Taken from her wiki:
>From 1981 to 1983, Shields, her mother, photographer Garry Gross, and Playboy Press were involved in litigation in the New York City Courts over the rights to photographs her mother had signed away to Gross (when dealing with models who are minors, a parent or legal guardian must sign such a release form while other agreements are subject to negotiation). Gross was the photographer of a controversial set of nude images taken in 1975 of a then ten-year-old Brooke Shields with the consent of her mother, Teri Shields, for the Playboy Press publication Sugar 'n' Spice. The images portray Shields nude, standing and sitting in a bathtub, wearing makeup and covered in oil. The courts ruled in favor of the photographer due to a strange twist in New York law. It would have been otherwise had Brooke Shields been considered a child "performer" rather than a model.
The images were deemed (((legal))) and printed in magazines. They can be found on a WordPress page uncensored and the address is on the first page of Google search.
The images were passed around to (((artists))) for 3 years.
She was chosen for the role of Violet in Pretty Baby, a film starring a 12 year old Brooke Shields playing a chid prostitute in which she has nude scenes. The director picked after seeing her pre pubescent Playboy pics.
Her mother took 450 dollars for the nudes and gave (((consent))) for her to be in softcore CP.
She claimed to remain celibate and 'lose her virginity' at 22. She had a breakdown after it, sounds like PTSD.
Speed this info. Make sure to send it to feminists as well because they already hate Hugh Hefner. We can turn them against Hollywood. Exploiting children is universally hated.
This is absolute proof pedophilia in Hollywood is no secret.
Brooke Shields was in Playboy when she 10
Other urls found in this thread:
Bump.
the truth is that most people prob don't realize it right now, but pedophilia, or at least ephebophilia, used to be pretty normalized and in the case of ephebophilia even looked at as something sympathetic.
look at all of the literary characters from the 20th century and before who were statutory rapists.
a good example is RP Macmurphy, from One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest. there is an absolutely classic character, who was hailed as an embodiment of the American spirit and American rebelliousness. what was he in prison for? Statutory rape of a 15 year old. our society could collectively read that and say "well, that's not something you should be in prison for at all!"
welcome to the US i the early to mid 20th century. it wasn't that long ago that we didn't have taxes or drug laws. even your parents probably lived through a time when they could legally drive around with a martini in their laps getting hammered and there were no laws against it.
all of the "nazis" on this board claim that "freedom has destroyed our society" but yet our society worked perfectly back when all of these things were unlegislated and America was a bastion of freedom for the entire world to behold. things went to shit once that changed.
10 year old Playboy models aren't something that was ever normal.
Driving around with a martini was cool in your opinion? Do you know how many people used to die in traffic accidents?
If you wanna fuck kids then petition your own government you got a phone, use it. Pathetic
She was also nude in The Blue Lagoon at 14. Apparently her mother decided from the moment she gave birth that Brooke was going to be a star.
Kind of feel bad for her. Sounds like she had a really fucked up childhood and it was all out in the open.
Jesus fuck, it's real. How is this legal? Even that one chick that was 17 when posing in hustler caused a huge uproar and the photos are illegal to have but this is just one search away.
Obviously censored pic related
i'm not saying that pedophilia was "normal", but certainly ephebophilia was, and it was concerned an overreach of government to legislate it by many (if not most) and therefore, PEDOphilia itself was somewhat less taboo and egregious.
don't try to accuse me of "defending pedophilia" either, i'm just stating the historical reality about the evolution of our culture and how we perceive things.
>implying i said it was cool
stfu with your god damn retarded strawmen, you stupid pathetic, pedantic cunt.
i hope you get into a sober car accident and die and on your deathbed jesus appears to you and tells you that you were a fucking retard for giving up your freedoms for a small illusion of safety.
also how fucking stupid do you have to be to say "10 year old playboy models aren't something taht was ever normal" in a thread THAT IS LITERALLY ABOUT A 10 YEAR OLD PLAYBOY MODEL that actually existed and was published, and sold to millions who considered it "totally normal"
just stfu, you ignorant moronic swine.
Its people with daughters who don't want an older man lying to their stupid naive 15 yr old girl just to get her in bed.
Child porn laws didn't exist in the way they do now.
well i don't really care about them. their daughters are of biological breeding age, and even though i'm not personally attracted to women who aren't fully developed i'm really not cool with pissed off fathers trying to legislate natural human sexuality just because it makes them personally uncomfortable and hurts their "fee feez".
