Other than contrarian edgelords what is it about Athestists that makes you hate them Sup Forums

As the title suggests what is it exactly about non-believers that make the religious sect on Sup Forums so absolutely against the idea of people happily living without faith.

Other urls found in this thread:

w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_atheism
patcondell.net/feedback/
sys.Sup
twitter.com/AnonBabble

To deny the spirituality of human existence is nigger tier bullshit

wait no I take that back, even niggers are spiritual enough to know atheism is wrong.

...

do you have faith in nature to take it's course?
welcome to religion.

Atheism is mainly caused by individualism that is a form of anarchy that refuses any viable future and that only cares about present.
It only results in self doubt, insecurity, isolation, desolation, neglect and condamnation of any true connection with the truth that you could have reached if only you commited to community, providence and grace.

it's close minded and arrogant

I wouldn’t hate atheists if they’d just shut the fuck up about their atheism.

It’s identical to my reason for not liking fags.

Translation: I FEEL that human existence is spiritual, and I FEEL that atheism is wrong.

Having no faith in a Nietszchean sense is redpilled, to the extent that you recognize that a new faith and value system will eventually take hold--as a society, faith is the only way to maintain any semblance of values and culture. Real-world examples of faithless societies all lead to total permissiveness aka tolerance, and social degeneration.

Why is there something wrong with people about being more individualistic, we're people, we're not a mindless herd of animals that stay together for safety.

>Irony, the post.

It's not about collectivism. Collectivism is anarchy.
It's about communion.
It's about having a contract between the past and the future.
It's about communion witch isn't the same as collectivism.
Communion is about connection between you and others through truth thanks to faith.

This.

Fuck all you faggots with sky daddies. The constant illogical bullshit argument always comes down to feelz.

You want to have a skydaddy that makes you get on your knees and "pray" to him fine. Don't shove that shit in anyone else's face and we won't have a problem.

Also you basing your moral code on a Jewed up book cobbled together by "wise minds" 10,000 years ago when Humans we know today have roamed this earth for over 250k years.

Fucking weak.

It will expand your consciousnesses.

And give you confidence that your prayers will be heard

No need for the book to live in the faith you ignorant moron.
And if you actually read the book you might have learned a few things

Ive read it. Its one of the best arguments on how stupid religion actually is.

Genesis 1:11-12 and 1:26-27 Trees came before Adam.
Genesis 2:4-9 Trees came after Adam.
Genesis 1:20-21 and 26-27 Birds were created before Adam.
Genesis 2:7 and 2:19 Birds were created after Adam.
Genesis 1:24-27 Animals were created before Adam.
Genesis 2:7 and 2:19 Animals were created after Adam.
Genesis 1:26-27 Adam and Eve were created at the same time.
Genesis 2:7 and 2:21-22 Adam was created first, woman sometime later.

Tell me french user. Would you be a bible thumping retard if you grew up in Sudan? Or perhaps Iraq? Syria? China?

No you only hold it in reverence because someone told you a fairy tale and you still believe it. Just so happens that is the fairy tale of your parents/social group.

>No need for the book
>Read the book to learn
Typical hypocrite christfag.

did she died?

Religion is like Magick.

It follows its own logic.

You're doing it wrong and you'll never convince a devout person they're wrong.

Stop wasting your time.

Irreligious people don't know how to reassure others of their own good natures. Atheism requires trust in philosophy. Too many atheists are subversive piles of shit whose reaction to being suspected of doing anything wrong is mocking the idea that they could ever do anything wrong.

I know you're a fucking ATHEIST and you hate GOD and GOD IS SO FAKE ITS LIKE IT PISSES ME OFF, but your life will be 100% easier and better if you wind up with a girl who was raised Christian. That's just the way it is. Once a month she'll say something about how she wants to save your soul, or maybe you will actually have to go to churce once a week, but it is worth it 1000% we promise you. Take a road trip to the south and to a few [popular chicken restaurants]s you will see what I mean. The girls who work at [popular chicken restaurant] in the south are sweet, even-tempered, have promise rings and if you ever actually get a career that requires you to travel she is less likely to be blowing Chad while you are out trying to pay the bills Also on the off-chance that God is real you will get some brownie points.

>Believing in a big space god

Read this. The Bible wasn't meant to be the truth.
It's only a source of inspiration that was perverted over time.
w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html

They tend to be childish, ignorant fucks. I don't have faith, but I'm not so arrogant that I think I know exactly what's going on with the universe. I accept the possibility of a god and will keep an open mind. Most atheists don't even doubt the existence of God, they're just mad at him.

Mostly it's the hypocrisy. Typically they go around telling theists how there's no proof of god and thus you shouldn't believe in him. Never do they take a step back and realize how that same logic applies to the belief that no god exists.

