>good guys won the WW2
Good guys won the WW2
Other urls found in this thread:
funny looking link to the wiki page for communism
The virgin Comunist.
The Chad NatSoc.
>Wikipedia is communist and biased, even though you have 20 sources right at the bottom of page
How does it feel to be a mental nigger? How does it feel to be a failure in life, but not realize it's because of your own personality and actions, and not some vast X conspiracy?
Must suck. But keep trying, shilling for dead ideologies online will surely fix your life.
Nazi Germany was comfy
thanks for the
>(You)
>tacky exaggerated propaganda is ''comfy''
Only if you're a plebeian.
Nazi Germany from 1936 onward was economically unsustainable, on account of spending shit they didn't have.
Their burnout was mitigated by taking Austrian and Czech gold reserves, but even with that, they would either have to cut their expenses (which would mean losing support), or melt down economically in a few years. Or, start a war, and steal stuff and enslave people.
>economically unsustainable
That's what war is for. Coincidentally what everyone has been doing up to 1945 and afterwards.
Jesenovac is still being used against the Croatian people, the slaughter of Croatians in Bleiburg massacre, by the Jugolslav Serbs and Bolshevik Jews, was used to inflate the holohoax propaganda against them and Germans.
Nope.
Germany would literally melt down, which totally shits on the argument that Nazis fixed anything. Applying some scotch tape that will hold for two days is not a fix.
Nazi Germany was predicated on aggressive expansion, stealing resources and enslaving people.
However, they were so incompetent even that didn't work that well.
They were a joke, just like their modern fanboys.
>germany was doing what everyone was and still is doing
>joke
Choose one.
>Jasenovac is still used against the Croatian people
Jasenovac was barely mentioned in Yugoslavia, you retarded leaf, on account of being damaging to ''brotherhood and unity''.
>Bleiburg
Yeah, killing ustašas and their friends totally compares to randomly butchering women and children, and having concentration camps for children.
>Jugoslav Serbs
There were 200,000 ethnic Croats in partisan movement.
>Bolshevik Jews
Tito was a Croat.
Nigger.
But who? Who exactly was doing that?
Literally no one, at that time.
Check the pic I made. Even with bigger and more experienced labor force, plus the same number of slave labor, plus far bigger resources, Nazi Germany failed to outproduce Soviet Union.
Soviet Union, with diminished territory, which moved half of it's industry.
Sure, shortages of certain resource played a part, but you can't attribute all to that, it was just inefficiency of Nazi state.
Contracts were handed out on political basis, not on the basis of efficiency.
And it's not even ''Germany didn't mobilize'' meme. They did. They were just inefficient.
The Holodomor ended in 1933, Nazi Germany didn't do shit
They restarted it Only now it served a double purpose, to feed their population, and to exterminate racially inferior one.
REMINDER
>so incompetent it didn't work well
Just like the Twin Towers were so poorly built they didn't last very long
They restarted another famine, that was not the Holodomor
>montenegro thinking that his opinion on countries larger than 5000kmsq actually matters
Haha
No, I mean, they did same shit, only with genocidal intent now.
Damn...
>An AK-47
>WW2
okay
Yeah, but then OP's picture is completely retarded
>implying that natsocs actually like le xd kakistanis
They're literally internet refugees, shitting up this board.
At eastern front germans didn't kill people, just communists. Bolshevik scum.
>economically unsustainable
>because they were spending money they didn’t have
LITERALLY EVERY FUCKING COUNTRY does this and still does this today, it’s called a deficit and it just means you pay it back later. Granted borrowing money to support your country is unsustainable but Hitler wasn’t an idiot. You borrow money when you know you will have more money in the future, the way gdp was going he would be able to pay it back, and if he won world war 2, at the very least on the eastern front, he woold be able to pay it back ten fold, partly because their was a lot of cheap labour to the east but also because he planned on reaching Russia’s oil fields and if had done that what was left of the Soviet Union would quickly collapse and he would be able to pay off a all debts ten fold and continue to grow his country without borrowing money.
Nah, dude. It wasn't even nearly as bad as in 30's. None of my grandparents ever said anything about hunger in 40's. As the article mentioned, primary targets were POWs and jews, not farmers, like in the 30's.