I want it to be illegal for an American citizen to own a gun and I'm not going to apologize for it

I want it to be illegal for an American citizen to own a gun and I'm not going to apologize for it.

The only exception I'd consider would be to those who are registered to hunt within their state. That registration must stay current. Extensive vetting and a six month waiting period. Only hunting rifles can be purchased. Feds would control the vetting and monitoring of hunting licenses. States would issue the hunting license.

In before
>"That's not even close to reality gun grabber. You are so far out there."

Hey gun humper, neither was gay marriage fifty years ago. We will win this fight. It will take decades. The California National Guard is a well regulated militia. My drunken Trump supporting neighbor doesn't regulate anything well.

Other urls found in this thread:

gov.uk/government/organisations/uk-visas-and-immigration
guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvmurd.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

No one gives a shit what you think leaf.

(((You))), also sage

I agree with you, other than highly regulated exceptions, guns should not be legal for citizens to own.

Sage

We must fight for our rights life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. All being diminished by gun humpers on a daily basis.

Also, all firearms and ammo have to be stored at a secure armory at a shooting range or hunting club facility. That's how they handle personal firearms on military bases for people who live on base. It would work just fine for civilians, too. You go, check out your personal firearm for your hunting trip and return it afterwards.

Well guns were legal for 200+ years before 2000 and mass shootings weren't a problem in the 19th and 20th century. So maybe there's a bigger issue at play?

Look you commie piece of shit. what part of shall not be infringed do you not get?

The right to bear arms is ALREADY “infringed” for many, and for very good reason. Here’s a short list of things that could easily happen if we were to give you your way, remove all “infringements,” and completely deregulate the Second Amendment:

>A career felon could walk out of prison, and purchase a full-auto AK-47 from Walmart
>Your psycho ex could buy a sniper rifle and silencer from “some guy” for $100
>A mentally handicapped child could get a pistol from a vending machine
>Known terrorists and those with terrorist affiliations could easily purchase Stinger missile launchers to shoot down airliners, and RPGs to blow up your Hummer
>Any nutjob could walk out of the asylum, buy a grenade launcher and flamethrower, and visit your kids at school.

kys

Good luck, buddy. I don't think you'll be convincing anywhere near enough people to make it happen, though.

No libtard should be allowed to keep his head. They don’t use what is in there anyway. Thank Allah so many Muslims are here now to begin detaching these libtards from their head.

I always find it hilarious how people compare an AR-15 (that shoots a tiny ass bullet) to howitzer cannons or those whammy shells from the Dukes of Hazard movie.

>tfw people without guns demand I give them my guns

Because criminals abide by laws, right?

my kid at school has a grenade launcher too so he'll be fine.

Come and try me nigger

>A career felon could walk out of prison, and purchase a full-auto AK-47 from Walmart


leaf

How do you plan on seizing the means of production if you are unarmed faggot?

>We will win this fight.

I was born to an anti gun family in an anti gun state.

Now we all have guns and support gun right organisation's.

You will not win this fight.

>what part of shall not be infringed do you not get?
You're retarded and anyone who repeats this is also retarded. is right when he says
>The right to bear arms is ALREADY “infringed”
Literally anything that stops, slows, or in any way makes it more difficult to purchase a firearm is an infringement.
Stop repeating that nonsense.

>implying guns are magically going to appear in the hands of criminals once all guns are bought back and highly regulated
Criminals commit crime due to circumstances. If they can sell their gun for $1000, they'll gladly do that rather than do crime.

>A career felon could walk out of prison, and purchase a full-auto AK-47 from Walmart
[citation needed]

>Your psycho ex could buy a sniper rifle and silencer from “some guy” for $100
Illegally. Gun control wouldn't help.

>A mentally handicapped child could get a pistol from a vending machine
Are you here to make people laugh or make a point? Same response to the last two points.

I say this is shit bait, end thread boys.

lets compromise and make it illegal for registered Democrats to own a gun

>Semi-automatic firearms banned in Australia
>Australia's crime rate stays exactly the same and even goes up
>We still have massacres and gang wars

W-well, at least we don't have any scary guns!

>Government estimates they only bought back some 30-60% of illegal firearms

O-oh...

You want our guns? Come try to take them faggot.
The military won't be on your side

You're both retarded and can't read.

Most of the recent attacks have been Democrats, socialists, or generally leftists.

Reign in your own shit and leave us mentally sound gun owners alone

You're more than welcome to come and disarm me, I've always been curious as to what hollow point .45ACP does to human flesh

>The democrat agrees with the communist
Color me shocked

This. It’s just common sense. Democrats commit the vast majority of gun crime.

>criminals use registered weapons
you didn't have your wheaties this morning, did you

sage

Shill slider

you will fail.
the american constitution is built to stop anything legislative from happening.

I want it to be illegal for democrats to own a gun. They cause too much gun violence

Pretty much

most states wont let you walk around with a switchblade

This is typical of gun nuts. They jump straight into their NRA sponsored talking points and most don't even bother to read my logical arguments.

