>Brown guy runs over 8 people with a truck in New York
>"He's a Terrorist. Kill all Muslims"
>White guy shoots and kills 25 people in church.
>"He just an evil lil white boi, he dindu nuffin, he got dem mental diseases n shit."
Why does Drumpf refuse to call this church shooter or vegas shooter terrorist?
Other urls found in this thread:
merriam-webster.com
en.wikipedia.org
instagram.com
twitter.com
No we've been saying he's an evil democrat and we should kill them all. Where have you been
because terrorism requires a political motive
it has nothing to do with bodycount
currently there is no evidence of a political motive in either this or vegas
also, muslim immigrants on diversity visas doing attacks for isis are entirely-preventable. this is why it is particularly aggravating for some
Because terrorism is defined as violence in service of an ideology. Muslim truck driver did it for Allah. The Texas shooter was pissed that his wife walked out on his domestic abusing ass. Note the difference.
sage and reported. All day long. this is spam. Make a lets-ban-guns-and-prep-bulls-general
>Bahamas
Why do you even care, you fucking nigger? Let me guess, globalist run propaganda has nothing better to do than whip up their niggers and slaves into a smug froth at how much they should hate America. Why the fuck do you even care about ISIS, terrorism, America, American gun control or Sunderland Springs? Fucking nigger.
The entire global media apparatus is designed to wage war against free men, nothing more.
because whats the political goal you stupid fuck? Terrorism requires there to be a political motive behind it
>terrorism requires a political motive
shooting innocent people in the middle of a concert is a pretty big political statement, it makes people fearful of public places are you fucking retarded?
these shootings are preventable too, but "muh guns"
merriam-webster.com
see definition four
you guys are literally like the liberals who insist something can only be racism if it has a historical back ground
Makes sense. Niggers, kikes, mudshits, gooks and other subhumans are not supposed to be in our homelands in the first place
shooting innocent people in the middle of a concert is absolutely not a political statement
what are you, retarded?
Learn to read you fucking autistic fuck. MOTIVE IS RIGHT THERE!
do you see the word "OR" ? do you understand what the word OR means? It means either one of these two statements has to be true, have you heard of logic?
yeah shooting innocent people isnt a political statement at all? thats why its such a big deal politically right? granted how our how society is built around politics/access to guns/shows/concerts.. no way is killing someone EVER a political statement! epic post user
fpbp
kys islandnigger
>everything is political
leftist shill spotted
that is correct. shooting innocent people is not a political statement in and of itself. i don't see why this is hard for you to understand
Ideology is the difference though.
>one person kills in the name of their god and to further their political, religious, and military cause, is correctly labeled a terrorist for this
>another kills because of non-political reasons, is labeled a felonous criminal and murderer, justly
>some non-country motherfucker tries to make a false dichotomy between peace and terror instead of rationally contrasting violence and terror
>is so retarded that they actually make a thread about this
holy fuck, non american education.
heres your (You)
Then what does constitute a political statement my good fellow? Where is the threshold? We must set this definition straight
Muslims are guests in America, you stupid fuck. They shouldn't be here to begin with.
If he's white, his race simply doesn't matter.
If you had some white guy in Africa or Japan shooting up a place, that would be a different story.
It would be a political statement if the Vegas shooter shot a bunch of people at an anti gun rally instead of a bunch of random people with no known political affiliation at a music concert.
there is no threshold. there is either a political or ideological motive or goal, or there isn't. there aren't varying degrees of terrorism.
and it has nothing to do with the attack being terrifying. it strictly does not. breivik was terrorism. paddock, from what we know, was not. this texas guy, from what we know, was not a terrorist and his shooting was not an act of terrorism. dylan roof did terrorism. the guy who shot scalise was a terrorist. and so on
Terror is has a political motive, to silence opposition, to harm your opponents, and to send a message of fear to them. There's no political motive behind the Vegas shooting or the Texas shooting.
I'm just gonna add your flag to my collection is that okay?
What terrorist organization did he claim to be apart of again?
