IOTBAC

Okay guys, we got work to do. There are still a large group of people that need to be “Black Pilled”. They have either not accepted or have resisted being a cuck. There is absolutely nothing wrong with cuckoldry. We must bring this to the attention of the public. Our objective is to convert as many faggots as possible. Godspeed Anons.


DO:
>print as many of these as you can
>purchase printable sticker paper
>put them up in visible location
>cover as much area as you can feasibly do in one night
>use fasteners that are non=permanent, yet will hold for at least 24 hrs (duct tape**)
>deliver your payload quickly, efficiently, and as discretely as possible

DO NOT:
>vandalize, deface, or otherwise permanently mark anything
>trespass or break-and-enter anywhere
>violate any by-laws or local regulations (or campus rules if you are on a uni campus)
>Stay safe and be smart!

Other urls found in this thread:

othersociologist.com/sociology-of-race/#white-privilege
thoughtco.com/white-privilege-definition-3026087
twitter.com/lisawade/status/923647581065846784
twitter.com/gaybonez/status/925730843439616001
tolerance.org/magazine/summer-2016/why-talk-about-whiteness
aeon.co/ideas/if-babies-were-randomly-allocated-to-families-would-racism-end
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Where is the Sup Forums insignia?
This isn't gonna work unless we add that.

fuck off

Shut up OP, I don't want to share my gf with anybody else. Your're probably some asshole behind a cubicle who has nothing to do but to shit post.

Fuck you.

user

>He actually has sex with his gf

>He actually has a gf

You do this OP. Im sure the cops will get a good laugh when they arrest you.

Western civilization has not yet learned that equality and individualism are evil ideals. And I think we are going to be on the edge of an accelerationist movement, which must take place. Future psyops are not going to be the straightforward, unironic propaganda that they were before. Sup Forumsacks are going to be at the center of that transformation. We are now going into a subversive, Judaic mode, and Sup Forumsacks are going to be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, without this new ideological subversion and accelerationism, the west will not change, but will die an agonizingly slow death.

White privilege is real and racism is an integral part of white culture. But what if that's not a bad thing? What if there's nothing wrong with white privilege or racism?

I think there would be a lot more happenings if we could further polarize the population into various extremes. Are we not here to start chaos and fire? The terrorist attacks are becoming too common to be outraged about. It's time to create our own happenings, with advanced memetic thought patterns.

How can we convince more white people that whiteness itself is evil, and how can we convince more white people that racism isn't a bad thing? Once this is achieved, they will fight.

shill

SAGE & STICK TO THE PLAN

"It's okay to be a cuck"
"It's okay to be a soyboy"
"Having white children contributes to white supremacy"

These are the signs we should really be putting up. The "okay to be white" signs served their usefulness, but now is the time to stir the pot more and more and more. Press more buttons to achieve more reactions.

WHAT EXACTLY IS WRONG WITH BEING A KEK? EXPLAIN YOURSELF!

It's wrong to be a cuck because you are being a little bitch. There are many whites who act like little faggots and do not realize it. Would these posters not stir up some thought in them? "It's okay to be white" is not enough. There WILL BE new phases.

Its nice that we have Catalonia flags now without needing the addon.

>Why do people dislike the message "it's okay to be white"? It's for the same reasons that some people disagree with "Black Lives Matter" or "Pro-Life." These are nice phrases, but we all know what they /really/ mean.

>And what does "it's okay to be white" /really/ mean? It's about scale: individualism vs. collectivism. We have a white individual named Bob. Is it okay for Bob to be white? Of course. But what if we expand our horizons... is it okay for America to be white? Is it okay for a country in Europe to be white? That's where the negativity comes from. Is it okay for a group of people anywhere to be white? Is it okay if our office is white? The school, fraternity, or movie cast? Not so much. But why?

>If you looked into the curriculum of sociology and its related fields, you will learn that white privilege and male privilege exist, and that these privileges originated from historical wells of violence and luck [6]. Slavery, the patriarchy, and colonialism. However, read further and you might come to the conclusion that much of your privilege in society comes from being a part of the majority demographic. The majority has majority privileges. Eventually you will learn that a "racist society" doesn't have to be imperialistic or have slaves, it just has to be white. This is because 'whiteness' itself oppressive and exclusive [10], just as masculinity is itself, toxic [8]. 'Whiteness' is about purity, and purity is exclusive, and thus creates inequality.

