Capitalism work-

...

Egalitarianism

Everything will be perfect.

And about 70% of those families would blow all the money in a month and still end up dirt poor, while the other 30% would start businesses and invest their money, only to end up rich again.

Cause it would still be 700.000 if there was zero incentive to work because it would be seized and re-distributed.
Fucking kill yourself.

Wealth != Income
Wealth is assets
Income is cashflow

>70%
cute, make that 90

What do they mean annual income?
Like for one year? Then there is no money left?

And if it were divided though the whole world each person would have $11,000.
Bring on globalism I can't wait to live in a Toyota corolla!

If you want that much money become an entrepreneur you cuck.

That's not how money works.

If there are 100 apples in the world and every apples is sold 1$ in the current state of the market, doesn't mean that you actually can go with 100$ and literally have all the appels of the world.

The second that you want to buy "everything", others agents of the market would start bidding for the product two, increasing the price.

The price of things is dynamic.
The value of your money is dyanmic.

You CAN'T literally divide equally the wealth.

>implying the actual (((wealth))) of the US ins't all offshore

it's 300,000
this is assuming you could see everything without prices going down
it's a one time thing not "annual"

Some would spend the money on drugs and degenerate materialist dreams, and others would be a bit more pragmatic and invest it.

Some people are just not meant to be rich, and not by "structural inequality" - they just make shitty decisions.

They literally took the total wealth of the us (primarily real estate and stocks) and divided it by the number of households.
The person doing the math thought wealth was income, which is why they said annually.
But it's not, it'd be a one time payment.
The wealth of the average american is 300k

it's worse than that, not only is there no money left, there is literally nothing left, it means selling every building, every brick, every apple, every head of corn, etc.

320,000,000 Americans × $700,000 = $224,000,000,000,000!
$244,000,000,000,000 ÷ $18,750,000,000,000 US GDP = about 12 times our economy.
Bottom line:
OP is a cunt.

1) it said divide wealth, not gdp
2) it said family, not person
3) it's still wrong, but you're equally wrong

>everyone gets 700k
>suddenly most of them stop working
>society collapses in an instant

>Dividing all the accumulated wealth of the US
>Thinking this is annual
>Not including the debt
>Being this much of a commie

It's about -250k per family, and median income is around 50k.

So around 6 times our existing economy. Still totally unreal. You and OP are fags.

Define "wealth"

If every man woman and child in the USA had $700,000 then a McChicken sandwich would be $10

inflation is a bitch

If the wealth was divided equally only a fraction of that wealth would have been created.
Your a communist because you are too weak to compete and want free gibs, not because you care for your fellow man.

this. redistributing the wealth in such a heavy handed fashion would create massive inflation. a $30k car would become $60k and the ammount of actual material wealth for the middle class would remain constant temporarily and begin to decline once the inflation hit the productive sector. the next step of every retarded commie country is price fixing. step three is venezuela. communism doesn't work.

More like $70.

How bout we revert back to Feudalism? Landlords hire serfs. They work for the lords and give Lords their product or produce. Lords sell their products or produce to other people. Lords get rich. Serfs get money. They buy shit. Etc

Source or kys.

>the pareto distribution is irreleva-

Per capita GDP is $57k retard. That includes double counted money (spent twice in a year). Plus money would lose all value if it were never earned.

Exactly. People live in the moment. Nobody wants to wait untill they get old and too stupid to remember anything. People want to party now and die young, but not really. Everyone wants to live forever.

15 trillion / 350 million = 57k, not 700k. Cool lie though, I bet it works really well with communists.

Given that you went full robber baron.

What amount of redistribution of wealth can you fat cats tolerate?

I let you in on a secret: if you distribute all wealth equally, nobody would have an incentive to pursue wealth in the first place. Average wealth would be 0, just like in Cuba.

I'm going to start killing anyone who keeps doing the hyphenated thread subject/OP meme.

Why do they always say annually? Shit wouldn't even last 6 months before the economy ground to a halt.

They only make those bad decisions because they're poor and have bad education.

>Muh communism it's an example of post monetary economy.

It's just state capitalism don't fall for the memes they were specifically designed so you don't question the monetary system and keep on being a bank slave.

it's not wrong

Oh I love this one. Let’s envision a world where literally everyone is a millionaire. I create a product like an iPhone but because in real world people have a range of income I try and make it at least accessible to lots of people. In fantasy millionaire world everyone is millionaire. So my iPhone costs $300,000 because that’s a reasonable amount and people will pay it. Welcome to a world where the value of the dollar is shit because you don’t know how money works.

Why would people stop working once they had $700k? The super rich don't stop working, and they have 700k many many times over....

The dirty secret is: if everyone had 700k, you would actually see a lot MORE people working. They would work, but they would work for themselves. Because they would have the means to do so. You are conflating disenfranchisement with inherent laziness. This is itself very lazy thinking, though. And inaccurate. You would actually see people opening new businesses: ones that they could afford to open with the new means of wealth. Ones that actively OPPOSED the current system that has disenfranchised them.