The hypocrisy. Claiming to worship science as much as a deist would worship a god, but then turning around and declaring with absolute certainty that there is no higher power, and no possibility of there being one. We, as a race, don't know jack fucking shit about the universe. We don't even know what is in 80% of our own oceans, and yet they claim to be absolutely sure that nowhere in the observable universe is a being that could be described as a god, while at the same time there is even a scientific theory that would prove there is.

A tier IV civilization, if one exists, would be indistinguishable from a godlike race, and it is entirely possible that one created the human race. This would fit the definition of a god, and yet, they're still certain there is no higher power.

>The constant illogical bullshit argument always comes down to feelz.
For most, yes. However there are legitimate logical arguments and observations that at the very least make materialism a highly suspect conclusion. Those observations are way too subtle to educate you here, however, the hard problem of consciousness is a good place to start.

Reminder that all atheists have an unhealthy relationship with their father.

My father is agnostic. 3rd generation farmer. He taught me to think critically, be compassionate and work towards a goal.

Unless you mean my "father" in the biblical sense.. then sure.

Atheists are quite literally degenerate beyond belief.

Yes I agree the Bible and probably every other religious text were clearly written to control ignorant people. It's all in Adam and Eve, 'to gain knowledge is sinful, go back to fields and make sure to give sacraments to the church'. But you shouldn't completely reject the possibility of a god just because of that. There is no way to disprove god and looking at all that exists in the universe, an intelligent creator is a far more logical theory than what the scientists have come up with.

They base all their perceptions and ethics on there is no god, while pretending to be logical.But they're mostly cynical no it alls who think science can answer for consciousness.

then they can't help but reveal how little they care about human beings and spout statements like "there are too many people in the world"

>chapter 1 is a summary
>chapter 2 goes into greater depth
>also half the stuff you listed is not even a contradiction
HURR DURR SKYDADDY CHRISTFAGS

I suggest you watch all the Stefan Molyneux, Louder with Crowder, Jordan B Peterson and Black Pigeon Speaks videos on what a vile, disgusting reeking piece of dogshit atheism actually is.

it IS wrong, you cocksucker.

Faith in a higher power is humbling. It also engages even low iq normies in productive philosophic thinking (as opposed to the relativist nilhilisric athiest philosophy). Ultimatletly faith is a powerful tool that can be used for good or evil. Basically it will amplify whatever you are predisposed to. People without faith (most of my closest friends) come across as somewhat impetant when acting in the world compared to those with faith (I still love em)

To eleborate further, athiets are afraid of the tool that is religion/faith as they are too weak to use it and therefore seek to destroy it in others.

>tfw atheist all my life but hate that most atheists just replace worshiping socialism instead of a religion

They're religious zealots with a "holier than thou" attitude.

Thank you that brings me to my next point. Belief in a higher power is natural to the human condition. I would estimate the number of natural athiets is similar to the number of naturally gay people. Just like sexuality though, it is somewhat malleable in a lot of people. The rise of athiesm (which is thankfully over) was merely a vocal minority pushing their views on the public not unlike other attacks but bitter people who resent that their natural state makes them at odds with society.

Atheism has an inbuilt blackpill that far too many atheists have proven themselves too retarded to understand. If there is no God, there is no morality and life is meaningless. Most atheists cant accept these logical conclusions of their belief system so they steal concepts of morality from religion and try (and fail) to come up with explanations to how there are morals without them admitting they have no foundation for morals. Same thing with meaning in life. They deny the inherent meaningless of life when following their belief to its logical conclusion (in a world without God, nothing you do has any eternal significance because no matter what you do, the universe reaches heat death all the same.) unable to cope with yet another black pill being inherent in the ideology, they delude themselves with false meaning (my life has meaning cuz i had kids, or i give my life meaning). Ignoring the ultimate meaninglessness of their lives.

Basically i cant stand atheists because most of them are edgelord brainlets. Very few actually stay consistent in their beliefs and even those ones are edgelords

No such thing as a faithless society when epistemology is taken into account.
>i trust in science
How do you know science is true?
>it is observable
How do you know you are actually observing what you think you are observing?

Contrarian and edgelords like you say, but also Atheists are usually insuffferable leftist pricks, elitists, obnoxious, and atheism itself is amoral and degenerate.

In a world without god, the religious are responsible for their own lives being miserable, abs have to face that human lives have no intrinsic value and they're not special. With a god, they can at least blame someone else's divine plan, while naming themselves one of the chosen people. No way to verify without believing, and until they die.

GG top kek.

"I've never heard of anthropology and can't understand morality so I'm going to call anyone who disagrees an edge lord and/or retard so that i have the high ground haha"

Legit, read what you've typed out before you post

I don't comprehend the panel behind the "poof".

