>all porn sites to be blocked in 2018
>law can operate retroactively
>people get jailed for wrongspeak
>no double jeopardy
>tools and weapons are literally hitler
>must cough up passwords or go to jail
>no right to silence
>tv license
Is there any first world country on the planet more authoritarian than the UK?
Other urls found in this thread:
wired.co.uk
news.bbc.co.uk
arstechnica.com
en.wikipedia.org
bbc.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
twitter.com
>>all porn sites to be blocked in 2018
Good
I've heard about North Korea but I believe it is just a hoax. So yeah, you're definitely right about the UK.
>first world
Thanks man
>>all porn sites to be blocked in 2018
[citation nonexistant]
Take off the meme flag.
I must have missed the part where North Korea became a first world country.
Got a link?
>no double jeopardy
What the fuck? Haven't heard about this before, what's their claim for changing it?
>porn ban
>age verification
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Gee user those 2 completely different statements sure don't sound like the same thing. Are you sure you want to keep digging?
It's not mentioned on that article, but websites (including overseas websites) will be blocked for noncompliance.
Why the fuck the rest of the world should follow the whims of the British, I don't know.
Mentioned on this one, though: arstechnica.com
Everything is fine goy, just remember to turn in your butter knives and register your tv.
>wish to sell your product abroad
>refuse to comply with the regulations of the countries you deal with
Are you retarded or something?
Take off the meme flag, show us what 3rd world shit hole you're from. If you really thought your country was better you wouldn't be ashamed of your flag.
are the last steps of dying giant ,the mentality of the elite hasnt abandoned the imperial times and see themself as semigods .
Reality will wake up them
It's got nothing to do with selling a product abroad.
If a porn site in Denmark for example doesn't have an age verification system on it, and the Brits tell them to add one, and Denmark tells them to fuck off, the UK will block the site.
Rowling really is a subhuman communist ape.
the ordinary people dont see the elites as semigods anymore,and the disbelief will break the social contract and submision .
they have no moral ascendancy over the underclass anymore
>the internet isn't international trade
You are beyond hope
Also still haven't dropped the meme flag. Enjoy your 3rd world shithole non.
>Is there any first world country on the planet more authoritarian than the UK?
It's called France.
Can i get COMPED on right in silence? Whats that about?
Australia
Wow, I thought we're the only jokers that do that.
>law can operate retroactively
really? law is just an imaginary concept in turkey but even they can't do this here. are you sure about this?
en.wikipedia.org
>In the United Kingdom, ex post facto laws are frowned upon, but are permitted by virtue of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty.
>Retrospective criminal laws are prohibited by Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to which the United Kingdom is a signatory, but several noted legal authorities have stated their opinion that parliamentary sovereignty takes priority even over this.[17][18]
USA is most authoritarian on Earth.
It is fucking jail with no walls.
The only place an American can't go right now is North Korea
wew lad
Nothing will stop the flow of sweet porn love juice.
Find a single case of a law being applied retroactively
Huh fucking welcome to Cardassia or what the UK.
Pardon that was meant to be welcome to Cardassia or what was the UK.
we're lubing up for that shariah law to make its way in
Double Jeopardy being abolished.
That is not an example of a law being applied retroactively. I'll repeat myself and make it clearer:
Find just 1 example of a case in which someone was put on trial (regardless of conviction) for a criminal offence that was not illegal at the time they committed the act.
How do the people let the government get away with this?
You do realise they will block the sight in the UK? They're not gonna block it worldwide which is what it seems like you think they're gonna do
>That is not an example of a law being applied retroactively.
Uh, yeah, actually, it is.
Deal with it.
You do realise they will block the sight in the UK?
Yes. When did I intimate otherwise?
Germany, did it really need to be said.
Go down town and say the Holocaust never happened.
OP BTFO
Well Double Jeopardy isn't a British concept and isn't quite that good.
Mostly, they don't half of what our meme flag friend has said is false, as evidenced by his inability to answer simple questions and provide evidence that actually supports what he said.
>>tv license
I sometimes stream sky on jewtube if it's happening so do I need one?
Where will it all end?
>ban porn
good luck faggots
Are you fucking retarded? Or is reading comprehension not one of your skills?
No. it isn't.
Double jeopardy is a law that prevents a person from being tried for the same charge if they were acquitted of it previously.
Ex Posto Facto, which is what you linked here refers to convicting someone of a crime, despite it not being a criminal offence at the time they committed the act.
As you quote in this post it is theoretically possible for someone to be convicted of a crime despite it not being illegal when they did it, however this is prevented by the EU, and also is only possibly theoretically. Note the article does not offer any examples.
I asked you to provide and example. You have fialed to do so. Abolishing a law that prevents someon from being tried for the same crime they were previously acquitted for has absolutely nothing to do with charging someone with a crime that was not a crime when they did it.
I assume whatever 3rd world shithole you're from has made your grasp of the English language weak at best.
