You realize being liberal in public is an IQ test right?

This is how people test to see if you're mentally sane and understand current social norms.

Do not be surprised if you stop being invited to things or people suddenly have to "leave" when you start spouting conservative stuff.

Deep down they're all conservative and also know conservatives are right.

The problem is that reality does not fit into the conservative narrative anymore so they know society is in decline and the only discourse that can make it NOT BLOW UP is the liberal one.

So take being liberal in public as nothing more than an IQ test. Do not be surprised when you don't pass.

>just look at this poor motherfucker, he doesn't understand the game

the goal is precisely to change the game

and you want to replace it with..

Once you come up with a good enough alternative, people will accept it.

>Because politics are summed up by "Conservative vs Liberal"

Stop using that European flag, burger. The political spectrum is far wider than that.

I'm at Singapore for work.

>Once you come up with a good enough alternative, people will accept it.
you're right user

>people laugh at Liberals
>people are fucking embarrassed of trumpfags

Libertarianism = high iq.
Me and my princeton buddy john stossel can attest to that.

>he doesn't understand the game
>somehow he's got millions of dollars oh well

How's Singapore?

> behave like sheeple to conform to narrative
> high IQ test
bait quality is declining at alarming rates

Just claim you're a radical centrist. Both left and right will think you're something of a cuck but as long as you can explain it articulately both left and right won't really care and won't really mind being around you.

>not realizing the tables have already turned
>not realizing "liberal" has a negative connotation
>not realizing only the dumbest of liberals arent aware of this

It's not an IQ test. It's a temperament and indoctrination test.

Whites are domesticated people.

White liberals have a certain temperament and are trained in a certain way.

They aren't intelligent, they don't solve problems. They don't think on their feet.

And they are watched over an elite, their own sheep dogs. These people fake being liberal to hang out with them.

All those wealthy billionaire liberals aren't really liberal. They just pretend to be,

Barack Obama outspent all past presidents combined. Liberals beg, borrow, and steal like oh I don't know HILLARY CLINTON to get their position. Liberals simply tolerating predators and criminals isn't sustainable, and it got us into this mess to begin with. Liberals are toilet-sloppy.

>oh hi im liberal please be liberal like me okay? because whatever ideology that isn't liberal isn't right because thats what i decided, are you liberal yet?

Great.

What USA should be. This is what a non-kiked USA looks like.

It's literally the opposite. It's a tactic to silence the opposition and to further the own agenda. It's to supress independent thought and the left's goal is to erode society as we know it. They WANT to blow it up (the "capitalist white supremacist patriarchy").

>Deep down they're all conservative
They vote alone, and still vote left. They are not all conservatives. And making a thread like this is nothing but a rather clumsy PsyOp to silence conservative voices in public in order to ensure the left can keep driving the narrative.

This is an ok advice.

Even though

Domestication test? No, because people know they have been indoctrinated. They just do it for the sake of social order.

Mostly highly intelligent brown japs living their own lives with 0 intentions of fucking you up.

I have not seen a beggar yet.
Nor drunktards. Nor faggots.

It's pretty fucking amazing

>literal bugman pretending he knows better

The only people who voted for Trump are rural and suburban retards.

City people all voted for Hillary.

>Implying society isn't long overdue for a blow-up
GTFO you liberal trash.

I think my IQ just dropped reading that but I'm too stupid now to know for sure

>The problem is that reality does not fit into the conservative narrative
No it does, the liberal narrative is one that has strayed from reality. Mah feminine penis, genetics don't matter, anti fascists acting like fascists. Then you call being a member of this retarded cult as the " sane " one. What a bad slide thread. Sage faggot

>society becomes conservative
>shuns first liberals and black people
>then starts to shun more and more people
>end up a paranoid society (we already are to some extent) in which trust is 0
>mega collapse
You think educated people do not know that?

Liberalism is shifting to entirely unacceptable to normies relatively quickly unless you are in an environment that is a massive corporation. In which case, I feel bad for you son, you got 99 problem but a glass ceiling ain't one.

Also you're not smart enough to realize that from this collapse nothing will be built, conservatives have never created any society.

