Red pill me on the French Revolution. I know there’s no way a bunch of white europeans destroyed their society without some kind of (((influence))).
Were the French the first to be infiltrated by (((them))) and is this why they are the most cucked Europeans? They started treating niggers as equals in the fucking 1700s. We didn’t even give them rights in the USA until the 1960s, and in my city we didn’t let them in our schools until the 70s.
Other urls found in this thread:
books.google.com
youtube.com
amazon.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
The French were and are idealists. They had the first radical socialist commune in the city with the Paris Commune too.
lrntofrenchpeople
>french people are starving
>government taxes them into poverty
>hungry and angry that they have no say in government
Rev up those guillotines it's time for some civil unrest.
I have always wanted to read this, thank you for sharing, user.
it started with good intentions and then got subverted by ((them)).
An anecdote regarding the Terror:
The Revolutionaries put the newly-freed Marquis de Sade in charge as head judge of Paris (even though he was born into an aristocratic family), expecting him to behave as his fictional villains did. They were disappointed when he refused to use the death penalty on anyone - even on those who had jailed him in the first place, when they were surrendered into his power. He gave many gold to flee the country, and was jailed, yet again, for "moderatism".
This seems likely
Thanks user
Glad you asked. I did much research on this so I kind of know what I’m talking about.
Watch this:youtube.com
I don’t know about jews influincing it but it could be possible.
French revolution was a violent revolution that destroyed France and its people. It inspired the Russian revolution and communism.
Leftists love the French Revolution because it is really the birth of the left as a political force to be reckoned with.
The French Revolution was the first time the Rothschilds really used the power of fiat currency to cause societal mayhem. Nobody tells the story of the currency. Those who are "smart" always tell us that the peasants just got tired of wealth disparity (a crock of shit).
>amazon.com
They admit this in the Protocols of Zion.
>Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands.
Benjamin Franklin. “I know not what to make of a nation of 40 million atheists.”
The French Revolution was not about liberty (American revolution was), it was a bout overturning the class system, Christianity and monarchy. If you are on the right, you should not celebrate the revolution
It was horrible. Louis XVI was the most gentle leader in French history. He was not a bad man. He tried to help France. The famines weren't his fault. First, he privatised wheat, but that coincided with a bad harvest, in which many went hungry, so he took back control of wheat, but it was too late. He was the man to turn it into a short-lived constitutional monarchy. He refused to flee to Austria, and refused their help, when they would have willingly invaded France to save the French monarchy, because he didn't want Frenchmen to die. The revolutionaries were bloodthirsty monsters. He and his wife were tried in a sham of a trial, and sentenced to a horrible fate that they didn't deserve.
This to a point. Should be noted also that the American Revolution was at its core, a revolt by the Nobility. The landed Aristocracy, Wealthy Merchants and existing power structures in the 13 colonies rebelled against the King and dragged the population along with them. The average joe blow did not experience much of a change in his way of life between the rule of Great Britain, and then the United States. The French Revolution by contrast was a Peasant revolt that overturned the existing power structures.
The first modern expression of pseudo-socialism. The daft idea that, through magic and murder, everyone will be made equal.
10 years later, Napoleon committed a coup that made him dictators (which he had been de facto well before that). A few years later he crowned himself emperor. And then subsequently lost it all by being a big, bloody idiot. My country used to have the Anti-Revolutionary Party, which was staunchly anti-Marxist. They named themselves after their opposition to this mad endeavour.
And exactly the same gentle, kind souls who wanted to make De Sade's fantasy reality make up the bulk of Marxism today.
the first pizzagate was the french revolution. why do you think the guillotine was invented...?
also keep in mind that while most of europe is about 2% jewish, france is 4% jewish because its one of the only countries that has equal number sephardic and ashkenazi. it may be the ONLY country in the world that is 50/50 between those two, so its 4% Jewish iirc.
Read McCullough's "Greater Journey." His "man on the street" view of the Paris Commune tells it all: Jews and Communists killing people en masse and then getting the shit kicked out of them.
The French Revolution and subsequent French politics have had one goal: to destroy Europe from within. Good job, Frogs!
I bet you think that October Revolution also happened because Evil Jew descended upon the land and corrupted the populace while Good Emperor played with his Faberge eggs.
