REMINDER: Christianity is Anti-White Ideology to it's Core

Everyone should realize by now that Christianity is the reason we're losing the war for our races and our countries. Christianity has laid the foundation for every degenerate act and every abuse of power. Christianity is an anti-national, universalist, egalitarian, pathologically altruistic anti-white ideology that has led out people to ruin and empowered Jewish Supremacists throughout the ages. It's time the native European spirit is revived for us and ours alone, with no foreign ideology hobbling our potential.

A few facts about Christianity:

Rome was only Christianized because it was politically convenient to do so, not because Constantine believed in the false Jewish messiah. At the time, Rome was utterly dependent on slave labor and Christianity had become rampant among the foreign born slaves the Empire relied on. It became exceptionally dangerous when the lower pleb classes of the Empire began adopting Christianity and suing for the release of slave populations. Christianity was literally the SJWism of the 1st century, at a time when the majority of Christians were swarthy Semites, Turkmen, Arabids, and Negroids. Constantine himself didn't even get baptized when he formed the Roman Church.

Christianity is also rampantly homoerotic from bottom to top, and encouraged the smartest men in European society to become celibate and cloister away in monasteries with other men, removed from the love and care of white women. This was the only way the intellectuals of Europe could engage in academic pursuits. This means entire generations of scholarly men's bloodlines were squandered in service to the Church for hundreds of years, making Christianity the most dysgenic phenomenon to ever infect Europe, even worse than the Black Death!

It's time we reclaim our racial destiny.

It's time we discard ALL Semitic trash.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/KCwG13K7TAo
youtu.be/Sz42hBg4jys
youtu.be/MV1sVDU9E2E
youtube.com/watch?v=fFoXKLCpq2g
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
pastebin.com/XNpDS5Vi
pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=benignus
perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=caritas
perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=diligo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

REMINDER: Christian activism and charity is the ONLY, ONLY reason that Negroids are going to become the majority on the planet in the next 60 years. Oh and not to mention all those Negroids that the Christcucks have created will be flooding into Western nations for the rest of our pathetic Judeo-Christian dominated lives. None of the Christcucks on this board will admit to these atrocities.

Thank you, Jesus!

What I really want is Christianity without blood sacrifice, virgin worship pedophile priests and mock cannibalism.

Is that even possible?

Anti-pope desu.

BTFO

...

...

...

>Hitler: Christianity is the basis of the entire morality of Germany
youtu.be/KCwG13K7TAo

>Hitler: We will defend Christianity
youtu.be/Sz42hBg4jys

>Hitler: We will never forsake God
youtu.be/MV1sVDU9E2E

>Hitler: God created our Volk
youtube.com/watch?v=fFoXKLCpq2g

OP IS A FAGGOT COME READ ALL ABOUT IT

>LOOK AT ALL MY "PRO-WHITE" LIES BASED ON JEWISH PROPAGANDA! CHRISTIANITY IS TOTALLY REDPILLED!

So how about Buddhism. No clinging to identity, seeks eternal peace and happiness. Once enlightened you get off of this planet and never come back. What do u say pol?

OP IS A FAGGOT COME READ ALL ABOUT IT

...

Kind of funny how this uses quotes from the Old Testament when any Christian will rush to tell you that the Old Testament is invalid because of Jesus.

...

>Rome was only Christianized because it was politically convenient to do so, not because Constantine believed in the false Jewish messiah.
Constantine's mother was a serious Christian, and Constantine made Christianity legal.

>Christianity is also rampantly homoerotic from bottom to top
Now we know your just baiting; Christianity has been anti-homosexuality since the beginning, and it's not until the recent lefty churches (most of the leadership of which is functionally atheist, by the way), that there was any support of homosexuality.

>saged

Buddhism is descended from Aryan theology, which is decended from our PIE ancestors. Meaning Buddhism and European paganisms share more in common with our actual European heritage than Christianity does.