Founding fathers were the liberals of their time.

>the overwhelming majority of scientists, engineers, STEM. noble prize winner..are all libs
>BUTT THEY DUMB

KEK

Liberals are sheep. They feel safer in a herd. Why do you think newer ones need safe spaces and try to stifle free speech or anything that "triggers" them?

They literally demonstrate extreme cattle, herd behavior.

They test your views to make sure you're one of them. They want people of the same sexual, social temperament.

What's the old hippie stereotype? They would reject anyone who they thought was a narc, didn't behave a certain way.

The only people excluded from the temperament test are niggers and coloreds.

Temperament matters for the whites but not the blacks, coloreds, etc.

For conservatives, the temperament of everyone matters.

A conservative wants to tame the world. The liberal just wants to feel safe in a herd and appease the wild animals that feed on it.

...

I know this.

Liberalism implies you need to ignore reality each day to an increasingly bigger extent.

Liberals created this civilization, if they cannot keep it anymore you'd better be worried.

That's what's happening right now you dumbfuck.

Liberalism is being seen for the insanity it is.

This is pretty good bait my man

>Liberalism implies you need to ignore reality each day to an increasingly bigger extent.

Yeah, that's why all the scientists/engineers are liberals. Because they ignore....wait a minute.

You haven't created a perspective, you haven't created any kind of tangible hope, you are anti-ideologic and this kind of anti politics does not create any society, it breaks societies and after it has already collapsed you'll need more creative people to create a new kind of ideology/hope

You cannot be in that position without ignoring judgements/reality for the sake of sciente

In order to perceive a greater reality you need to ignore all the social norms

It is a disgrace liberals have created new social norms themselves, this is the end of creativity I'd say

Liberals have reality problems. They can have the support of the youth vote back whenever they start prizing truth over the maintenance of grundy, culture-fearing delusions m

This reminds me of a "conversation" I had yesterday with a girlfriend of a friend:

>this trump guy is insane
In what sense?
>he's just mentally unstable
Why do you think that?
>I think he's senile and he's going to do something horrible
What made you think that?
>He's just insane!
Right, by why?
>can't you see it? he's clearly unhinged

I just changed the subject because there was clearly no point in "discussing" this with her.

>radical centrist
That might work for a little while, but at some point Right Wing Death Squads will be brought up and my cover will be blown

This isn't bait.

That's how things are going to happen, status quo is dangerous as fuck

They said the same about the founding fathers.

How deluded does one have to be to ignore every social norm in England, for example, to simply run away for a "better life" somewhere you don't even know exist

This shit chat argumentation reaching liberals is catastrophic

>falling for the right wing death squad meme

bumping this thread is an IQ test.

SAGE

This is some pretty brainlet tier doublethink

What do you think we are, epsilons and deltas?

Fuck outta here

What you say is partly true, but then you take it too far

Its like saying religion is true because it makes you happy or its worth it to not risk spending an eternity in hell

What you really need to do, is pretend to be a liberal, but be on the very edge of hyperbole, satire, irony, whatever you call it, so you can make your opponents out to be a joke while having plausible deniability that you aren't doing that and are actually on their side

Basically, be like sam hyde, but dont put yourself all over the internet like that

oh nvm you're completely batshit insane and retarded

Just read his shit about the founding fathers along with the implying of where intelligence lays, he has absolutely no clue what hes talking about. Stop responding to this slide, this faggot is clearly here to bait goddamn nufags.

>implying your redit spacing scares me
>implying i care what normies think
>implying i depend on their approval
>implying random asshole's approval is something i would see as relevant

stop projecting with your meme flags
sage

>>Liberals created this civilization


No

warfare, expansion, risk-taking and innovation created this civilization

not liberals. liberals are okay as a psuedoruling class but they are not maintaining healthy social norms anymore

a change of guard is necessary

just keep saging

>it's for your own good to throw out your brain and become a liberal
>BE LIBERAL OR PEOPLE WONT LIKE YOU GOYIM

My political views don't exist as a means to make friends, faggot.

