Despite most of you being absurdly right-wing, would you agree with the accuracy of this, fair or unfair as it may be?

Despite most of you being absurdly right-wing, would you agree with the accuracy of this, fair or unfair as it may be?

I wonder (((who))) owns 95% of the bank......

Hard to read, but essentially sums up my thoughts on this.

Definitely the people that only very rich or very insane people blame, right? The rich because they need a scapegoat and the insane because, well, you tell me.

That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.

>muh meritocracy
Keep working hard goy, the successful are just better than you! Don't analyze it, you're just stupid! Get fucked!

>baseless conjecture and philosophical masturbation
How deep.

>Whitechapel Road
>All of the properties are foreign bullshit

This isn't Monopoly. I'd throw this off brand board into the trash where it belongs and break out the actual Monopoly board.

It's not baseless since there's evidence of it all around the United States of America. The reality is, you get off your ass, you try, and maybe you'll succeed. There's no promises in life, there never are, but there's people who have grown up with nothing to become extremely successful. Will they own 95 percent of the US? Eh, probably not, at least not in their life-time, but they can aim for that if they want, and maybe their family can achieve it one day. It's good to dream big.

>there's evidence of it all around the United States of America
Because democrats = socialists, right. Idiot.

The new age democrat, in the vocal minority that's currently driving the party, absolutely. I believe back when the NY democrats had the power in the party, they weren't very close to socialists, but the Cali democrats got loud, took over, and now yes. It's democrats = Socialist.

>socialism is when the government does things!
read a book, retard. genuine leftists are a pathetically small minority in the Democratic party.

Socialism is when the government does too many things, at the cost of the tax payer. It's really not rocket science.

You forgot the fact all the modern socialist/marxoid states have jew run central banks and in no way resemble the laws, regs, and conditions of "capitalist" past.

>((( the rich )))
I love how far the commies go to avoid calling out the kikes, and how far they go to never hold niggers accountable for their own actions ever.

Your meme is one of the reasons why people democratically elected Adolf Hitler- to break up jew control of the banks. You think you're attacking us, but you're really arguing for our side.

If you have to concoct an absurdist meme to try to explain your view, perhaps your view is absurd.

But real life isn't a board game

All the names are wrong on that.

There are a lot of people who don’t have to work hard who get money, those who literally pass wealth from one generation to the next. And my view is that once you reach a position of success, the rewards become infinitely more imbalanced vs the amount of effort put in. Zuckerberg earns more while taking a shit at work than most A dozen of his office will work that year. Yes he deserves to be successful for a good idea and hard work, but it gets to a point where it just becomes ridiculous.

Funny, I remember seeing this on Facebook when I had one. Hang yourself.

Can you provide a source to this definition of socialism? Because the definition I'm looking at is that socialism is when the workers own the means of production. That doesn't sound like the government doing things, in fact I'd say it's got nothing to do with how much the government does. So do you have a source that says socialism is when the government does things? I've got over a century of history and literature that agrees with my definition.

You do know that Monopoly was designed by a pair of socialists to try and demonstrate the unfairness of capitalism? The fact that you're having to change the rules to try and do the same thing shows how badly they failed. They failed almost as badly as actual socialism.

> Given
Oh, its cute that they think that's how life is.

You cannot provide a source, can you? Does it feel embarrassing to be so tragically uneducated? I hope you are fixing this anonymous. There is no excuse for such a thing in this era.

He is conflating socialism with authoritarianism which isn't exactly surprise, considering state of Soviet Union, DPRK and China which all are authoritarian.

Obviously, it doesn't mean I'm not going to bully him for his critically misinformed opinion. And if you think Leninism and it's derivatives are all there is to socialism, you're just as misinformed :^)

Silly. Socialism is when the gummint tells the workers they own the means of production.

I'm saying meaning is use which was the conclusion reached by Hegel and Wittgenstein :v)

this. absolutely 100% irrefutable

A capitalist system has never actually been tried.

Sad thing is once the poor masses wake up and realize every law that's ever been in the history of civilization was to keep them down and keep the (((rich))) in power it will be too late to do anything and the rich will have already fled to their bunkers and launched nukes to cleanse the earth before emerging to start the whole shit show over again.
The only way to moderately fix things would be to go back to using work vouchers that represent labor instead of fiat currency that represent whatever is most valuable in the market at the time.

Different theory, technology will make workers irrelevant and the powers that be will keep some people around as consumers or restructure the economy to make consumers irrelevant and start a mass genocide event.

>born into wealthy family
>given an elite education and a massive leg-up in life

What do you have an issue with, mate?

Amusingly, Monopoly (the game) was specifically designed to make capitalism look bad. Your argument is kind of circular here.

no its complete bullshit because life isnt a game of monopoly. you can make money by working hard and smart and investing well.

Limited number of properties, limited number of houses and hotels, strictly regulated building guidelines, strictly regulated movement, prices set by government, rent set by government.
Sure, that's a great example of free markets.

>you can make money by working hard
You can demolish a highway with a spoon too, the problem is that isn't efficient and not how highways are demolish like no billionaire makes it off of hard work, but through the manipulation of social connections.

fucking work smart as well as hard. It's fucking obvious that no matter how hard you work as a bog cleaner you are never going to be as successful as someone who works hard at developing software. Why the fuck am I even pointing this out!! you're personification of 'a little learning is a dangerous thing'

Most people who work hard to develop software lose a lot of money unless they are soulless shills making contributions to some other well funded group's ideas.

He may be wrong but what's not wrong is socialism in all forms is cancer and you need to hang yourself.

>B-BUT MUH FREE MARKET
>MUH EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY

Are you sirius?
Have you ever played the game?

Zucc stole Faceberg. He's a fucking meme.

Stupid af
Sage all fields

I know I hate Jews too senpai

This board is the new Sup Forums. It cannot resist slide threads. It loves slide threads.

Sup Forums is Sup Forums

ffs burger, shows they're not working smart then....

while you're here i'll have a large latte, and make sure it's fucking hot this time

Working smart is a euphemism for accepting (((their))) rule and I am not your mother even though that is the only human you are used to interacting with.

>you start a game of monopoly
>You work hard and spend your money wisely
>Other people don't work as hard
>At the end of the game your children get your property and cash
>Other people's children start demanding your children's property get taken away because ''it's unfair"

...

>muh jews
stormniggers keep on stormnigging

No, it's a false analogy, abusing amongst others the term "succeed". It's intended to induce people to feel that because they could not "succeed" in such a game of monopoly, they also cannot "succeed" in a real world of income inequality.

But in Monopoly, the only way you can "succeed" is to be the single winning player with all the money.

In the real world, you can "succeed" by having enough money to live and work with some spare time, playing video games, going outdoors, getting a dog, having a family.

Hence, the measure of success in the real world is perfectly attainable when there is income inequality.

Only to the insectile leftist is "success" defined as "world control".

Still, nice attempt at subverting Sup Forums. Have some pictures of the only solution to leftists that has ever worked.

> You start a game of monopoly.

> Others collect 200 dollars when they pass go. You collect only 20 but you don't have to pay income tax.

> The only free spaces are brown and light blue.

>Boomer owns blue, green and red section. Thinks he should own brown and light blue too.

> GenX pities you, but thinks the solution is to build hotels on his areas so Boomer will go bankrupt instead of loaning you some money.

> GenZ gets promised some railroads and utilities when it's his turn to play by Boomer. GenX has been teaching him about the game.

Do you roll the dice user? If you don't you're a lazy limp wristed faggot.