News

What is pols reliable news sorce

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/pidgin
ancient-code.com/news/
zerohedge.com/
youtu.be/fl9OUQUgDtQ
youtu.be/12g4v0YNCRU
reddit.com/r/The_Donald/
reddit.com/r/conspiracy/
drudgereport.com/
prisonplanet.com/
usawatchdog.com/
rantingly.com/
thelibertydaily.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

My ass

Sup Forums

me too

there isnt one reliable, unbiased news source

BBC and the Guardian

cuck and cuckier

People familiar with the situation, sources say.

spbp

NHK world. (Japanese News). You won’t find adjective, opinion, hyperbole, or any fat in their articles whatsoever. Just the facts. They avoid publishing stuff that could be fake or construed as inaccurate.

Matt Drudge

Literally always more accurate than any mainstream source.

And that's saying something in and of itself.

Sup Forums, newfag

I typically visit CNN and BBC, as they're the most distinguished and eminently renowned of news outlets.

First hand experience and my own two eyes.

Heh nice bait


Let me pull the reel from your hands.
bbc.com/pidgin

Reuters and (((Bloomberg))) because they do good research

Boots on the ground. Sup Forums is the only place where you get real, uncensored news when it happens. Sure, sometimes it's just some faggot LARP'ing, but if you can filter through the BS and check from multiple sources, then Sup Forums is by far the best place to stay up to date on current events.

Sup Forums and bloomberg

ask.com

You no like de pidgin, mon? Dem good good news place dey. De don good job since first start bin happen.

INFOWARS DOT COM

unironically the best informed news platform with the best analysis

spbp

Does anyone else feel bad that they check Sup Forums for headlines?

Why would you?

The important shit gets noticed and bumped. It's much faster than filtering the nonsense and propaganda away for yourself
>although you should do this sometimes

This, and that's a very, very sad state of affairs.

the huffington post

rss reader with as many reputable sources feeds as possible

ikr

In terms of msm nothing beats TRT turkish news. Roaches hate everyone equally so there's no bias irt Russia/EU/USA

ancient-code.com/news/
zerohedge.com/

Infowars is by far the best and on the cutting edge.

TIP OF THE SPEAR

i visit RT. but they are still pro israel and pro jew just like putin.

youtu.be/fl9OUQUgDtQ

OP is now less a fag in your shadow

this

Financial Times, to be honest.

r/feminism

Stick around and you will see.

Sup Forums is the fastest and most reliable. The combination of autism and intellect is unmatched

Sup Forums

Other than pol.
Drudge report
Gotnews
For analysis
Molymeme
No Agenda

WSJ with free chrome extension
NOS, dutch news
Reuters
Sup Forums

dailystormer, twitter, Sup Forums

CNN
MSNBC
Reddit
HuffPost
WaPo
NYT

Basically, the more Jews the better. Just listen to what they have to say and likely the exact opposite is true.

THIS

Every "news" site has an agenda. Even Reuters and Guardian has completely gone down the shitter.

If Reuters/Guardian runs a story. I check RT for their version of the same story. Because they have the opposite agenda.

Then I use all these biased sources in an attempt to triangulate the truth. Whichever pieces of information both of them agree exists, can be taken as definite truths.

Sup Forums
original sources (e.g. video of Trump speech or whatever happening)

Washington Free Beacon
The Intercept
RT

ITM

HAHAHA...AAHAHAHAHAHA BAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

When news break I immediately come to Sup Forums. It’s the best bullshit filter.

...

Reuters and apnews. What do you guys think of those?

I like browsing ZeroHedge

Anyone /oann/ here?

/r/news
salon
buzzfeed
abc
nbc
cnn
financial times

Same

I like to deposit news there daily.

CNN

At this point I've given up completely.

The best I can manage is to treat every story as 100% propaganda, read between the lines, try to discern which truth is being buried, and take context from there. If you just consider everything you read as a chocolate ration increase story(ITS NOT), things can make a lot more sense.

BASED

wow nice latte

this

I find the Washington Post to be the most accurate and least biased.

reuters

no such thing

you have to read a variety and make your own judgement, dont just blindly accept anything you read

>Then I use all these biased sources in an attempt to triangulate the truth.
Only so effective. Most sources are pretty close to one another. You have to add context from much, much wider sources than just news stories. There isn't any substitute for digging yourself.

Best example I can think of right now is the middle east. You can't learn anything from any mainstream news source, and I do mean anything. Most struggle to get geography right. I'm pretty sure most editors don't know where Yemen even is. Coverage of current Saudi succession crisis is the worst I have seen from the MSM in 30 years. WWIII could break out with Iran in the next 5 minutes and most "professional" journalists covering the situation know more about Westeros than they do about the countries they are assigned to.

This is all before the media even starts injecting agendas, biases, batshit ideologies or plain old graft into the copy. I can't believe anyone still pays for this shit.

She looks like my old housemate from Czechia

>buzzfeed
>cnn

World Affairs Brief (Joel Skousen)
The New American
Zero Hedge
National Interest
JR Nyquist

This guy, when I am doing DMT

youtu.be/12g4v0YNCRU

BREITBART

it reminds me of simpler times

r/the_donald times.

rip 2016

Fuck off Alex

I love your ass (no homo)

spbp

> reddit.com/r/The_Donald/
> reddit.com/r/conspiracy/
> zerohedge.com/
> drudgereport.com/
> prisonplanet.com/
> usawatchdog.com/
> rantingly.com/
> thelibertydaily.com/

No, you fuck off David Brock you POTBOLLIED VAMPIRE PEDO RAAAARGGGGHHHH

Cspan

Sup Forums
Zerohedge

...

Honestly this.

That's not necessarily a good thing.