Automation is coming

Vegas Shuttle bus driver as an Occupation RIP 1985 - 2018.
(You had a good run)

>Testing in Las Vegas:
msn.com/en-us/news/us/self-driving-bus-involved-in-accident-on-its-first-day/ar-BBEKNxm?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=ieslice

Taxi Drivers, Uber/Lyft Drivers Occupation just diagnosed with stage 4 Cancer.
>Testing in Phoenix:
money.cnn.com/2017/11/07/technology/waymo-phoenix-no-drivers/index.html

Now the jobs to replace these:
Because of Government regulations, insurance companies and other such liability nonsense there will most likely be independent certification of "safety". Meaning eventually each design, spot checks during production and system updating will require 3rd party certification. This will require a new type of technician that doesn't exist. Followed shortly by specialties in Law that arise from lawsuits.

The questions:
Will these firms be private or will Government create another inefficient bloated Bureaucratic corruption machine?

What are we going to do about the fact most High School and College Graduates in this country are not prepared for this type of job?

Are we doomed?

Other urls found in this thread:

theregister.co.uk/2017/09/13/whos_to_blame_when_your_bot_goes_wrong/
theintercept.com/2017/03/22/real-time-face-recognition-threatens-to-turn-cops-body-cameras-into-surveillance-machines/
zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-29/nyc-plans-new-facial-recognition-cameras-bridges-tunnels-heres-how-dodge-them
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Part 2
The key bit from the CNN Article:
>[Experts widely expect autonomous vehicles to be far safer than human drivers. Crashes are overwhelmingly caused by human error. However, regulators have struggled with determining how to validate that an autonomous vehicle is safe enough.]

Keywords: Regulators, struggled and validate

Meaning: "Regulators" existing Bureaucracies (DOT, and assorted alphabet diarrhea) are worried about liability because industry is subsidized by State to "protect" people. AKA their dick is so far in the corporate 'gibs' pickle jar if it breaks they aren't getting away unscathed.

>TL;DR: Government intervention results in a sharp rise in cocaine sales its how bureaucracies are born.

Likely course of action: Discussion of regulations at the State Level in regards to "Validation" aka certification and testing requirements will begin. Queuing the Lobbyists to get involved, followed by hookers and blow to an extreme only Charlie Sheen could really appreciate. State will then spend millions on a Colombian themed fact finding commission to provide a report. Said report will be produced by the only intern that wasn't invited to the "corporate brain storming" session in Cancun. The report will clearly confirm/outline what the Lobbyists had stated in the beginning possibly with subtle tweaks that guarantee that intern will be invited next time or suddenly die of a drug overdose. State will review and mess everything up, finger pointing will begin and a baby bureaucracy is born. Process will be escalated to Congress where the above will be repeated until the baby bureaucracy grows up into a bloated nightmarish entity its creators fear. Then we find a new reason to do blow and bang Brazilian hookers with the Clinton foundation. The product being something like ANSI or UL mixed with the EPA is my bet.

We're doomed. How badly can this go /pol?

I laughed

I'm an uber driver, I'm not concerned, in fact I'm hoping as children die from automated schoolbuses and garbage trucks I may see my tips go up in a sad attempt to stave off automated personal drivers.

It is inevitable most of the jobs will be gone in 20 years. Way cheaper to have an entirely automated system. Better grab some blow and head to DC so you can lobby to have "protections" aka artificial nonsense to drive the cost of driverless cars up.

technology is not inherently bad.

Didn't say the technology is bad. Just that I have no confidence I a giant regulatory monster being fueled by copious amounts of drugs and influence relying on a busted education system.

theregister.co.uk/2017/09/13/whos_to_blame_when_your_bot_goes_wrong/
(((They))) are going to fuck this up beyond all recognition. Think about who will be out of the work force first. How technical the replacement jobs will be and mah inclusion.

Jones kept saying robots will replace humans. He's probably right.

muds will just mud it up

the future will be more dystopian and more utopian than we can imagine. whites will survive and succeed

>the future will be more dystopian
Than you can imagine.

There will be a few gated communities here and there being "utopia". We have a long way as a species before we move to a post scarcity economy. This cannot be done with constant interventionism and subsidized corporate nonsense. Real capitalism will need to be strictly adhered to.

Jones was right.

From what I've seen on Sup Forums, billionaire globalist shills, otherwise known as "conservatives" or "right wingers" love it when the elites automate jobs. Just look at any thread about a higher minimum wage or generally higher wages for workers. Conservashits fight against this with all their autism.

>automated "taxis"
>credit card only
>CCTV everywhere
cities are fucking CANCER

what a sad existence that awaits us in the transhumanist "utopia". For without purpose, all human shave left to do is eat food, fuck, and watch tv.

