Playboy operated a CP ring in the 70s

Previous Threads:
Playboy got away with selling child pornography. They had pre pubescent children in their magazines posing nude. The children were sexualised and pimped out by their own mothers to porn magazines. Nobody went to jail. This is concrete proof pedophilia has been no secret in Hollywood and the entertainment industry.
Spread this info. It has been suppressed for years. Normies will be red pilled by this.

theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph

>The original picture, for which Shields was paid $450, was taken by fashion photographer Garry Gross in 1975 for a Playboy publication titled Sugar and Spice. It was one of a dozen images of Shields designed, according to Gross, to reveal the not-so-latent sexuality of the prepubescent child.
Those photos can be found uncensored with a quick google search. They are regarded as (((legal))) despite being blatant CP.
Brooke Shields was later casted in Pretty Baby where she played the role of a child prostitute. She had nude scenes in the movie despite being 11 at the time. She was chosen for the role after the director saw her nude photos.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html

>Now her photographer mother Irina has been ordered to pay 10,000 euros in damages to Eva for taking the explicit pictures of her in the 1970s, when she was between four and 12.
>She made her movie debut at the age of eleven in 1976, playing a child in Roman Polanski's movie The Tenant. In 1977 her mother lost custody of her children and Eva was brought up by the parents of footwear designer Christian Louboutin.
Her mother took explicit pics of her since she was a toddler and sent her to work on a movie made by a known pedophile.

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/stephen_radford/status/594218241012015104
twitter.com/jweeezy1230/status/756635232753815553
twitter.com/SheBeeGee/status/682846438586494976
twitter.com/BabyJudoChop/status/572783162645999616
twitter.com/Anneflo/status/542361507078864896
twitter.com/CSquieri/status/540915314347630592
twitter.com/ohhkarin/status/515359741715832832
twitter.com/Datdudegates/status/741437150869196800
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

OP is actually a pedophile trying to get said images for himself

>inb4 OP gets rightly banned for spamming and then becomes convinced that the pedo Jew mods are out to get him.

you are mentally ill

What do you want us to fucking do about this?
Are we working on a time machine ITT?
Maybe we should stop all of those ACTUAL CHILD PORN STUDIOS that existed back then too?

>kill porno
go on...

take your meds schitzo

SAGE GOES INTO ALL ORIFICES.

Is that you Dave?

WTF I JUST FOUND A CP RING ON TWITTER!!
OMG WTF I'VE LITERALLY NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS! HELP POL!
twitter.com/stephen_radford/status/594218241012015104
twitter.com/jweeezy1230/status/756635232753815553
twitter.com/SheBeeGee/status/682846438586494976
twitter.com/BabyJudoChop/status/572783162645999616
twitter.com/Anneflo/status/542361507078864896
twitter.com/CSquieri/status/540915314347630592
twitter.com/ohhkarin/status/515359741715832832
twitter.com/Datdudegates/status/741437150869196800

...

OP kill yourself

i aint clickin dat

More angry shills. Kill yourselves.

no shit

>that title spin clickbait
fake news, op is a gay who never tried to find naked teens on the internet when he was in middle school.

people on twitter posting pictures when they were kids.

the chilean is rightfully making fun of you retards.

Do you even know what a shill is?
Care to tell us when you first found out about the thread you started?

there actually are pedo twitter accounts

not even kidding
im convinced you're legit mentally handicapped

>muh fake news.
Didn't work before, what mskes you think it'll work now?

FINDING NUDE TEENS

ON GOOGLE

IS NOT

COMMON KNOWLEDGE!!!!!!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

You haven't responded

I assume that's because you know you have no argument?

IT LITERALLY IS

do you know what/who a shill is?

you got shit on in the last threads you made, fuck off newfag.

SAGE.

Its jumping the gun to call a couple of photos a ring. You'd have to come up with something more.

but you know they better filter out right wing media
>fucking kikes

and loli tentacle fun :

AND I NEVER, EVER IN MY LIFE SEARCHED FOR NUDE TEENS!!
NEVER!!
BECAUSE IM A GAY FAGGOT THAT GETS ANGRY WHEN STRAIGHT PEOPLE LOOK FOR NAKED TEENAGE GIRLS!!

OH, THE HUMANITY!!!


REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

you like loli

Its ok user. You are just some kid, its understandable you grew up on the internet of social media and youtube where everything is handed to you and you only visit one or two sites. You never had to learn how to internet.

These skills will be lost forever when gen z kills all millennials ;_; There will be noone left who remembers yahoo categories and following mazes of links to find the good sites while fapping to thumbnails as your printer slowly produces a physical copy of the anarchists cookbook for you to put in a binder, a binder thats still in the upper corner of your closet to this day.

fucking myspace ruined everything.

I laughed way too much at your comment and my own comment..

time to use my new found knowledge and then go to sleep I think

n-n-n-no...!

Can't unsee, want to unsee

I'm 24 dammit

you might be new but you're kinda adorable

k definitely time to sleep...

fag!

>a tiny internet 2.0 baby
lmao

>Meme flag.
>"I'm not a shill!"
Kill yourself.

What is a shill? Could you tell us that?

...

at this point he's clearly (you) farming, he's not addressing any point that undermines his laughable opinion and is clearly trying to bait people in to feeding this need for attention

>a cp ring
>one picture featuring a nude girl

For it to be a cp ring youd need to find a lot more nude girls than just brooke shields for it to qualify.

Plus this shit happened in the 70s, what is the point of focusing on it.

>Didn't even read OP.
It was a lot more than Brooke Shields. They had numerous child 'models' posing nude in European Playboy issues.

I viewed the images and even though they are not really appropriate, i do not think its CP.

The definition of pornography is "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement." And it seems to be none of those.

Theres no view of any sexual organs
>kid non-existant tiddies reeeeeee
No, just no, then seeing a kid at the beach naked or topless is live CP

Neither is there any activity, she isn't touching herself and neither is anyone touching her.

>makeup
True, she has makeup and the posing is that of sexual models but it doesn't by definition have to be sexual as thats the only thing. It might be a weird attenpt at art, idk.

The only question remaining is whether they MEAN it to be sexual and fap material, playboy is filled with commercial bullshit, art topics, etc. Last playboy ive seen was 2 years ago and of the like 60ish pages 3 contained any actual nudity, the rest was stories, ads and other bullshit.

So depending on the article accompanying the photos it either is or isn't meant sexually, anyone know?

...

>t. Closeted Pedo

lol
>the horror!
switch "Sup Forums' to "Sup Forums" in your browser there oh no we wuz rangs (more or less)

Playboy trafficked over 30000000 children and that's how they became rich!