Liberals are the ones who directly inherit the expansionist trait.

You don't think liberals cuccing the whole world is a coincidence right?

Liberals have changed their methods, not their end goals.

Oh so you're pretty much the same as me with all the "plausible deniability"

You understand the social norms too, unlike a good 80% of this board

So what if Jews set the stage up

Someone had to, right?

>so you be saying being a tradcon is edgy and underground. what a time to be alive.
It is odd that everyone in my personal and business world is a republican.
>white check
>productive check
>not in government sector check

It's always been like that.

Being a radtrad was always edgy and undeground, just not the good type of undeground where people actually want to support you because they feel empathy towards the cause instead of feeling the need to satisfy themselves.

Why the fuck do memetalonians have a fleg now?

it is a meme flag, not based on their IP addresses

>You understand the social norms too, unlike a good 80% of this board

well trying to be just extreme enough to seem make fun of liberals isnt exactly the same as just pretending to be a liberal and i find it hard to keep up the act, but i dont need to because it works so well at getting people on my side before i even reveal it

But y tho?

because muh independence and shit

>TL;DR
"Umm didn't you know all the cool people are liberal. You want to be cool right."

>"Umm didn't you know all the cool people are liberal. You want to be cool right."
Umm didn't you know all the normal people are liberal. You want to be normal and actually have friends and a community right.

Fixed that for you.

Yeah, but they're bunch of faggots.

All they do is do a meme vote and say we're leaving.

When they shoot someone, then we can start talking about them being a real country. Right now they're just masturbating wussies.

> I just changed the subject because there was clearly no point in "discussing" this with her.

It is implied "discussing" it with us here brings a point to your actions. I seriously doubt you have a point anymore than she did, if she existed at all.

Your actions, while veiled, are obvious when one realizes that Trump serves to divide opinion by double binding the public view of his actions. You are simply an extension of those double binds.

Just because an entity can't articulate the effects they are suffering from the double binds (by the other individual or individuals involved) does not imply that entity's suffering is non-existent or not real. It's also not worth using to bolster some vauge argument anyone arguing against Trump is wrong, or unhinged (fill in the blank with ad hominem arguments).

By directly addressing why Trump might be mentally unstable, an opening is made to debate said "stability". This itself is a diversion tactic and should not be taken as bait as it is wasteful (and frankly boring given we've been there, done that).

In other words, you fail at being a troll, relating lame second hand conversations with non-existent beings. Now let's talk about why trolls are so lame and hate themselves so much!

Wow, that's a lot of words just to say "stupid people suffer from their stupidity too".

I'm not turmp suporter, but I do find it funny that poeple simply accept whatever they've heard enough times without knowing why. It's not my place to educate her, nor was it the time, i'd just spoil everyone's time with another useless debate without point or purpose.

What 'independent thought' are you people coming up with?
>hurr durr muh Jooz
>hurr durr muh blax iz favored over hwhitee!
That's not independent thought, thats repeating agitprop.

I literally have a tinder account open just to bait liberal women and use my fake persona of a true liberalcuck and thus get my dick wet

I despise liberals

>A conservative wants to tame the world.
And this is why no one likes them. The 'world' is other people's also, and does not belong to the conservative. What you are actually saying is that the conservative is an atomized individual bereft of moral and culture, inculcated with a conquest drive that forbids working with others whom it can't profit from.

What a shitty existence.
>The liberal just wants to feel safe in a herd and appease the wild animals that feed on it.
You mean 'doesn't mind sharing the world some'. How horrible.

Everyone despises everyone deep down dude.

You're not allowed on this nor you're special.

>baiting liberal girls
That's pretty much the only thing they're good for. Being baited, fucked, taken advantage on etc

>Uses memeflag
>Lectures about IQ

Even sub 80 IQ niggers know you're hiding your flag because you're a coward

I don't despise everyone. I love my family, and love everyone who loves me and those who I think are great people.

>Deep down they're all conservative and also know conservatives are right.
Unlikely, but that would be even worse, since that'd mean that they are destroying Europe out of their own cowardice, and not out of any misguided principle.

i'm liberal in public/work
i'm conservative around family
i'm nazi in my room

I bet you have a lot of friends

lowest quality bait.