>check archive
>this thread gets posted every 4 hours on the dot for the past two weeks

HMMMMMMMMMMMM

(((OP))) has been making these threads all day. I wonder why...

thats a heresy called Marcionism condemned by St Johns own disciples

Beastility is a sin

>Unprecedented wonders in arts architecture and prosperity manifested in Christendom alone.
>100 years of Kike tricks and murder of Christians.
Christians hate whites.

> Christianity has been anti-homosexuality since the beginning

Nigger, there is literally a scripture where Jesus was laying around with a naked young boy.

...

...

...

Oh so you believe every law in The Old Testament must followed? Congratulations. You're a Jew.

...

The final man of the Constantine line was the very first Larpagan
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)

Just look up Marcionism

>Nigger, there is literally a scripture where Jesus was laying around with a naked young boy.
I've read all the scriptures multiple times, and there is nothing even close to that. Folks would have to literally be retarded to believe anything you're saying.

It tries to remove itself from all heritage

>the Old Testament is invalid because of Jesus
Wrong. What we do say is that we don't follow Levitical Law, this is orthodox teaching and has been followed by practically all churches since the start

ALL CATHOLICS

It's not that long of a book and surely you have a reference.

...

...

...

...

>Wrong. What we do say is that we don't follow Levitical Law, this is orthodox teaching and has been followed by practically all churches since the start
Yes, this is right. Customary law is not required of Christians, but moral law is. And that's because customary law exists for another purpose.

...

Marcion removed books from the new testament as well. He was right about getting rid of the old testament desu tho senpai

...

Mark 14:51–52 you fucking faggots. Read from Strongs concordance since later translations try to hide the fact that the "certain young boy" (why is he so special? why did he flee with Jesus when all his actual fucking APOSTLES fled? Maybe because the boy was a frightened prostitute?) was naked BEFORE he fled, and had to cover up with linen AS he was fleeing.

Saint Polykarp, favorite disciple of Apostle John. Called Marcion himself FIRST BORN OF SATAN

...

...

>Attempt to rebuild the Jewish Temple
>In 363, not long before Julian left Antioch to launch his campaign against Persia, in keeping with his effort to foster religions other than Christianity, he ordered the Temple rebuilt.[113] A personal friend of his, Ammianus Marcellinus, wrote this about the effort:
>Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud Temple once at Jerusalem, and committed this task to Alypius of Antioch. Alypius set vigorously to work, and was seconded by the governor of the province; when fearful balls of fire, breaking out near the foundations, continued their attacks, till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more: and he gave up the attempt.

Interesting

...

...

...

So? New testament is good but the old testament is just a huge genealogical record of Israelites.

Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization
But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote):
- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...
... he isn't kidding, or meaning the opposite, but setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical
While christian churches seem to be very well of this (including orthodox leader Patriarch Bartholomew), Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!

Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"
Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"

But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.

...

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!

That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".

It's funny that you should condemn Marcionism and then praise Hitler, who promoted "positive Christianity", which was essentially Marcionist in nature.

This thread again?

Saged and hidden

Christian Morality attacks the foundations of the monarchy and capitalism, thus its spirituality is left-wing

Jesus saying that for the rich, powerful, strong (i.e. a monarch) it is almost impossible to go to Heaven, while the poor will inherit the Earth, you have a recipe for spiritual marxism that will become the real deal as soon as the Church losses its ability to prevent people from reading the Gospel directly
Under Christianity, a hobo is holier than the king, a beggar is holier than an entrepreneur, that contradiction can't last, and it didn't last

It is not an accident Europeans were the first people to violently remove their monarchs to replace them with utopian ideologies
it is not an accident either that every christian church outright rejects whatever version of "true Christianity" you may claim to be the truth.

The people devoted to the cult, working for it 24 / 7, spending their entire lives on it think that your interpretation makes no sense

They think that when Jesus and Paul said something they actually meant it, the people joining religious missions because the Gospel inspired them, the people that go to Africa and adopt babies, the people that actually wanna follow the lives of the early Christians like John Chrysostom (which you constantly claim is a "true Christian" because he didn't like jews, while ignoring everything else he ever said) and live a life of self-denial and poverty to feed others, people like Mother Teresa that lived surrounded by filth and excrement in India...
But you don't. You wanna pretend to be a christian while living a life of a roman
Jesus himself said that if you wanna be like a roman and love your friends and hate your enemies, then pretend to follow him, you are a hypocrite
What kind of argument can you even make to actual devoted christians that go on missions to Congo and India and even DIE for it, to tell them that their version of Christianity is corrupted and damaged by jews?

