So how exactly do lolbertarians and ancaps plan to remove niggers...

So how exactly do lolbertarians and ancaps plan to remove niggers, communist and kikes with "physical removal" considering you have no standing army or hierarchy and are violating the nap by doing so. Or is going to be one of those "state enforced anarchism" types.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=TICdCM4j7x8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Who said they ever wanted to get rid of them in the first place?

>niggers are too dumb to capitalize
>niggers either starve or resort to stealing food
>niggers get shot for stealing food

>nigger shoots you instead
>nobody cares because laws dont exist
>end

With private cops enforcing private laws on my private property. Can't remove them from other people's property though - other than commies of course as the fact they are commies violates the NAP.

i don't think niggers can survive in an ancap society

even with all their gibs they still have negative net worth, with no gibs they'll starve after the first 72 hours

they'll riot, sure, but it won't last too long. not a single nigger can produce or even secure their own food, there's like an 80 IQ cutoff for that kind of strategy

That's a cute butt.

No gibs me dats means much fewer niggers. Some communist cuck like castro jr will thow their country on the sword of (((multiculti))) just to virtue signal about it.

this. also, the bigger problem is that an ancap society has no ability (or desire) to stop pedophilia

Go back to leftypol faggot

>b-but Im not a commitard
Go back to leftypol faggot

>>nigger shoots you instead
>neighbors shoot him because nobody wants robbing niggers in the neighborhood
To be fair, you need a really high IQ to understand anarcho capitalism.

>ancap
>no law
pick one

inb4 but muh anarchy

private law is a thing, nigger

easy. Develop a different potent, highly addictive and lethal narcotic. niggers are dumb and degenerate sage

No government enforced integration. Some nigger comes into your establishment, you tell him to get the fuck out and if he doesn't he's violating the NAP by encroaching on your property and takes a bullet in the head.

Imagine a society where white flight was marketable and racial price differences were labeled with citations to supporting research.
Only in some regions, of course.
There might be tacit distinction or diversity-seeking markets as well as explicit ones.
It's kind of horrible, but the way to get out from under it is ironically for people to become more equal to each other. The price differences can disappear first individually and then collectively as people reach towards the best standards.

Ancap cultures have as much or as little desire for cultural objectives as people are willing to work and pay for, same as every other culture.

you're not violating the nap because there's no nap between us and them

try again nigger shill

how is this solution not obvious to you? must not be around niggers a lot sage.

>Ancap cultures have as much or as little desire for cultural objectives as people are willing to work and pay for, same as every other culture.
regardless of whether you desire to, you would be unable to stop pedophilia since it's not against the NAP if the child "consents"

2nd part of the plan would be to prop up some nigger to be a famous rapper to promote the drug because niggers will sell their own out. crabs in a bucket.

less (or no) welfare, and no laws against self-segregration

it would do more than sitting around fantasizing about ethnostates and the day of the rope

That ass had a black dick in it

yeah... it's Sasha Grey

Who said that’s a bad thing?

not just one

niggers do a great job of removing themselves. all you need to do is cut welfare and you'll have millions dead within weeks.

>it's not on 4skin
>it must not exist
mind posting webm of you flushing your toilet?

niggers cannot aim for shit
the only reason they ever get away with crime is because of noguns faggots

god i am so horny. i really just want a girl to let me sniff and lick her butthole. i was walking behind this little glamour the other day. she was wearing leggings and her ass was a peach. she looked behind her and then changed direction. how am i supposed to get a girl to let me sniff and lick her butthole if they think i am a creep.

rape?

do what other australians do

pay her

i might as well. girls seem to think i am a rapist anyway.

do it. you just want the sex, most rapists want to hurt someone. it's different.

Anyone know if this girl has done any nude scenes?

>implying peace time politics are required to be synonymous
shit b9

lol it's a nasty pornstar Sasha gray. She has a good scene getting fucked by a guy in a bear suit if you're into being a porn addled fapgoy

Shes a jew, so who cares

Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Why is that? Black gentleman shot up our range and sent shooters running in all directions a month back. Now my daughter refuses to get out of the damned car if she sees a brown person on the line.