Thank you for giving anecdotal evidence on my point about brainlets.
Apparently you’ve never read Nietzche. And all of your anthropological arguments fall on their head as soon as examined. If anthropology was the basis of morals, rape would be acceptable as it furthers your own seed

We don’t like our faith questioned. We’ve been holding on to these Jewish fables for millennia and I’ll be fucked if any fedora tipping gaytheist is going to come along and not have blind, unquestioning faith in the same deity I was groomed to believe in.

That picture is major cringe
it's Atheists/Theists not religious. You can be a religious motherfucker and still not believe in God, just do it because of trollery or money.

also, Atheism doesn't really exist.
Atheists make factual claims "There is no God" without proof. You cannot make a factual claim of something you do not know to be fact. This goes for theists as well, theism and atheism are both bullshit.

Atheism also contradicts scientific theory that we could be living inside a simulation created by a technological "God"

instead of saying it is possible, atheists say "There is no God"
theists say "There is a God"
neither have proof, both are bullshit.

"How do you know science is true". Please learn what 'science' actually means. It's not claiming to have any absolute truth, it's a way of understanding the observable ways in which the world works.
"How do you know you're actually observing what you think you're observing?"
That's what peer reviews and followup studies done by other researchers are for. If they are all conclusive and the results agree with eachother, the idea is taken as a model which can later be disproven if sufficient evidence is mounted. Please don't undermine the work of thousands of people more intelligent and dedicated than you, our society relies on it.

Spirituality =/= religion

Creationism - spawned out of nowhere

It takes a special kind of arrogance to claim you know for sure there is no god. Like being agnostic was too low brow for these faggots. See also: vegans, cyclists

Most athiests don't actually claim there is no chance of there being a higher power, that's an unscientific viewpoint.

There is no empiric evidence of the existence of a higher power, and therefore no reason to live your life under the assumption that there is.

Once again, you prove yourself a brainlet.
>i dont understand what epistemology is or the brain in a jar/ultimate deciever theory so ill yammer on about peer review

Creationism doesn't say we were spawned out of nowhere. It says we were created by an intelligent being.

it's actually closer to the scientific theory that we may be living inside a simulation as artificial intelligent beings than atheism is, but it's still bullshit because it makes factual claims of things it does not know to be fact. As do atheists.

It's funny that you view religion as a means of placing blame on someone for a shitty life as if a shitty life is a given. How sad it must be to be an atheist and not even being able to imagine not feeling like a piece of shit.

It's another episode of
>Christcucks whine and cry about atheists pushing their shit while constantly spamming garbage sandnigger cuckoldry threads like this.
Religion board when?

Only if you are using the colloquial definition of theory and not the scientific. Neither meet the rigors of evidence required to be theories.

>You just DUN GET IT MANG, it is real in my mind!

Not at all more credible, are you stoned?

How are atheists edgelords? Atheism is literally the status quo.

This isny evidence for or against atheism, but there is a strong correlation between childhood sexual molestation and atheism so its understandable that a shitty life is considered normal

GODS NOT REAL MORTY!!!!

Atheism, being lack of belief doesn't require any evidence. It only requires a lack of evidence for the existence of a deity.

You cannot prove a negative, and there is no need. Belief in anything without evidence is ridiculous.

That's agnosticism. Atheism is the firm belief in the absences of a creator

No. To actively say there is no God, you move beyond the realm of lack of belief into the realm of belief. The people who actually lack belief are agnostics.

Pretty much this. Glad someone gets it.

Ok so your argument against anthropology is that "rape would be moral without God because it furthers your seed". I'm honestly not sure how you came to this conclusion or why the interference of a creator has something to do with it, but sure. To say, though, that epistemological concepts somehow invalidate scientific research and prove the existence of God is borderline retarded. Sure, I understand that scientists can simply be looking at the wrong thing/be corrupted/that reality isn't even what it seems. But if we are to accept the reality we've been dealing with up till now, we have to accept that it will continue behaving in a similar way otherwise what's the point of anything.
But I'm sure you don't care about any of that, you just come here to call people brianlets because it gives you a sense of superiority.

P.S. I don't deny the existence of a creator, I just hate zealots who push un-thought out bullshit under the guise of enlightenment for their own agenda

There is an important distinction between negative atheism, positive atheism and agnosticism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_atheism

Holy fuck you are retarded
What is science based on?
Observation
what is epistemology?
Study of how we know whar we know
Why would epistemological points invalidate your “muh peer review yammering?
How do you know what you are observing is actually what you are observing? Read up on epistemology, the brain in a vat theory and Descartes demon and try again.

Negative/positive atheism is just ashallow attempt by atheists to justify having beliefs.

it is a scientific theory though.
just because you disagree with it, does not render it not so.

we can create artificial intelligence in a machine, in the future we will be able to do so on a large scale, this is science and it fits as scientific theory that it has already been done, and we are the artificial intelligence.