(((((((((YOU))))))))
Posting from Hell, Nicky?
no they weren't and no it wasn't, it was just the one Marx-Levy had the biggest hardon for. lrntonotbeafuckingretard
The french revolution was the original mistake. It was when the entire wheel started to turn. It's the wheel that eventually put us into the situation where we are now.
They did. Rousseau and ultimately protestantism's history of rebellion against established authorities fermented it. The monarchs were seen as the true Jews and parasites.
Because the French elite sent so much aid to us to spite the British.
They heard what we were fighting for, and wondered why they didn't have those rights.
The French constitution and ours have many similarities.
Fun fact: George Washington was sent a key to the Bastille from the revolutionaries. It's still proudly on display at his estate.
>Louis XVI was the most gentle leader in French history.
That was the problem. He wasn't badass enough. There wouldn't have been a rebellion under Louis XIV he crushed shit like that after he saw what happened during the Fronde
It was a masonic revolution intended to depose the natural elite from power and to replace it with a new, secular, materialistic government.
I'm sure it was done with good intentions, to liberate people from the ancien regime. But in the end the materialism, egalitarianism and individualism that they promoted led to the nihilistic misery of the modern world, with people fighting over which purposeless, materialistic ideology should be forced on everyone else.
>It was a masonic revolution
>t. John Robison
>the first time the Rothschilds really used the power of fiat currency
>the first time
Wtf? How nu are you
>Red pill me on the French Revolution
It was a necessary purge of elitist fucks, like the sjw politicians of today and other notables who no longer represented the people and increased taxes to the level where normal people couldn't afford food anymore, almost like today.
It's not the first purge, there have been several and it was certainly not the last.
Soros funded the French Revolution
>Soros funded the French Revolution
Soros may play two ways, he funds the EU, but he also contributes to its destruction. So he benefits eiter way.
What is important is giving future politicians an incentive to represent the people.
The American revolution was most definitely not about liberty, except in rhetoric. It was just another masonic revolution to make America a completely new kind of nation in the shape of the enlightenment values. ie anti-Christian values.
It was basically based in the denial of the transcendent, since turning over the ancien regime (and the divine rights of kings) was seen as progress.
The end result is materialism, nihilism and endless war, within and between nations, until the natural order is restored in some form.
You are an idiot. It was a slaughter of innocent rulers, peasants, and everyone else by power-hungry, bloodthirsty Jacobin monsters.
But I want to know moar.
The American "Revolution" wasn't a revolution, it was a war of independence. We instilled no new leaders, no new ways, we just wanted to keep the money we made, instead of giving to Britain.
awww poor eu elites, right.. faggot.
Purges are always necessary to instil enough fear into leaders and politicians and give them the incentive to represent the people, and prevent corruption.
>pushing for secularization of power
>not masonic/gnostic
>American revolution is not a revolution
Yes it was, faggot.
The we revolted against a monarchy.
>We instilled no new leaders, no new ways
...
>We instilled no new leaders
"You" very specifically did just that, retard.
>we just wanted to keep the money we made
And in the Commonwealth, you did so.
>instead of giving to Britain.
The Colonies were Britain, and they were paying their debts.
No. Specifically not.
Shit, Gnosticism especially has nothing to do with that, as it's more like religionised Hermeticism.
The difference between the French Revolution and the American Revolution was that the French cared more about equality, while the Americans cared more about liberty.
What happened on the French Revolution was bolchevik tier savagery and cruelty. Yet 90% of the people here celebrate it out of ignorance.
Do you know what the French Revolution was? There was no EU.
All of our governments had been around for many years. The youngest was Georgia, which was still over 50 years old.
All of our leaders before the revolution stayed our leaders afterwards. George Washington, previously a continental general, became our general, then our president. Most of our "new" leaders had already been a part of our government.
>cared
This
Sorry m8, it was either orchestrated and/or hijacked by ideological people trying to organize a brand new type of society based in enlightenment values, ie towards "progress" in a gnostic sense. This is the reason America never had a king restrained by religious authority, which was the norm before the enlightenment and since the dawn of civilization.
The protocols of Zion was an elaborate hoax played for laughs
>Heavy gov debts
>people were starved
>press published inflammatory and phony info
We had no government. We had no representation in parliment and whatever order we had here was an extension of the British monarchy.