Alrighty then, top results on google images is considered delete-able.
Thats why I posted the censored pic
No way in hell I'm googling that name EVER
But what the fuck!?! How can this be real
Brooke Shields was always pimped out by her mother.
Your gonna hang pedo scum. Nobody will defend you.
No one will defend him until pedophilia is normalized. After that, he will be celebrated and given money.
bros im not a pedo, i'm just having a fucking reasonable discussion, get over yourselves. you're no better than the left and the SJWs in my opinion. same type of retards who were stupid enough to condemn milo for simply talking about his own experiences with being abused.
you're LOOKING at proof of how pedophilia used to be normalized. literally. you are SEEING the proof in this thread. and you're really going to call me a "pedo scum" because i'm recognizing the reality that our society didn't used to look down on it so much?
stfu dude, you're an anti-intellectual, emotionally driven, safe-space needing piece of shit. people like you demean the otherwise intellectual basis and merits of conservatism IMO.
What is this obscure new york law anyways? What's to stop pedos in the future from exploiting this?
fucking pedo
it's real because the hardon society has against pedos is relatively new. even back in the 90s pedophilia wasn't really considered that big a deal, not like it is now.
out society has become a LOT less permissive than it used to be, obviously.
fucking moronic retards in this thread are trying to equate my comments with "defense of pedophilia" but they're just statements about how our society changes, nothing more and nothing less.
you people are literally calling me a pedo for simply pointing out the truth of how our society changed in its perceptions of this crime.
nice. i'm getting the distinct fucking urge to switch political parties right now, not even joking.
Explain that to the inmates while they're stomping your brains in and the guards ignore it.
She was literally butt naked in Blue Lagoon at 14 years old.
...
I'll miss you user when they come for you
>i'm getting the distinct fucking urge to switch political parties right now, not even joking.
do it you sicko, you will definitely feel more at ease with the other "sexually liberated" perverts and other mentally ill fags.
>but yet our society worked perfectly back when all of these things were unlegislated
right, perfectly. everything was just fucking smooth.
Well good thing the rest of society does care.
>being one of those guys that says someone is 'naked' even when you can't see anything whatsoever
Omg she's naked!
do you really literally think i am a pedo? seriously? because i'm commenting that our society used to not really consider pedophilia to be a big deal?
it's the fucking objective intellectual truth .you are looking at a thread about brooke shields being in playboy at age 10. use your fucking brain for 2 seconds. do you think she would have been in playboy if current attitudes about pedophilia existed back then? i mentioned One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest and RP McMurphy earlier in the thread too. do you think pedophile characters like that would be hailed universally as "American Heroes" if these attitudes existed back then?
how about Bill Maher and others in the 90s, going on air and defending the rights of teachers to bang 13 year old students and there was not a peep of controversy about it.
for fucks sake. back off of me, faggot. i'm just telling you the truth of history. you're pissing me off immensely man, i won't deny it. people like you who just label someone a "pedo" because they say something truthful you don't like are no different than the lefties who label people "racists" for talking honestly about race.
This needs to be talked about. It's child pornography and shows the reality of Hollywood. With all the cases against Weinstein people forget pedos have been left to abuse children as long as it's (((art))).
do they? because the age of consent is 14 in germany, 16 in most of europe and much of the US, non existent in many other well developed western nations. up until a few years ago it was 14 in canada too.
am i a "pedo" for pointing that out? people in this thread seem to genuinely think i am a "pedo" for objectively pointing out the attitudes people have in different places, geographically and temporally, about this issue.
>having the “what’s a pedo really” debate
>not realizing we won it a decade ago
i'll say it one more time if it really matters to you. i am not anything even remotely bordering on pedo, i'm just trying to discuss THE OBJECTIVE REALITY of our cultural attitudes towards the issue, ok? can you understand that? or is it really too much? you need to chill bro. seriously you need to chill. majorly.
for fucks sake, you fucking people.
WHAT debate? WHAT debate do you think im having? how am i saying "whats a pedo?" how do i come across as "defending pedophilia" to you people?!?!?! i am only pointing out the objective truth that our society didn't perceive it the same way in the past. LOOK AT THE OP, YOU MORON. it's should be pretty obvious even just from that, that the attitudes back then weren't the same as they are now.
fucking uptight, anti-intellectual, emotionally driven assbags.
