Only reason for becoming a teacher was to get in the pants of a 16 year high school girl

>only reason for becoming a teacher was to get in the pants of a 16 year high school girl.
>people say he is a great character

Being a great character and a good person are not mutually inclusive

I fail to see the issue

would you not do the same

Good character =/= good person

>not becoming a teacher to fuck a teenage girl
Faggot.

He inspired me and I'm following his example.

Onizuka was great man.

16, what are you gay?

Girls that age have completed puberty. They have grass on the field, all the bases, and they've likely played ball a few times already with guys their age.

There is no moral dilemma. It's legal in most countries and some states in the US.

The only problem might be one of ethics. Like being in a position of authority and using that position to manipulate the student into sex like with the promise of better grades or something, but other than that, which can easily be avoided... fuck the 16 year old. Fuck her twice.

Fuck her in class, fuck her in the ass, fuck her with a bass.

He is a good person. Leave your house and you might realize that.

>16 is morally reprehensible to have sex with
I hope Sup Forums bans Muslim countries next.

Who let the 3DPD fags on Sup Forums?

Muslims countries think 8 is the age to fuck a girl.

I realized it without leaving the house

what about being 40 with a 16 year old bride

thats hallal

Dude high school teenage girls are promiscuous as fuck. They're practically asking for it. You should've known this.

First off Good character does not equate to good person

secondly, Its Onizuka

Third, He gave up on that idea halfway through episode 1

Fourth, None of the girls in his class are worth fucking

Fifth, read Shonan Junai Gumi! it explains better why he became a teacher

and finally and most importantly ITS EIKICHI FUCKING ONIZUKA

Creepy maybe, but nothing inherently wrong with it. Would it be better if she were 18 and he were 50? How about if she's 30 and he's 75?

What if the 16 year old is a male and the teacher is a 40 year old milf? Even in the states people wouldn't bat an eye at that, the kid would even be praised as a stud despite being less developed than a girl is at that time frame.

All morals are a subjective grey area. The laws change by arbitrary lines on a map, and ethics change with time, circumstance, and a whole crap-load of other variables.

This is not some issue where 99+% of the population are for or against something like with murder or slavery. It's a toss up. Make your case. I've heard no argument from the opposite side in this thread at all. Just that he's bad and then an exaggeration of the circumstances from the OPs template scenario which is also fine by me. So, please, if you think something is morally reprehensible explain why. Don't just say it's wrong or gross.

Think of all of the reasons for why it would be wrong to fuck a 5 year old, okay, now think of reasons to not fuck a 16 year old... yea, legitimate arguments and objections aren't so forthcoming with the latter. Now think of why it's suddenly right to fuck that 18 year old because she's what, 2 years older. Think back to when you were in high school. Did you honestly change that much from a softmore to a senior, not really. Also, why would it be okay for a 16 year old to fuck another 16 year old if 16 year olds shouldn't be fucking?

Nah, you guys are full of shit, you feel uncomfortable with something so you say it's wrong, when you might just be uncomfortable with it. Same reason people don't want to let gays adopt kids and get married, they're just uncomfortable with it so they assume it's degenerate when really it's just something you don't care for.

I don't like it when strangers ask me for the time; it makes me uncomfortable. What kind of sick fuck asks for the time of day?

16 is legal even in advanced countries like Switzerland. And there's nothing wrong with wanting a young girl, females start losing their value after their puberty.

Fuck off normalfags 3DPD lovers.

awesome, you're my kind of dude

And you can go with them.

It's scientifically proven that men are attracted to girls under 18. 18 is just an arbitrary age people choose to say "now you're an adult and responsible for yourself."

I mean wholy shit complaining that a 16yo has sex with an grown man. Tumblrfags took over Sup Forums.

>Sup Forums discussing sex

I M laffin

just because their bodies are mature doesn't mean their bodies are, lots of these girls are exploited because of their stupidity, that age restriction is set to protect them. No

Sup Forums is full of normalfags.

A 18 year old isn't smarter than a 16 year old and the brain isn't really fully mature until 25.

16 year old girls aren't stupide because of their age they're stupide because they were raised that way. There are plenty of 16 year olds which are less stupide than "adults".

Also by your logic you would have to make the usage of the internet illegal for 16 year olds because they're to "stupide" for that and can be "exploited" in many diffrent way.

Let me tell you one thing. Stupide people are raised stupided and they don't just stop being stupide because they got 18 or 20.
And stupide people like that will always be exploited like by smarter people.
Also the age restriction doesn't stop 16 year olds getting exploited by other 16 year olds.

Grow the fuck up.

Sounds like a great teacher to me.

Is this a pasta?

I'd certainly have enjoyed a teacher like Onizuka

Well, the internet would be a lot more bearable if there was an underage ban.

