‘Virtue Signaling’ Isn’t the Problem. Not Believing One Another Is.
nytimes.com
‘Virtue Signaling’ Isn’t the Problem. Not Believing One Another Is.
nytimes.com
Other urls found in this thread:
I will surely click on an article that you had so little interest in you can't even summarize
Ny times is fucking garbage
hope she aborted it anyway
learn to read fag
I honestly find that tweet pretty funny.
Stop being such a fag, OP
Should i move to jackson mississippi?
...
>the pic
is she joji's sister?
?
D o xx x x x x ed
4k what?
Learn to archive, libshit.
learn to kys you redneck fuck
Yes or no
well yes, when you oversaturate discourse with a buzzword, it becomes meaningless
4k HD Russia Today
...
Its not a buzzword fag
>virtue is a buzzword
everything except the ending is right in that article.
>"accusations of ‘‘virtue signaling’’ are, more than anything, a way of walking out on that argument and dismissing it altogether — a quick and easy solution for those moments when engaging and listening, agreeing or disagreeing, seem too hard, too challenging, too personal, too dangerous"
>"seem too hard, too challenging, too personal, too dangerous"
HHAHAHA who the fuck wrote this shit? Arguing with mental ill people about were they can piss and a take a dump is apparently too challenging, too personal and too dangerous. Its not like its just a utter waste of time.
>But of course many people do care, about all sorts of things that you or I might disagree with.
but that's wrong
>I'm unemployed
>I like to travel
Who whose dime?
>The Daily Mail, a newspaper known for its own tabloid nativism and xenophobia.