>The prevailing thought in academia is that sex, gender, ability, culture, nationality, and class, all confer privileges to an individual [7]. In order for society to be truly equal in opportunity, everyone needs to acknowledge these privileges and diminish them. Often, this will include shedding exclusive traits associated with each identity. This means rejecting the idea that males are more aggressive and must protect, rejecting whiteness as purity, limiting people with disabilities, and rejecting the idea that certain people cannot be Irish, or any nationality. In addition, whenever there is a minority identity, their numbers should be increased for representation, because they will feel like an outcast if they are not [9].

>The thing about all this social justice stuff is that it's correct. Group privileges exist, they cause imbalances in opportunity, and this leads to an unequal society. They aren't 'twisting' the idea of equality, they are exploring it logically. If you are a liberal, you must think that being inclusive and equal is important. In addition, you might think that individualism is a grand thing. It's not. This is your formal invitation to join to alt-right, by recognizing that equality, inclusivity, and individualism are myopic ideals that society should have never embraced in the first place. This is because they are delusions that go against how humans operate and how wealth is built.

[6] othersociologist.com/sociology-of-race/#white-privilege
[7] thoughtco.com/white-privilege-definition-3026087
[8] twitter.com/lisawade/status/923647581065846784
[9] twitter.com/gaybonez/status/925730843439616001
[10] tolerance.org/magazine/summer-2016/why-talk-about-whiteness

this is an example of a good sign

>If babies were randomly allocated to families would racism end?

>Imagine a world in which all the babies born each day were randomly redistributed among the biological parents. The infant assigned to any given set of parents could be white, black, Asian, Hispanic, Native American, or any combination thereof (and that’s just the US); the baby could be perfectly healthy or grossly deformed. Parents would know only that their child was not their biological child. Let us call this social mixing.

>This plan is of course politically impossible, perhaps even repellent. Our goal, however, is to engage the reader in a thought experiment, to examine why it stirs up such uncomfortable feelings.

>You may argue that genetic bias is indelible in human nature. Social mixing would not only disturb the comfort of this fatalistic attitude, but also use genetic chauvinism for ends beyond mere economic equality, providing grounds for a compassion that goes beyond the wellbeing of our immediate families. Since any man might be your biological brother, any woman your biological sister, concern for them would have to be expressed by a concern for a common good.

>The superficial connection between colour and culture would be severed. Racism would be wiped out. Racial ghettos would disappear; children of all races would live in all neighbourhoods. Any white child could have black parents and any black child could have white parents. Imagine the US president flanked by his or her black, white, Asian and Hispanic children. Imagine if social mixing had been in effect 100 years ago in Germany, Bosnia, Palestine or the Congo. Racial, religious, and social genocide would not have happened.

Etc

aeon.co/ideas/if-babies-were-randomly-allocated-to-families-would-racism-end

Fuck off shill

KEEP IT SIMPLE. REMEMBER THE 5 WORDS

A thought experiment:

Imagine whites and nonwhites as two guys in a closed room, both armed with handguns pointed at each other. Mr. White has on armor called 'white privilege'. Mr. Nonwhite has no such armor. The guns they have are called "collectivism" or "tribalism".

In order to de-escalate the situation, and possibly overthrow the malicious entity that locked them there in the first place, who should put their gun down first?

Some people (leftists, especially) might say that the armored guy should drop the gun first, since he retains an upper hand: the armor. The thinking goes, that if the nonwhite guy still decides to shoot, the white guy can tackle him and not die, due to his armor. The nonwhite should not put the gun down first, because to do so would be complete surrender; he would be vulnerable, and have no trump card in case the white guy decided to shoot.

This situation is a modified "prisoner's dilemma," which examines two prisoners who are caught together, but separated at the police station and offered leniency in exchange for confessions:

Option A: One rats out the other: An imbalance in trust results in one gaining freedom, and the other jailed.
Option B: Both stay silent: Mutual Cooperation leads to the best outcome. Maximum freedom, for both.
Option C: Both rat each other out: Simultaneous Distrust leads to an inferior outcome, where neither person gets adequate freedom.

Note the conclusion of the dilemma: "two completely 'rational' individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interests to do so."

Now, we start to apply this: It is obvious that white people and nonwhite people are:
1) Not one person (uncoordinated)
2) Not rational (this follows from 1)
3) Imbalanced in political power, wealth, education, and crime rates (distrust exists aplenty)

Apply all of this to multiculturalism: not all whites and not all nonwhites will be convinced to lay down the power of tribalism. Additionally, not everyone in each group will be convinced that they should not shoot. This means that whoever does put down the gun, will probably be shot.

