Brooke Shields was in a Playboy magazine in 1975 when she was ten years old. Hollywood has legally published CP and promoted pedophilia.
Taken from her wiki:
>From 1981 to 1983, Shields, her mother, photographer Garry Gross, and Playboy Press were involved in litigation in the New York City Courts over the rights to photographs her mother had signed away to Gross (when dealing with models who are minors, a parent or legal guardian must sign such a release form while other agreements are subject to negotiation). Gross was the photographer of a controversial set of nude images taken in 1975 of a then ten-year-old Brooke Shields with the consent of her mother, Teri Shields, for the Playboy Press publication Sugar 'n' Spice. The images portray Shields nude, standing and sitting in a bathtub, wearing makeup and covered in oil. The courts ruled in favor of the photographer due to a strange twist in New York law. It would have been otherwise had Brooke Shields been considered a child "performer" rather than a model.
The images were deemed (((legal))) and printed in magazines. They can be found on a WordPress page uncensored and the address is on the first page of Google search.
The images were passed around to (((artists))) for 3 years.
She was chosen for the role of Violet in Pretty Baby, a film starring a 12 year old Brooke Shields playing a chid prostitute in which she has nude scenes. The director picked after seeing her pre pubescent Playboy pics.
Her mother took 450 dollars for the nudes and gave (((consent))) for her to be in softcore CP.
She claimed to remain celibate and 'lose her virginity' at 22. She had a breakdown after it, sounds like PTSD.
Speed this info. Make sure to send it to feminists as well because they already hate Hugh Hefner. We can turn them against Hollywood. Exploiting children is universally hated.
This is absolute proof pedophilia in Hollywood is no secret.
/PedoWood/ PedoAnon on suicide watch edition
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
drjudithreisman.com
youtube.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
google.com.mt
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
hecklerspray.com
madamepickwickartblog.com
twitter.com
FPBP
/thread
I believe the reason they got away with this is because..
1. Brooke is really a male/female transexual. Her mom put her on estrogen from a young age.
2. The nudes only showed her bare chest and a bit of ass crack.
We need to get this trending. This is something that could red pill a lot of people. It is not widely known because few news sites acknowledge it.
Everyone left or right wing hates pedos.
Many transinvestigators say Brooke is really a male.
youtube.com
They greatest trick of all in Hollywood is how many are really transexuals and perhaps adopting children (claiming they're pregnant) while abusing and grooming them.
They got away with it because it's tolerated in Hollywood. It's never been a secret (((they))) don't have to follow laws or morality as long as they have powerful friends.
...
>Brooke is really a male/female transexual. Her mom put her on estrogen from a young age.
Whether she was a boy or girl doesn't excuse the fact she was in softcore CP.
It's insane nobody went to jail when her mother was pimping her out to Hollywood at the age of 10.
Creepy but there is no way in hell im googling any of that mister fbi
>Elvis Levi del
A 12 year old girl plays the role of a child prostitute and is nude on screen.
They never hid this. They never went to jail. It was praised by (((critics))).
It's legal. That's the most important thing to remember. Hollywood was allowed to produce CP and it is still legal to this day.
what do you think pic related was about, user?
...
bro i put in over 100 replies on the last thread and Sup Forums was trying to eat me alive for it. i agree it's something fully worthwhile to have trending. important info. OPs screecap is of my posts actually.
the sick thing is how well accepted it was. in the other thread, i was providing examples of movies and music that glorified and normalized pedophilia and Sup Forums was trying to paint me as a "pedo" for doing so. the point i try to make it the point of WHY this was allowed to happen to poor brooke shields
point 1 -
>While the general age of consent is now set between 16 and 18 in all U.S. states, the age of consent has widely varied across the country in the past. In 1880, the age of consent was set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7.[2] The ages of consent were raised across the U.S. during the late 19th century and the early 20th century.[3][4] By 1920 ages of consent generally rose to 16-18 and small adjustments to these laws occurred after 1920. As of 2015 the final state to raise its age of general consent was Hawaii, which changed it from 14 to 16 in 2001.[5]
>en.wikipedia.org
point 2 -
movies like One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest (main character and "iconic american hero" RP McMurphy was a pedo). Lolita is another good example of a filim about pedophilia that was labeled as "a cinematic masterpiece" for a very long time, but is now basically ignored since its too controversial.
