How could you honestly still support capitalism?

How could you honestly still support capitalism?

The rich get richer and poor get poorer. It's disgusting!
Its better that we are all equal in wealth, rather than the majority poor and starving and the minority rich and thriving.
#alllivesmatter

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw
youtu.be/rrjvifKXQy4
theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html
youtube.com/watch?v=79DijItQXMM
youtube.com/watch?v=qb64HIAG96w
youtu.be/vahAxPl_YtY
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You can gather candy without a bucket.

Gonna teach her about state-centric economic systems by telling her that since the state owns the means by which she procures candy: the state is entitled to most (or all) of her candy.

>why cant everything be free my man?
>shit literally grows from the ground!
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN "GROW IT YOURSELF THEN"?

>A heavier set of discipline is absurd to single mothers.


This is why, fellas. This is why you stay away from woman of this nature.

This bitch has obviously never been to an apple picking farm.

Why are leftists incapable of making rational arguments?

And why should you give the lazy and incompetent the same as someone who is hardworking and competent? That would be essentially unfair. It takes away the incentive to work hard.

And in nature usually only those get resources who are the smartest, most competitive and healthiest, while the others died because of lack if food. This ensured that our genetics constantly improved. Now in this world laws of nature do not apply anymore, those with the worst genetics have the most children resulting in a strong dysgenic effect.

Get rid of non-Whites in our countries and apply eugenics, in the long-term we would be all wealthy.

You need to recognize the difference between spending your money on things you use now (consumption) and spending it on things that allow you to make more money in the future (investment). In order to invest in things like factory equipment and tools, you need to put off spending on things like fancy meals and nice clothes. That is, you're always faced with a trade-off between 'something now' and 'potentially more later.'

In a system of private capital ownership, the individual decides how much they want to invest, and in turn gets to keep the profits when (if) those investments pay off. In a system of public capital ownership, there's no incentive to invest wisely, and in fact you benefit most by looting the public coffers in any way you can.

She's right. Capitalism is unfair, so I'm gonna beat my kid now.

That's literally communism.
State owns the bucket used to collect the grain. State owns the grain.

Sorry for wasting your time guys I get paid to make posts like this

youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw

How do I get shekels for shitposting

Haters gonna hate.

That's okay, it's good practice for when our normies friends try to spout off on Facebook.

"For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt? This is John Galt speaking. I am the man who loves his life. I am the man who does not sacrifice his love or his values. I am the man who has deprived you of victims and thus has destroyed your world, and if you wish to know why you are perishing-you who dread knowledge-I am the man who will now tell you." The chief engineer was the only one able to move; he ran to a television set and struggled frantically with its dials. But the screen remained empty; the speaker had not chosen to be seen. Only his voice filled the airways of the country-of the world, thought the chief engineer-sounding as if he were speaking here, in this room, not to a group, but to one man; it was not the tone of addressing a meeting, but the tone of addressing a mind.

"You have heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis. You have said it yourself, half in fear, half in hope that the words had no meaning. You have cried that man's sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded. Since virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster. In the name of a return to morality, you have sacrificed all those evils which you held as the cause of your plight. You have sacrificed justice to mercy. You have sacrificed independence to unity. You have sacrificed reason to faith. You have sacrificed wealth to need. You have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial. You have sacrificed happiness to duty..

"You have destroyed all that which you held to be evil and achieved all that which you held to be good. Why, then, do you shrink in horror from the sight of the world around you? That world is not the product of your sins, it is the product and the image of your virtues. It is your moral ideal brought into reality in its full and final perfection. You have fought for it, you have dreamed of it, and you have wished it, and I-I am the man who has granted you your wish.

"Your ideal had an implacable enemy, which your code of morality was designed to destroy. I have withdrawn that enemy. I have taken it out of your way and out of your reach. I have removed the source of all those evils you were sacrificing one by one. I have ended your battle. I have stopped your motor. I have deprived your world of man's mind.

"Men do not live by the mind, you say? I have withdrawn those who do. The mind is impotent, you say? I have withdrawn those whose mind isn't. There are values higher than the mind, you say? I have withdrawn those for whom there aren't.

"While you were dragging to your sacrificial altars the men of justice, of independence, of reason, of wealth, of self-esteem-I beat you to it, I reached them first. I told them the nature of the game you were playing and the nature of that moral code of yours, which they had been too innocently generous to grasp. I showed them the way to live by another morality-mine. It is mine that they chose to follow.

