Failure

>Socialism wor-

Few people actually think that it does

You will never be creative, ever

>Highest IQ country in the world remained Communist
Really makes u think.....

singapore?

>Marxism-Leninism is the only form of socialism

All thanks to Russia desu

Socialism is proof that if you put a smiley face on something everyone will eat it up and then starve due to lack of food to eat.

And they've been moving further and further away from Communism to a more free market economy.

Really stupid meme. Russia starved for hundreds years during Feudalism and Capitalism times. Only during Communism times famines was ended. Of course not immediatly, it took several decades to change primitive agrarian system to modern agrarian system.

China is still going pretty strong.

>highest IQ country
Hong Kong and Singapore were never communist. Although I suppose you could say that the average Chinese IQ fell 3 points during the past 70 years.

...

>chinese government
>marxist in any way

China has abandoned Marxism-Leninism, faggot. It's basically a free(ish) market oligarchy now, thanks to Deng Xiaoping.

>mass IQ testing
>China
>70 years ago

If you know anything about China you know that the communism already failed and they switched to state capitalism after mao died. It is a mixed economy most experts considered to be state capitalism now. They have "free-market" districts with fuckin mcdonalds and taco bells in them ffs.

Low and behold their economy exploded as soon as the regional free market zones on the coast took hold.

...

NK's system is indistinguishable from other country's Marxism-Leninism

>Only during Communism times famines was ended. Of course not immediately, it took several decades to change primitive agrarian system to modern agrarian system.
Oh yes... totally. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the USSR sold oil and gas for food during the "good years" of the Soviet Union... nope, not at all. Nevermind that by 1985, half of all food in the Soviet Union was imported from its avowed enemies. Ever wonder why food shortages occurred after that year? It wasn't because of Gorbachev's reforms. It was because the price of oil plummeted and the USSR could no longer pay as much for food imports from the West. Not to mention that the USA had to send billions of dollars in food aid and loans to the USSR from 1989-1991 so that millions of people wouldn't starve to death.
TL;DR The Soviet Union was never self-sufficient wrt food.

I was stating that since Hong Kong and Singapore have average IQs of 108 and the PRC has an average IQ of 105 despite similar ethnic makeups, perhaps the difference could be that two of those nations didn't kill off their intellectual class by the millions in the past 70 years.

>Only during Communism times famines was ended

Because the Holodomor doesn't count, right Dmitri?

>sold oil and gas for food

>communist Russia - 4 - 50% export of oil and gas
>capitalist Russia - 40 - 70% export of oil and gas

You have problems with reading? Or you think communism is magic fairy that can fix things with magic wand?

>Of course not immediatly, it took several decades

>Of course it took several decades
Many of which were spent recovering from a fuckup that was the DIRECT RESULT of party policy. Communist agriculture has always been grossly inefficient.

>USSR has massive steppe region and plains
>USA has massive steppe region and plains
>one has famines and has to import food for decades
>the other has never had a famine in history and has been the world's largest agricultural exporter for over a century
Really makes you think...

Asshole: No Venezuela? No Brazil? No Chile? No Ecuador? No BOLIVIA?

>Communist agriculture has always been grossly inefficient

In compare with Russia before 1917? Communist agriculture was much more efficient then.

I think most of the world prefers to imagine that Latin America doesn't exist. Let's face it, nothing influential ever really happens there. In fact, everything there pretty much stays the same. Flip flopping from some corrupt centrist democracy to far-left socialism to far-right military dictatorships and back to corrupt centrist democracy, etc etc. It never changes. Latin America's most influential part in world history is probably going to end up being the demographic overrunning of the USA.

>USA: 20% of agriculture territory
>Russia: 7% of agriculture territory

>Russia: 7% of agriculture territory
Is that including the other Soviet republics like Ukraine?

bernie got lots of votes

USSR had 9% of agricultural lands. Near all of them hadn't even enought natural precipitation level. Russian agriculture in all times was mostly shit because of climate in compare with Europe or USA.

We are pulling crops and meat for 500 million people this year. Your 9% of farmable land must be larger than our total farmable land, considering you are 6 times larger than us.

And Russia (or USSR) makes more food than Argentine because of big territory. But you can do more food from one hectare because of better climate.

Not enough to stop corporate shill and corrupt hypocrite powerhouse - Hillary R. Clinton, from taking the DNC primary.

More like in Name -only.

State Capitalism
State CApitalism
State Capitalism

Argentina has bloody brilliant land though, can't compare

...

>Wanting a Jew in government

Why?

The irony of your ID.

millenials/liberals/soyboys aren't aware of the JQ

they just want free shit