I almost feel the gun argument is unwinnable. They are, for all intents and purposes, "climate deniers," flat earthers, science deniers. They have a huge emotional stake in not seeing the "causality" of things you espouse, to things that are happening.

GO AWAY, BATIN

I want you to KYS and I'm not going to apologize for it, faggot

You haven't made a logical argument.

Honestly we really need to start throwing you chimps into mental institutions.

>5.56 tearing animals apart
oregano

>People thinking taking away the LEGAL guns means it'll take the already illegal guns away from niggers and their peers

Sure works where I live! The fact that I have been mugged at gunpoint 4 times in 5 years means nothing!

Please, don't be a fool. Celebrities and "important" people surround themselves with armed guards in pretty much every country

>Hey gun humper, neither was gay marriage fifty years ago.

Great comparison! I too remember the old bill of rights amendment: "The right to no gay marriage."

I want you to move into the worst parts of Chicago without a gun. They already have strict gun control. What's the problem?

Nigger they're not gonna give up their guns when they make more selling than that in a few days (or less) selling drugs. That's just asking to be at the mercy of rival gang memebers. Plus depending on the weapon they could easily sell that for much more on the black market than your dinky police buy-backs can afford.

It is an unwinnable argument. SHALL

In the immortal of Sargon.
Who cares what you think? You're a fucking communist

Go ahead and turn yourself into a sitting little duck you dumb faggot. You are genetically defective. Your threat matrix is broken. It doesn't work. Peopaganda has turned your brain into fucking mashed potatoes. The system could come and take your wife and rape her in front of you and you would help hold her down if they told you it was 'for your own security'. Fuck you cunt you are not my ally

Why wouldn't someone who legally has a weapon from your scenario go on a killing spree? I'm genuinely asking.

>Comparing gun grabbing to gay marriage because "muh progress"
Do dumb.
Protip: Gay marriage was allowing people to do something.
Literal gun grabbing (what you propose) involves taking a right AWAY from people, who, by definition of their status (gun owners) are ARMED.

The most hilarious parts of these leftist pussies is that they suddenly have a PERFECT understanding of supply, demand, and why government bans fail when the subject is CANNABIS!

Really? I guess you've never seen what's going on in Mexico, then. Criminals would rather choose to use those weapons to rule with an iron fist.

I want it to be legal to murder communists

>I want it to be illegal for an American citizen to post their opinions on the internet and I'm not going to apologize for it.
>The only exception I'd consider would be to those who are registered as journalists within their state. That registration must stay current. Extensive vetting and a six month waiting period. Only registered journalists can post. Feds would control the vetting and monitoring of journalist licenses. States would issue the journalist license.
>In before
>>"That's not even close to reality speech suppressor. You are so far out there."
>Hey 1st amendment humper, neither was gay marriage fifty years ago. We will win this fight. It will take decades. The Media is all the free speech we need. My drunken Trump supporting neighbor doesn't regulate anything well.

What caliber shell could accomplish what that pic portrays? Something from an anti-tank gun?

>in before
>that feel when
>kill yourself
But (((OP))), how will we kill you without guns?

>I want
Tough titty, little guy. Never going to happen.

Don't you faggots believe that Trump is LITERALLY hitler? And you're wiling to be disarmed when you believe that fascists are running around everywhere?

Fuck you commie, you just want a disarmed enemy.

something high explosive, and something greater than 40 MM

if you hate it so much then go live in a country that has guns banned

The leftist fantasy is that assault rifles fire sharks that take huge bites out of the target.

It would actually be pretty awesome if they weren't using the idea to enslave Americans.

This is why gun control is popular in cities! If they couldn't keep people scared into compliance, nobody would do the bidding of the city machines.

*farts*
$@ ge

>communist
>for disarming the proletariat

A liar and an idiot and a lying idiot.
>we will win
from the bottom of the power gradient? lel

>vetting

Am I the only one who fucking cant stand hearing this term or seeing it written? I feel like every time I hear it the person using it is just trying to seem like a brainiac

>forefathers said you could own a person
no, they just didn't say you couldn't; slavery was never explicitly made legal in the constitution

>communist flag
>"I want..."

1000 years gas chamber

>we will win this fight. It will take decades
Lmao

Come and take it...

...

Fast food kills more Americans than guns, but you don't see people advocating to ban assault burgers. This is why people don't take gun grabbers seriously: they're mental midget hypocrites. The issue isn't guns or food, it's liberty. Here's some devils advocacy:
I don't oppose gun control, I favor totalitarian regimes. You shouldn't be allowed to have guns, or fast food, or porn, or be gay. Gun grabbers wont make any traction until they face the hypocrisy of their logic:
>i fear y, so you shouldnt be allowed to have x
>i fear firearm violence, so you shouldnt be allowed to have guns
>i fear moral degeneracy, so you shouldnt be allowed to be gay
The destination is different, but the road is the same. If you're taking away others peoples pursuit of happiness under the guise of preventing potential disaster, you can't make an intellectually sincere argument for gun control without also advocating for the ban of fast food, smoking, and drinking. To loosely paraphrase franklin
Those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither.