What you see today is crony capitalism, the economy is run by a government, they print borrow and spend as they please. They put taxes and tariffs on certain items. this is not free market capitalism

"All the men who have vanished, the men you hated, yet dreaded to lose, it is I who have taken them away from you. Do not attempt to find us. We do not choose to be found. Do not cry that it is our duty to serve you. We do not recognize such duty. Do not cry that you need us. We do not consider need a claim. Do not cry that you own us. You don't. Do not beg us to return. We are on strike, we, the men of the mind.

"We are on strike against self-immolation. We are on strike against the creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. We are on strike against the dogma that the pursuit of one's happiness is evil. We are on strike against the doctrine that life is guilt.

"There is a difference between our strike and all those you've practiced for centuries: our strike consists, not of making demands, but of granting them. We are evil, according to your morality. We have chosen not to harm you any longer. We are useless, according to your economics. We have chosen not to exploit you any longer. We are dangerous and to be shackled, according to your politics. We have chosen not to endanger you, nor to wear the shackles any longer. We are only an illusion, according to your philosophy. We have chosen not to blind you any longer and have left you free to face reality-the reality you wanted, the world as you see it now, a world without mind.

"We have granted you everything you demanded of us, we who had always been the givers, but have only now understood it. We have no demands to present to you, no terms to bargain about, no compromise to reach. You have nothing to offer us. We do not need you.

"Are you now crying: No, this was not what you wanted? A mindless world of ruins was not your goal? You did not want us to leave you? You moral cannibals, I know that you've always known what it was that you wanted. But your game is up, because now we know it, too.

"Through centuries of scourges and disasters, brought about by your code of morality, you have cried that your code had been broken, that the scourges were punishment for breaking it, that men were too weak and too selfish to spill all the blood it required. You damned man, you damned existence, you damned this earth, but never dared to question your code. Your victims took the blame and struggled on, with your curses as reward for their martyrdom-while you went on crying that your code was noble, but human nature was not good enough to practice it. And no one rose to ask the question: Good?-by what standard?

"You wanted to know John Galt's identity. I am the man who has asked that question.

"Yes, this is an age of moral crisis. Yes, you are bearing punishment for your evil. But it is not man who is now on trial and it is not human nature that will take the blame. It is your moral code that's through, this time. Your moral code has reached its climax, the blind alley at the end of its course. And if you wish to go on living, what you now need is not to return to morality-you who have never known any-but to discover it.

"You have heard no concepts of morality but the mystical or the social. You have been taught that morality is a code of behavior imposed on you by whim, the whim of a supernatural power or the whim of society, to serve God's purpose or your neighbor's welfare, to please an authority beyond the grave or else next door-but not to serve your life or pleasure. Your pleasure, you have been taught, is to be found in immorality, your interests would best be served by evil, and any moral code must be designed not for you, but against you, not to further your life, but to drain it.

"For centuries, the battle of morality was fought between those who claimed that your life belongs to God and those who claimed that it belongs to your neighbors-between those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of ghosts in heaven and those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of incompetents on earth. And no one came to say that your life belongs to you and that the good is to live it.

"Both sides agreed that morality demands the surrender of your self-interest and of your mind, that the moral and the practical are opposites, that morality is not the province of reason, but the province of faith and force. Both sides agreed that no rational morality is possible, that there is no right or wrong in reason-that in reason there's no reason to be moral.

"Whatever else they fought about, it was against man's mind that all your moralists have stood united. It was man's mind that all their schemes and systems were intended to despoil and destroy. Now choose to perish or to learn that the anti-mind is the anti-life.

"Man's mind is his basic tool of survival. Life is given to him, survival is not. His body is given to him, its sustenance is not. His mind is given to him, its content is not. To remain alive, he must act, and before he can act he must know the nature and purpose of his action. He cannot obtain his food without a knowledge of food and of the way to obtain it. He cannot dig a ditch-or build a cyclotron-without a knowledge of his aim and of the means to achieve it. To remain alive, he must think.

"But to think is an act of choice. The key to what you so recklessly call 'human nature,' the open secret you live with, yet dread to name, is the fact that man is a being of volitional consciousness. Reason does not work automatically; thinking is not a mechanical process; the connections of logic are not made by instinct. The function of your stomach, lungs or heart is automatic; the function of your mind is not. In any hour and issue of your life, you are free to think or to evade that effort. But you are not free to escape from your nature, from the fact that reason is your means of survival-so that for you, who are a human being, the question 'to be or not to be' is the question 'to' think or not to think.'

"A being of volitional consciousness has no automatic course of behavior. He needs a code of values to guide his actions. 'Value' is that which one acts to gain and keep, 'virtue' is the action by which one gains and keeps it. 'Value' presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what? 'Value' presupposes a standard, a purpose and the necessity of action in the face of an alternative. Where there are no alternatives, no values are possible.