Exerpt from Hoppe's recent speech

>Many libertarians hold the view that all that is needed to maintain a libertarian social order is a strict enforcement of the non-aggression principle. Otherwise, as long as one abstains from aggression, according to their view, the principle of live-and-let-live should hold. Yet surely while this live-and-let-live sounds appealing to adolescents, in rebellion against parental authority and all social convention and control (and I should add many youngsters have initially been attracted to libertarian believing that this live-and-let-live is all that libertarianism has to offer), and while this principle does indeed hold and apply for people living far apart and dealing with each other only indirectly and from afar, it does not hold and apply, or rather it is insufficient when it comes to people living in close proximity to each other as neighbors and cohabitants of the same community.

>A simple example suffices to make this point. Assume there's all of a sudden a new next-door neighbor this neighbor does not aggress against you or your property in any way, but he is simply a bad neighbor. He is littering on his own neighboring property turning it into a garbage heap for instance. In the open for you to see he engages in ritual animal slaughter. [Possible jab at Augustus Invictus.] Or he turns his house into a Freudenhaus, a bordello with clients coming and going all day and all night long. Or he never offers a helping hand and never keeps any promises that he has made. Or he can not (or else he refuses) to speak to you in your own language and so forth and so forth. We all have experiences with how bad life can become if you have bad neighbors.

part 1/n

How to Spot Nu-Pol 101

Now so much for those libertarians who in addition to their live-and-let-live motto also hail the idea of "respect no authority", "respect no hierarchy", "respect no person above you".

Now the lesson: the peaceful cohabitation of neighbors and of people in regular direct contact with each other on some territory, that is, a tranquil, convivial social order, requires also a commonality of culture, of language, religion, custom, and convention. There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures on distant, physically separated territories, but multiculturalism cultural heterogeneity cannot exist in one in the same place in territory without leading to diminishing social trust, increased tension, and ultimately the call for a strongman and the destruction of anything resembling a libertarian social order.

And moreover, just as a libertarian order must always be on guard against bad (even if non aggressive) neighbors by means of social ostracism that is by a common you are-not-welcome-here culture, so, and indeed even more vigilantly so, must it be guarded against neighbors who openly advocate communism, socialism, syndicalism, or democracy in any shape or form. These people, in thereby posing an open threat to all private property and property owners, must not only be shunned, but they must, to use by now somewhat famous Hoppe meme, be "physically removed", if need be by violence, and forced to leave for other pastures. Not to do so inevitably leads to--well--communism, socialism, syndicalism, or democracy and hence the very opposite of a social order that can call itself a libertarian.

part 2/n

Now with these "common sensical" insights in mind, I turn now to the more challenging question of how to move from here, that is, the status quo, to there. And for this it might be instructive to first briefly consider the answer given by the "liberalala", "peace and love and liberty", "Frieda, Freuda, Eierkuchen", "capitalism is love" libertarians, because it reveals the same fundamental egalitarianism even if in a slightly different form as that exhibited also by the live-and-let-live libertarians. These, these live-and-let-live libertarians, as I have just tried to show, define what we may call the bad neighbor problem and what is in fact of course merely a shorthand for the general problem posed by the coexistence of distinctly different, alien, mutually disturbing, annoying, strange, or hostile cultures. They have simply defined this problem out of existence because they assume all people are exactly the same, all cultures are the same, and if that is true then a bad neighbor problem simply cannot exist!

Now outside egalitarian fantasy lands however, in the real world libertarians must above all be realistic and recognize from the outset, as he Alt-Right does, the inequality not just of individuals but also of different cultures as an ineradicable datum of the human existence. We must further recognize that there exists plenty of enemies of liberty as defined by libertarianism, and that they, not we, are in charge of worldly affairs, that in many parts of the contemporary world their control of the populace is so complete that the idea of liberty and of a libertarian social order are practically unheard of or considered unthinkable, except as some idle intellectual play or mental gymnastics by a few exotic individuals, and that it is essentially only in the West, that is, in the countries of Western and Central Europe and the lands settled by its people, that the idea of liberty is so deeply-rooted that these enemies still can be openly challenged.

