Pol needs to be aware of this book. I saw it posted a bunch of times over the past year, never thought anything of it...

Pol needs to be aware of this book. I saw it posted a bunch of times over the past year, never thought anything of it. I finally took a chance with it and it is extremely underrated.

Blue-pilled cuck

Tell us more, OP. How has it changed your life? What are the guiding principles that cased you to make an advert for the 100065th time about this book?
I’d possibly pick it up, but it’s not worth it because no one can ever say WHY this book is so good. Just puffery that’s unsubstantiated.

explain

It explains why humans act in every way that we act, the source being powerlessness. It explains how our current society is creating an unbelievable amount of powerlessness in people and gives solutions in a number of areas. It is a short book but covers a lot. Very dense read.

quite shilling your faggot pamphlet here. What the fuck is it even about dickface?

This is what he has to say about gays, a small part about the erosion of the family unit:

"Before getting to the creation of a strong family, we first have to look deeper into the nature of sexuality.

Sexuality has to do with power, or the individual’s exposure and reaction to external and internal power. The individual can either be sexually dominant or submissive. Humanity’s biology is one of sexual dimorphism in which men are the dominant sex and women the submissive, but with free will anything is possible. Environmental factors play a role in a person’s sexual development, but in the end it is up to the individual to cultivate the right nature.

Homosexual men are averse to masculinity, most likely having had bad experiences with overly masculine men or overly harsh women that subjected the man to fear and powerlessness. Men who are homosexual were likely to be exposed to extremely masculine men (father), counterparted with an extremely submissive mother in which the child would turn to for refuge. The child finds an outlet in femininity away from the domineering excessive masculinity. This develops and manifests later when the child is exposed to masculine boys in which the child feels inferior and turns those feelings into sexual submissive feelings towards the boys rather than trying to be masculine himself. Men who are homosexual may also have had a weak and feminine father in which the child learns and mimics, never understanding the importance of cultivating masculinity, counterparted with an overly dominant/artificial mother that overwhelms and/or confuses the child. The homosexual man becomes adverse to the harshness of competing for women and the difficulty in cultivating masculinity. Homosexuals are repulsed by the thought of pursuing a woman sexually because these thoughts only bring feelings of inadequacy and powerlessness. The homosexual derives pleasure from being submissive to more dominant men,

the path of least resistance in grappling with his inferiority and difficulty. The homosexual seeks to be dominated sexually by another man because the feelings of inferiority manifest into a submissive sexuality. With socio-sexual mating structures between straight men and women being rigid and harsh at times, homosexuals seek each other out and develop fluid dominant/submissive socio-sexual structures as a way to remove themselves from the harshness of women’s selection and the difficult path in becoming a man, experiencing sexual pleasure in any way they can get among each other, whether it be through dominance or submission.

Homosexual men relinquish all self-control. This is why they are likely to be hedonistic and pursue casual sex. The “gayness” of the homosexual is a lack of understanding that a man must be courageous, have self-control, and that true happiness does not come from being overly gay and happy all the time to protect from the harshness of existence, but comes from accomplishment, self-actualization, overcoming, truly connecting with others and so on. Homosexuals artificially pretend that everything is great and project this pathetic gaiety onto others. In the certain kind of flamboyant gay man these things can be seen the easiest. These projections and the man’s feelings of inferiority, especially regarding masculinity, reflect the man’s inability to grapple with the demands of existence and the cultivation of power.

Men who are “bears” are hyper-masculine and because of this expose themselves to masculinity’s fragility and ability to be rejected in favor of deviancy. Hyper-masculinity fosters a snapping of the mind, because it is an extreme state of being that is taxing on the mind and is not objectively necessary. The hyper-masculine man will reach the state of extreme masculinity, realize that even in that state of being there is still always weakness, and turn on this weakness in exploring the subjective free will.

Homosexual men tend to be perfectionists, which explains a lot of their nature. A perfectionist man finds faults in his character easily and exacerbates these faults as objective and absolute truth. For example a homosexual man may have felt that he could not compete with other men for women because of a sense of inferiority. Being a perfectionist, or absolute-minded person, the man’s inferiority manifests into a rejection of his masculine nature in which he feels he is not capable of pursuing. The man delves into what must be absolutely true- he is inferior to other men and must be submissive to them, and this desire to be submissive grows because it is the path of least resistance. The man rejects the pursuit of women altogether and relishes in his pathetic state of submissiveness by becoming friends with women rather than pursue them sexually- something deep down the man truly desires but suppresses. Also notice that gay men/boys turn to women/girls who have the most mental issues and are mostly dominant-narcissistic types of women who think they know it all yet underneath feel crippling doubts of self-worth. The reason for this attraction is because the women seek power in the worship they get from these gay men, the gay men seek to be subservient to women who are perceived to be powerful, and they both seek the mutual reassurance that their mental deficiencies are ok. They both want to be validated. The gay man wants validation of his place of sexual-social inferiority to women, that he is not-worthy of pursuing a women sexually and therefore seeks a woman who portrays that she superior to men and has power over men. The woman wants validation in her self-pride and general confusion and destructiveness in life by a person that is always loyal and subservient and trustworthy, and is still male, giving him more weight than her female peers.

