Guntards will defend this

Guntards will defend this

hey fag, if the airforce had PROPERLY filed his paperwork he wouldn't have been able to own a gun. period. the problem seems to be with government red-tape and countless hoops to jump through...

Guntards...as you call them...stopped his rampage

No we won't, the goverment needs to do their fucking job before they add more laws.

shhhhh stop using your brains and let the social media memepic form all your opinions for you

>Defending a soyboy

Well firstly the airforce is unconstitutional, your constitution mentions an army and navy but no airforce

time you abolish the unconstitutional airforce

You are just as bad as him.

I'm a "guntard", and I won't defend his actions. He broke the law and was put down like the animal he was. The Airforce fucked up, simple as that. Also sage you fucking shill.

>air force fails to send the record in to nics despite being required to do so
>passes checks

The laws are not even being fucking enforced.

Wasn't he not allowed to own a gun? iirc if you're dishon'd you lose that.

>No we won't, the goverment needs to do their fucking job before they add more laws.

Texas has the death penalty for this type of shit, and it is an express lane.

Didn't stop this fucktard now, did it?

no one will be talking about this in a week or two.

>The report filed by the El Paso officers says that the person who reported Mr. Kelley missing from the hospital advised them that he “suffered from mental disorders,” and that he “was attempting to carry out death threats” against “his military chain of command.” The man “was a danger to himself and others as he had already been caught sneaking firearms onto Holloman Air Force Base,”

what did Devin know

Libtards will post shit tier bait and pretend it's top tier.

According the the US Code, every physically capable, battle-aged male is a member of the unorganized militia. For the unorganized militia to be functional and serve the security of a free state, it must be armed. Thus a well regulated militia is one that is capable of arming itself.

The 1792 Militia Act outlined that the militia was supposed to be able to equip themselves with the basic gear of a contemporary infantryman when they are called up to serve in defense of the nation. It is entirely clear that "well regulated" means armed. The militia must arm itself, and thus the right to bear and keep arms cannot be infringed.

No. Instead we will make fun of fucking leftist cocksuckers liker yourself.

Meanwhile, we will continue to stockpile guns. Not for fighting the government.

>A "right"
>Being able to be taken away

How is it a right then? Imagine if people lost their freedom of speech for saying something libelous in the past.

It's ridiculous.

The second amendment is a privilege, not a right.

>leaf complains about American constitution

>law requires your posts are in both english and french

Pretty sure it was the "well-regulated militia" that stopped him.

those are all /pol criteria excepting he wasn't virginal

He found out 98% of the military is crooks and retards

Fortunately, the guy who stopped him was a part of that militia.

What does a militia have to do with any of this? Man liberals really are retarded cuckolds.

>Guntards will defend this
Our firearm rights aren't subject to firearm deaths.

But posting forum sliding shitposts is acceptable?

On the other hand, if he managed to get ahold of a firearm illegally, pol would take it as an argument that gun control never works.

if by "defend this" you mean "not bend the knee of fealty to Islam and unarm themselves whole simultaneously spreading their assholes while tearfully condemning every member of their own race" then yes, i will "defend it." also, you are a faggot kike and should be burned slowly in the town proper while watching your children be raped to death by sub saharans.

Who cares let usas have all the mass shootings they want it's a small happening and a show to watch every time.

>On the other hand, if he managed to get ahold of a firearm illegally, pol would take it as an argument that gun control never works.
If he was so mentally ill that he'd kill innocent people he shouldn't have been on the streets.

Fix the mental health system to get and keep people like that off the streets. That way, you leave our firearm rights alone.

Of course that's if he wasn't an edgy atheist antifa member who wanted to kill innocent White Christians and just happened to target his ex-mother-in-law.