...

If Christianity is "the enemy of Jewry", then Jews don't need any friends. "Based Christian" Charlemagne, the father of Europe according to Christians, for killing pagan saxons, gave Jews their economical power
> Charlemagne (800–814) readily made use of the Church for the purpose of infusing coherence into the loosely joined parts of his extensive empire, by any means a blind tool of the canonical law. He employed Jews for diplomatic purposes, sending, for instance, a Jew as interpreter and guide with his embassy to Harun al-Rashid. Yet, even then, a gradual change occurred in the lives of the Jews. The Church forbade Christians to be usurers, so the Jews secured the remunerative monopoly of money-lending. This decree caused a mixed reaction of people in general in the Frankish empire (including Germany) to the Jews: Jewish people were sought everywhere, as well as avoided. This ambivalence about Jews occurred because their capital was indispensable, while their business was viewed as disreputable. This curious combination of circumstances increased Jewish influence and Jews went about the country freely, settling also in the eastern portions. Aside from Cologne, the earliest communities were established in Mainz, Worms, Speyer, and Regensburg.[15]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades

Their christian "punishment" against the "evil jews" was to receive a lucrative financial monopoly of "sinful high financing that no christians shall ever benefit from" and to move to the next country to fleece when the peasants got too riled up.

...

Christianity can't cure a disease it caused

Pagan Romans were fundamentally free of the chains of jewish power, so much that they almost exterminated them all in their own homeland after the rebellion of Bar Kocheba
It would be Christian Europe that would fall under permanent jewish influence, with the jewish-controlled churches banning europeans from financing and loaning, giving them as a monopoly to jews

By the modern era, Christians were so throughly judaized, that they started to actively wish for the restoration of Israel so that the end of the world would finally come around and their civilization would die!
And why would it be otherwise?
A religion which such obsession with death, with promise is the end of the world, is fundamentally a time-bomb in the basement of a civilization

Do you really believe that the early christians that embraced their martyrhood to the lions said to themselves "I am dying to this lion so that the white race can survive, fuck jews!" or any such anachronistic reinterpretation that you have decided to give to their death cult?

...

- there is no "white genocide", what is really going is white suicide, with christian morality as its main driver
the abortion issue is a perfect example of white christians openly fighting against their own interests by wanting to increase the birthrates of blacks and other democrat sub-groups that do abort
Tell me: do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks? (The entire South would be deep blue for starters)

- That Jews took control of european finances and loaning and then global finances by proxy, is another example of how Christian Morality screws whites over
If the Churches had not been issuing numerous bans on white christians from practising usury (which is simply a way of saying "high risk financing"), jews would have never taken over that niche market
Far from destroyin them, Christianity made Jews the masters of Europe. The occasional progom more than paid for itself

- Support for Israel is a third way Christian Morality screws whites over, and it is far from a recent occurance or corruption. As early as 1600s, puritans already believed that a jewish Israel in the middle east was a prerequisite for the Apocalypse
- Christianity does not allow for racial divisions among Christians either "there is no jew or greek" makes it quite clear.
Citing Paul made extremely easy for the anti-segregation preachers of the 60s to get the majority of whites on their side
It also makes no historical sense, christian preachers from 1700s (before the supposed "jewish take over of Christianity") actively travelled to dangerous parts of Africa and South America to convert tribes even when it very often costed their own lives, and when they were converted they fought against conquerors for equal rights for the new christians (see: bartolome de las casas). Numerous preachers of all churches were massacred in Japan (which remains immune to the moral paralysis that is destroying Europe... really makes me think).

REMINDER: These Christcucks will NEVER have an actual explanation why Jeesus was laying down with a naked little boy when the Romans came to seize him.