point 3 - songs like seventeen by winger, christine sixteen by kiss, dont stand so close to me by the police, saw her standing there by the beatles and many, many, many, many more.
point 4 - the generation of the 60s openly lobbied against age of consent laws, feeling them to be repressive. they believed in "free love".
our society used to be a fucking openly pedo loving society up until a few years ago. that is the reality.
>our society used to be a fucking openly pedo loving society up until a few years ago. that is the reality.
lol im sorry dude, i dunno. i'm prob not gonna stay in this thread like i did the last one though. just pointing out this is the truth. still dunno whats so wrong with saying it.
>the sick thing is how well accepted it was.
You're just going to keep pushing and pushing, aren't you.
I just checked the footage for Pretty Baby [1978]
Holy cow.
Just a casual glance is a redpill in itself.
what is it "pushing"? speak to me user. enlighten me. help me to understand. help me to help you help me if you please.
Out of all the red pills, Brooke Shields exploitation at the hands of her mother and Hollywood is the most painful.
She was sexualised as a child and put in softcore CP yet nobody is talking about this.
Nobody should have gotten away with what Playboy and Garry Gross did.
BUMP - look up the works of Judith Reisman.
...
wtf man should they?
Bump
You're gonna get V&, Chester.
...
Does they hollywood into my clothes, does it do into my butt under my clothes? pls I want to know if I go there
It doesn't matter how long it has gone on for. It doesn't matter how many societies participate. It doesn't matter if I am literally the last person on earth who thinks pedophilia is wrong. It has never and will never be normal.
sinead fucking OD'd on red pills
huh? what are you talking about now? oh hur hurrr im chester like chester the molester hurr hurrr hurrrrr yeah i get it. cool. you still think im a pedo for pointing out how normal pedophilia was in our society during the 20th century.
but of course if i just reframed what i was saying slightly, and said "the frankfurt school cultural marxists, including marcuse, horkheimer and adorno, specifically tried to push pedophilia into our society and normalize it as a means to destroy our values from the inside out" you would probably be all over me. you would probably be worshiping me and hanging on every word i said.
in truth, reality is more murky and complex. both statements are actually true. yes there were groups trying to use pedophilia and degeneracy to tear us down but surprise surprise, our extremely libertarian pre 20th century and early to mid 20th century united states had a fair amount of natural degeneracy within it and nobody needed to foster that.
who would have thought that a nation where it was legal to fuck 10 year olds, had no drug laws and no taxes and almost no other laws other than "keep the races separate" jim crow shit and "don't murder anyone" would be given to natural "degeneracy" and debauchery.
You mean Seconal?
>Im Chester like Chester the molester
at least you're being honest now
This fucking shit is literally still on google image search. redpill the nation with this before it gets taken down!
50 shades of prey
Dude, I knew Blue Lagoon [1980] was a bit much when I was a kid, but Geez.
Knowing now that it was literally illegal in terms of under-age sexuality . . .
Dang.
All of those memories just got re-ordered in an unpleasant way. I'm not trying to be melodramatic or anything. It's just that I'm middle-aged and this goes back to memories of when I was a kid watching skin-a-max. At the time when I saw Blue Lagoon she was (at the time of filming) roughly my age. For me it was like looking at the girl next door. Knowing more of the context, though, really puts a tint of darkness on those images.
It's a hell of a thing to think about.
maybe Hugh took the early train home, before things got too hot.