>when dumb people think they understand anything about politics

Then the poor are going to have to start producing some wealth. Spending your welfare check adds nothing to the economy.

Bump since OP is a faggot.

"There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or non-existence-and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not; it depends on a specific course of action. Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist. It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and-self-generated action. If an organism fails in that action, it does; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence. It is only the concept of 'Life' that makes the concept of 'Value' possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil.

"A plant must feed itself in order to live; the sunlight, the water, the chemicals it needs are the values its nature has set it to pursue; its life is the standard of value directing its actions. But a plant has no choice of action; there are alternatives in the conditions it encounters, but there is no alternative in its function: it acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction.

"An animal is equipped for sustaining its life; its senses provide it with an automatic code of action, an automatic knowledge of what is good for it or evil. It has no power to extend its knowledge or to evade it. In conditions where its knowledge proves inadequate, it dies. But so long as it lives, it acts on its knowledge, with automatic safety and no power of choice, it is unable to ignore its own good, unable to decide to choose the evil and act as its own destroyer.

"Man has no automatic code of survival. His particular distinction from all other living species is the necessity to act in the face of alternatives by means of volitional choice. He has no automatic knowledge of what is good for him or evil, what values his life depends on, what course of action it requires. Are you prattling about an instinct of self-preservation? An instinct of self-preservation is precisely what man does not possess. An 'instinct' is an unerring and automatic form of knowledge. A desire is not an instinct. A desire to live does not give you the knowledge required for living. And even man's desire to live is not automatic: your secret evil today is that that is the desire you do not hold. Your fear of death is not a love of life and will not give you the knowledge needed to keep it. Man must obtain his knowledge and choose his actions by a process of thinking, which nature will not force him t9 perform. Man has the power to act as his own destroyer-and that is the way he has acted through most of his history.

"A living entity that regarded its means of survival as evil, would not survive. A plant that struggled to mangle its roots, a bird that fought to break its wings would not remain for long in the existence they affronted. But the history of man has been a struggle to deny and to destroy his mind.

"Man has been called a rational being, but rationality is a matter of choice-and the alternative his nature offers him is: rational being or suicidal animal. Man has to be man-by choice; he has to hold his life as a value-by choice: he has to learn to sustain it-by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues-by choice.

"A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality.

"Whoever you are, you who are hearing me now, I am speaking to whatever living remnant is left uncorrupted within you, to the remnant of the human, to your mind, and I say: There is a morality of reason, a morality proper to man, and Man's Life is its standard of value.

"All that which is proper to the life of a rational being is the good; all that which destroys it is the evil.

"Man's life, as required by his nature, is not the life of a mindless brute, of a looting thug or a mooching mystic, but the life of a thinking being-not life by means of force or fraud, but life by means of achievement-not survival at any price, since there's only one price that pays for man's survival: reason.

"Man's life is the standard of morality, but your own life is its purpose. If existence on earth is your goal, you must choose your actions and values by the standard of that which is proper to man-for the purpose of preserving, fulfilling and enjoying the irreplaceable value which is your life.

"Since life requires a specific course of action, any other course will destroy it. A being who does not hold his own life as the motive and goal of his actions, is acting on the motive and standard of death. Such a being is a metaphysical monstrosity, struggling to oppose, negate and contradict the fact of his own existence, running blindly amuck on a trail of destruction, capable of nothing but pain.

"Happiness is the successful state of life, pain is an agent of death. Happiness is that state of consciousness which proceeds from the achievement of one's values. A morality that dares to tell you to find happiness in the renunciation of your happiness-to value the failure of your values-is an insolent negation of morality. A doctrine that gives you, as an ideal, the role of a sacrificial animal seeking slaughter on the altars of others, is giving you death as your standard. By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man-every man-is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose.

"But neither life nor happiness can be achieved by the pursuit of irrational whims. Just as man is free to attempt to survive in any random manner, but will perish unless he lives as his nature requires, so he is free to seek his happiness in any mindless fraud, but the torture of frustration is all he will find, unless he seeks the happiness proper to man. The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to enjoy yourself and live.

"Sweep aside those parasites of subsidized classrooms, who live on the profits of the mind of others and proclaim that man needs no morality, no values, no code of behavior. They, who pose as scientists and claim that man is only an animal, do not grant him inclusion in the law of existence they have granted to the lowest of insects. They recognize that every living species has a way of survival demanded by its nature, they do not claim that a fish can live out of water or that a dog can live without its sense of smell-but man, they claim, the most complex of beings, man can survive in any way whatever, man has no identity, no nature, and there's no practical reason why he cannot live with his means of survival destroyed, with his mind throttled and placed at the disposal of any orders they might care to issue.