Just because I post this, and just because I criticised your thought process, does not mean I champion the things I post. I am a rationalist, and a realist. Wealth is concentrated away from people as the surest way of controlling their potential to cause damage. Sometimes, that "damage" is not destructive, but creative. Sometimes, that "damage" is simply providing an opposition to existing monopolies and cartels.

>Welcome to a world where the value of the dollar is shit because you don’t know how money works.
That's this world, brah.

Hmm.
$700'000 * 320 million = $224'000'000 million = $224 trillion

World GDP (annual) = $78.28 trillion

Total incomes in us = $16'000'000 million annually
Annual average income per person (incl children and black) is thus $50'000 per person annually.


You are full of shit and a bad troll.

They wouldn't work for 5-15 dollars per hour. Labour-leisure optimization would yield a much lower amount of wprking hours per week.
People that already have 700k today don't stop working because they make at least 50 bucks an hour. However, a dinndunutin nog that just got 700k for free wont be worth 50 bucks an hour.

>work on a profitable idea/business
>after extensive hourse and sacrifice i make millions
>some useless socialist inferior cry babys want my money

> fails to mention that that 700k would be worthless

communist economics

100% INCOME TAX BRUH SO THE GOVERNMENT CAN TAKE WHAT IT NEEDS AND DIVIDE EVERYTHING ELSE EQUALLY AMONG THE PEOPLE BROOOO

>The dirty secret is: if everyone had 700k, most of them would blow it on dumb shit and be poor again the next day
FTFY

>The dirty secret is: if everyone had 700k, you would actually see a lot MORE people working. They would work, but they would work for themselves. Because they would have the means to do so. You are conflating disenfranchisement with inherent laziness. This is itself very lazy thinking, though. And inaccurate. You would actually see people opening new businesses: ones that they could afford to open with the new means of wealth. Ones that actively OPPOSED the current system that has disenfranchised them.
Half the country has a double digit IQ. You are vastly overstating the amount of people with the intellect to be able to work for themselves.

If everyone had 700k, prices would surely rise as money inflation would be high af.

Unless you're talking about communism... Then OP is a faggot

Why would someone clean toilets if they had 700k, why would kids go to school if they had 700k, why would people join the army if their livelihoods were secure

Oh fucking bullshit.

Spending money is good for the economy. Hoarding billions isn't.

If every nog dumped 700k a year into our economy...

>Hoarding billions isn't.
most richfags dont actually hoard money in a vault, dumbass
they invest it

The average Joe doesn't know how the markets work.

They don't know that every day went the market opens there is literally a bunch of dudes shouting offers like some kind of bizarre auction and that's how the price of shit is fixed and then spread to the rest of society.

...

s.
The last time someone interrupted me, I broke his jaw. And no Swede has ever dared. So keep larping on the internet, criminal, you've got no culture and no content.

that's all interwoven in trillions of connections as capital in supporting the economy.
>mfw replying to bait and tankies are actually this dumb

Unused land, art and jewelry it's hoarding, things richfags like a lot.

ever seen a bitch save that Money for later ?
Me neither

Having a Natsoc Flag, but posting Muh Communism Memes

Honestly confused here

All the capitalism cucks ITT.

You're just as much a fucking (wage) slave now as Ukrainian farmers were in 1930. The only difference is you get the 'freedom' to poison yourself with burgers and beer

Yeah but the value of things depend on the current state of the society...

If rich people hoard in jewelry, doesn't mean that if there is a revolution or that you redistribute the welth equally then that jewlry would be valued the same.

That's retarded... It's like that Uncertainty principle of Heisenberg applied to economics.
The second that you interact with the market, everything changes.

Most of the "wealth" actually work like "promises".

have you never heard of liquidated investments? land/real estate is one of the most famous ones. is all about property value

>flag
>1 post by this Id

They invest it in black lives matter. Money well spent...

What you call being a wage slave is having a life of responsibility. But please keep being a parasite.

You both need to read on agrarian reforms during the XXth century and into the underground art/jewelry mafias cause your capitalism doesn't includes many of the things that have made it what it is today.

My theory is that capitalism will fix itself...

Look at history.
Every fucking big empire or kingdom died at some point of history.

One of the most common reasons is when the monarch, emperor or king die and the heirs try to fight for their pice of pie.

Every one of this bigs companies, google, ibm, microsoft, facebook, toyota, volkswagen, monsanto, are going to start to be on fire when most of the big names, top ceos, top investors, etc, start dying of old age and all of their sons, heirs, seconds in command, start to back stab each other for a piece of pie.

Nature (Death) alone will fix the concentration of wealth problem.
The only problem it's that it takes time...

Redistribution depended as you said, of accidents, revolutions, wars, etc.

In our modern world most of those things are being abolished or regulated, redistribution it's on the way of the dodo and only accumulation will remain.

Yo give us some of that money too. We're bros, right?