Leaderless liberals have no hope for the future. Identity politics will tear the democratic leadership apart, also they can't move on supporting the majority white working class voter (which should be their bedrock) instead they'll be pushing ever further into toxic progressive policy. And when white people don't vote for them they'll just call them racist, which will only push them further away. Welcome to 2018, 2020, 2024+

this guy gets it

What do you think Sean Hannity's IQ is?

All leftists will eventually be slaughtered

>smart people always go with the flow
LITERAL
BUGMEN

90

more than 100 if he doesn't believe the shit he says or less than 90 if he believes what he says

T H I S
American political thought is reductionist cancer in all cases. In America "Conservative" can mean anything from nationalist to centrist with slightly right-wing views, just as "Liberal" can mean anything from socialist to centrist with slightly left-wing views.

>poor motherfucker
He has been at the top of media since before Obama. Whether you agree with his politics or not other opinion news anchors (and even real anchors) would LOVE to have his success.

>so they know society is in decline and the only discourse that can make it NOT BLOW UP is the liberal one.
You need to crawl right back underneath whatever rock you slithered out from underneath. If you weren't a pseudo-intellectual moron you would know that the is typically a return to tradition when the pendulum of postmodernism has swung too far left, like it has over the last decade.

What's it like having multiple parties? My friends think the US should have multiple parties but I feel like you would fragment those that agree with each other on 90% of the issues.

>return to tradition when the pendulum
That is exactly what liberals are trying to avoid by pushing the agenda even faster

all those words typed out only to say nothing.
this is why libs are seen as retards.

Power is much less concentrated because you cannot form a government without coalition except in the most unlikely and extreme case of one party winning absolute parliamentary majority alone (almost never happens in multiparty systems). But it also makes government more unstable as squabbles between coalition partners happen all the time. For instance, we went through 3 different governments (and 3 elections) in the past 2 years.

Every system has it's ups and downs, and frankly due to the single mandate constituencies and FPTP system in America, even if you had multiple parties, Dems and Reps would still hold an almost total control on your parliament, barring maybe one or two randoms getting into Congress.

This
>reddit fag

One of the most retarded post I read in days!

I guess I see it as a way to grow the power of the unelected bureaucracies. Hypothetically, use climate change (or specifically carbon credits) for example, nothing gets done by elected officials because multiple parties disagree but the people (beholden to the populist idea of the day) really want something to change because of... idk... "muh hurricanes." That populist sentiment greenlights the President to enact regulations, which, might as well be fucking law.

It's the other way around. Being leftist means you lack critical thinking skills. You are also a coward for following the establishment instead of thinking for yourself and doing what is objectively moral.

I'm not sure that made sense. I was getting distracted. I came back and ditched where I was going with the carbon credit example.

>perceive a greater reality
just kys already faggot.

This post is cancer

>everything around us goes to shit
>my grandma just got raped by 10 somali savages
>every poster is in arabic
>"lets do something about this guys"
>mfw my friend doesnt understand the game

Normal people are not liberal. Normal people don't think it's okay to turn your cock and balls inside out and call yourself Shirley. Normal people don't jerk off to the communist manifesto. Normal people don't think it's okay to be a complete sexual degenerate cuck.

Libertarian in public, 14/88 in private

Conservatives and Liberals will accept you enough to socialize with you

You realize we're taking names of those who fail to respond to conservative replies right?

How many lists are you on?

>a fucking meme flag
People who are publically and obstinately liberal reveal themselves as easy marks. Most people just play dumb and apolitical.

Party systems grow out of the structure of government and electoral laws in any given countries. The system the US has means that a multiparty system will never happen in America, at best one of the two dominant parties will be replaced by someone else (which has happened before in America), or at best you might get a two-and-a-half party system like Britain was for a time.

As for your example, well even under your current system nothing gets done and the President pretty much enacts regulations to get shit done anyways so it wouldn't be much of a change if it was a bunch of parties doing fuck all instead of two parties doing fuck all.