Women who are lesbians can be two things:

Dykes are adverse to masculine men because they were exposed to powerful men and developed a feeling of jealously for this power, along with a strong aversion to masculine nature. These women are wrathful. They then try to become men because they feel that they should and CAN be just like men. They want the power of masculinity and they absolutely do not want to be subjected to any masculine power. Masculine women most likely had a weak feminine father or no father, or were brought up to be one of the guys.

The “soft” lesbian is adverse to masculine nature but does not want to become a man, and would rather be submissive to another women then God forbid be submissive to a man and his penis, the symbol of his masculine nature (His tool of sexual power).

The transgender person is a person that takes the pursuance of their deviant submissiveness or dominance to its logical conclusion. A person may delve into bisexuality, then homosexuality, and there is nothing stopping them from pursuing trans-sexuality. In fact the mind will follow this destructive path because it is the path of least resistance. People support transgender people because they believe that because someone CAN become transgender, they SHOULD become transgender. It is destructive to be transgender and it is destructive to encourage transgender for the sake of the creation and preservation of the self and society, especially regarding the preservation of masculinity. People are not born transgender; they become it. The genetic makeup and/or parental predisposition and early parental influence does have a large effect on the individual’s probability of becoming transgender, but the notion that a person is simply born that way is wrong. Included in the genetic makeup, a person could be born with certain characteristics that predispose the person to pursuing a deviant path.

For example a man can be born with low testosterone and feminine features so he is more likely to pursue homosexuality or become transgender. A woman could be born very large and masculine so would be predisposed to being a dyke or transgender. It is important to always follow the biological nature of masculinity for man and femininity for women no matter what the inclinations of the genetic makeup are.

A reason why a person would pursue sexual deviancy may be because they desire the attention and feeling of being different or special. With the breakdown of social anchors and lack of social curbing, the deviant person recognizes the possibility of being deviant and pursues this deviancy without any repercussion, gaining all of the sympathy from clueless supporters and attention from anyone else.

The acceptance of the cuckold is the end of masculinity and society. When society deems the cuckold acceptable, men turn to its nature because it is the path of least resistance. The cuckold develops and derives a pleasure in being emasculated. The cuckold desires for their woman in their relationship to sleep around with other men of a higher sexual prowess. Proponents of free will argue that it is good for men to pursue cuckoldry because they are getting what they want, pleasure, without harming anyone. A deeper analysis of the situation reveals that the pleasure the cuckold derives is superficial and that a deeper depression is destroying the individual, just the same as any hedonist. The cuckold takes pleasure in their own destruction. The destructiveness of the cuckold situation is so acute because it acutely destroys masculinity and the family unit. Say men of sexual value five relish in their inferiority to men of higher sexual value and pursue cuckoldry. You still have a society with men of sexual value five and higher pursuing masculinity and building society, but what is stopping

the wave of cuckoldry to continue until men of sexual value nine desire to be cuckolded by men of even higher sexual prowess. It will continue until the last masculine man on Earth gives up or when civilization collapses, which is something much more likely to occur earlier.

With free will, there is nothing Wrong with being sexually and biologically deviant, but there is something wrong. The allowance of complete free will opens up a society to the destructiveness of the slippery slope and the adverse effects of more and more people becoming abnormal, discarding masculinity, and discarding the path of building.

Controlling our sexuality structures our mind and society and balances our Power and Animalistic Spectrum.


One of the most important components in creating a strong society and enjoyable life is creating strong families. A strong family is the key to creating a strong individual. A balance in the Power and Animalistic/Artificial Spectrums is needed to create a strong family.

What a pile of crap talking about deviants etc. A lot of this book promotes untrue stereo types that were proven long ago to not be true. Todays transgendered youth are sick and confused for sure because psychologically and medically transgendered people are one percent of the US population. This book is old school

Post a link to where I can download a copy of your book for free and I'll read it. It's the least you can do since you constantly spam Sup Forums to promote your book.

You don't belong here. Leave, faggot.

it's right on the website www.thefoundationpress.com/fulltext.html

The gay man stuff seems plausible. The others more sketchy. Most lesbians are women with barely-controllable anger issues, for example. Trannys are suicidal, but symbollically killing themselves (or their perception of themselves) rather than off themselves right away. They could probably be cured with in a society with defined Rights of Passage rituals, but these days are encouraged by insane parents as a sort of vicarious "my child is special" kind of way, but taken to the extremes of mutilation.

Not bad though. Is there a Leftist section?

Doh, I'll check it out for myself, thanks m8.

Who is this Sean Goonan ? What are his creds ?

Half of section 3 is about a society that he calls "artificial" which is basically leftist. He rails against feminism, welfare, the castration of men, the acceptance of degeneracy and so on in this artificial leaning society (a society in which people do not retain their base animalistic nature , and do not adhere to any sense of hierarchy.)

He is a 24-year old college dropout according to his bio.

Well if the info's good , the info's good . I'll check it out . Thanks OP .

holy shit, paragraphs bro

damn nigga format dat shit yo

the pdf version was fine

> pdf version
Link it

>well, that's the content of the book
thanks, no need to get it now