> BUT le JEWsus was BASED and his teachings were corrupted by KIKES meme

Literally all the followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself were kikes.

Among his followers there were many zealots, the most radical jews of them all, that wanted wars against Rome
But sure, he was "le anti-semite non-kike that kikes hated" right?

Now you are going to talk about how he disagreed with pharisees or whatever.

But why would the pharisees be discussing mosaic law with a non-jew? Never mind, what exactly did he denounce the pharisees for that makes him not a kike? Have you actually read the Gospel?

Can you point to a single value that Jesus denounced that wasn't valid?

Because the denounciations of Jesus were idiotic, insane, even marxist
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to punish a slut! (Jesus didnt like slut shaming, quite liberal if you ask me!)
There he denounces the rich pharisees and promises the earth to the meek and the poor! (... and marxist)
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to live, instead of embracing death like him!
There he denounces them over a disagreement on how Mosaic Law is applied! (but Jesus was not a Jew I swear!!!)

You blindly may say "he disagreed with the kikes" as if that was something we needed to applaud!
I have to ask you "christians" of Sup Forums, what are these supposed teachings of Jesus that supposedly got corrupted by kikes? "Hate your enemies"? "Save treasures for tomorrow"? "DO resist evil"?

The opposite of everything Jesus said?
I mean really, is "but kikes killed Jesus" your only argument?

Muslims are hated by Jews as well, but Jews are smart enough to use them as a tool. The same way they use the insane anti-morality of Christianity to corrupt the ancient world and give themselves a privileged financial spot!

But if Jews don't like the own poison they created, that means that we shall drink it, according to you!
wtf I guess I love ISIS now!

The pagans deserved it

> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Letting someone else slap your face with the back of his hand was a form of social rebellion back then

no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.

There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult to them.


In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"

Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself
Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication, as some Sup Forumslacks imply

Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever
see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity

Christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation: That is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in
Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies

Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them. So here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople
Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off (mental masturbation, really)

dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him

He never promoted it, he tolerated it if you knwo about the historyof that heresy

...

> le pope is le anti-Pope meme
> le christianity is corrupted meme
Question for Sup Forums "christians" claiming that the Pope is the anti-Christ

How would you prove that interpretation of "do not resist evil" by Pope or any mainstream christian leader is twisted, corrupted and out of context?
The context of the story is how christians should behave the opposite of gentiles, who love their friends and families, and hate their enemies

The larger context is a Gospel where all the main figures mentioned allowed their enemies to kill them without slaying them back: Jesus, Peter, Paul

What is true context of the paragraph?
How do you turn "Do not resist evil" into "FUCK OFF MUSLIMS!"?
YOU are the Anti-Christ, Christian of Sup Forums. You deny the words of Jesus because you don't wanna give up your earthly interests.
You "christian" people of Sup Forums/ seem to believe that Paul the Pharisee and Peter the Jew the grabbed their swords and killed the romans that wanted to execute them, come on

They were well aware that their religion demanded them to be submissive to their enemies and finally die to them, that is exactly the lesson they wanted the goyim to learn
Look, I know that you actually don't believe in the whole "infinite treasures in Heaven" thing, so you are trying to justify fighting for survival in this world where you can get actual treasures, but don't try to rewrite history please

These threads are completely pointless. As much as I, as a heathen myself, want to see white Christians as my allies, for them I'm just another pagan that needs to be converted. Why should I even worry that one sort of Abrahamic religion is being replaced by another one in Europe? None of these would ever like me.

Christianity is anti-traditionalist in the biological sense, it has no worldy interest in our beings as animals
Everything animal about the human being is considered sinful


Paul was anti-natalist, as things like wife and family would get in the way of getting people to worship his jewish god.