"Sweep aside those hatred-eaten mystics, who pose as friends of humanity and preach that the highest virtue man can practice is to hold his own life as of no value. Do they tell you that the purpose of morality is to curb man's instinct of self-preservation? It is for the purpose of self-preservation that man needs a code of morality. The only man who desires to be moral is the man who desires to live.

"No, you do not have to live; it is your basic act of choice; but if you choose to live,. you must live as a man-by the work and the judgment of your mind.

"No, you do not have to live as a man; it is an act of moral choice. But you cannot live as anything else-and the alternative is that state of living death which you now see within you and around you, the state of a thing unfit for existence, no longer human and less than animal, a thing that knows nothing but pain and drags itself through its span of years in the agony of unthinking self-destruction.

"No, you do not have to think; it is an act of moral choice. But someone had to think to keep you alive; if you choose to default, you default on existence and you pass the deficit to some moral man, expecting him to sacrifice his good for the sake of letting you survive by your evil.

"No, you do not have to be a man; but today those who are, are not there any longer. I have removed your means of survival-your victims.

If in doubt regurgitate autism and win the argument.

>the bucket is mine hurr
>I don't understand how contracts and incentives work

What's the NatSoc version?

that's the natsoc version
she's just retarded

There would still be disparities in wealth regardless of the economic system in place. It would just be the same old game under different rules

BASED

m8, most of die Juden in Poland were the decent ones.
Hell, we even have whole ethnicity of civilized and pleasant Muslims somewhere near Ukrainian border.

Look man, you and I both know that the only reason your shithole isn't being flooded by muslims is because you bent the knee, and will bent it every time they ask you to.

>preserving historical sites is bad
wew lad

>because you bent the knee
No, it's because we're poor and angry at everyone who isn't Hungarian.

Also that's rich coming from dedicated gypsy country.

Sage.

Get on social media and red pill normies on the reality of Hollywood:

Hollywood publicly promoted Pedophilia for decades. They have been getting away with this shit for years but the Spacey scandal is the start of (((their))) downfall.

Shirley Temple was abused for years in the entertainment industry and is the earliest example of a child being exploited by Pedophiles in entertainment.:
youtu.be/rrjvifKXQy4

Playboy publicy sold child pornography. Possibly involved in a child prostitution ring in the 70s.
theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html

Use my bucket and i'll only take half the candy, oh look use someone elses bucket they only charge 1 piece of candy. I think your mum is a selfish, greedy, dumb bitch kid

Trump jr’s joke really enraged these people didn’t it.

Relax kike. I never said it's bad. I explicitly said it's BASED.

Hey, gypsy, non-gypsy, at least we're not a bunch of bitches so beneath contempt that we're allowed to exist as kike pets.

Ok I'm gonna invite a person over to my house and tell him/her that he/she now belongs to me because he/she is on my property.

>at least we're not a bunch of bitches so beneath contempt that we're allowed to exist as kike pets
>being this much in denial
>in god's almighty year of 2017
lel

Shit that was powerful. Why is Rand so maligned, again? Is it because she eternally BTFO'd leftism or...?

...

this is a kike world, you're just living in it.

>historical site

its a fucking kike cemetery you gargantuan faggot
it isnt european history therefore it is irrellevant
I suppose we shouldnt destroy any of the mosques around the UK since they are probably historical sites by now as well

why are all women so bad at analogies?

>its better that we are all equal in wealth
>implying a totalitarian state is going to share wealth with you
It's not better to starve together equally though.

Yeah, yeah. Funny how Germany, UK, France, Italy and every other worthwhile nation in Europe is flooded, while BASED Polen and Bozgoria are spared because they're the only ones brave enough to stand up to the "globalists."

That's when your kid innovates and uses a pillow case instead, then smacks you over the head with te candy for being a snarky asshole

dream your dream, m8
I hope your waking won't be painful

>conceding like a little bitch
That's why your low IQ submissive nation is spared. You're natural dogs.

Losers always think of being employed instead of to create and employ.
Also, by her logic, her child could've collected nothing and would, as she likely got to know capitalism, still be paid in a certain amount of candy.

Why do political women on Twitter always suck even in translating THEIR OWN real life situations into an abstract image?

Isn't everyone getting richer in capitalism? Everyone I know is. We're fucking loaded, can buy whatever we want, chicks fuck you just because you have money, minorities stop me while I want down the street to ask to clean my house or mow my lawn. Capitalism is the best form of government ever invented.

If she was stupid enough to make this deal to begin with, she deserves to lose her candy.
If someone tried to pull that one on me when I was a kid I'd use a plastic bag or something.

