Why Don't Right-wingers Understand Economics?

I get you don't like social Liberalism. I get it but why can't you at least admit Liberals were right when it comes to economics. I mean economically left policies benefit the majority of people while right wing policies only benefit the wealthy. Shouldn't a nationalist want the greatest number in a nation to be happy rather than 1% of the nation?

youtube.com/watch?v=Y3HL_ooA2Wc

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kz2PPNNafP4
youtube.com/watch?v=d-UeA8CH0J0
youtube.com/watch?v=MU41Nj1j9sE
youtube.com/watch?v=Y3HL_ooA2Wc
youtu.be/GTQnarzmTOc?t=1m33s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because anything more than "Gas le kikes, race war now!" is too complex for Sup Forums.

Unfortunanetly i think this is true

>FDR
>FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate

Chomsky said we'd still be in the great depression if it weren't for FDR's policies.

>Shouldn't a nationalist want the greatest number in a nation to be happy rather than 1% of the nation?
Of course.
youtube.com/watch?v=kz2PPNNafP4
youtube.com/watch?v=d-UeA8CH0J0

Look up the German economy after Hitler took power and kicked out the plutocrats

>chomsky
Yeah, he also said rogue khmers didn't kill anybody and it's all CIA propaganda.

>Chomsky

EVERY MAN A KING!

SHARE THE WEALTH!

...

>noam chomsky
>richard spencer
great way to start a thread

why don't lefties understand economics past "take their money and spend it!" no monetary policy understanding... no understanding of capital investment.. no understanding of liquidity dangers.

Only a moron would say that a fed reserve at near 0% on an economy with 70% consumption that's 20T's in debt would do well with a bunch of entitlement programs.. which will only be steered towards immigrants anyway

Yeah and it did well due to left wing policies

Are you an MIT professor?

Enjoy your ban

Sure.

You don't understand economics, you don't understand monetary policy, you don't understand investment, you don't understand that a 0% interest rate is literally needed right now. This is why right-wingers can't be trusted with an economy

You're confusing American right-wingers with the right wing in general. In general right wing European thinkers tend to find problems with capitalism in general, even though they generally agree in that both "capitalism" and themselves believe in the concept of inequality as a moral good or necessity. The right wing generally has a lot of issues with liberal capitalism but not so much capitalism in general.

This is a meme. He questioned the truthfulness of accounts by a French priest at the time (keep in mind, the priest and the CIA were the only sources of information at the time, and this was shortly after Watergate and COINTELPRO), but after the full evidence emerged, he corrected his own estimates.

>Liberals were right when it comes to economics
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>muh poor peepole.... muh rich peepole... duh ebil rich
There is nothing intelligent, sophisticated, or correct about this position.

>CUT TAXES ON THE RICH AND THEN EVERYONE WILL BE A BILLIONIARE
LOL, right-wing nuts everyone.

What you don't understand is the reason we are in this mess is not redistribution of wealth but unbridled increasing concentration of wealth.

your society's standard of living actually has very little to do with it's exact economic system.
The difference between Sweden and Liberia is not economics

It's more about the genes of the people in the society than any other factor.
Economic and political policies which improve the genetic makeup of the people will result in a higher standard of living.

For example, if your economic policies encourage all the smart, motivated people to flee your country, and subsidize the reproduction of your underclass, you're going down the drain. If your economic policies do the opposite, you can become the richest nation on earth

>CUT TAXES ON THE RICH AND THEN EVERYONE WILL BE A BILLIONIARE
>muh trickle down
All leftist economic arguments are meme tier and incoherent because they don't even understand even basic economic concepts like supply and demand. This is why they always resort to simplistic strawmen of things they don't agree with while believing stupid shit like labor theory of value

nobody understand economics
that's part of the problem, that we've let it all get so complicated. a simpler system would suck though unless it was more free. but then you think with a free system the same economy we had before, the same complexity, could grow back.

all i know is the future is cashless so that the establishment can control who buys and sells. and cash will be illegal.

You're thinking or corporatism rather than capitalism, you dolt.

Right-wingers don't understand economics at all, they are uneducated. This is why no one likes them

I understand economics

No retard im talking about free marketism.

and i say simpler would suck only because it implies the state decided what is and isn't allowed under the simplicity laws or whatever which would inevitably slippery slope into too much establishment power over the system like we have now. so i assumed a simple currency system would be less free and thus prolematic. just to elaborate.