If unmarried men followed the words of Paul, there would no be any civilization to begin with, people would stop marrying as it would interfere witgh their mental masturbation being a "good person" by telling others that they will go to hell

See:
> 8 Now to the unmarried men and women, and for the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
> Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife.
> 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.
t. Paul the Pharisee

Paul makes it EXTREMELY CLEAR that the main concern for every christian is the spread of this virus-like cult at the expense of their own tribe, and his main worry is that Christians may not devote 100 % of their time to the spread of the cult

the organic self-sustaining self-interested self-preserving society that Sup Forums wants is fundamentally incompatible with the "do not save for tomorrow, leave your family and spread my cult" dogma that both Jesus and Paul saw as the main duty of a christian

Jesus made it even clearer:

> "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't become my follower me"- Jesus

If you can refute THIS Ill eat my shekels

>But I say unto you, Love your enemies.
>EGO AVTEM DICO VOBIS DILIGITE INIMICOS VESTROS
5th word – Diligo, diligere, dilexi, dilectum.

1 Cor. 13
>Charity is patient, charity is kind
>CARITAS PATIENS EST BENIGNA EST
1st word – Caritas,Caritatis.

Here are the uses of the word according to doctrine, to the commandments of God. Douey Rheims (1899 ed.) is used as direct and literal translation. Approved by the Roman Catholic Church, 30 years before the KJV was made, as the official English translation. The Latin translation of the NT is from 200 AD, by skeptics' dating, revised by Saint Jerome according to the decree of Pope Damascus I. Clementine Vulgate is used. When we are commanded to love everyone as God does, ONLY THESE TWO WORDS ARE EVER USED. WHAT DO THEY MEAN?

Diligere: This word does not mean love as in only kisses and hugs. It means to love as in to value/to esteem. It is often used concerning merchandise. To value one means to desire the best end for them, that they are good objectively, not only that they feel good, that they are glorious, but that includes judgment and correction. So if you value their final end, then you would have no issue with punishment. But I say unto thee value/love thy goy. See your goyim are all useful, enemies or friends they all can be put to good use and benefit you. You see if you don't punish him then he can become corrupted and ruined through degeneracy. Punishment is an act of love. You value you him and so you desire to preserve his body and spirit. And when it comes to the death penalty in Torah, the it is written that they are better off dead. According to the Lord's judgment they are better off dead. Whatever that may entail. Hell is God's plane of operations.

Plautus: Amphitryon A.1 S.3 among lovers
Seutonius: Julius 50 among lovers
Julius Caesar: Gallic War 6.19 among slaves

If his Kingdom is of this World, as Sup Forums Christians claim... if Christianity is a religion of earthly power, why didn't it save the Western Roman Empire then? Why did Saint Augustine wrote that it was not a christian concern the existence or not of wordly kingdoms?

Why were Christians unable to save even their fucking holy land from the Muslims, if they are the religion of earthly power that you believe they are?
Why is the North Africa now muslim, if it was once christian and roman?

That they didn't manage to screw things completely over was an accident of history, not for lack of trying

and most importantly of all questions, why has Christianity become an enabler of the muslim invasion of Europe, if it is such religion of earthly power and "the strong will inherit the Earth" as you seem to believe?
why are all the christian mainstream churches pro-refugee, if christian doctrine says "hate your enemy, and do not lend to them all they want" instead of the opposite as you claim?

The strange thing is that "christians" like you are a minority within Christianity itself that they claim to represent, with everyone from the Pope to the Anglican Churches to the Protestant Churches actively cucking for the destruction of the West
The Pope literally points to the same verses that I do to justify his doctrine, yet you come here to tell me that he is wrong, and I am wrong, and even damn Jesus and paul were wrong tho, because some medieval crusader decided to recreate christianity as a earthly cult of power in order to sack Constantinople!

>if you follow one law then you must follow the entire set of laws
No, really who the fuck is this stupid?

Jews are a very successful group that has become successful by monopolising finances through ethnic networking and promoting ideologies that demonize their own actions so that the goyim won't copy their success
so they promote anti-nationalistic Communism among the goyim while endorsing Zionism for themselves
that is why they promoted universalist Christianity among the goyim while keeping Judaism for themselves, and including it as the Old Testament within Christianity, so that they would remain the most important people of the world.
So there is no real contradiction once you understand how Jews work: Do as I say (Christianity), not as I do (Judaism, Old Testament).
then christians wonder why Jews dominate them!