I wasn't asking for a hypothetical situation, i'm asking for a clear cut definition. Please reread my request and try again.
>Everything is black or white
Okay.
What sets Dylann Roof apart from this? That he posted how he hated black people online and went on to shoot them? Who's to say there wasn't any political/ideological motive behind this shooter - did you know him?
What constitutes an act of terror then anyways?
By this definition it could be argued that by this shooter being athiest had committed terrorism towards christianity..
Why are black women so grotesque? Like... even the most mediocre looking white woman is a 10/10 compared to the best looking black woman in the world.
>white dude is muslim
>kill all muslims still applies
What part confuses you?
You can't even name the ideology or religion White Boi belongs to, can you?
you've been informed as to what constitutes an act of terror multiple times in this thread. i also said "from what we know" as in, from what we know right now, this church shooting does not appear to be an act of terror. this may change. that's why i worded it deliberately that way. same goes for paddock.
>shooting innocent people in the middle of a concert is a pretty big political statement
What was the statement?
Because the FBI would like to know.
>These shootings are preventable too
Gun control hasn't stopped them in Europe or Mexico.
>see definition four
>violent or destructive acts (such as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands
...and what this have to do with Vegas or the Church?
>What constitutes an act of terror then anyways?
The word is "terrorism" you illiterate, ignorant mutt.
>What consitutes terrorism
An act of violence designed to affect a political or religous outcome. Do they not have elementary schools in your halfwit backwater?
How can someone be so fucking stupid as to (technically) be an adult and struggle with the simple concept of what defines terrorism?
You should honestly kys because allowing low I.Q. muppets like you to breed or vote is disastrous.
Do people like OP really not understand that killing in the name of something = terrorism and killing because you want to end your life with a bang != terrorism? Or are they just pretending to be retarded? I honestly cannot tell at this point.
Definitions usually come with contexts and examples. Terrorism requires a political motive. What exactly did the Vegas shooter achieve by murdering a bunch of random people at a music concert? He wasn't intimidating opposition to gun control, he wasn't making any demands, and had no discernible political affiliation that seemed radical in any way therefore as it stands he doesn't have a discernable motive and he isn't a terrorist, he's a mass shooter.
Imagine if it was a vehement Norse pagan who did it, I would not be surprised if everyone said it wasn't his race that was his motive but his ideology (paganism) that was his motive (although that doesn't mean he wasn't mentally ill or in a bad time in his life before the murders) it's the same with Muslims, they both hate Cristians for ideological reasons. Maybe this man was a pagan, maybe he was a communist or Muslim, but nomatter what, you can't blame an entire group of people (a group of people who can't change their genetics) for a crime.
>these shooting are preventable
How about you prevent trucks? People will find ways to kill people if they want to. In fact, who can you stop? Yourself, that is the only person you can stop. No one else.
He didn't do it in the name of atheism, his family cited domestic issues, he went in there to kill his wife and kill people in the church who were helping her get away from him.
>Then what does constitute a political statement
Pledging the attack in allegiance with an armed political movement with clearly defined political aims. For example a suicide bomber, swearing allegiance with Hamas and declaring his aim to be the destruction of the state of Israel, or the latest NYC truck driver flying an ISIS flag, pledging allegiance to ISIS and calling for the establishment of an Islamic caliphate. A mentally ill person killing his family, or random strangers in his community, or people in a workplace he had a disagreement with, do not remotely for this category.
It's such a simple concept I have a hard time believing people like you are actually too stupid to grasp it, but instead desperately want to portray whites as the bad guys while defending Muslims, leftists, and blacks.
>pic
C E L L U L I T E
what a bae
would make caramel babies with
So you know why this guy shot up this church then? What political goal was he trying to achieve?
I know this is bait but I'm going to reply anyway because it's so fucking annying seeing this false equivalence shot parroted everywhere
I don't know why pol hates race mixing.
That's it? Really?
Gay.
Jews plz keep forcing race mixing down my throat until i breed brown pussy
Sauce on this semen demon?