>Seconal
both i guess
lol are you just someone who doesn't want to admit that their grandma was probably totally cool with naked kiddies and child porn and child fucking? or at least only considered it a "minor offense"? or even better, something that's maybe "not ideal, but totally a case of government overreach to enforce"? cuzzzzzzzzz those were the attitudes.
pretty baby breddy gud compared to the shit they put out today. fapped to the bathtub webms many times.
mr rogers was definitely a pedo too. i don't give a shit what anyone says, one look at him and i know the truth lol. all of the childrens show hosts are natural pedos i think.
I pray good will triumph in the end. Only pure evil could do what (((they))) have done.
You can't even maintain the illusion of impartiality without tripping over your own perversion you disgusting pedo
lol ok ok ok. how about this? how about if you try to find me some stuff, other than court cases, because we know the laws have been on the books since the 1920s, that REALLY demonstrates that society had even 1/10th of the vitriol and hatred and condemnation of pedos and naked children peddlers back then that they do now.
oh wait, you can't find any of that because it didn't exist. our DEMOCRATIC, elected BY THE PEOPLE and FOR THE PEOPLE, society was provably IMMENSELY tolerant of them all.
Build a time machine then you overgrown poofter
That would ruin my life too much for one night.
>the top headline about the CIA infiltrating CBS has been removed from this pic
Just according to keikaku...
lol
>still saying im a pedo
you know, you live in a world today where pedophilia is everywhere. and exploitation of children is everywhere. its STILL everywhere. so if you really care about the problem, then why do you want to minimize it and act like it's this small, non-proliferated illness of society when all of the evidence points to something that is in direct contrast to what you're saying?
i know i can provide tons of examples to prove my points
en.m.wikipedia.org
>Color Climax was the first to produce commercial child pornography films.[4] From 1969 to 1979, Color Climax was responsible for the relatively large-scale distribution of child pornography.[6]
>Between 1971 and 1979 the company produced 36 or more 10-minute films for its Lolita series.[4][7][8] These films featured young girls, mainly with men, but sometimes with women or other children.[4][7][8] The participating girls were mainly between the ages of 7 and 11 years; however, some were younger.[4][7][8] Titles included Incest Family, Pre-Teen Sex, Sucking Daddy, and Child Love.[7]
dude just remember pedos always SEEK access to children.
Why does the label bother you so much?
>dude just remember pedos always SEEK access to children.
wait what is that? what happened with the CIA infiltrating CBS? never heard of that.
sort of unrelated, but i know that in the 60s CBS funded and subzidized a literal full scale invasion of Haiti, just so they could get the god damn rights to film a god damn documentary about it.
lmfao, if that isn't one of the most insanely messed up things i've ever heard, i dunno what is
>en.wikipedia.org
and i don't have them saved on my comp anymore, but if you go and read the old newspaper clipping about this story its even more fucked up. they are tough to find though. i know you can get some of them on the MIT website in their newspaper archives, if anyone is interested. at least that's where i got them before.
why does the label of "pedo" bother me so much? lol well it's not a very good label. i was sodomized as a child you know. a pedo is not exactly something i would want to be. but that's not really the issue i have in this thread. it's not really the label that bothers me. it's more just the fact that you can't TALK about history and you can't say honest, open and truthful things that could actually shine lights on this issue without people like you coming in and trying to intimidate people and shut them down and stuff
>was saddamized as a child
Sorry to hear that but thank George Bush we got him
Search for the full cover of that magazine. That pic is cropped
Left, right, red or blue....I hope the scab gets picked off this cancer so everyone can clearly see it for what it is. Keep pushing!
lol
he was sending us letters and begging us not to invade him. he was willing to comply with every demand the US had and the UN had. we invaded anyway. total miscarriage of justice and blatant abuse of the US military.
and now because of that our country is totally unwilling to support wars against nations that genuinely are threats to us, and genuinely are creating weapons that will be a threat to us, and which we KNOW are doing so not because we have some fucker like Colin Powell standing before the UN making dumb speeches and "Swearing its true", but because they're actually saying it themselves and saying they are going to build nukes and then wipe off of the face of this planet.
I hope pedowood burns and takes the los angeles metropolitan area with it.
