Anons at Core of Future Social Guidance

Anons are at the core of the intellectual force of human destiny for the future. Ancient authors of sacred texts describe them as pivotal in the many truth movements of our time. This was recently discovered, along with many other matters cryptically hidden in sacred texts by OOP technique.

Some key points:
- The ancient Egyptian tradition of "sending to another world" now found in Bible stories, giving them new meaning.
- Words and names in Scripture have sacred meanings, derived by OOP technique contextualized by the present paradigm.
- Three ages of pre-ordained time have elapsed, and we are now in a shorter window of opportunity at the "end of time."
- The JQ mystery is resolved, early reasons for and means of it revealed, as well as purpose and end resolution.
- A great many, never-before-answered questions/mysteries of Bible now resolve only as supportive of OOP deciphering.
- Jesus, Paul, Moses and Thoth are all found to be consistent and related - each for different times and purposes.
- Future theology is valid only as determined by a new collective of truth promoters already present and described in encryptions of sacred text.
- This further evolving of ancient wisdom for modern man is represented by the broken, first tablets of Moses and the seven seals of Revelation.
- Nearly 20 years of consistent progress in the promotion of truth - by music, whistle-blowers, anons, alternative news media and nationalism - now comprise the Second Advent Body of "salvation."

Documentation on this discovery first circulated virally among televangelists, who first accepted it widely but also found themselves in err because of it and soon suppressed it. The music community also circulated it internally and have since authored thousands of songs and videos about their thoughts and hopes for it to be more widely known.

This is the study (anons in parable, p145) : cog49.com/ft.pdf

A brief list of points of interest : pastebin.com/gHDKKBjW

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Hyk-Vdd_Qrk
youtube.com/watch?v=jRXZkdEj7YI
youtube.com/watch?v=_QUq72fla3o
youtube.com/watch?v=h8Rf24KdOBw
youtube.com/watch?v=qIuxiwhUGz4
youtube.com/watch?v=jMxU2ToSunY
youtube.com/watch?v=4m2q5Fw8gwI
youtube.com/watch?v=IKeLldG8YYU
cog49.com/ts/147046584.txt
youtube.com/watch?v=bvVnkrLtoNk
youtu.be/S9H5jFcUONc
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Here are some of the videos that tell the story since this study first appeared
(out of thousands of songs influenced by it), from the church cucking on the issue
to the prevailing of music with it and even to the present state of mind because of it.

Early political weather (in small spaces): youtube.com/watch?v=Hyk-Vdd_Qrk

The celebrity perspective: youtube.com/watch?v=jRXZkdEj7YI

A religious view: youtube.com/watch?v=_QUq72fla3o

An Armegeddon-like take: youtube.com/watch?v=h8Rf24KdOBw

Another take on the whole story: youtube.com/watch?v=qIuxiwhUGz4

Some disappointment with the church: youtube.com/watch?v=jMxU2ToSunY

Search for further revelation youtube.com/watch?v=4m2q5Fw8gwI

Saviors of the World: youtube.com/watch?v=IKeLldG8YYU
time stamp: cog49.com/ts/147046584.txt

At the end of the day what is this new special original exgesis going to get us? Why should we care?

correction*
anons pg 125 in the pdf,
in "Parable of the Plagues."

Well, the fact that it is the original means it results from the same
ancient intelligence that set everything else in order to accomplish it.
There are many advantages to understanding it, when enough of the right people do.
It resolves the JQ problem, for one, and that open up a whole host of other possibilities.
But by the time that happens, we will also know enough about the things we need to know to do guide our future from there.
Were that not the case, it would do us no good to gain such freedom.

We have already had a lot of success in the same things this touches on.
But it all becomes easier when we realize why that is, and see what were missing.

Why we should care largely depends on the extent of the vision of the individual.
Our people generally live day to day, and we plan for their future pretty minimally.
We plan for the future of our societies very minimally, allowing others to do that instead.
That is, of course, the source of all the world's troubles right now, as we all know.

As you might expect, those who seek to control us and take away our future for themselves
I have found are the most interested in the meat of this study, but they are few in number.
The ultimate revelation for the Christian world is a means of the people securing their own future.
We can all plan better for our own lives and that of our children and the world because of this.

Its not like we really have a choice either.
We are all caught up in this now.
Its nice to see light at the end of the tunnel.

Why do you post this trash every single day?

...

Why would you care?

Because you're a loser intel agency slave.