Oh, so she can drive a 2ton car and work a job as a wage slave at 16, she can even be trialed as an adult when she murders someone, and it's perfectly fine that she fucks someone else that's under 18 because she knew she wanted that, but the second he's 19, nope, she's confused and doesn't know what she wants... It's not love, it's not how to sustain a lifelong marriage, it's not doing your taxes. It's just sex. Penis goes in vagina, feels good. You attracted to man, you attracted to woman? You want feels good? Yes/no? You not want baby, you not want aids, put on condom.

Whatever age you body is ready for sex, and you actively are seeking out sex is the right age. 25, 18, 16, hell I'd even think as early as 14 for the girls that started puberty sooner than most. When I was 14 I was jerking off, looking at porn, starring at my attractive teacher's ass the entire class with an erection. I had a cell phone, bank account, part time job for less than minimum wage (now that's getting taken advantage of). I was ready for sex with anyone I found sexually attractive, and had one of my teachers I liked tried to fuck me I would have turned them down because I knew it was illegal and I wouldn't have wanted them to end up in jail over some bullshit because I'm not a sociopath. I find it more morally atrocious for the student to be fucking the teacher. They know what he'd be risking. His job, his freedom, and all they have to do is mention it to the wrong person or get upset at him and that's that. How does the teacher risk hurting the student... by being a regretted sexual conquest that was bound to happen sooner or later, or maybe the parents disapprove and she gets grounded or called a slut. Seems like shit a teen could get over in a month, while the teacher rots in a jail cell and can never seek gainful employment again let alone if he's placed on a sexual offenders list when he gets out. Then he get to be treated like he's actively soliciting 4 year olds.

No pain, no gain

What the fuck is wrong with you

Go back to having sexual relations with the exhaust of an oil stove

Why is there even normalfag morality on Sup Forums?

You have tumblr and reddshit, fuck off.

Go back and read it again. I think you misinterpreted something if you're this upset over sex with a 16 year old.

It's a pretty funny joke, because this shit isn't even in a fanservice or loli thread, its a fucking GTO thread.

Not Sup Forums related, though I hope you aren't justifying fucking 3DPD teens.

"Think of all of the reasons for why it would be wrong to fuck a 5 year old, okay, now think of reasons to not fuck a 16 year old... yea, legitimate arguments and objections aren't so forthcoming with the latter. "

I take it this is the part you found offensive. Read it again. Read it several times. Look up some word definitions if you have to. We've obviously got a dumb one on our hands.

>here's a hint. I'm not saying it's okay to fuck a 5 year old.

Definitely Sup Forums related. We are discussing OP's idiotic character judgements of an Sup Forums related franchise.

What's wrong is that there is only very minor difference between a 16 and 18 year old if their process has been stunted. Think: Two years, prior to which nearly all the skill of life normally should be learned, and rather than invest it in the girl's capabilities you would rather she invest it in sex.

It almost makes me wonder if the education system is intentionally kept stunted to provide for an unlimited supply of fuck dolls for decrepid old farts.

To add to that, I find it creepy that I get replied to faster in a thread about 40 year olds fucking children young enough to be their daughters than in a thread actually about /anime/.

"process" should be "development"

Sup Forums is dead.

I'm still mad he's a virgin in the sequel aswell and never fucked Azusa. She's been replaced by some other girl we all know he won't fuck because if he loses his virginty and gets the girl the author can't make more manga.

You do realise their brains are still not fully developed right?

That's the reason you don't have sex with girls that young.

It's not a moral objection, it's scientific fact.

What are you talking about? It's not like they're braindead and can't think for themselves.

Words of wisdom.

I completely forgot the sequel existed. I really lost all interest when he just got a replacement set of students. Is it as bad as I assume it is?

Nothing proves he didn't fucked Azusa iirc.
Nor that he did but still

The scientific fact is that they can breed and therefore nature approves of it. It is completely an issue of man-made morality.

>You do realise their brains are still not fully developed right?
So people shouldn't have sex until their late 20's? Because that's when the brain is finally fully developed. So we are going to prevent people from breeding in the best ages for healthy child production?

I'd fuck a 16 year old if I got away with it without getting into trouble. It's legal in my country anyway.

>brains not fully developed
>but muh adolescence where old neural pathways are experiencing atrophy and newer ones are being relaid

I'm not saying anyone should get into a serious relationship with anyone under the early 20's, but that's not because of any scientific theory. Life in those years is usually very hectic and decisions made in the later teens-early twenties affect their whole lives. This fact is only because of our society though because of the end of secondary school (high school) and the societal pressure to find work or continue education. If our society were different, say compulsory education extended through graduate school studies, 24 or 25 would be the pivotal point and not 18.

All that garbage aside: a 16 year old brain is allowed to drive in most places. It's not the greatest thing, but we can't expect them to make decisions that could kill someone else now can we?

Never took learning theory I see.