The statement about the "CIA just attacked the C.I.Chief" has a serious problem that leads me to believe this may be a form of counter-intelligence, if not a conspiracy seed. The reason for this is the statement "Let's be real clear", this is a common practice in PR, and disinformation. To set a "clearly" proposition is to suggest the statement to follow is absolutely TRUE, as in: obviously this statement is proven, for whatever reason. This Q is making this statement as an "authority" based on previous truths, and this is the counter-intel trick. Start with verifiable truths and once the other players know you only play Aces or Kings, you play your 2's like Aces and they all fold. They've been hypnotized to believe it's true. But this suggestion that the supposed accident that shut the @RealDonaldTrump Twitter page down being an injection to the Twitter Code, or a reset to correct the problem is untraceable. Even if it happened Twitter will never release that information, and without any facts no one could even be investigated for it.
This is NOT a pleasant fact whatsoever. If Q is right, then it means he's within the NSA or MI, and that both have total access to not only Twitter's code, but are deeply connected to the insiders who would have sussed out the mess. And, it should therefor be assumed that because he's a Good Guy, fighting the good fight, we should ignore the fact that the NSA and MI have back-end access to Twitter's programmers. But that's not even the real problem with this.
A much more serious issue is the fact that it is common practice for the CIA to plant articles like the ones written by Sorcha Fall. They can later be refuted as "Conspiracies" written by Russian puppets, or whatever culture makes it convenient to disclaim because it was tarnished by some ridiculous lie that makes the truthier parts all the more suspect. Beware!
Just the pure fact that Tony Podesta was not publicly indicted along with Huma tells me to question