That's it.
Faith is something passive and has to do with consciousness.

Hardly.

An agnostic is undecided on the existence of unicorns. A negative atheist does not believe in unicorns until good evidence of unicorns is presented. A positive atheist asserts that unicorns do not exist, period.

This distinction completely changes what you are arguing against.

I don't blame American atheists since their surrounded by retarded prots.
But European atheists are retarded since they reject the teachings of the One Holy Roman Catholic Church (this applies to prots too)

"Hey my dude
Brain is a jar
You should just kys bcuz nothing is truely knowable"

As for basing morals on anthropology? What kind of morality would that give you? One where theft is ok as it strengthens your own lot in life. One where rape is ok because spreading your seed is your biological imperative and rape is by far more effective than monogamy and consentual relations. Murder is ok as it removes competition over resources. Im not seeing much of a morality here. Its almost like Dostoyevsky had a point with regards to everything being permissible without God. You are exactly the kind of atheist that makes me hate atheists. Youre too much of a brainlet to realize just how much of a brainlet you are. It would be acceptable if you were in the minority

Occam's razor

We don't know a lot of things, true, but we know God breaks the laws of physics. Especially in the Christian sense of the word.
If we stumbled upon a creator in a corner of the universe, even he would not be omnipresent. It's simply physically impossible.

What does a negative atheist consider good evidence of unicorns existing?

why do atheists believe in aliens before they would believe in unicorns?

neither a negative or positive atheist has any proof aliens exist.

You proved my point

>A scientific theory is an explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested, in accordance with the scientific method, by using a predefined protocol of observations and experiments.

I never said I disagree with it, only that it doesn't meet the definition of theory, and it still does not.

Take a break with this fine read
patcondell.net/feedback/

>God breaks the laws of physics
flawed reasoning.
God, being the computer programmer, created the physics within the virtual environment/operating system.

being a computer programmer, you can edit and break any laws within the code you desire.

when I CAPITOLIZE words it makes them TRUE.

you're a BAD person

it doesn't meet your personal definition.

why would a cross bother them if it means nothing at all?
so do we then start taking down circles, squares, and anything astrological? constellations?

>What does a negative atheist consider good evidence of unicorns existing?

A fossil record which has been independently verified by a number of different reputable scientific bodies would do the trick.

>why do atheists believe in aliens before they would believe in unicorns?
We've largely explored the entire Earth, space is vast and unexplored.

That's the definition as used in scientific institutions around the world.

Read this
sys.Sup Forums.org/derefer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw2.vatican.va%2Fcontent%2Fjohn-paul-ii%2Fen%2Fencyclicals%2Fdocuments%2Fhf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html

Faith is complementary to reason.
It helps us go forward.

If it's nigger tier bullshit then why are to many niggers religious?

>christian makes thread
hey other Christians come enjoy a christian thread with me
>atheist makes thread
WHY WON'T CHRISTIANS STOP TALKING ABOUT US ALL THE TIME!?

Relevant digits, btw:
>598
>Isa 59:8 The way of peace they know not; and there is no judgment in their goings: they have made them crooked paths: whosoever goeth therein shall not know peace.
So... ya...
>when god calls you out on an Egyptian numerology forum via centuries old text predating electricity

Because religious people are too fucking stupid to realise atheists have faith too, they just don't believe in god.

They have faith that the morality they follow is true, just and right.

Why can't religious folk like Shapiro and those on Sup Forums wrap their head around this? Atheists are essentially taking the skywizard middleman out from between man and morality.

I've never met an atheist who has zero morality and thus zero faith.

Don't be a wanker. Let people believe what they want.

The only other book with 59 chapters:
>Psalm 59:8 But thou, O Lord, shalt laugh at them; thou shalt have all the heathen in derision.

You are literally being bantzed by God, how can you not believe?

I have nothing against those with faith, and I think evolutionary psychology has shown us it's importance.

That being said, if you make a testable claim, expect someone to test it.

Corrupt metaphysically foundation to the extent of insanity.

>muh atoms formed, muh ancestor mr. banana.


Dont hate them, just pitty for their souls, we only exist in God.

>To deny the spirituality of human existence is nigger tier bullshit

This, atheists can accept gravity, evolution, tons of other things that has shown to be valid and real in this existence, yet they can't take a look at the billions of people in this world and recognize that there IS real spirituality in this world. They (atheists) just choose to deny it.

I'm sorry I don't have a testable claim, how about an intensely interesting observation?

... and yes i realise retards like Who aren't self aware enough to realise they have faith that their morality is the correct one, but aren't you religious folk supposed to smarter when it comes to this faith stuff? If so why do you faith to understand this?

>yet they can't take a look at the billions of people in this world and recognize that there IS real spirituality in this world.

see