There aren't many hot nogs, but when they show up, they're damn sexy.
>guy in new york buys truck and murders 8 people
>gets out and shouts allahu akbar
>tries to get killed with toy guns and fails
>wakes up in hospital and brags about what he did
>talks about how isis and allah will be proud of him
>guy in texas walks into a church and kills 30 people
>runs like a bitch when an armed citizen returns fire
>police catch him and gun him down
>no motive given
That said, if you can prove he did it because of the Antifa group he was allegedly part of, you'd have a point.
An antifa group or a radical anti-thiest group.
She's jiggling so much, it's like a seizure.
she's ugly though.
How many people you kill has nothing to do with whether its terrorism or not you brainlet, its about the intent and who was targeted.
Because terrorists by definition have allegiance to an organization.
Lone nutjobs don't, so therefore don't fit the definition.
For fucks sake.
usa is a white funded country after all
the only group that have a right to commit a crime are white white people
I just responded to a 1 post by this ID OP, didn't I?
Damn it. Sorry.
>Brown guy
>Kills people
>Terrorist
He did it for Islamic State. WHEN YOU KILL IN THE NAME OF AN IDEOLOGY, IT IS TERRORISM!!
>White guy
>Kills people
>Crazy/Evil
Yes. When you kill people for the sake of killing people, yeah that's the evil shit the mentally unstable tend to do. MAYBE IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO KEEP GUNS AWAY FROM THOSE ARE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS!!
Because they weren’t terrorists. The correct term for most white shooters would be “murderers”, they just for whatever reason, decided to kill a group of people but there is no connection between the Vegas shooter, the church shooter, or Dylan roof, or even an actual white terrorist like Timothy McVeigh. Since each incident is isolated, and not motivated by political or religious ideology using the term “terrorist” doesn’t make any sense.
What about niggers who kill each other every single day in Chicago? Are they terrorists? Again, the answer is no. Even though they murder people, and are often times connected through gang membership, these acts don’t count as terrorism due to the lack of a political or religious motive. Simply murdering someone is not an act of terrorism otherwise we wouldn’t have the term “murder” and instead would call all homicides “terrorism”, but we don’t.
But they what about mudslimes who kill in the mane of allah? Yep, that fits the definition of terrorism, which is (and I quote): “The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” Muslim attacks fit this definition because they are carried out as acts against western, Christian society as a means of implementing sharia law in the west (there’s your “political aims”) They’re also carried out as a means to make people afraid for expressing their own, non-muslim beliefs, like the attack in Germany during a Christmas celebration. And there’s your religious motivation. Also consider that these attacks are carried out by organized groups that are organized solely for the fact of carrying out these attacks, such as ISIS. All of these things combined all add up to the very definition of terrorism, in a way that other types of murder does not.
So don’t even try your leftist deflection of “durrhurr in murica only brown people can be terrorists” cause I ain’t buying it.
White people are not human.
Because we don't know if he had a fucking agenda, or if he was just mentally unstable.
Media never reports on their prescription drugs
I am telling you, it's the fucking prescription drugs
Hes an antifa terrorist you faggot
Sage
That was him explosively releasing his anti-Christian sentiment, thus it was ideological and terrorism.
you're the only cunt inserting race
islam is a totalitarian cult not a race and no one said "kill all"
Because it implies motive you idiot. Terrorist kills for a cause or an idea, what were the motive in these?
it started as pretending but they all forgot it was just a rhetorical tool, and not their actual ideology.
>liberal
if you want to kill all liberals then we are ok with it.
No, he's a Democrat.
girl in the pic would be hot if it wasnt for her average non-white empty and souless eyes. fucking disgusting.
This kek
>terrorism requires a political motive
AMERICAN
EDUCATION
His wife was a member of the church, suggesting a personal motive. The truck attack was clearly religiously motivated. You refuse to understand nuance and are retarded. I consider Dylann Roof a terrorist.