Don't worry though because it doesn't matter what you want and it never will... Commies lost and the democrats will never win another election as long as any of us are still alive. You're done. And if somehow you got the legislation in place people way crazier and more dangerous than anyone on Sup Forums would be kicking in the doors of everyone responsible and literally executing them for treason as is ALSO our right and obligation as American citizens

So how is this not spam again?

I want it legal to kill all communists, and I’m not going to apologize for it.

It'll never happen in your lifetime :)

>assault burgers
hahaha kek

>We're going to take your guns.
>Oh, how?
>The militarized police state that we constantly complain about.

There is literally no consistency in any anti-gun stance.

That flag takes away the surprise. Why don't you wait until your comerade is done watching Jamal fuck his wife so you can post this in /leftypol/?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

You think that's a contradiction? Ask a lefty why the ban on pot doesn't work.

Fuck off commie you just want us to give our guns away so you could enact the commie revolution you kike slave!
S H I L L
H
I
L
L

I like how they included the nog as if the rest of the strawmen wouldn't hate him

Same gagging this hard. Saged and reported

Was just about to mention that.

>let's ban guns so criminals can't get them
>let's legalize pot, people will still get it anyway and any restriction is pointless

Who cares what you want?

*Rubs hands*
Yes goy
*Adjusts yamulka*
Advocate against the rights of the goyim. Us whites need to be stopped

...

Did you forget we can see your poster id? Samefag with a proxy next time dumbass.

Dreams are REAL OP your wish is granted:

gov.uk/government/organisations/uk-visas-and-immigration

This is actually probably the most important point.

You have no guns, you have no tangible power.
Literally, "Who cares what you want"?

...

Samefagging. If anyone has a decent rebuttal to my post, please post it so I can consider it's value. I live in the commie state of california, gun grabber central, and this argument (coupled with relevant stats from shithole central/south american nations) has btfo every gun grabbing libtard i've met. i've yet to find a counter-argument that doesnt exhibit circular fallacies or promote anti-american ideals of liberty

Good luck with that I guess.

>People will get it anyway

I understand that it's a pragmatic inconsistency, but the ideological inconsistency is even more annoying to me. We're talking about people who legitimately think Trump is a deranged dictator, but think that the public should disarm.

sounds great, faggot

THE COMMIE GAVE UP AND LEFT, PLEASE STOP BUMPING THE THREAD

>not posting the gif
Here you go

They don't mentally connect the civic function of an armed populace.

They'll even go so far as to think, "Jeez, if this guy is as bad as we say, maybe we should violently resist", but they still don't put it together with the purpose of the 2nd amendment.

Protip: The protests on saturday are an indication of how effective these people are when their foreign help has been cut off.
These cognitive inconsistencies are crippling.

I'd just like tighter gun control. Mental health checks and extensive background checks. Mandatory gun safety classes in which your mental health is monitored.

Mandatory gun safes and gun safe inspections.

You can kill someone with a hunting rifle as easily as a pistol. No reason to ban types of weapons. Just regulate whose hands they fall into.

Yuck, someone actually took the effort to cut off another man's penis, that's so gay.

To be honest, the answer to gun grabbers should be this: Go ahead, ban guns. But don’t send the police or military you hate to collect these weapons. Do it yourself. Go door to door, trying to steal $3000 rifles from people who want nothing more than to protect their rights they have seen be infringed time and time again. Gun nuts get their “ban”, and America purges its leftist retards.

What the fuck is a gun safety class going to do? Accidental deaths are practically non-existent. What the fuck are they going to teach? Don't murder people?

Background checks do literally nothing. They are the ultimate in feel good retardation.

>"Looking only to official criminal records, data over the past thirty years consistently show that the mythology of murderers as ordinary citizens does not hold true. Studies have found that approximately 75% of murderers have adult criminal records, and that murderers average a prior adult criminal career of six years, including four major adult felony arrests. These studies also found that when the murder occurred "[a]bout 11% of murder arrestees [were] actually on pre-trial release"--that is, they were awaiting trial for another offense."

>"The fact that only 75% of murderers have adult crime records should not be misunderstood as implying that the remaining 25% of murderers are non-criminals. The reason over half of those 25% of murderers don't have adult records is that they are juveniles. Thus, by definition they cannot have an adult criminal record."

guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvmurd.html

You people legitimately belong in mental institutions.

>All this shit.

I'd just like tighter marriage control. Mental health checks and extensive background checks. Mandatory safe sex classes in which your mental health is monitored.

Mandatory condom tax and anal tearing inspections.

You can kill someone with AIDS as easily as a pistol. No reason to ban types of faggots. Just regulate who they have "access" to.

And then commies infiltrate these testing institutions and de facto ban your right to own weapons. That is my counter argument. It’s like a poll tax or poll test. Why don’t we have those things?