We already had a government, you nut. What do you think the colonies were? We just had no representation in the governing of the Empire.
>en.wikipedia.org
You can read about some of that government, right here.
Let me try to sort this out for you. Enlightenment philosophy led to intellectuals (free-masons among others) trying to rework the natural order in the name of science. The rejection of natural order (god's law) and efforts to "improve" is based specifically in the gnostic impulse to reach divinity through material means.
Gnostics don't believe in a divine/natural order, so they don't mind breaking it to gain power/enlightenment/whatever.
>We already had a government, you nut. What do you think the colonies were? We just had no representation in the governing of the Empire
>We just had no representation in the governing of the Empire
>Governing Empire
Blame the “enlightenment” “philosiphers”
>Gnostics don't believe in a divine/natural order,
They very specifically do. That's like one of the basic aspects of Gnosticism.
>Enlightenment philosophy led to intellectuals (free-masons among others) trying to rework the natural order in the name of science.
>rework
No, just understand. Which is in no way a bad thing. Anti-intellectualism, however, is.
Use whatever word you want. Doesn't change anything.
>Do you know what the French Revolution was? There was no EU.
I know what it was, and i know what your conflating it with.
The (elites) of today have no royal lineage, pathetic freaks who steal and gut each countrys economy in the name of social justice while they swim in all the wealth and riches they have stolen from the people.
and its never enough.
Europe is on the brink of civil war, and we know the who the culprits are. We know who doesn't represent us.
I'd rip my balls of for a new French revolution, just to see actual social justice in practice, the justice of populism, the peoples anger against the system that betrayed them and drove them into poverty and despair.
We need governments that no longer demands that Europe descends into the depths of socialism and regression.
First people set up a democratic gov in russia, but a year later red overthrow it.
Changes everything, breh.
We already had order. We had our own governments, we just paid taxes to the British Empire, and followed some general laws. Our colonial governments had their own taxes, their own laws, their own leaders, Etc. And the people in power in our colonies before the war, during the war, and after the war were the same people. We didn't want to overthrow the order, we just restructures our colonies into one country, and cut out the middleman who took our money.
How can one know so little about his own country?
Did he spell fabreget correctly?
Populist conservative governments.
kk
You are an idiot. The French Revolution was a massacre of innocent people, and was nothing at all like our current civilization.
>We had our own governments,
Were those officials elected or appointed?
By whom?
It was Marxism before Marx. People hated life as it was so much they decided to totally remake society in a bloody spectacle.
We used to have a bunch of French posters, and they either went somewhere or are hiding behind memeflags.
What happened?
...
The (((jacobins)))
>They very specifically do. That's like one of the basic aspects of Gnosticism.
let me rephrase that, they believe in natural order. Which can be reworked, exploited and changed for the better by those with the means and sufficient amounts of knowledge.
This is antithetical to a Divine order which is given from god to the world. This law is objective and immutable, attempts to fuck with it will result in catastrophy.
>No, just understand. Which is in no way a bad thing. Anti-intellectualism, however, is.
The point though isn't knowledge for it's own sake. It's rather to ascend and achieve whatever enlightenment they call it. It's a vision of material rising to the state of the divine, which is heretical since only the Divine can touch the material (since the Divine is higher and created the material, which is lower) by it's own accord, not the other way around.
>what happened
Top kek
Irrelevant isn't it, the more you whine and rant about populism, and the more you steal and demand of the people, the more the peoples fury will grow until it finally explodes.
It makes me hard jus thinking about it.
>en.wikipedia.org
>the Thirteen Colonies had a high degree of self-governance and active local elections
>active local elections
What are you even talking about?
Does anyone here speak nut?
>constitutional monarchy
>monarchs listed
I think the point was that they were, in the end, under the rule of monarchy. Which is qualitatively different from a government which draws it's justification from the "will of the people", instead of a divine mandate.
all I have left is hatred, I'm highly educated and unemployed like everyone else in europe.
Trust me, hatred accumulates, and when the bough brakes not even the gates of hell will be able to contain the peoples hatred for the system that has broken and stolen all of their countries from them!
And what does that have to do? The King barely had any involvement in the governing of the Colonies. Neither, really, did Parliament. Most of the governing was done by local leaders, elected locally, or colonial governors. We didn't overthrow the King, we just put ourselves out of his control.