What have we done?

>CCTV I wish it ended there.
theintercept.com/2017/03/22/real-time-face-recognition-threatens-to-turn-cops-body-cameras-into-surveillance-machines/

zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-29/nyc-plans-new-facial-recognition-cameras-bridges-tunnels-heres-how-dodge-them

Fuckin leaf. We have tons of very technical jobs (with on the job training) that are not minimum wage. The logical thing to do right now would be to abolish minimum wage.

good goy

>I love freedom!
>The Bill of Rights is amazing!
>but I gotta be "safe"
boomers

How many times do you retards have to shill here for a higher minimum wage? Can't you losers actually develop some skills? And how retarded do you have to be to think that working class people are demanding tax cuts for billionaires? You're not one of these retards that thinks minorities are not an issue, yet people keeping what they've earned is? You're not a cuck by any chance are you?

its coming alright

...

It's not done. What we can work for is a return to entrepreneurship. Pay attention a meme the government to death everytime there is a grab at more power or control. Worst case scenario is described above overall the world turns into detroit. If regulation is kept down or nonexistent prices will go down, freeing up capital. We can choose socialist dystopia or your average person owning 3d printers capable of manufacturing and opening there own businesses. The possibilities are endless.

if everyone starts a bussiness then there will be no consumers.

>Right
Nothing in here has anything to do with minimum wage. But low and behold muh gibs. If we can only produce mostly minimum wage earners we as a species are more than fucked.

Nothing triggers billionaire globalist shills like you than lower unemployment and higher wages for workers.

Your billionaire globalist gods that you worship, serve and obey aren't just automating min wage jobs either, cuck.

That's not how it works.
Even your min wage fuckers are a business. They are service based but still a business.

Let me grab some similar graphs for Detroit 30 years ago. Short term dude. I am not talking about min wage outside of transitioning a largely unskilled poorly educated work force with entitlement issues into a highly technical work force that is 1000s of times more efficient.

Lol billionaire globalist shills will argue against higher wages for workers at all costs.

You realize you can spend a few years in an apprenticeship and be making 80k to 100k a year at the end of it right. Why are you so fixated on unskilled jobs?

May I suggest Building Automation as a trade.

Workers, you keep using that word I don't think you know what it means.

Your billionaire globalist gods aren't just automating min wage jobs.

You hate workers.

>Lol billionaire globalist shills will argue against higher wages for workers at all costs.
What is this, 1898? Big businesses love compelled higher wages because it decreases economic mobility and entrenches the upper class. For some reason you have in your head "Wal Mart" but not "Oracle" or "Microsoft" or "Raytheon" or "Halliburton" or "Facebook" or...

If there's one thing the wealthy want, it's to have the entire social structure depend on their profits, because then they've essentially captured all government for free.

There was a time all businesses wanted the government to leave them alone. Now that the government has succeeded in infiltrating every aspect of life, government is run by business for business. Jiggering tax laws isn't going to change that because jiggering tax laws was the CAUSE of it. Mess with wages, and benefits, and etc, and more and more businesses find it essential to their long-term success to capture government. Oh, we need a new Department of X, we need a committee on Y, etc etc etc.

Gods? Ah you're a religious zealot. I am not talking about globalism or any such nonsense. Yes I know building operators/engineers make a good living and we are automating those jobs like crazy. Why you may ask. Because they have massive labor shortages because no one wants to do that kind of technical work. Even though it pays well.

>Big businesses love compelled higher wages

What is this nu-shilling?

Must be why they shipped millions of jobs overseas right.

>Because they have massive labor shortages

There are no labor shortages. They have to raise their wages, offer better benefits and train people.

It's called the market.

Supply and demand bitch.

Ie the original post. I can't wait for the department of automation. There sole function will be to maintain the status quo and suck off all the savings into giant government coffers.

Again. You know you're extra fucked if this is your attitude.

It's called the skills gap. If you're not aware of it you have no business discussing such topics.

Some companies did this, yes. As I indicated, that poster thought of certain characteristic examples that supported his point but ignored all the other examples which did not.

Some companies can alter behavior to avoid wage increases. This is why companies that can't want to do more to ensure no one else can. The whole purpose, again, is to ensure that the entire social structure depends on these megacorps' profit. Oh, we have to support huge companies because muh welfare muh health care muh education muh food stamps muh children muh environment.

Clearly some companies can take advantage of externalities to make some extra cash (which I note governments didn't stand in the way of and the media actively shills for) by making poor faggots in China or wherever deal with the problems but this cannot go on forever and then where will your examples be?

Thank God those fucking scammer taxi drivers deserve death

KEK
That's a good take away never thought of that.

bump