The problem with Sup Forums christians' claims of modern misinterpretations if Christianity is that those were the ACTUAL interpretations of Early Christians

Whatever Christians would not wish others to do to them, they do not to others. And they comfort their oppressors and make them their friends; they do good to their enemies…. Through love towards their oppressors, they persuade them to become Christians.
—The Apology of Aristides 15[13]

How can a man be master of another's life, if he is not even master of his own? Hence he ought to be poor in spirit, and look at Him who for our sake became poor of His own will; let him consider that we are all equal by nature, and not exalt himself impertinently against his own race[...]

—Gregory of Nyssa, Homilies on the Beatitudes[18]

Who is more likely to have a corrupted version of Christianity?

a) The Early Christians that Roman authors characterized as an extremely docile people that was a frequent target of free loaders
b) The Crusaders that sold children as slaves and destroyed Constantinople

>Mark 14:51–52
Everyone who wonders if you're full of it or not should go ahead and read those verses, and they will see. It just says there was some guy outside with just linen wrapped around him, and when others tried to grab him, he ran off. That's not even sexual in any way.

> "If only we had more Chrsitianity in these times of equality and brotherhood, sacrificing your own material wealth to help the poor and to forgive your transgressors." - Sup Forums christians

The West is not dying because gays fuck their butts (heck, even muslims fuck each other all and goats the time, and they are the civilizations expanding the most right now, while the west collapses)

The West is dying because of pathological altruism, and i quote Paul himself in his interpretation (insofar whenever Jesus said this you always say "Jesus means the opposite"):

> 14 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse.
> 17 Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. 18 If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. 19 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,”[d] says the Lord. 20 On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him;
> if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.
In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”[e] 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Your Old Testament morality has nothing to do with the Jesus and Paul that you claim to follow, and no church father ever pretended otherwise

You are a larper that does not give a fuck about what Paul actually said, and needs to pretend that Mosaic Law applies to him
Yet I am quite sure you work in Saturday and eat pork, lol

If you wanna be a jew, and then go on and convert to Judaism, and stop pretending that Christian Churches want anything to do with you

>You can pick and choose which laws to follow that were given to you by the supposed creator of the entire fucking universe

The absolute state of Christcuckery.

...

CARITAS: It means love, it's aim is not to give short term pleasure. It means love as in valuable, of great worth, esteem. Commonly used for merchandise, used to complain how expensive something costs extended to people likewise. God will always value us immensely. The same with people. Romans used it to speak of slaves and mistresses that they liked the most.
Suet. Augustus 42 – w wine
Cicero Against Verres 2.3.47 – w provisions
Likewise with friends.


Benigna does mean to be kind. This Latin word here is also typically described as “obliging” which is just another way to say “helpful”. Therefore the assertion that the ancient Greek says love means being helpful is backed up by the Latin Vulgate. He didn't use Amare or adamare which means more of to love as in to love/like someone, or to really really love/like someone. He doesn't use Indulgere which means to politely and nicely yield to in a gentle manner. He DIDNT USE Fovere meaning to warm up or to nurture and assist and embrace warmly. He didn't use honestare which means to honor. He didn't use vereri which means to revere to be star struck. He didn't use He didn't use gratulari. Which means to congratulate. Huh what a cohencidence, of all the words to use in Latin he chose this one. Diligere. And when he uses the word “bless” he did not use Augere, which means to bless by increasing. JUST A COHENCEDENCE NOTHING TO SEE HERE GOY

pastebin.com/XNpDS5Vi
-temporary pastebin of all the versers of Love in new testament

Remember IM STILL WOKING ON TIHS

Galatians 5:14
For all the law is fulfilled in one word: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
omnis enim lex in uno sermone impletur diliges proximum tuum sicut te ipsum

> le Christianity made the west meme

absolute insane nonsense

western law systems are based off Roman Law, which existed before Christianity existed
western languages are based on indoeuropean languages, Malta is the only western country with semitic languages root

Most of the religious symbolism of the West is pagan as well, christian trees, easter, etc
heck, the american constitution never ever mentioned Jesus anywhere, and has the separation of state and church as one of its most explicit declarations

the founding fathers and most of western people for the last 1000 years have been deists. Whenever they tried to take Jesus seriously, things went wrong very fast.

