Was clergy celibacy a Jewish trick to stop the smartest white men from having kids?

Rabbis can have all the kids they want. Why can't Christian priests?

Other urls found in this thread:

unz.com/jman/more-on-farming-and-inheritance-systems-part-i-iq/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

serpent seed

not posting the rest of those tits was a jewish trick

The average IQ actually got higher in the Middle Ages due to Clark-Unz selection.

unz.com/jman/more-on-farming-and-inheritance-systems-part-i-iq/

>implying the clergy didnt have the highest per capita of illegitimate children

> t. Rabbi Manikshewitz

yeah bud the popes of the middle ages literally required that they be the ones to take the brides virginity if the couple wanted him to marry them

Clergy celibacy was a clever maneuver the papacy used to retain titular ownership of bishoprics once appointed titleholders die. Look up the investiture crisis for interesting context

No, it's the exact opposite, which is why Jews like Wilhelm Reich dedicated a significant portion of his work to examining means by which priestly celibacy could be undermined (and, by extension, all moral purity of the clergy).

It extends back to the Jews. Josephus wrote of the Essenes (the Jewish group both Jesus and John the Baptist belonged):

>The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have. These Essens reject pleasures as an evil, but esteem continence, and the conquest over our passions, to be virtue. They neglect wedlock, but choose out other persons children, while they are pliable, and fit for learning, and esteem them to be of their kindred, and form them according to their own manners. They do not absolutely deny the fitness of marriage, and the succession of mankind thereby continued; but they guard against the lascivious behavior of women, and are persuaded that none of them preserve their fidelity to one man.

It also gives insight as to where Jesus was between age 12 and 30. He had been adopted by an Essene and had been taught "according to their own manners".

checked

Jewsus was a pedo

Gonna need a sauce on those milkers

Angell summers pretty sure

only celibate while in clergy, not everyone stays, and originally it was chastity, not celibacy. one of the many things that protestant don't do, because it is directly against the world of the lord, orthodoxy.

Priestly celibacy is a discipline, not a dogma. It can be rescinded at any time by the Pope. There are other Rites in the Church that have different rules about priestly celibacy, such as the Chaldeans. Also, ministers from protestant sects can keep their families when they convert to Catholicism.

That's internet trash. In the original Greek, the word used to describe the servant is "doulos", meaning "slave", or "servant".

Educate yourself "that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil", cf. Eph 6:11.

No it was cuckholic bullshit, convert to orthodoxy

checked again, no such reference, unless you would like to pull up the original text so we can go over it word by word, context by context.

But homo sex is not allowed in the bible dummy.
also it says that it was a roman soldier that had the slave.
at this rate the pedo alliations are pure BS made up rubbish.

No you shitskin. The clergy was a place for degenerates to go so they wouldn't harm society. Your daughter is a degenerate whore that's embarrassing your noble family? Time to send her to a convent, she's the churches problem now. Your son can't stop molesting kids? Send him to the monastery, where they bugger each other all day and night.

...

probably, he was a jew after all.

I believe this might be true. Also the whole "only jews could be money lenders" thing is usually framed as some sort of crime/persecution of jews, but it gave them a monopoly over all of europes banks. boo hoo

any homosexual reference is a retrospective attempt to distort the bible. all forms of Love are nationalism or familiarity (familiar). they are explicitly not homosexual. sexual love is normally called a holy union (marriage) or lust.

I saw thanks.

...

>Have to spend your time raising a family in a time that is literally Fallout without nuclear waste

vs

>staying celibate in monastery where you just pray and learn and since you have no family the wealth stays in the monastery
And that's not even taking into consideration 1 Corinthians 7

This is the correct answer, in the early Church monasteries and the like were basically the same as any other landholding. The Church wanted to own them and their wealth in total rather than having a religious variant of the regular king/lord/vassal setup. The transition drastically increased the power of the Church relative to the monarchs.

Soon all will kneel before the new pope and begin the 10th crusade.

You're an idiot for believing that, it wasn't servant, in Luke 7:1-10, it mentioned slave. You clearly didn't research before checking if it works. Also, the one below the scripture is bullshit, I can smell it from the United States to Israel.