A key element of all of this is trust. Do whites and nonwhites trust each other? No; the distrust comes from inequality, but the inequality comes from where? Slavery, and later, capitalism. However, in order to decrease inequality, both sides need to cooperate to fight off the corporations that want to enslave them. Equality is needed to build more equality. Inequality will result in more inequality. Thus, any starting point will be recursively multiplied, without a show of force from one side to cooperate.

This is especially important in America, where nonwhites (blacks) started out on a very unequal landscape. This thinking also implies that mass immigration immeasurably worse than trickle immigration: without any assimilation, the spread of wealth will be hindered. In the extreme, it implies that mass immigration is, in the long run, equivalent to slavery. Indeed, the Europeans, although well-intentioned (maybe), have unwittingly committed the equivalent sin America did, when they brought unwilling Africans with no other options to become cogs in a system that will never truly welcome them as equals.

Throughout all of this, we haven't even considered that one racial group might have a difference in average intelligence. We didn't need to address it, but there is evidence such differences exist.

this is a redpill thread now, goys

No one thinks this is funny of clever, the meme won't take.

...

Can we do this one too please. Would appreciate it. Apparently it's encouraged to be individualstic and come up with your own text, so... GUYS LET's DO THIS. MANLETS OF THE WORLD UNITE!!

...

Hahahahaha please make these and post 'em in yo neighborhoods

we will i promise it'll be some good times my man

...

...

Sew Frave, so powderful!

not subversive enough try again

...

IVE TRIED SO HARD

...

for new fags who don't know, the neo-reactionary movement is the true origin of the alt-right, but Sup Forums isn't the place to discuss that anymore.

Basically you start wondering why society always moves left, and why republicans are just progressives from 40 years ago plus lower taxes. The bluepill is that leftism is rational, but the neo-reactionary movement is about formulating an alternate hypothesis to this

SHILL ALERT SAGE IN ALL FIELDS

IT'S REAL

...

...

...

...

...

...

you sound like a communist

false equivalency.
white privilege doesn't stop bullets

it's not my writing, goy. i am reposting it as an example of what they think

white privilege is the only form of collectivism that whites have, it's a vanguard against nonwhite's collectivism, and it's crumbling fast

The point is that you may want to retain your white privilege, and encourage other whites to do the same, lest you wind up at the wrong end of tribal politics

...

impressive, but this is my thread nao, and the ride never ends

...

...

This is a shill thread, stick to the original

its my thread now, friendo

...

as long as we can still fuck dogs in nevada, who cares?

Yawn. Haven't you got somewhere to go and chimp?

back off don't annoy him you shitskin

Honestly, I think I'm going to start posting these around my campus. I think stickers are the very best format. It's about time that someone stood up for cucks.

>let's bring millions of board wrecking normalfaggots to Sup Forums

Go back, Reddit.

bump

don't we want "normies" to get redpilled?
Normies will come to Sup Forums and become redpilled. After they're redpilled they're no longer normies.

fuck off OP, no one is falling for it faggey

Sup Forums (I think you mean Sup Forums though) is heavy redpill. You don't drop the intellectual equivalent of a Nagasaki Wake Up Call on normies. You have to nudge them into asking questions themselves. You drop subtle redpills like Jew names and their characteristics and then they notice these coincidences on their own.
Jews did exactly the same thing, why do you think the immigration reform act of 1965 was backed up with "this won't change the racial make up of America" even though it clearly would and did? Why didn't they come out and say "yeah, this majority white country will be unrecognizable in 50 years time and you better start learning Spanish"? Because the people weren't cucked back then and would have gassed (((them))) on the spot. What you're saying is like telling someone it's okay to be white and them still being on the fence, but with one foot in your yard, and then immediately saying "let me tell you about the 6m". It wouldn't in a million years work.

you severely underestimate normies.
They're already exposed to all the redpills thanks to trump. Now Sup Forums needs to bring the hard shit

I always hope that if people who write shit like this actually have children, they'll realise that they'd probably kill dozens of children to save their own. That they'd work long hours to see their child get the best schooling, and fuck the children whose parents couldn't afford it. If the government forced all children to the same standard, and stripped parents of any potential to positively or negatively impact the growth of their child, the government wouldn't last a day, and they'd be right there stabbing a bureacrat in the eye.