Jesus these threads are absolute fucking dog shit every single time.
>some retard posts their hourly bait
>anti-pagan meme spam begins from the same guy every thread
>ancap guy comes in to post his wall of text
>le kike on stick
>le odin drank cum
Sup Forums goes full retard mode when religion is brought up, and these threads are just a cycle of the same retardation over and over ad nauseam.

Also your neighbor is not you enemy. Your neighbor "is the one that sheweth mercy" so not the robber. the Samaritan is not a thief, hence nota rapugee
Against Heresies by Saint Irenaeus Doctor of the Roman Catholic Church 2.16.2-3

>Moreover, all the rest of the multitude of those righteous men who lived before Abraham, and of those patriarchs who preceded Moses, were justified independently of the things above mentioned, and without the Law of Moses. As also Moses himself says to the people of Deuteronomy: “The LORD thy God formed a covenant in Horeb. The LORD formed not this covenant with your fathers, but for you.” Why then did the LORD not form the covenant for the fathers [the Patriarchs]? Because the Law[Torah] was not established for righteous men. But the righteous fathers had the meaning of the Decalogue [10 commandments] written in their hearts and souls. That is they loved the God who made them and did no injury to their neighbor.
Note that Genesis 14 has Abraham killing lots of men in some horribly bloody battle... Irenaeus knew that too

Levitcus 19:18
non quaeres ultionem nec memor eris iniuriae civium tuorum diliges amicum tuum sicut temet ipsum ego Dominus
Seek not revenge, nor be mindful of the injury of thy citizens. Thou shalt love thy friend as thyself. I am the Lord.
I mean look at thi translation. This IS JEWISH. IT SAYS FRIEND

No faggot, go ahead and post the Strong's concordance from the Koine Greek you lying piece of shit. The boy was WITH Jesus, and UNCLOTHED. He put on a linen cloth TO flee WITH Christ.

You're fucking pathetic. Keep lying to yourself you pathetic pile of shit.

HOW ABOUT YOU GIVE ME AN ANSWER LARPER I GAVE YOU ALL NIGHT

> le Christianity didn't hamper Europe's science meme xD

why did Islam get ahead of Europe then?

> it... it didn't... I swear

Why is our world for complex mathematics ALGEBRA then? Did you think that europeans just tho it was a pretty word or what?

> bu... but the Gallileo, Copernicus, Servetus and all the other scientists that the Church persecuted were christians and even talked well of the kike Jesus!!!

see: pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
> According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power.
Now that not being a christian is not a death sentence, most scientists don't give a fuck about pretending to worship a kike

> lol you are dumb, Europe took over the World thank to Christianity xDD
Then why didn't Europe take over the World during the Middle Ages, during the peak of the Church, when Islamic Armies had a string of victories from Egypt to Jerusalem to the Balkans and Greece, which they occupied for 400 years?

Europe took over the Americans in the 1500s, during a time where the power of the Church was collapsing because of the Protestant Reform and the Enlightenment, and the renewed interest in greek-roman culture had grown a product of the Renaissance.
Europe took over the Africa and Asia in the 1800s, after the French Revolution had destroyed the remaining power of the Church, and industrial revolution, followed by the scientific revolution, had demolished most of the dogmas of the Churches.

> le Jesus was violent this one time so we have to ignore "love your enemies" meme xDDDD
> le Jesus wanted you to use swords against your enemies meme xDDD

Sup Forums christians are right that Jesus didn't promice peace and niceness, he promised suffering and war.