>let me rephrase that, they believe in natural order. Which can be reworked, exploited and changed for the better by those with the means and sufficient amounts of knowledge.
Still wrong. Shit, have you done like any research on this? Maybe start with some Tobias Churton to cover the basics.
But what you said is the correct way the world works (but not what the Gnostics believe[d])
>The point though isn't knowledge for it's own sake.
Depends on the person. For most, it's for it's own sake, since very few are fool enough to think they can study their way divine.
So? That doesn't make it a revolution. We didn't overthrow the King. We just stopped paying him, and restructured into one country. We elected our new leaders from our pools of old leaders.
You are an idiot. The French Revolution wasn't some glorious victory of the people over hereditary tyrants. The King wasn't a bad man, let alone a tyrant. Read up on him. It was a slaughter that led to the death of millions of civilians, established a new dictatorship, and led to the decline of France on the global stage. This is the fifth French Republic, by the way.
That is government, aye. Sadly not as authoritative as it should have been though, what with parliament and all.
When you're king of a kingdom you dont need to do anything. Your rule is absolute. If the people want to LARP as and independent nation with "elected officials" thats fine, but it means nothing.
You really need to fully understand how a monarchy operates before you go around calling a colony an independent nation.
sure, but that does not negate the fact that Europe today would benefit from a revolution.
It had a ton of Jewish influence. Both in causing wealth disparity, and at inciting violence. They were merchants in a country where most people were extremely poor. Think about it.
It doesnt matter what the colonists were LARPing as. The king's rule is absolute in his kingdom.
>they admit it in this hoax
really redpilled me there
>When you're king of a kingdom you dont need to do anything. Your rule is absolute.
That is so hilarious, historically wrong. Especially in England, which never had absolute monarchy.
>Your rule is absolute
Wow, a real idiot! A king isn't necessarily absolute. Especially not the English one. Do you know what Parliament is?
Then stop shitposting about how great the French Revolution was, you nitwit.
what country are you from user? I know nothing of the French Revolution, but this made me sad, as an opinion that isn't purely objective
you have a heart, bless you
>have you done like any research on this?
Mostly countless of hours on lectures and a few books, mostly theology tho.
Gnosis, literally the first page in wikipedia:
"Gnosis is the common Greek noun for knowledge (γνῶσις, gnôsis, f.).[1] The term is used in various Hellenistic religions and philosophies.[2][3] It is best known from Gnosticism, where it signifies a knowledge or insight into man's real nature as Divine, leading to the deliverance of the Divine spark within man from the constraints of earthly existence.[3][2]"
It's the whole basis of the philosophy. To transcend the lower material world through knowledge of the divine.
>Depends on the person. For most, it's for it's own sake, since very few are fool enough to think they can study their way divine.
Then you aren't a gnostic. And are something much more sensible and non-heretical.
I'm a Yankee, through and through.
>Mostly countless of hours on lectures and a few books, mostly theology tho.
Then how are you getting it so wrong?
> To transcend the lower material world through knowledge of the divine.
But not to change it. Only to understand it. Maybe read more than just the wiki? Because the Parfait would think you're way outta the ballpark.
>Then you aren't a gnostic.
Indeed. I was just talking about intellectualism there, like with Freemasonry.
Ok, help me understand which official choose to exclude the colonies from parliament?
And how or why would subjects of the monarchy not have any say in being represented in parliment?
>The French Revolution by contrast was a Peasant revolt that overturned the existing power structures.
You don't really believe that peasants could possibly achieve that user, ... do you?
This is just a myth, it was done by protestant bourgeois, lots of masonic traitors within the government and the army.
People were passive sheep back then, it still holds true today.
They were ordered to comply or to die, most chose the former.
It was a bloodbath like no other.
You cant have a meaninful discussion without someone going
>Hurr hurr french flag
>Catholic monarchy
well no wonder the french were so cucked
>Then stop shitposting about how great the French Revolution was, you nitwit.
Then stop history larping you leftypol cuck.
And stop trying to to jew people into submissive support of your regressive EU sjw causes.
I'm a monarchist, and purges of politicians are necessary in order to prevent corruption.
Hurr hurr french flag