Fascist economy = best economy
youtube.com/watch?v=MU41Nj1j9sE

only a person who doesn't understand economics would think he understands economics. the shit you can do with money is beyond human comprehension it's almost magic at this point. the strings are being pulled in ways they don't teach in business school

nice commie fist salute

you don't know anything.

yes, you are totally correct
the economics textbooks they give you in school are jewish trickery in the form of the paper jew

>economics

Which specific part?

>He questioned the truthfulness of accounts by a French priest at the time
and he's questioning the truthfulness of accounts by economics professors at this time

of course i don't, like i said: nobody knows. well i suppose that isn't strictly true, the people who understand the economy are the people who run it, and they manipulate it in ways we simply could never understand. and even they are likely only riding this beast and not even in full control or understanding themselves of what will happen. i speculate

trickle down

>left policies benefit the majority of people while right wing policies only benefit the wealthy
If your talking modern left and right yes their policies are shit, but protectionism isn't a liberal policy and never was.
In Canada the first major economic policy that built our nation was led forward by our first Prime Minister Sir John A. MacDonald, who was an Irish Catholic and a Conservative. It was called the National Policy and it instituted high import tariffs to protect our manufacturing and grow our nation which led to the creation of the CPR and the expansion west to the Pacific coast. Protectionism made Canada strong until the Liberal fucks Mackenzie King and St. Laurent gutted the National Policy in favour of globalization and later free trade under Mulroney and Chrétien. Now we've gone from low population and stable economy to inequality, rapid overpopulation and the complete destruction of our secondary industry.

So no liberal economists can go fuck themselfs because they work for the Bay Street slugs not the Canadian people and the same goes for America and any other western nation.

That's a neoconservative proposition, not a "alt-right" proposition

It was pretty close to Hoover and FDR's new deal. It produced rationing... lol

SLIDE MOAR FAGGOTS HAHAHAHA
>THEY ARE SLIDING THIS THREAD
SLIDE MOAR FAGGOTS HAHAHA
>THEY ARE SLIDING THIS THREAD

ALL ANONS NEEDED
>ALL ANONS NEEDED
ALL ANONS NEEDED
>ALL ANONS NEEDED

SPREAD INFORMATION
>SPREAD INFORMATION
SPREAD INFORMATION
>SPREAD INFORMATION

What material have you read about economics? Chomsky is not an economist btw.

Stormfront larpers are probably 10/15 percent of Sup Forums. Before the election it wasn't this gay--only threads about Jews but not daily nigger hate shit

>Pretending trickle down economics is not working
You do realize that money is not wealth, right?
You do realize that welfare recipients in the USA live in a form of luxury that none of the kings of old could even dream of?
Climate control inside of climate control to keep your food fresh and your toes toasty, all the libraries of the world in their pocket, foods and spices from around the world are affordable, medical care beyond comprehension.

The list goes on and on and on, these lying faggots don't care at ALL about poverty, it is all about power and control.

When will liberals realise that for a debt ridden nation, benefit money can't just be created out of thin air

Alt-right is socialist economically

I watched this

youtube.com/watch?v=Y3HL_ooA2Wc

(((Chomsky))) should stick to linguistics.

>BASED BLACKS IN MAGA HATS

Not Marxist socialist

"nigger hate" has been on Sup Forums before the election ever started

You realize all those are due to redistribution right?

First we have to get the white ethnostate then we worry about economics afterwards. If you get communism while the blacks are still here you only get white people working for the welfare taking blacks and Mexicans.

It sorta can

I know that, but they are still socialist

Nah.

Why are you people responding to concern troll slide threads???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/

Stop. Do serious Sup Forums business or go shit in Sup Forums

Anything else serves the Jew.

Do not post after this post.

It's important to make the difference between a pragmatic use of socialistic policy and plain Marxist socialism.

One had private property and private initiative of capital while the other doesn't.

No, a nationalist should want a strong middle class , a strong indicator of a nation's prosperity, which is impossible with leftist economic policies. Idiot.

Spencer stole that sign off an Antifa protesting the deploraball and waited outside because the deploraball banned him.

Nothing is preventing you from worrying about both at the same time, this is just a tool for socialists to lead useful idiots along.

Socialistic policy is only pragmatic for the one that wants to get elected. Also if you read the communist manifesto the 10 planks of the communist manifesto, you will see that progressive taxation, public education, etc is all written down there.