If the poor keep getting poorer, how come there are more and more of them, and they're getting fatter and fatter?

Who pays you?

Look at the poor in places ruled by socialism. They starve, they have nothing.

Look at the poor in places ruled by capitalism.
They have fucking iphones.

Beyond that, at least in capitalists we can *have* a fucking rich class. What do you get in socialist states? A nation of peasants, with a moldering film of decadent rulers at the top.

Capitalism fucks over the uncreative, the unambitious, the unable.

Socialism fucks over *everybody* except for the autocrat at the top of it all.

Capitalism is indeed not equal, there are winners and losers. Socialism ensures equality by making -everyone- a loser.

Socialism. Doesn't. Work.

Equal in wealth?
Are you pulling others down because your a poor lazy faggot?
OK duke del welfare, SERPENTUS LIMBUS

enjoy your socialist shit hole.

>The "party" owns the capital and the production.
That's communism.
Capitalism means taking one or two candies as bucket rent. Also is a good learning example.

Shut up nigger

Sounds like totalitarianism. A capitalistic system would charge the child a fixed number of candies based on supply and demand. Why is it liberals have no comprehension of Capitalism?

Actually the poor get richer too, that's why poverty has been reduced by, what, 80% over the last couple of decades?

Good work with all that Socialism though, you guys sure helped invest in all of the businesses that actually created the economies of developing n-

Oh no wait, you didn't, because every country that went Socialist turned into a shithole!

>muh Sweden
Somalia's government was Socialist!

>muh Norway
Zimbabwe's government was Socialist!

>muh China
50 million starved to death, then a HERO named Deng Xiaoping implemented market reforms!

youtube.com/watch?v=79DijItQXMM

All people are not equal. So why should they have equal wealth? Better question, what would you do if someone took what YOU had earned? Would you still be a commie then?

Where do I sign?

It would help your cause to actually have a rational argument.

>Capitalism
You give the bucket to your workers Chad and Virgin. They collect candies, give them to you and then you award them with 6% of the candies as well as the opportunity to keep collecting candies in the future
>Communism
You tell Ivan and Dostoy to go collect candies but give them no bucket because the bucket designers got shot for treason. Ivan collects 4 candies and Dostoy 0, they both get 1 candy each. Ivan complains so he gets shot, Dostoy is also shot because he is gay.

youtube.com/watch?v=qb64HIAG96w

you, rich people, give money to poor.

>problem solved.gif

She wouldnt have a fucking bucket or candy to put in it if it wasnt for Capitalism.

Poor quality bait. Sage

Well least your training up new fags to spot this nonsense.

Yes

youtu.be/vahAxPl_YtY

>gonna teach my kid about capitalism
>doesn't understand capitalism

Capitalism and Communism are literally two sides of the same coin. I love when idiots argue about which is better and don't understand that it doesn't matter. The elite will always enslave the masses unless the masses rise up and slaughter the elite.

>gonna teach my kid capitalism
>conflates voluntary transaction with stealing
Every time

Exactly, this user gets it

It's cool. This place would be far less entertaining without the shills. There would be more political discussion, but far less entertainment.

So the child then uses a pillow case to collect the candy, hauling more than the bucket, she then recruits friends to help collect candy, she then buys a a bike to expedite candy collection and to hit the markets on the other side of town, then with the extra earnings she trades for bikes for all of her friends, in exchange for 50% of their candy. Now the girl has all the candy in the town, has fed her friends, and didn't need a handout from her mom to do it.

>voluntarily being KEKED

Doesn't matter whether you like it or not, getting WAGE KEKED is getting WAGE KEKED

Jew controllers want more capitalists so Sup Forums bows down and does their bidding just like everyone else.
Duh.

Communism: The state gives everyone candy
Capitalism: The rich buy all the buckets and rent them out for 90% of the candy collected
Fascism: The state gives everyone a bucket

My (((Neighbors)))

I’m going to teach my kid to hurry up and eat her candy. Because if I die, that bucket belongs to the government.

Mind blown.

But she...she just described communism

Her kid had a "means of production" that she owns and thus she owns what the kid uses it for.

How...how are libs so fucking retarded?

A true capitalism analogy would be if the kid negotiated some of the candy for himself in exchange for his contribution since only a kid in a costume gets candy while trick or treating....

How....so....retarded....libs.....arhghg!!!

I was poor and I got rich.

>i'm gonna teach my kid about capitalism by performing a non-contractual, aggressive action that violates her private property rights

Tips?

That’s not capitalism that’s called the right of the parent and it’s a rule in all family units.

The parent owns all of a kids shit.