Alright I'll play along, because you're somewhat polite.
What about our cultural attitudes towards the issue? What are you trying to say? It changed? No shit.
They had her full frontal with body oil and make-up when she was 10. She didn't even hit puberty and was a child. Nobody is reporting it despite it being clear proof of pedophilia in Hollywood.
She was 10 and didn't even hit puberty yet. This is way more fucked up.
>literally have a thread pointing out that 10 year olds used to pose in playboy
>comment that attitudes were (clearly) very different about sex with underage women in the past
>get called a pedo by nazi psychopaths and emotionally driven conservatives.
fuck all of you, and i am a right-winger, and i made a bunch of memes during pedogate and pizzagate and have always done my best to raise awareness of these issues, but you're a bunch of fucking retards. when it gets to the point where you are just blindly ignoring simple AND EXTREMELY OBVIOUS TRUTHS you can go fuck yourselves hardcore with a dildo.
t. Baby rapist
post her pussy
The pedo doth protest too much, methinks
Fucking kids is wrong, whether it was done in the past or the present. Taking nude pictures of them for a porn magazine is wrong whether it was done in the past or the present. The OBJECTIVE REALITY is that a bunch of pedos took naked pictures of a child so they could jerk off to them later and got away with it because of a loophole in Jew York laws.
>anti-intellectual
Shove your relativism straight up your ass, pedo faggot.
playboy.com
Look at their page. An open secret.
careful, you are giving yourself away.
well you already did that when you projected your own demons onto ZpxWwm6R.
But it is clear from your very descriptive posts of brook shields you are getting off on describing minors in child porn.
Her bobs and vagene were showin
How the fuck can you have read the article and still not realize the law is about the ownership of the photos and not whether it's legal for her to have been in them? Learn to fucking read.
yeah they changed. they changed big time. i don't know why. they CLEARLY and PATENTLY did though i mean just look at the OP and there are MANY more examples of shit like this you can find.
in the case of PEDOphilia, the change is definitely warranted because children are so vulnerable, obviously. in the case of sexually mature people who engage in consensual sex though? it's a more tricky issue, i think. i think that the laws are probably correct, with regards to the age of consent, because they're needed to protect the vulnerable young people in our society. but that doesn't change the fact that most western civilizations, including white ones and european ones, do not have the same strict consent laws that we do and that 18 is almost the highest age of consent anywhere in the world.
i mean germany, for example, the age of consent is 14. there are western european countries with NO age of consent. i think 15 or 16 is the average for most places.
does this mean i think the age of consent should be dropped? no. and i didn't say that. i'm just saying it's a more complicated issue than people make it out to be. end of story.
and yes these are my real views. i don't have any secret agenda as you are implying. or holding some secret position or trying to advocate for pedophilia or whatever. i don't care how much you want to condemn me but this is simply an honest assessment of the situation from my point of view.
The blue lagoon was so fucking sexy.
It made me sick. I think everyone should know this happened because people have ignored the pedophilia infestation of media for too long.
>Fucking kids is wrong
no shit
you can say "it's wrong then and its wrong now" all you want, it doesn't change the objective fact that your parents and grandparents had a very different cultural attitude about these crimes, whether or not they want to admit it now.
>muh relativism
i really haven't made any sort of moral objections or judgements, i'm only talking about the way the crime was PERCEIVED by OTHER PEOPLE who WERE NOT ME in the past. can you understand that? is this really that difficult of a concept?
these are OTHER PEOPLES ideas i am discussing. people from the past. NOT my own. can. you. understand. that. simple. concept.
then everything changed when the cultural marxists attacked
ok, i've not at any point in this thread tried to say its not fucked up. YOU PEOPLE ARE FUCKED UP in trying to make me out to be a pedo so badly for simply pointing out the very real change in cultural attitudes that happened. simple. end of story. these are not MY opinions im discussing, ok? they are OTHER PEOPLES OPINIONS over the course of our recent history that have changed. can you understand that concept bro? because people here seem to be having a pretty big issue with getting that through their heads.
yes i agree. the point of cultural marxism was always to make peoples lives so miserable that they would reject capitalism and their own rights in exchange for communism.
everyone knows immigration and PC culture was one way to do this, but it also involved tamping down on freedoms in a lot of other ways too, as well as infecting our capitalist economics theories with a lot of bad ideas like "keynesian economics".
