Anyone who expresses pro-gun control sentiments should be killed

>anyone who expresses pro-gun control sentiments should be killed

Prove me wrong Sup Forums

Can't argue with that.

If we tarred and feathered a few, they might back off.

...

Killed with what?

Guns of course.

I think it ought to be more drastic action than that. Pro-gun control views have got to be genetic or something like that, right? So if we kill everyone who expresses those views, not only are we clearing the nation of pathetic unarmed filth, but we're also performing a sort of eugenics program against idiots and bad bloodlines.

...

You just counter proved your own point

>500k mothers die during abortions
wtf is wrong with america

How so?

Just make an online database of people who don't own guns. Make sure there is a way for people to get themselves off the list once they are armed. Problem solved.

Make sure you have great lawyers.

In case anyone doesn't understand the point of this:
Criminals would love to know who can't fight back.
This way, you don't have to get your hands dirty.

I support this completely.

Why is her neck so thin LMAO

If anyone actually does this and problems arise, I disclaim all responsibility.

Even the cop gets aborted

... the nazis were pro gun control you socialist fuck

These are a good start. Just needs an IOTBW tag.

>you socialist fuck
Wat

It's just the art style

y

No they weren't, they made it easier for german citizens to buy guns.

No, it’s taught when you’re young at school. When I was a kid til about 8 or so, I was infatuated with guns. Then 2nd-3rd grade came along and I was spewing how guns should be banned. I said that in front of my dad and he flipped out on my teacher for teaching me that crap, and explained to me everything regarding the 2A. Ever since then I’ve been pro machine guns and RPGs for civilians. It’s lazy/liberal parenting and school indoctrination that gets that in people’s heads.

Even better, make some kind of virtue signaling website where people can declare they've given up their weapons and publish their addresses to prove they're not afraid.

>i need guns to protect myself from those who want to harm me or kill me
>I should be killed for wanting to protect myself
>I need guns because there are those who wish to kill me

In Portland, they label themselves already.

I think it's the opposite. People who are pro-gun control don't want to disarm everyone, they just want an elite few to control all the guns (police, military, etc.). Also, they naturally tend to not own guns. By killing them we are just showing them the consequences of allowing themselves to be disarmed.

oh wait you said pro-gun control
i thought you said pro gun kek

>I think it's the opposite
No wonder, I was arguing the opposite of what I said due to not fully reading your initial post

Case in point

Those are all expressly anti-American ideals.

It depends on race. Only whites and Asians can be trusted to own guns imo. Blacks and Jews can't be trusted at all.

I can't.

Are you that /k/ommando with the half-nigger sister?

No reason to even have blacks and Jews in the state at that point.

How the fuck did you know?

I know you're trolling but it's learned behavior.
In the old days of Yugoslavia we had classes in high school where we'd learn how to maintain AK's, and the whole generation grew up conservative and fairly pro-gun.
By simply having a short mandatory military service, you'd achieve the same effect. Even if it lasted for just a few weeks - by simply having someone handle and fire a gun, you already go a long way to stop them from turning into a purple headed neolib.
Ideally you'd want to do that as early as possible, before they've adopted any concrete political views, much like it was done in Yugoslavia. No ammunition, no danger for anyone - just learn how to disassemble, clean and reassemble it.
Kids would probably love it too.

>jews with guns

Post half nigger sister faggot. I like some mixed meat

I know all and see all

Also your filenames

I'm not posting my sister for some 4channer to fap to. I can definitely tell you she took more from the white side than the black side though. No nigger lips or anything like that.

Obviously you've never been in a situation where you (or someone with you) needed a gun.

Come back to me once you finally crawl out o fMommy's Basement and live in the real world.

Oh yeah, remember that Texas shooting? It was a good guy with a gun that stopped a really bad guy with a gun.

Read what I posted again.

>anyone who expresses pro-gun CONTROL sentiments should be killed

Perhaps not killed, but not allowed to vote, etc

Sure thing NSA/ATF/FBI/CIA, whatever you say. I guess it's OK to advocate violence if you're trying to entrap people huh?

And how are you going to do that?

Well, they aren't armed and we are, so we round them up and shoot 'em.

How do you "round them up"?

Do you think they're just going to say ok?

disregard, I'm a drunk faggot that can't read

They won't have a choice, it's not like pro-gun control faggots own guns themselves.

You should have phrased OP better.
Half this thread is people misreading what you posted

Yeah, you're right. What do you think sounds better?
>anyone who express anti-gun rights sentiments should be killed
Or
>anyone who expresses support for gun control should be killed
Or
>anyone who opposes the 2nd Amendment should be killed

That's not a bad idea user.
We may even able to red-pill our future children that way.
>Get child a good gun.
>22. is probably a good choice due to the low caliber and the non-essential need for ear protection.
>Teach them how to maintain and repair said gun.
>If they fuck around with the gun like if they point it at you or themselves.
>Then it is a good idea to heavily punish them.

categorically true.
All people who are afraid that guns cause crime should be murdered. With guns. By guns. For guns.

****DISCLAIMER**** I am NOT actually advocating for violence, this is not an incitement of violence, please be a decent human being and disagree.

It isn't about gun control though is it really? It's all about getting rid of the first amendment, Americans have never lost a right in the constitution before so they can't target the most important one first, first they have to take away a different one, one that can be the first domino, it has to be one that people can feel good about losing, that's why they target the second amendment, it's to break the dam so they can take out the first amendment.

3rd, or "anyone who is anti-gun"

Sounds good, user.

You know user I was just in a /k/ thread that had most of the images you're posting now.

It was also talking about Sup Forums
You wouldn't know anything about that would you?

I'm not saying I support doing that. But I will say if it happened, I'd find it immensely gratifying.

>tfw no pro-gun gf

I know that feel

Abortion leads to the mothers death this frequently? There's a few variables that could affect it, or how large that number is compared to the meaningful deaths.

The problem with gun control is that it gets people killed.
Killing people to stop people from getting killed is classic utilitarianism.
The answer is that you're a retarded false flagger.

The problem with gun control is that it gets people killed.
If you disarm people, the strong grow stronger, and the weak lose an equalizing factor.
The people supporting gun control are generally in "the weak" population.
We shouldn't kill them, because they're part of the population guns serve to protect.
We should try to persuade them when we can. When we can't, we should let them die.

Go the fuck away, Snopes-fan.

So do you have a anti-gun gf then?

no