The core of the issue is what are the targets of the sword of violence he promises:

- people of your own household. Father against Son. Mother against Daughter
- money changers that were not hurting him or attacking any of his followers at all, and were the only way people that lived in a far away places of the empire could exchange their money to local currency and donate to the temple. Money changing has nothing to do with Money Lending. Money lending would not become the main economic function of Jews until 600 years later, when the Church banned the goyim from high-risk financing

For your enemies, he wants you to love them and to lend them everything they expect from you, as PAUL HIMSELF confirmed (Romans 12:14-21).
Jesus stopped his followers from actually using any sword to attack their enemies, and reprimanded them for misunderstanding. When Peter realized that he would go "holy fuck he really wants us to die for him, his kingdom is not of this world" and denied him 3 times.

And why would Peter do otherwise? Peter realized that he would die: "holy fuck he really wants us to die for him, his kingdom really is not of this world"
Of course he was going to fear for his life. He realized that Christians were never supposed to get power. The religion never worked like that. His kingdom is NOT of this world. That is why Paul didn't try to create a crusader state. Because the only stable, non self-contradicting position christianity can take is the one of a pacifist paranoid minority that is protected by the weapons of someone with will to power.
"The meek will inherit the Earth" becomes a declaration of suicide when adopted by the strong

perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=benignus

perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=caritas
perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=diligo
For citations

The war that Jesus DID promise was a war against your own damn family: "I do not come to bring peace, but to set a man against his own household"
Which is exactly that historically happened, Christians were extremely successful at killing each other and killing white pagans, all while completely failing to recover their Holy Lands from Muslims.
The sack of Constantinople by Christians and the Wars of Reformation between Catholics and Protestants weakened Europe so much that Muslims would occupy the balkans for 500 years,

Sup Forums christians are extremely deluded people that wanna follow the commands of a Jew that promised to make their families divide and even asked them to hate themselves and their own families (!!!!) so that they may perhaps-- have a slight chance of worshiping a Jewish War God for the rest of eternity

...

Do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks as it has now?
Abortion alone has split black birthrate in a half, otherwise we would be talking about african levels of black birthrates

What do i recommend instead of Christianity? Simple: Pragmatism
To recognize that what matters is the here and now. That Gods won't come to save us
That we are alone
That only ourselves can save us
Otherwise, it is game over

And Jesus is not going to cry about it, why would he? All he wants is to abolish the Earth and create a paralel dimension where everyone worships him 24 / 7
Our desires of this world, our need to fly and colonize the stars: Gone

I find it interesting that for something "divinely inspired" Christianity does not give us any insight into the Universe. If the Bible had mentioned there are 8 planets in this System, that there are worlds beyond that we can actually inhabit, that Stars are made of Hydrogen, which is part of what water is composed... May be then I would be believe "holy fuck it really is God-inspired!!!"
If Paul had made some huge scientific discovery thanks to this "revelation from the creator of the Universe", I would actually give this pharisee some credit
But all we got is endless pages of social critique, about how rich is evil, strong is evil, resisting evil is evil

I can guarantee you, there isn't a single chapter of the Gospel that I can quote that you would not call left-wing nonsense if it was said by a modern leftist instead of Jesus
(with the probable exception of some of the very trippy chapters of the Revelation)

...

to argue that Christianity can unify whites is just ahistorical
the core of the issue is that the Gospel describes a suicidal way of living, and christians have to carefully choose what to believe or not to believe, so there is a LOT, and I mean A LOOOOOOOOOT of cherry-picking and "this is the right interpretation and everyone else is a heretic"

even here in the Sup Forums, at the slightest disagreement over a quote by Jesus, the supposed unifier of the white race, the 1500s and 1600s get repeated all over as catholics and protestants call each other heretic
The only time where most of the population of Europe was unified under one single head of state was during the peak of the pagan roman emperors

it is only the rise of securalism that has allowed italian catholics and protestant swedes to ignore their differences and join the European political project, which, even if dominated by cucked politicians right now, have the chance to do a lot more for whites (Visegrád Group, which includes atheistic Czechia)

- seen here

1 Corinthians 37 by Saint Clement of Rome the Pope calls Meekness/Submissiveness a quality of Roman Generals and Centurions

...

...