I’m 59 & female & I remember when Brooke Shields was pimped out like that. I was really disturbed by her movie Pretty Baby (never saw it) & I wondered WHY society was allowing this bs in.
This was about the time that POLANSKI was raping that 13 year old girl too.
SICK SHIT
>i'm just saying it's a more complicated issue than people make it out to be
Okay, mind explaining a bit more? Looking at other countries and their laws does not complicate the issue, as the US is a sovereign country and does not need the input or permission of other countries to instill laws it sees fit.>in the case of sexually mature people who engage in consensual sex though? it's a more tricky issue
Where do you draw the line? Seems that having laws that define both consensual sex AND sexual maturity makes thing LESS complicated. Years can be counted, measured. If you go redefine Sexual maturity or whatever, then it muddies the issue, the law becomes a case by case, and justice is not the same for everyone.
just to elaborate on what im talking about bro and why i say its tricky and why i say we're a little to harsh on it, consider that there are 19 year olds languishing in prison today, or registered as sex offenders, literally because they had sex with their 17 year old girlfriends. OR in some cases because their 17 year old girlfriends sent them nude pictures and then they got busted for "child porn".
do you see what i mean? something that insane would never have happened in the past.
you and others here are trying to accuse me of being a pedo apologist but all i am doing is pointing out some real flaws in our system that extend from the over-emotional virtue signalling that developed within the last few years, and which i'm saying factually DID NOT EXIST in times prior.
>Okay, mind explaining a bit more? Looking at other countries and their laws does not complicate the issue, as the US is a sovereign country and does not need the input or permission of other countries to instill laws it sees fit
see . also i point to other countries laws only because those laws "work" fine over there. so it's a relevant point. and it also highlights how a lot of our ideas about this issue are CULTURAL specific to us. not universal by any means.
>Where do you draw the line?
again see i would say that there are a lot of predatory people out there, and that the consent laws are important. they PROTECT A VULNERABLE GROUP, that's why we have them, right?
BUT there is no doubt in my mind that say, a 22 year old can't be "in love" with a 17 year old and that cannot be a normal, healthy relationship. or a 20 year old in love with a 16 year old. believe it or not, there are people in prison for stuff like that in our nation today. it's just wrong. IMO it's just wrong.
Bullshit, it was never accepted because sex outside of marriage was still looked down on. People got married younger, and marriage between older men and young women was sometimes accepted, but creepy old dudes banging random 15 year olds was never normal. But the point of that character was that he chose a mental hospital instead of prison because he thought it would be better. He wasn't somebody you were supposed to look up to, but someone who consistently made terrible decisions and was used as a foil to show how fucked up mental institutions were. And drug laws weren't really needed because negroes were already restrained by other laws and Jews didn't have control of the pharmaceutical industry yet.
>Bullshit, it was never accepted because sex outside
lol you are looking at the proof in this thread so dont fucking tell me "bullshit" with your emotionally driven drivel.
...
(((They're))) pedos
Are you high right now? You're probably being trolled.
Pedo confirmed, and you are probably a kike as well. You belong in a mass grave with all the other sickos.
>being trolled
i wish you were right dude but unfortunately this is how emotionally charged people get on this topic.
i'm totally against pedophilia lol in every way and i support age of consent laws because they have a real and tangible purpose but the emotions people exhibit when you just talk honestly about this shit are fucking retarded. it's the same as the whole "racism" thing on the left. can't say anything real or honest without being shut down or condemned.
ok cool bro, whatever im done
You aren't done until you've been at 616° for three and a half hours, pervert.
Thanks for the convo, twas interesting.
Word of advice though?
>this is how emotionally charged people get on this topic.
Old Sup Forums might have given you a pass, but you'll take notice that the site (and this board in particular) took a HARD right turn, and you won't win hearts or mind. Not on this. Precisely because of how emotionally charged people get around this issue.
Look up why pedos get their shit pushed in in jail, I'm sure you'll get an idea why you have so much venom spat at you
cool bruh, that's me, im a pervert. you got me. im actually sent here by the JIDF to subvert your board too and make you all secretly more sympathetic to pedophilia.
