Weird

It depends on why the war occurs. If the war begins over a constitutional issue, then there is a good chance that some states may try to secede and there may be strife between states.

Regardless of what reason, there will be combat in the streets between citizens. Right and left wing militias would clash, some left wingers wanting to create some comunigger state while some right wingers may try to create a huyt ethno state. And to top it off, there will be government forces trying to stop the combat, most likely with the help of pro federalist militias.

It would be like Libya, many small factions, each trying to further their own goals. The groups would be:
>Pro Government forces
>Communists (many different groups would unite for the same cause)
>Socialists would splinter from the communist group later on, assuming the communists succeed in some of their goals
>Right wing militias (3%ers, oathkeepers) who exist to protect their own freedoms granted by the constitution and to counter the communists. Most likely would work with the government of either their aligned state or the feds depending on the circumstances of the war.
>White nationalists, who would kinda work with the normal right wing militias but splinter off in the hope to create their own white ethno state
>Black nationalists, who's main goal is to "fight racism" and even create some black ethno state in the south. They would co operate with the leftists but not all the way to communism. But mostly they would chimp out and make us of the chaos to loot.
>Foreign cells (the us has loads of enemies; who wouldn't exploit this civil unrest?)
>Already existing gangs would try to hold territory, possibly working with some foreign organized crime or with the black ethnos if they are black gangs.

Indiana reporting in.

Is there, I dare to say, realistically way out of this for US without Civil War of sorts?

Multicultural societies evolve to this point inevitably.

I don't know
I only know I'd side with /dixie/

There will be no war. War requires a forces with major political and financial resources to lead the effort, othervise it will be not a war, but insurgency, neither really dangerous for government not popular.

No way any part of current political elites are in some way radical for this, so keep your guns aside and try to deal with the issue constitutionally. Trump election is a living monument that America is a land of oportunities, where everything is possible.

No, sadly.

bunch of half whites shooting each other.

So this is about maximizing or minimizing damage atm?

heck yeah, me too.

Next Civil War would likely be commies / sizeable number of minorities vs nationalists / traditional "American" people. Not quite sure how that would pan out with respect to specific states, and frankly I wonder about my own state. It's southern and pretty traditional in a lot of places, sure, but there is a sizeable cuck population in the capitol area. I myself am a Wisconsin transplant, though I would immediately side with the south / nationalists / traditionalists if it came to that.

*crawfishes externally*

Completely decentralized. Small, disorganized cells of rebels staging attacks against government-friendly military and civilian targets. Light, mobile, hard to track and plan against. It'd essentially be an insurgency ala Iraq/Afghanistan.

There's a reason liberals keep fighting for expanded government surveillance and control, they know that if legit civil war breaks out in anything less than a full-blown Nineteen Eighty-Four Big Brother state the rebels will undoubtedly win.

At this point in time I think the most likely scenario would be a leftist state going fully hysterical about Trump over some dumb shit and trying to actually secede, maybe even a collection of some states, and then the rest of the union moving in to put it down.

I doubt it would be anywhere near the scale of the Civil War though, maybe a few skirmishes but lefties don't have the stomach for war or sustained casualties, let alone the means to actually overthrow the US military.

Honestly, I think Lebanon's civil war is a good idea of the clusterfuck it'd resemble.

Might as well add UL to this pic. Show some love to southern and grambling too.


Wtf is a Napoleonic Code?

It's part of our fuck-ass dumb as hell law system
French law sucks t b h, but maybe it's just my Anglo showing

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Code

went to a civil war reenactment today lads

Louisiana does not actually have a Napoleonic Code, but we have a Civil Law system, like France, compared to the US gov and other states.
Basically, the letter of the law is more important than how it has been previously been interpreted.

It doesn't matter, as any kind of "resistance" of any kind would be crushed by government forces in a matter of hours. War is a complex event, requiring a whole bunch of presuppositions to happen.

US Civil war was a combination of unclear constitution norms, overconfidence of hardcore aristocratic elites on a south, total lack of government forces on early stages of conflict and, mainly, absence of experience about how clusterfuck it could go.

You, guys, hardly realise what the war really is. If one of the sides can't countermeasure picrelated, it's not a war, it's insurgency.

Over 90% of the city people kill each other while looting and fighting over food. A few smarter ones strike out into the countryside hoping to take food from rural people. Rural people shoot them. The end.

Now here's a good one.

I just know I have a Ghost Gunner 2 coming in the mail soon, I'm preparing. Gonna make sure my friends and family are armed for whatever might happen.

>i'm a larping faggot that has no idea how this works

Stalingrad for every liberal stronghold city.

Well, I kinda born in a country teared apart by Civil war and have relatives actively participating on both sides. What is your competence?