>all porn sites to be blocked in 2018
>mfw BLACKED becomes BLOCKED
en.wikipedia.org
>One example of an ex post facto criminal law in the UK is the Criminal Justice Act 2003. This law allows people acquitted for murder to be retried if there is “new, compelling, reliable and substantial evidence” that the acquitted person really was guilty. This Justice Act applies retroactively and can be used to re-prosecute people who were acquitted before the Criminal Justice Act went into effect in 2005, or even before the Criminal Justice Act was passed in 2003. As a result, the defendants who were acquitted in the murder of Stephen Lawrence were allowed to be retried, even though this murder occurred in 1993 and the defendants had been acquitted in 1996. Many people have criticized the Criminal Justice Act because of its essential abolition of prohibition against both ex post facto and double jeopardy laws[19]
Wow. You're right. It's like I have zero understanding of something written on the ex post facto law page.
...you fucking retard.
RIP BRITS
This is why you want to keep your guns
Whoa so this is the power of Brexit?
Yes you actually do have zero understanding. That's an example of ex post facto allowing for double jeopardy to be ignored, not an actual example of ex posto facto.
No one is being charged with a criminal offence that was not criminal when they committed the act. Your example is people who were charged with murder and could not be charged with it again because of the laws at the time, once the law was no longer applicable they charged the defendant with murder again.
So no you have not shown an example of ex post facto being applied. An example of ex posto facto would be to charge someone with possession of an illegal substance decades later once the substance was made illegal.
How do i get around that??
>Your example is people who were charged with murder and could not be charged with it again because of the laws at the time, once the law was no longer applicable they charged the defendant with murder again.
Q.E.D.
>All porn sites to be blocked in 2018
You're saying that like its a bad thing
England is currently the most cucked nation ever.
>no guns
>bin that knife
>pay that tele
>muslim rape
>muslim terror
>police love muslims
>girl meat kebabs
v for vendetta, except the gov is left wing radical authoritarian.
Don't let any brit read this but we are more cucked.
Most of what he's said is right though.
>All pornography sites must use age-verification software of some kind to block under 18s from accessing their content. Internet service providers will be forced to block any websites that do not comply.
>can't find anything concrete on non-retroactive law, but it wouldn't surprise me
>double jeopardy was scrapped in England and Wales in 2005, and people who had previously tried prior to this have since been re-trialed for the same charge since double jeopardy was rescinded - see: telegraph.co.uk
>carrying weapons (or anything that police believe you might use as a weapon) is against the law. Firearms are legal with the appropriate licensing, but self-defence has not been considered a legitimate reason for owning a firearm since 1968.
>police can actually jail you for refusing to give up passwords to electronic devices - see: dailymail.co.uk
>you do have a right to silence, but the above could be considered in breach of that
TV licence bullshittery is well-known, no explanation needed
MASSIVE. FUCKING. KEK.
Okay Im going to explain this to you like you're a child.
Imagine you steal a chocolate bar. At the time it's not illegal to steal a chocolate bar. But i campaign to change the law, and once its changed I charge you for stealing the chocolate bar. That would be applying the law retro actively. That would be ex post facto.
Now imagine you steal a chocolate bar and it is already illegal. But due to a lack of evidence I can't convict you. Because of double jeopardy I can't accuse you of stealing that chocolate bar again. But then double jeopardy is removed from law, you are no longer protected by double jeopardy, and I can accuse you of stealing that chocolate bar again.
Completely different scenarios, so yes you're lying that the law can be applied retroactively in the UK.
>all porn sites blocked
This is a good thing.
I'll admit this country is dead but porn should be illegal in every country.
Sorry, but you've already proven my point: You lost, live with it.
>all porn sites to be blocked in 2018
But then you'd be relegated to fucking your British women.
Do you really want that?
>2 completely different situations are the same thing because I'm a brainlet
Enjoy your ban btw
>Off-topic and Sup Forums-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, t
Also on the topic of right to silence/computer passwords in the link I provided;
>He was not judged to be a threat to national security, and the encrypted material in question was not suspected of securing illegal material.
>The man who ran a software company in London told a judge he was refusing to disclose the code on principle, on the basis that he should have a right to silence but was jailed for 13 months for refusing to hand over his decryption keys.
>he was not believed to be a risk to national security, and was not believed to be hiding any illegal materials behind encryption
>jailed for over a year for refusing to give police the key anyway
Audible lol
>ban threatening
The butthurt is real.You can't win the argument so you start begging for bans?
>at least Muhammad is fucking me wife m8
give me back my sides you son of a bitch!
>2018 block porn sites
>2020 race of strong white youth itching for blood and pussy
Somebody hasn't thought this through.
...
>mfw huge colonial family
>can leave anytime to any part of the globe
best feeling on earth
>2020
>white
Or they have.
>>all porn sites to be blocked in 2018
Good.
Porn is degenerate and a jewish run industry.
You can stick with your hands if you want cucks, I'd rather just fuck a woman.
legally yes
however only dumb frog posters get caught by the goggle box brigade.
Yeah but at least you can admit your country has problems.
Don't mention 56% around the yanks or they have an autistic fit, lol