Good. Fuck off, parasite.
no i hear you man, i really do. i AM hard right, lol. i'm much more of a libertarian than an authoritarian though.
i mean i can understand the emotional reactions on the one hand because pedophilia really is a pretty serious crime IMO but they still piss me off in the same way the left pisses me off because i like to talk about things honestly, really think about them, understand them, but it seems no matter what you're talking about there is always some group of people in the world somewhere who will want to fucking lynch you for being honest about it.
fuck i mean human beings have been known to literally engage in fistfights and try to kill eachother over sportsteams. just the way it is. bothers me. but whatever.
Can people get this trending on Twitter.
If normies see this they will freak out. People need to be reminded what happened.
You are hard, right? Cause you're in a pedo thread. Kill yourself, child fucker.
Macmurphy was a literal cuck
bro im not a pedo i'm just talking about the issue lol. you're no different than people on the left who cry "racism" everytime someone actually talks about race. you're just a nutjob.
like i really don't get it. do you think I put brooke shields in playboy or something? do you think it was me? do you think it was me that normalized these crimes during the 20th century and beforehand? fuck man, i was born in the 80's, it wasn't me. get over yourself bro. i'm just discussing OTHER peoples opinions. can you understand that concept?
>You hate pedos? You're just a right wing SJW!
brainlet
How is owning pedophilia paraphernalia legal?
GTFO. I've seen threads about this same topic where there are hundreds of people defending the right to have sex with and marry 10 year olds. The only reason they're taking this stance here is because Hollywood is involved. Don't act like everyone here is repulsed by the thought of fucking a kid.
Yeah like they want more attention on hollywoods pedo problems. I'll make such a stink they'll never recover
where are the pictures to prove it?
You are repeating leftist lies used to normalize it, the idea that "society pre-1965 was just as degenerate as society now but in secret so why not do it openly goy?"
I don't give a fuck either way but an image of a nude child isn't inherently illegal, cretin.
Brooke Shields is a victim of societal shaming of childhood sexuality. You may not want to hear it but in reality most of these "sexually abused" kids grow up to be completely normal, and the ones who end up damaged took to the bluepill narrative of "woe is me, I'm broken and shameful and dirty, I'll never be the same or have a normal life." Society defines morality by exerting enormous pressure on people to think a certain way, and constant exposure to certain narratives can make people believe irrational things. Brooke Shields was fine until she became an adult and spent several years internalizing the message that her childhood was fucked up. Only then did her problems began. We treat our victims like shit.
This. Y'all niggers need to think
i dont like this thread, i remember when i downloaded that movie and felt like i was gonna get v& immediately
>Covered in oil.
>Wearing makeup.
>Steamy bath.
>10 year old nude.
>(((Legal)))
This is not some innocent Photoshoot. It's a child in a Playboy magazine.
They treated a pre pubescent child like a pornstar and called it (((art))).
Courts wouldn't find it obscene. There is no focus on the genitals. No truly sexual suggestion. Maybe you should look at yourself more if you find this sexually appealing.
>Fifteen years old going on thirty five, Doc, and she was very willing...
I never said that. There is a difference between taking family photos of your 2 or 3 year old bathing and a 10 year old oiled up, naked, and wearing make-up in an obviously risqué photo shoot
>She was initially a child model and gained critical acclaim at age 12 for her leading role in Louis Malle's film Pretty Baby, in which she played a child prostitute
She was initially a child model and gained critical acclaim at age 12 for her leading role in Louis Malle's film Pretty Baby, in which she played a child prostitute
>She was initially a child model and gained critical acclaim at age 12 for her leading role in Louis Malle's film Pretty Baby, in which she played a child prostitute
What
The
Fuck
sounds like something dan "better hide her" schneider would say
Or, you know, a judge.
The photographer admitted to sexualizing a 10 year old.
Pedophilia is tolerated under the false idea that calling something art makes it acceptable.
>I've seen threads about this same topic where there are hundreds of people defending the right to have sex with and marry 10 year olds
go ahead and start a thread RIGHT NOW. Defend the right of pedos to fuck and marry kids. Link the thread here
>GTFO
make me
>Don't act like everyone here is repulsed by the thought of fucking a kid.
t. pedo
(((Art))).
there are numerous lampposts, we'll have enough for those sorts of (((judges)))