Banning guns won't stop maniacs from killing people

>banning guns won't stop maniacs from killing people

>quick we need to take north korea's weapons away before they kill people

>Taxation keeps the money supply liquid and inflation low
>Gold has never been more expensive

Why do leftist have this bizarre urge to make themselves look like retards at every opportunity?

You missed the point entirely. We're not taking their nukes. We're nuking them first.

having weapons don't make people dangerous user

gud thread bump for angry burgers

Think of it like a large scale lautenberg amendment action.

how will the burgers cope

look at italy:
>guns illegal
>literally hundred shooting murders a day

LIKE
PLEASE DUDE
JUST LIKE


GIVE UP YOUR GUNS

We don't want to take away their weapons though, we want to take away their lives.

Plus 1 for making me google something.

>guns
vs
>thermonuclear ICBMs
Kill yourself kike
SAGE

>quick we need to take north korea's weapons away before they kill people

I never said, I think north korea has the right to have atomic bombs.

Atomic bombs are a shield against atomic bombs, if you dont have one you are dead

No, but being an insane dictator with a legion of commie zombies does.

source?

>banning guns will stop maniacs from killing people
>lets get rid of our own nuclear weapons so north korea doesn't kill us

Dumb arse.

good post would have been excellent with a small amount of context. the lautenberg amendment bars domestic violence offenders from owning firearms, but the situation is more like someone convicted of making terroristic threats having their 2nd amendment rights forfeit as a felon.

NK wants to nuke people because we won't trade with them. You get that? We all decided that they're people are starving to death and being murdered by the millions in gulags so we don't want to do business with them anymore. They decided that the USA, Japan and South Korea are bullying the world in to compliance and thus threatening to nuke one of us.

To compare this situation to the delusion that guns can be banned is preposterous. You should kys before we have to.

>they're
their. wtf is this shit lately, my brain just farts and poof

>banning guns = banning legal guns. this doesn't account for illegal guns
>nk will not surrender their weapons. we never suggested this

>Ukraine gives up nukes. Gets ass reamed by East/West and gutted up like a sturgeon for its roe.
> Iraq and Libya give up WMDs. Their heads of state swing from the gallows after western "peacekeeping" operations in less than a decade.
> Best Korea builds and keeps nukes. West whines bitches and sanctions, but doesn't touch them because cost/benefit is too great. Retains sovereignty.

I don't think this is the metaphor you we're looking for.

>"I really want to kill this guy''
>"Fuck, killing people is illegal''

>Gold has never been more expensive

wat?

it's 2017 u know

>quick we need to take north korea's weapons away before they kill people
Wrong, we need to kill north korea before they kill people

>Guns don't kill people
>Pugs kill people

Shieeeeeeet

As someone who doesn't have a horse in this race, why is what he's saying retarded. It seems like a reasonable objection on the surface.

psychotics arent allowed to own firearms user

Google mexico.