>mr rogers
>pedo
Fuck off Kike He was a minister trying to do the impossible, teach children some morality in a medium filled with cultural degeneracy.
Brooke Shields is only a few years older than me, so I remember quite a bit of her early career. The thing people have to try to put into context is that while, yes, society didn't throw people in jail for making a movie like "Pretty Baby", I do recall comments from my parents, extended family, neighborhood adults, about how movies like that shouldn't be allowed. Blue Lagoon was 'scandalous' for God's sake, it wasn't somethig parents let their kids watch, and lots of adults would comment about how they shouldn't make those movies showing that. As a kid...I guess what you'd call a tween now, you had to sneak viewing Blue Lagoon on skinamax at midnight or later. So, "normies" didn't think that these films were "ok". But nobody made enough of a furor to make it a political issue at that time.
oh yeah, it's probably got to do with this:
en.wikipedia.org
>youtube.com
dunno though, would be interesting to read it if we could have access.
...
why would anyone want pictures of a little girl? whats the difference between them and little boys? neither have any sexual maturation. the fuck
Sup Forums logic
>hollywood is full of pedos
>i am a pedo because i comment about how normalized pedophilia was in our culture during the 20th century
>mr rogers, who was part of the hollywood scene and spent his life around children is def not a pedo
>i am a kike for suggesting that hollywood pedo who surrounded himself with children, mr rogers, is a pedo.
Sup Forums logic
why? what's with all of the hostility towards me? first for pointing out the truth about the pedo stuff in our nations cultural past, and now for pointing out the truth about Operation Mockingbird? for fucks sake man, speak to me in words. what is your issue. try to communicate with me user. i will try to soothe your anger.
and since we're on the topic of crazy ass CIA programs
>en.wikipedia.org
i'm sure everyone already knows about that one though
Your old posts don't get deleted just because some times gone by and you forgot how close you've come to outing yourself
I get the gist of your point, but Mr. Rogers was not part of the hollywood "scene". IIRC his show was shot in Pittsburgh. Was he a pedo? Possibly, I don't know. My gut says no, but I have no proof either way.
>Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'
>Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'
I hope you get chewed out for how badly you are doing. Or maybe they just suicide you at this point? I'm not sure how serious it's gotten for you guys yet.
wut? good, go back and post quotes where i "outed myself" or "defended pedophilia" or "supported pedophilia" pls. pls and thanks.
I don't have the manpower to take on such a task
he still had to mix with CEOs of communication companies and showbiz producers. i think the culture is the same although i admit i am not an insider.
oh, i get it, you literally think i am JIDF. ok. i understand.
it's not "topic dilution" dude, i am bumping this thread like crazy. i don't talk on threads that i don't think deserve to be seen by people. this isn't a slide thread or some stupid BBC "white bois cant compete" thread. this is real info and relevant stuff.
You must have seen a different set of pictures than I did.
Archived before the [person with a large crooked nose rubbing his hands] 404s it.
FWIW, I don't think pedophilia was ever considered "normal". I think it was something that polite people didn't discuss, and it was simpler to turn a blind eye to. When it came to the town weird diddling your kid, you'd kick someone's ass. When it came to movies and books romanticizing/glorifying it, you thought it was perverse and ignored it. Just MHO.
I see that the new tactics we were warned of yesterday have begun.
>he still had to mix with CEOs of communication companies and showbiz producers. i think the culture is the same although i admit i am not an insider.
It could be, I'm not an insider to show business either. Personally, I don't think he was.
