If you love communism so much, why don't you move to Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea?

>If you love communism so much, why don't you move to Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea?

What can I answer against that? Help me guys

Because you love it so much you want to spread it

That you are secretly aware of how garbage Communism is but just wont admit it to yourself

you cant. You simply have to accept that you are a massive faggot

No boarders
No walls
No person is Illegal.

Just tell them all those places are not real gommunism

Vietnam is an option too

Because I don't want to get murdered by non-white people

if Fauxialists actually believed a word of what they preach they wouldn't wear overpriced hipster clothes, use $700 phones, or drive trendy expensive little cars. They WOULD live in a shitty commune and ACTUALLY BE PUT TO WORK EQUALLY WITH THE OTHER PEASANTS, but fuck that, man. That's HARD. They're the worst kind of consumer.

marxism is an ideological virus, it would rather attack opposition and multiply than stay contained

>Denmark
>Canada
>UK
>France
>Sweden
>Netherlands

That the fight is not to establish a state for communists but to destroy capitalism and replace it everywhere with communism. Insofar as there is a fight, anyway. Communism is not a competing ideology but the inevitable result of capitalism.

The revolution must be global to succeed, and it needs to (will) occur in highly developed industrial economies. Marx wrote that way back in the 1850s. Communism has never worked because it's never had a fighting chance. It has only occurred in undeveloped backwater shitholes and, lo and behold, they remain shitholes afterwards. Better shitholes - the USSR's growth was faster under communism than it was under capitalism and their GDP has only just recently returned to Soviet-era levels (yes, that's right, for the years between 1999 and 2014 the Russian Federation had a smaller GDP than the Russian Soviet Republic in the USSR, but you don't see that on le not an argument man's jewtube channel), but still shitholes. There are shitholes in Africa that have been run according to the IMF and World Bank's recipe for capitalist success for literal decades and, lo and behold, they also remain shitholes.

>but why does communism only occur in shitholes
Because revolutions only occur in shitholes too. Wow. What a shocker.

But this is a bait thread so I'm not even going to bother writing up a big essay about it. Happy to answer any questions though.

You reply with, "not real communism". Duh.

Cuba is the only socialist one there. For the rest say not real communism and for Cuba say your against Authoritarianism.

Vietnam is also a choice.

>Netherlands is communist
American education, everyone

Killing yourself because apparently you are a retard playing commie

Move there and enjoy paradise.

Serious question here. So say you win communism wins what do you realy think your life will be like than. You wont have this any more so what will you occupy your time with.

If you love "libertarianism" so much, why don't you go to Somalia?

There is literally no answer. You have the opportunity to move to a communist country and experiencing communism without spilling the blood of your family and countrymen by attempting a communist takeover. There is no excuse

Tell them they are right and go fuck off to north korea

>What can I answer against that?
"I will support my jewish, anti-White ideology by moving to one of those places."

That's the point.

>socialist countries (Cuba, DPRK) don't accept any immigrants - impossible for a Western leftist to move there
>"immigration is a socialist conspiracy"

>What can I answer against that?
Seriously? For a start those countries would not allow you to move there (North Korea does not offer citizenship to everyone who turns up and says 'I'm a communist').
Then there's the fact that you might not want to pack up your entire life and leave all your friends (kek) and family.
Plus if everyone who supports communism were to move to a communist country, that would lead to huge problems for those countries (which would be unable to deal with the massive influx of immigrants), and would be a setback to communism as an ideal because the majority of countries would then be left with no communists.

That's without even without getting into the fact that 'supporting commuism' and 'supporting North Korea' are obviously radically different things.

Honestly if you can't work out how to respond to such an absurdly stupid statement, then I would have to agree with

Say that if they believe in free markets and lack of regulation, they should move to liberia

>communism wins
I'll give you the strict Marxist dogma, unchanged from 1850.

Firstly, capital is owned communally by the people who use it. Decisions are made by the whole commune on the use of that capital. The commune puts people to work who can work and distributes product to those who need it. Communes trade amongst each other to ensure they all are adequately provisioned.

There is no central state.

The glue that holds this aspirational idea together is the concept of the perfectly rational New Soviet Man. Put very basically the idea is that two contradictory posits cannot both be true. There is only one truth. We assume that the problem of government is a soluble problem and any soluble problem can have only one optimum solution. This is the epistemological dictate of Enlightenment rationality and it's not unique to communism - communism is one proposed solution to this dictate, but there are others. It might seem retarded to us but we're over a hundred and fifty years distant from it. It was all the rage in Europe in the 1850s among philosophers.

Anyway, if every problem has a clearly optimum solution then every man, being rational, needs only to have that solution explained to him and he will, of his own free will, enact it - because it's the solution. So the New Soviet Man is just a normal man who has been educated in why communism is perfectly rational, and he just naturally lives a communist life. This is why the state withers away - you don't need it any more.

If you're the average twenty-something you'd wake up in the morning, go to school/work as usual, collect your rations on the way home, and be paid in labour credits that you could use to purchase luxuries from other worker communes.

I don't actually believe this garbage, but that's what Marx wrote. There has been evolution in though in a century and a half but, in my opinion, not enough. Communism is still fundamentally a backwards philosophy.

>>"mass non-white immigration into white countries is a jewish program"
FTFY

Right wingers generally tend to be nationalists. Communists on the other hand are internationalists so it make more sense for communist than libertarian to move out.

They didnt implement the gorrect benis bolizies :'DDD

We're all fucked until the Robots are working the fields for us... then there will be no more struggle - it will become like Star Trek - don't know why people are trying to implement communism at this early stage of human development - it can't work yet. Venus Project

Well, now is the problem of conflating economic models with national models.

It would be quite pointless to say to an american patriot that "If you love USA so much, you should move to canada", but saying to a Swede that "if you like free markets so much, you should move to USA" is more apt

>any of these countries being communist dictatorships
neck yourself.

North Korea will bend to your cock if you immigrate to them