The science of the Egyptian alchemists are at the core of Christianity. Christians of course,
have been misled by the JQ, the PC and the commercial interests of those in the church business.
Knowing this would be the case, the ancients chose to convey to our present, technological
generation means of recognizing and operating with the greater forces of nature that actually
determine social guidance, in order to restore the future to the people.

Obviously, I'm not the one practicing Alinsky here.

youtube.com/watch?v=bvVnkrLtoNk

youtu.be/S9H5jFcUONc

...

Nothing in the study is backed up by any real evidence. The thoughts are entertaining but it seems mostly a mish mash of loose conjectures

I take that well. All the observations of even ancient seers were quite subjective, seeking their own confirmation in their applied value.
This work is somewhat similar. And it takes people well versed in the alternatives to belief to really weigh the whole value of it.

But there is more confirmation intrinsic to the whole study, which is also why it is fairly sizable. It is in the way so many faint
observations are confirmed by many others that, also taken alone, are rather faint.

But the whole picture stands in complete difference to every other option of belief, when it comes to the applied value.

This is a Christian board. Get your satanic shit out of here.

It shows there is a completely different understanding of our past and future, as well as that of nature and the real world,
and that all of that has been preserved only for our time and our future.

This is more Christian than you anything you will find in a church.
I would not be allowed to post here, except that this is now well known.

What is the period of these buildings?
If they have no inscriptions, they would be
among the oldest, right?

>nobody posting Thoth's true avatar

All this gets just as lost in modern thought as it does that Adam could "blush red in the face"
(hence his name) and that Jesus had light colored hair and eyes (per Pilate's letter describing him).

It shows the connection of Germanics, bluebloods to the Essenes who opposed the Pharisees, to Adam and to the Ananukki.

But the Egyptian connection explains it all.

You might want to consider fleshing out what is so intrinsic, or how its a different understanding of past and future etc.
Religion in general is quite subjective not only to the culture that adheres to it, but the era of its time as well. This becomes a problem since its open to any and every interpretation based on ones own thought, which contradicts that idea that there is a constant universal truth hidden in it.
What I get at is that the study attempts 'mental alchemy' of sorts to distill the essence arriving at 7 core objects/concepts, but the methodology as well as how it relates to everything else is iffy at best.
For examply, you mention OOP, yet the core ideas that make OOP so powerful such as polymorphism etc is entire left out and not explicitly explained. You see, OOP isn't something fairly new either, its just a way of thinking thats been around forever, actually innate in human thought, but was concretely defined and applied to programming in recent times. This means this sort of approach can be applied to almost anything, not just sacred texts, and actually is most notably used in computer programs. How it is applied is up to whos applying it, in this case the author of the study.
I hope you get at what im trying to say. The OOP approach is neat, but it needs the be more concrete to convince the reader its not just a mix of subjective object oriented thoughts from different time periods linked together by the authors own application of it.

Thank you for your comment.
I know OOP concepts are not new. Pointing
out that they were apparent in sacred text authorship
was part of the point here.
It was when OOP broke into common use in
programming languages that facilitated me
in making this observation to begin with.

Its not so much OOP programming as OOP
technique, and yeah, polymorphism that
makes the point. And I could be more
clear about that in places. That was just never
an intent when I was writing this.

Instead, it just turns out more presently to be
an angle of interest with some appeal to the
sort of thinker that can appreciate the rest.

Given that language at the time was largely pictographic/heiroglyphic rather than linearly sequential and phonetic based like recent times does lend validity to your claim since thats most likely how their thought process operated at the time. Even today you can see hints of this with classical chinese or kanji users so Im sure the OOP approach is worth pursuing. The study does raise interesting points in this regard when it comes to symbolic and contextual meanings rather than literal so I don't doubt youre onto something.
The study is quite haphazard but interesting nonetheless, so hey thanks for the read.

This brings up another interesting point though. This is something valuable to everybody. But addressing a particular audience with something specific to their interests means catering to the present state of their art, their established jargon, their preferences and presenting something of cutting-edge furtherance to their own thought.

It cannot be approached from within the religious dystopian mosh pit of Christian rhetoric, because people are generally immune to thinking for themselves there, and few people apart from that have any interest in it.

And I would agree the study is at least not coherently narrated. That is somewhat due to an intent to present the big picture, which has many parts, without too much focus on anything particular that distracts from that. And actually, some parts of it are now a bit dated.