Literally nothing wrong with what happened to Brooke Shields. She was never molested, never raped, never performed in child pornography, and while controversial Pretty Baby was hailed by critics as a realistic portrayal of the era of legal brothels and it's actually a good film. Yea she's naked in it, so what. Naked kids aren't CP. The reason she's fucked is the same reason a lot of women become fucked: she swallowed the victimization bluepill. The MeToo hysteria is a perfect example of how women convince themselves something terrible happened to them when in reality nothing at all happened and they're following societal cues to feel like victims. Brooke Shields was totally fine until she spent years as an adult listening to people tell her she was exploited as a child. To a woman social value is everything, so convince her she's damaged and exploited and she'll develop all sorts of mental issues.
what did you see in them?
it's so obvious shes a little boy wearing makeup
you can tell its a man's back and ass too
No one went to jail because Brooke didn't perform in CP. Naked kids are not child pornography.
well i guess "normal" is a subjective term. normal for who?
remember though that the country was religion and followed a lot of oldschool values. they were still deeply rooted in the tradition that it was totally normal for an adult male to marry a 13 year old child if he was going to provide for her and protect her and she would bare him babies.
now yes, it's true that became illegal around 1920, but that doesn't mean the culture just instantly changed overnight.
look at how much the culture in the US today has changed and how much of the old cultural holdover we have. people still fighting for things to go back to the way they were before.
so yeah, i mean i don't think that predatory relationships were considered "normal" no, but actual, genuine, legitimate pedophilia in the sense of marrying a 13 year old and having babies with her? yup. that was normal and it still is in many places in the world today.
>inb4 i get called a pedo again for stating this
lol open your eyes guys. you can't stay blind to the facts forever.
its a male
brooke shields is a male
hecklerspray.com
madamepickwickartblog.com
male chesticles
It was public broadcasting
bruh im jooing you so hard right now, you don't even know it.
for fuck sake ano! stop posting CP..
madamepickwickartblog.com
if you can't tell thats a boy your eyes are retarded
even little girls have effeminate features
Yup. Again, I don't think Mr. Rogers was a pedo. I don't know how much he would've had to do with Hollywood. My guess would be very little.
...
user if that shocks you, do a search for naturist families and prepare to be redpilled on how common naked children actually are throughout the world. It's very interesting how emotional some people get when it comes to child nudity, when it's not uncommon and most reactions to it are irrational pedo scares.
He was a good man. 2 groups derailing thread atm, rogers was a pedo and Brooke shields is trans. Ignore them.
Kill yourself scum.
you don't think that it probably caused her a lot of confusion and neurosis over herself? being confronted with being turned into a sexual object and symbol at the age of 12?
i mean, in an almost strictly intellectual sense, i can see the logic that maybe there is no inherent great damage in simply being photographed naked as a child. sure. ok. hell, parents photograph their children naked all of the time for various reasons. no harm comes of it.
but that's not what we're talking about. we're talking about a girl who at a very young age was sexualized and grew up knowing that men all over the country were probably jacking off in their rooms to her naked, underdeveloped body. she, as a 10 year old girl, had to live an existence where if she went out to dinner at a restaurant, everyone there may well have seen her naked and who knows what they did to her in their mind. the other patrons, the hosts, the cooks, the waiters. you can't tell me that's not going to cause some major neurosis's. you can't tell me that is something a 10 year old child is equipped to deal with psychologically.
the thing about CP is its not like "omg a picture of a naked person was taken" and that's some inherently awful thing, it's what's done with the CP and the purpose it is disseminated for. that is the part that does a lot of damage.
according to brooke she ended up not losing her virginity until she was 22 and she had a breakdown after. so maybe that's true, maybe it isn't. it probably is though and it just speaks to the sort of psychological damage that was likely done to her as a result of all of this sexualization at an early age. know what i mean?
It's legal. Let that sink in.
I think I follow...I was referring to predatory relationships when I said it wasn't ever considered normal, and I don't think that the average American spent a lot of time worrying about movies like Pretty Baby. It was a "thing" at the time, I do remember that. Along with Taxi Driver, and then later The Blue Lagoon, as I mentioned in an earlier post. Anyhow, the young brides you mentioned, yes, of course, I don't think that that was "abnormal" in the early, early 20th century and before in the US. I have to admit, I don't know how widespread that it was though.
WRONG bro i already told you, i am the JIDF
What difference would it make? It's still CP that was published and deemed legal less than 50 years ago.
50 years is not a long time.