/PedoWood/ - Eyes Wide Shut

I just discovered the infamous Gary Gross nude photoshoot of a 10 year old Brooke Shields.
iconicphotos.org/tag/brooke-shields/
She was a pre-pubescent child. A number of photos were taken of her nude and in a steamy bath. In one of the photos she was oiled and wearing makeup posing full frontal. The (((Artist))) admits to sexually objectifying a child. Her mother singned the papers and gave (((consent))). It was regarded as legal despite the fact it's blatant sofcore child porn. Nobody was even arrested.
I'm black pilled after seeing this. They got away with publishing kiddie porn because they called it (((art))).
Looking at these photos I know for a fact she was abused.
This needs to be made trending now. It's concrete proof that the entertainment industry is abusing children.
She went on to star in Pretty Baby after this filth and she was full frontal nude at the age of 12 in that movie.
I'm fucking contemplating suicide after finding this. It's not even hidden, you can find it on a Google search and not a fucking peep from any MSM news source.

Other urls found in this thread:

iconicphotos.org/tag/brooke-shields/
medium.com/@Lazulu/stephen-king-hero-of-the-resistance-certainly-loves-his-child-rape-fantasies-6a34a1596cd2
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

it’s ok, man. we all feel the same way.

How is this not child porn though? She's a 10 year old girl. I read it went to court and they didn't regard it as kiddie porn despite the fact it was blatantly sexual.

Wasn't that on Playboy? Also found out about it ir a while ago. Fucking sick. This kind of thing is not even hidden. For instance, ever heard of STAR Magazine? What about "baby groupies" such as Lari Maddox? Jimmy Page sure liked them. Google that shit

Don't want to steal your thread OP, just a reminder to look beyond the film industry, search for the following:
R. Kelly's "sex cult"
Sean Diddy Combs and his "taste for young boys". Allegedly he slept with Usher, who invested in Bieber, whose mom, Pattie Mallette (see her wiki) had been abused several times as a kid. Justin began doing "business trips" at around 13. Don't get me started boy bands and talent shows. Google Lou Pearlson

"The Woman in the Child"

"Little Women Magazine"

owned by Playboy Press

how deep does this rabbit hole go

It was literally in playboy but it was still deemed "art". That's fucked up shit

Did they actually release it?
I heard the (((artist))) was given copyright as long as he didn't release it in a pornographic mag.

Sick bastards, that's why I want to make an actual holocaust, adding pedos with the kikes into the gas chambers. All pedos must go.

shillin muh thread with no shame. Eat a dick pedos

Christ Almighty, some people actually think this is CP. She's not having sex people, she's just naked. Reminder that nudity doesn't have to equal sex, and a naked kid doesn't have to be a sex object.
>inb4 pedo

...

>10 years old.
>Not even reached puberty.
>Oiled up.
>Makup and red lipstick.
>Fully nude.
>Posing like a Playboy model.
>Steamy bath.
It's quite obvious that she was sexualized. No sane person could rationalize this filth.

Hi john

hang all pedos

Kill order
1.) Pedophiles
2.) Traitors
3.) (((elites)))

basically there's no genitalia (vagina or anus) showing
for this same reason there are thousands of pictures of naked girls on the internet under 18
they're just things like nudist family photos

She's was covered in oil and make-up. She was posing like Playboy models would. It was obviously sexualized yet they didn't put anyone in jail and let the (((artist))) sell the images.
How did people not riot in the streets?

All you newfags are too young to remember that back then that was acceptable art.

I was so scared to click, Wtf is this

that is fucking purely disgusting

Get in on the open secret documentary it's massive massive proof and highly disturbing YouTube it we need a pedo wood mega thread to unite the clans and get working on this

Context please.
This was supposed in their mind to emphasize the contrast between childhood and womanhood.

>iconicphotos.org/tag/brooke-shields/
Cunny

...

...

why did you just link child porn

>iconicphotos.org/tag/brooke-shields/

She's arguably the Rosetta Stone because she was the most blatant.

Rejoice. Everyone's been secretly ready for this purge for 30 years.

Kinda sounds like cp based solely on that description alone

Doubting Thomas Sculpture By Patricia Piccinini - I dont know what it means cause I dont feel like reading artist gobbledygook . Looks like something that bites kids hands off

>this photo shoot is CP
>I have analysed these photos in depth and it’s definately CP

medium.com/@Lazulu/stephen-king-hero-of-the-resistance-certainly-loves-his-child-rape-fantasies-6a34a1596cd2

I ain't clickin' that shit, go get hit by a bus nigger

...

Literally demonic

I better not get fucking v& for clicking on that shit op

A leaf with common sense.

Look up the connection between ToyFreakz and a Pakistani pedo ring. There's a few posts on Voat about it.

Of course all these slide threads are ruining potential discussion in threads like this one.

slide threads are absolutely out of control right now

Are you aware that some child model agencies in the US that used clothed models for photoshoots were determined to be guilty of producing child pornography based on such images branded "suggestive"? I am sure they were suggestive images in the sense that the customers of these agencies were presumably men with a sexual interest in images of girls on the cusp of pubescence. I remember trying to find some of these "suggestive" images back when I read about it, and I found many full sets posted on various boards. These photographs of Brooke Shields are well, well beyond the clothed suggestiveness of that material. It's kind of a funny business how a "sex object" is defined and who gets to define it in legal terms. For roaming pedos out there any kid in ordinary clothing walking down the street is a sex object... Clothed models vs artistic photographs of a naked child vs a naked child in a family album.

JIDF and a ton of others are working to destroy any successful productive discussion.

Look up Sable Starr.

I'd rather not.

It's very strange. They let the richest of their kind get away with it and call it art. Polanski. Weinstein. It's part of their cult of perception. You have to see these people through their eyes despite what your own are telling you. It's almost like a religion...

There's a wikipedia page on her. She was essentially used by tons of famous musicians. They wrote about her in a magazine that basically focused on the underage groupies that were exploited by all these famous men. They were treated in the actual media as being glamorous for having sex with adult men. It actually seemed to contribute to the careers of the men. If normal 30,000/yr type people were to do this, they would get prison time. Instead, these men were given awards. Polanski, Saville, Cosby,.... were normative and most likely still are. It's well known that Bryan Singer has abused tons of underage boys at his parties. The stories of abuse are pretty awful. Some of his victims went on to become almost like lifetime minions of his that have trained new younger generations of abused victims. It's really really sick.

We need a strong political force to bring these people to justice.

She's only 3 years older than me. Even as a kid I felt something was wrong with how blatantly she got exploited.
She was insanely famous back then.

It may never happen or it will eventually.

That ad is sickening trash. Why was there a surge of openness regarding their matters in the 70s and 80s?

>Sable Starr
just read it
and it's sick

I'd rather not. Summary?
This is the + in LGBTQ+

*unzips dick*