>It's important to make the not real socialism argument

Neck yourself you leftist fuck.

stop trolling

Leftism is what created the middle class you MORON

Because you are wrong, and provided no evidence to make me consider my position. Why is being a condescending faggot supposed to sway anyone to your side

>Why Don't Right-wingers Understand Economics?
Are you actually fucking retarded?
Go to an Econ class, 90% of the student body will be right wing.

>what is a mixed economy

...

>supply loads of proof
>"HURR NO EVIDENCE"

You never have taken an economics class. In fact they are firing right-wing profs for being so uneducated and stupid.

...

He's saying it IS real socialism you moron. Hope you have cancer

> Liberals were right
> economically left
How confused you are conflating Americas liberal party with the left

Also failing to see how "benefiting the majority" just means sustaining more "worker"-consumers for the 1%.

It has always been the middle that counts (society/democracy) and that is torn in two by the Underclass-Overclass relationship.

>TFW Capitalism explained by socialists is literally more accurate than that retarded primitive jibberish written on "socialism explained by capitalists".

3,2,1
> Yeah, that's invalid because jews wrote it

Also
Holy shit what a cringey video, we had better "econ rap" videos 6 years ago
youtu.be/GTQnarzmTOc?t=1m33s

>sustaining more workers
No, having less workers is better for the working class actually.

>faggoty YouTube video
>loads of evidence

Also econ is no longer in the business school at my uni due to how useless their research is.

Sorry it is lefties who do not get economics? How has the welfare state not create only more poor? Capitalism all the way get government out of my wallet!!!!!

We also would of had a revolution, Embraced Hitler and Gas all our Kikes.

That video is biased towards Hayek though.

Stop larping

>wanting your tax dollars to go to minorities

Then what's the point of your school?

fucking idiots believe that human's natural state isn't poverty is the reason.

We keep asking how to avoid poverty instead of how to acquire wealth

Reality is biased towards Hayek

So how does having no roads help the market?

The moment i started reading that i realized you were a troll.

I agree with you, but the problem is if you tax the richest and biggest companies, they'll pack up shop and leave, at least this is what they always threaten anyway.

Maybe the commies are right when it comes to the rich, perhaps we should, or a government confiscate their property and wealth.

Teach real business, not psuedo psychology with "supply and demand" shoehorned into every class

>wanting your tax dollars to go to the richest 1%

What are you on about? Read the fucking post > "benefiting the majority" just means sustaining more "worker"-consumers for the 1%

Why don't LEFT wingers understand economy?
Hitler was pretty right winged, yet Germany is top 10, while russia still strugles.

No, you are just a typical lefty college kiddo who will be in massive debt and unemployed in five years

>Chomsky said
If Chomsky told you that cats shit out Snickers bars, would you be inclined to find out??

business is literally not a real major. It's for retards who didn't make it into STEM. It's bullshit that's been figured out decades ago and is completely useless.

>The moment i started reading that i realized you were a troll.

>Coming from someone hiding their flag while claiming the left is responsible for creating the middle class

We know you are a leaf, faggot.

>raised fist
I hate this faggot communist

hahahahahahaha
Get out of college into the real world kiddo. It's the business majors that will be hiring your non-functioning ass.
The most impotent lessons I learned in business were not from sitting in a classroom.

I'm actually not in college or have any debt

He was left-wing economically

IDIOT, benefint the majority means making the working class have more wealth

idk

You CANNONT multiply wealth by dividing it. Right-Wing liberals have the right idea when it comes to economics. Look at Latin America; Chile, richest part of Latin America, Least amount of natural resources in Latin America. Venezuela, poorest part of Latin America, most confirmed natural resources. Wanna know the difference between the two? Venezuela is Socialist, while Chile has a 100% Free Market

>I'm actually not in college or have any debt
And yet you feel superior to econ and business majors?
Have fun busing tables for the rest of your life after your trust fund runs out.

>coming from someone who thinks (or is pretending to think) capitalism created the middle class

If you go to Harvard mainly. Business majors end up unemployed. Top economists make a lot of money but "business" majors don't do anything.

No shit mongoloid. It LITERALLY isn't. Finance and accounting are though. Your shitposting will improve, just keep at it

I'm actually applying to college next year. So no.

> That picture
> Spencer finally reveals his true Communist colors

That explains A LOT.