>The girl in the pic is hot
Fixed that for you. Look at that body, would hit with the force of 1,000 burning suns.
Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim.
Literally the first sentence on wikipedia you dumbshit.
Trump did some faggot speech about how Americans need to pull through this and pray. What more do you want?
yeah her body and face are hot, but she has those average shitskin eyes, by turn off for me, if she got cow eyes it's a no no.
yep
I knew the shooter was white after announced the location of the shooting.
A muslim or a mexican would NEVER shoot up a church during a service, only a degenerate heathen wH*te subhumans would do that.
If eyes are the only thing you care about you're gay. You are gay.
You want a retarded kid? Help keep your race alive buddy.
Anyone who uses "Drumpf" is a faggot who needs to die.
To answer your question, everyone only believe things when they're convenient
Introductionn to Vannila profile narrative 101:
1) wipe the records after the massacer. Maintain "Vanilla profile" on shooter. Have Steve Weinstein explain the term. Keep goyim guessing on motive till next shooting.
2) Promote public places as generally unsafe. Random shooters with no motives.
3) Zero motives but also all motives are possible not ruled out. Anything goes as long as you buy the osi porno scanners.
4) Get handlers, crisis actors, hooked on stock options and expensive tastes.
5) Prep handlers/conspirators for the narrative
"come on guys, this is what we're so afraid of... When Steve can do this, we are in deep shit because there's just nothing there.. You find me where someone whose like Steve does this. I hope to hell they find when they do an autopsy that there's a tumor in his head or something, because if they don't, we're all in trouble." ...that was not a threat by Eric Paddock, that was a promise.
I think we're losing the track of what terrorism actually is. ISIS-backed attackers are terrorists by definition, because they create a feeling of terror and uncertainty, the same way the Irish terrorists created terror and uncertainty. Where will those crazy people strike next? You never know.
Meanwhile some guy decides to end his life on a high note and kill some people and doesn't have anything to do with any ideology at all.
Are liberals trying to co-opt the term terrorism? They already have taken so many and given them new definitions. Is terrorism next?
I would say this is proof of ideology.
Only a sane god-hating white man would shoot up a church. Those whities in the church have been brainwashed by brown theist tards
DICTIONARY
We have race mixed enough. Doing it any further will lessen diversity
Subhuman eyes are a big turn off for me and their stinky smell too, you probably what I mean if you've been around negros. Smells like the stinkiest NYC homeless person.
Cause its a false flag thats the difference
Liberals are projecting. Terrorism has always been a democrat thing. Since KKK has a stigma, they decided to cozy up with ISIS. Then they got a stigma, so they cozied up with Antifa. Now they got a stigma so they are distancing themselves and covering up all their little terrorist attacks. Liberals are the terrorists. They are projectionists.
Pretty sure White people haven't been passing around a highly popularized guidebook that's centuries old explicitly stating to wage jihad on all nonWhites for God, among other things.
Being naturally White isn't an ideology.
OP is right we need to label atheists as terrorists.
Nation of Islam is explicity racist. John Allen Muhammad was connected with them. Many others. They think evil scientists created the white race. They kill white people all the time. They're a seditious totalitarian racist ideology. Why are blacks not required to renounce them to run for office? Look at all the deaths directly connected to them?
>North America
>homeland of wh*tes of european descent
>durr even if we prevent killings in one way people will still find ways to kill each other
>so why even bother to minimalize the death toll anyways??
lmfao
putting words in my mouth, ive said absolutely nothing about those groups of people
the guy was a leftist so I agree we should kill all leftists.
Not to mention they're screaming "alah Akbar" while doing the killing. Fuck Democrats, bunch of deceivers.
He has been labeled a terrorist, you hopeless retard.
>because terrorism requires a political motive
Terrorism is a literal meaning. Terrorism is supposed to cause as much terror and fear as possible, not some retarded imaginary political bullshit.
...
Get to the back of the bus nigger.
"kill all muslims" is the default anyway, literally just business as usual the very same day
he was antifa and a fedora
it was terrorism