West Virginia resistance reporting in. Can we join daddy VA again?

Unless they weaponize mobility scooters I don't see it happening. People talk a lot of shit online but if you actually go outside you'll see most people are fat, prescription drug addled, alcoholics. They are fucking willfully dumb too. This place will just slowly collapse over a period of a few hundred years.

>You, guys, hardly realise what the war really is.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand war...
kys

Mississippi here. Yankee faggots can fuck off.

I'd use the chaos to settle scores. Any minority, mentally retarded, or obese people will go first. Maybe a rape or 2 if I have time. When the shtf, cops are going to be at home protecting their family, not looking for an armed person among dozens of armed people who are removing human detritus anyway.

TEXAS UP

Probably something like this. Feds and Syndies can get fucked.

>Michigan
>Syndicalist
Hell no

Joo York

Not a chance, dude.

The corruption of the federal government, combined with the attacks on the majority through non-whites and leftist identity politics, is going to come to a head either during Trumps first or second tenure as POTUS.

Non-whites now believe they no longer have to live in an America with white leaders, and their leftist overlords will continue to fuel their resentment until open rebellion takes place.

It'd be the urbanites being blockaded into their cities, and being starved out. The right/whites dominate the rural areas, the areas that produce everything. All we'd have to do is keep them in their cities, and they'll starve. Easy

>, it's not a war, it's insurgency.

Insurgency is a method of warfare.

...

Not just that. Cities aren't just homogeneous political groups, it would be street vs. street. Neighbor against neighbor.

visited family in oregon recently. jesus christ man people out there are really far gone. love the state itself though

Yes, but it would involve demographics changing to the point that the country becomes a banana republic tyranny ruled by one party. At that point there wouldn't be enough resistance to fight a civil war.

Funny coming from a guy whose country has the highest admixture of black and Jewish DNA in Europe.

Uhh, yes they are user

Yesir!

Northern Florida here!

archive.4plebs.org/_/search/boards/pol.x/subject/Knowledge Bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/
archive.4plebs.org/_/search/boards/pol.x/subject/Knowledge Bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/

Me too user, outnumbered and deep behind enemy lines

Massachusetts reporting
I just had to take out a second mortgage to pay my insurance please send help

Red Mitten Michigan standing by and awaiting signal

Sup Forums has a new hero

It would be a fucking mess because America isn't divided as cleanly in the geographic sense like it was back in 1861. The two clashing mentalities would be between rural areas and urban areas, and those are scattered everywhere.

KENTUCKY REPORTING IN motherfuckers

D u b s of truth. This. A lot of factions is correct

Hey man what mods?

My body is ready.

It'd be the greatest cluster fuck for centuries.
Imagine a divided federal government, hundreds, if not thousands of militias and militant groups, foreign fighters, foreign interventions, all inside the richest, most technologically advanced nation in the world.
It would be glorious
PRAISE KEK

You would see quite a few women being culled. Minorities would likely be purged since they make up most of the leftist base. Whites generally grow out of their indoctrination even in this day and age of leftist group think given time. Most of the whites to worry about would be the younger kids who have been freshly indoctrinated and are more susceptible to propaganda (government schools are bad). Major cities are trade/transaction points. Public universities are government farms and located here in larger numbers. You have to keep in mind that cities are mostly trade and therefore easier to make "profit" so they produce nothing of traditional value. Rural and suburban areas have their resources extracted and sent to cities. These people generally rely on a hard work ethic to flourish or creation.

Georgia reporting in!
Vengeance will be ours

what's the safest spot for a hoosier? Think I'm good in Brown County.

It’s called Kaiserreich. I swear it’s better quality than the Vanilla game

It will look exactly like PO's pic.

...exactly.

Thanks friend. Compatible with Road to '56 or no? I love a lot of '56s features and tech trees though many are retarded too.

>How long would it last?
it would last as long as it takes for mobs of angry poor people to lynch themselves a bunch of faggoty rich aristocrats so about ten minutes and it would be over but the stink from the heads on spikes would linger awhile

Id rape my neighbor then kill her.

I wouldn't even rape her

>Id rape my neighbor then kill her.
>I wouldn't even rape her

I'd kill my neighbor then sexually abuse the carcass.

My man. Fayetteville area reporting in. You?

100,000 fit young white males vs 150m obese niggers and numales

It would look like Mexico but with alot more niggers

All you cunts would be applying for Canadian passports telling everyone how much you love hockey gravy with balls of cheese on chips and that you always loved Canada and wanted to move there

The weak would run meaning mostly minorities. Canada would get blacked even harder than it is now.

The majority always fucks the minority you are the minority get used to it. Learn Spanish

>What would US civil war 2.0 look like?
Not like this.