No it's not. The resources our corporations take from us belong to all of us, yet they get to take it and pay us a pittance. You say or do the wrong thing? No more food. It's literally no different than the evils of communism; it's just wrapped up in an American flag.

People die of natural causes, we are not gods.

That's my point.
When the king/emperor dies, the transition of power is NEVER nice and dandy.

That will generate a natural deconcentration of wealth.

Corporations doesn't take resources from you.

They take value from you.

But the value it's only generated because the corporation exists in the first place.
You don't randomly go organizing files and automatically generate value for somebody. You generate value organizing the important files of a corporation that have a function.

The amount of law armor for corporate assets it's unbeliavable, many heirs have been cucked out of their own money by CEOs.

we have to go back to monarchism

>freedom and capitalism is slavery
WTF I hate capitalism and freedom now.

>be Walmart shareholder
>invest 100 million of my own money into Walmart
>get 700,000 back
IT
JUST
WORKS

Do any of these assholes who claim that capitalism doesn't work study economics?

As a graduate in economics reading the cringe shit they post is just laughter inducing, since they just boil it down to the most basic - "everyone would be rich" bs

Sons against sons.
Ceos against ceos.
Right hands against left hands.
Directors against directors.

That's the point...

Most of the big firms are relative new. The big reaper didn't visited them for now.

Yeah, fuck those people who learned something useful/profitable. Give those dumb fucks money!

But then $700,000 would be worth like a dollar.

Plus you'd have to fight a bloody war killing off 80% of the population to get that far.

Commies are lazy, stupid and useless. Fuck off and go extinct already Swede.

>be donothing nobody
>blame failures on rich people
>say you are entitled to their money

Wow all those rich people living their own lives are really holding you back.

>pass law to divide wealth equally
>top 10% leave country

How much do you get then?

Yes but there's a problem. A corporation is a mini centrally planned firm that doesn't give a Fuck about anything but making more money, and the boards of directors structure themselves in such a way so as the people who actually generate the value of the corporation get paid the least while the ones who do the central planning get paid the most and the shareholders are incentivized to invest more, even if that means cooking the books, lying to the government, polluting the environment, or getting actual literal slaves in Burma to make Nike shirts for 8 cents an hour. The fact that you get paid even a minimum wage is because people fought and died against corporations to secure you those rights. If it wasn't for those brave souls you would quite literally be making 8 cents an hour making shirts and our glorious western nations would be just as fucking shitty as the rest of the world.

>The fact that you get paid even a minimum wage is because people fought and died against corporations to secure you those rights.


> Work in IT
> Literally no union
> Salaries discussed with your boss
Really makes you think...

More seriously... You are """""""right""""", but your narrative, your schematics are a caricature. An epic about fight and bullshit.
It's a lot more complex than that.

For example, corporations not only are this profiting monsters. They are actually COMPETENT in the function they sell.
The big problem of your socialization bullshit, is that the average and big mass of popualtion it's terrible incompetente.

There are places for arguments and are places for hierarchies.
I don't want a mass of retards arguing how to redistribute food ending up decimating the population.

Do you do work for free?
Then according to your logic, you "don't give a fuck about anything but making more money"

Now proceed to make baseless accusations and claim every company in business is the same. Corporations are tried as people and they are ran by people. All people aren't the same and they all aren't criminals, neither are corporations.

Stop speaking about American history. They din't fight and die for minimum wage when they were founding the country. The great depression introduced minimum wage.

Most peps just don't want to do shit and get paid for it.

Majority is too dumb to handle that kind of amount of money anyways.

Good, I want them to all leave, why are you acting like that's a bad thing?

>posting an image that shows an extreme misunderstand on what wealth is.
SWEDEN YES

I think it also depends on how we arrive at this change.

If you just suddenly implemented this overnight, then everyone's going to run around and scream like they won the lottery and do stupid shit.

If little by little changes were made that led to this end result, then the reaction would also be different.

So what? Are you a racist?

Now give me your house.

kys

>if we divided the money equally the median income would go up
Fucking socialists man. Not only do they not understand economics they also have no idea what math is.

I'd love to actually do this and watch shit go right beck to how it was within 2 years, just to end the equality argument. Smart people will still get money from idiots. It's that simple.

>hyperinflation happens
>now everybody has the same amount of money : nothing
>the uber-rich use their old connections to just get into power again
>yes, the working people starve, but we are all equal now, right?
> welcome to zimbabwe

No one's arguing for socialism here

do you really think your average ghetto dwelling gangbanger would work hard if "we just gave dem more money for dey programz"?
fucking nigger lover take off that flag

>hurr communism's the same thing as capitalism hurr
>hurr I'm a failure in real life so I blame the system despite subconsciously knowing that no matter what the system was I would still fail because I am inherently a failure, not the system
You would never be happy with ANY system, not just communism and capitalism.

The thing is, I'm not for communism, and the fact you think I am when I point out the obvious problems with capitalism shows how narrow minded you are. I'm willing to bet I'm wayyyyy more successful than you, by all measures of success, even if it is irrelevant.

then what are you for?