In confining our strategic considerations now only to the West them we can identify, pretty much as the Alt-Right has effectively done, these actors and agencies as our principal enemies: they are first and foremost the ruling elites in control of the state apparatus and in particular that so-called a deep state or the so-called "cathedral" of the military, the secret services, the central banks, and the supreme courts. As well, they include the leaders of the military-industrial complex that is of nominally private firms that owe their very existence to the state as the exclusive or dominant buyer of their products, and they also include the leaders of the big commercial banks which owes their privilege of creating money and credit out of thin air to the existence of the central bank and its role as a lender of last resort. They together, that is, state, big business, and big banking, form an extremely powerful even if tiny mutual admiration society, jointly ripping off the huge mass of taxpayers and living it up big-time at their expense.

The second much larger group of enemies is made up of the intellectuals, the educators, and educrats from the highest level of academia down to the level of elementary schools and kindergartens. Funded almost exclusively whether directly or indirectly by the state, they in their overwhelming majority have become the soft tools and willing executioners in the hands of the ruling elite and its designs for absolute power and total control.

And certainly there are the journalists of the mainstream media as a docile products of the system of education and the craven recipients and popularizers of government information.

Now equally important in the development of a libertarian strategy then is immediately following next question: who are the victims [of the elites]?

Now the standard libertarian answer to this is the taxpayers as opposed to the tax consumers, yet while this is essentially correct, it is at best only part of the answer and libertarians could learn something in this respect from the Alt-Right because apart from the narrowly economic aspect there is also a wider cultural aspect that must be taken into account in identifying the victims. In order to expand and increase its power, the ruling elites have been conducting for many decades what Pat Buchanan has identified as a systematic cultural war aimed at the transvaluation of all values and the destruction of all natural (or if you will, organic) social bonds and institutions such as families, communities, ethnic groups, and genealogically related nations, so as to create inherently an increasingly atomized populace whose only shared characteristic and unifying bond is its common existential dependency on the state.

The first step in this direction, taken already more than half a century ago or even longer ago, was the introduction of public welfare in social security. Thereby, the underclass and the elderly were turned into state dependents, and the value and the importance of family and community was correspondingly diminished and weakened. More recently, further reaching steps in this direction have proliferated. A new victimology has been proclaimed and promoted. Women, and in particular single mothers, blacks, browns, Latinos, homosexuals, lesbians, bi-, and transsexuals have been awarded victim status and accorded legal privileges through non-discrimination or affirmative action decrees.

>As well, most recently such privileges have been expanded also to foreign national immigrants, whether legal or illegal, in so far as they fall into one of the just mentioned categories or are members of non-Christian religions such as Islam for instance. The result? Not only has the earlier mentioned bad neighbor problem not been avoided or softened, but it has been systematically promoted and intensified instead. Cultural homogeneity has been destroyed and the freedom of association and the voluntary physical segregation and separation of different people, communities, cultures and traditions, has been replaced by an all-pervasive system of forced social integration.

>Moreover, each mentioned victim group has thus been pitted against every other, and all of them have been pitted against white heterosexual Christian males (and in particular those married and with children) as the only remaining legally unprotected group of alleged victimizers.

>Hence as a result of the transvaluation of all values promoted by the ruling elites, the world has been literally turned upside down. The institution of a family household with father, mother, and their children that has formed the basis of Western Civilization as the freest, most industrious, ingenious, and all-around accomplished civilization known to mankind, that is, the very institution and people that has done most good in human history (they've done many bad things): that group has been officially stigmatized and vilified as a source of all social ills and made the most heavily disadvantaged even persecuted group by the enemy elites' relentless policy of "Divide Et Impere".

Full lecture here

youtube.com/watch?v=TICdCM4j7x8

Your thinking operates under the false assumption that those people are or can be self supporting.

If the people want laws, there will be laws.

not if they violate the NAP

too easy
remove gibs
>they either starve or give you an excuse to shoot them
>profit

Not obeying my rules on my property violates the NAP. If people don't like the rules they don't have to come.

>high-IQ
>to understand how the ME works

>or pakistan
>or africa
>very high IQ

>pakistan or africa
>ancap
Sure. And Germany is socialist.

I just say let Planned Parenthood do it’s thing, while redpilling whites on how good it feels to creampie your girlfriend.

>niggers
I support Planned Parenthood. I send money and pester my congress critters. In the US, 50% of all black babies are aborted. The question only remains, on how to abort the other 50%. To this end, I encourage blacks to kill each other. Pro gun, pro abortion. Get it?