Anyone that doesn't support free markets and white nationalism deserves to be killed

Anyone that doesn't support free markets and white nationalism deserves to be killed.

Why would you want to be poor and have and extremely long workweek when you could have a free market and have a 2-3 day work week instead?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=gm8ZJx_t7Oo
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Fuck muh free market,
A fascistic society needs an opportunity granting, yet regulated economy, i.e, Corporatism.

>A fascistic society needs an opportunity granting, yet regulated economy, i.e, Corporatism.
We literally live under corporatism right now and it doesn't benefit the lower and middle classes.

A free market means wages increase as prices fall.

Also healthcare is cheap.

We had a free market driven healthcare system before Obamacare. It was shit.

Why would job creators make the workweek this short without regulations?

We live under Corporatism right now

What does white nationalism have anything to do with working conditions?

time to be gassed cuck

>Why would job creators make the workweek this short without regulations?
It's not up to them retard.
If the economy is productive to the point wages are high and prices are enough to the point people don't need to work 40 hours a week, they will find jobs with fewer hours.

>We had a free market driven healthcare system before Obamacare. It was shit.
No, we had a free market healthcare system in the 50s and 60s and it was amazing and inexpensive

after that period we had a corporatist system

also

The more free market a country is, the richer it's people are.

We need to ABOLISH central banking.

>tfw

bumping

No. What you're referring to is globalist capitalism.

The government controls the banking industry, there is a monopoly on banking.
The government sets the interest rate which is the most important price in the entire economy.

I fully agree with OP

Everyone should fully agree with me.

Fuck central banks.

>GDP Per Capita.
If you are going to support laissez faire, at least do it right.

White nationalism in its present form is incompatible with free markets or voluntary association.

>gini coefficient
Completely irrelevant information.
You aren't poor because others are rich.
Somm inequality is necessary for economic production to occur.

It's just happens to be that the most economically free countries have the least amount of inequality, funny how that is.

It absolutely is compatible.
USA was a free market white nationalist nation for over 150 fucking YEARS.

Honestly we should have memed Manlet Rand into office instead of Trump.

He would have completely closed the borders AND implemented free markets.

>Some inequality is necessary for economic production to occur.
Just as some level of unemployment is necessary. The problem is the same; How much?

>It's just happens to be that the most economically free countries have the least amount of inequality, funny how that is.
Literally my point.

>You aren't poor because others are rich.
Completely and absolutely wrong; capital accumulation by the few can be (and sometimes is) an inefficient allocation of resources (and so quite negative for society as a whole).

>Just as some level of unemployment is necessary.
No, that isn't true.

>Completely and absolutely wrong
You are completely and absolutely wrong.

>capital accumulation by the few can be (and sometimes is) an inefficient allocation of resources (and so quite negative for society as a whole).
How?
Money saved means the purchasing power of all other money in the economy goes up and people can buy more things.

The reason investors aren't investing that much money now is because they constantly get free money from the federal reserve(pumped into the stock market).
Why would they risk building new things when they just get free money from stocks anyway?

>Money saved means the purchasing power of all other money in the economy goes up and people can buy more things.
>The preferences of a small group of people are the same than those of society as a whole.
>Allocative efficiency doesn't exist.
Discussion with Keynesians is pointless.

>No, that isn't true.
Show me any, ANY, serious economist that believes in full employment.

>I need muh free market so I can earn shekels selling degenerate jew porn
Kill urself op

>>The preferences of a small group of people are the same than those of society as a whole.
Never said this.

>Discussion with Keynesians is pointless.
It is.

>Show me any, ANY, serious economist that believes in full employment.
I never said I believe in full employment.

Just that unemployment isn't "necessary" for free markets to work.
Temporary unemployment is just an effect of free markets.

>dude I'm low IQ retard and I want to work 60 hours a week instead of 20 hours a week because I enjoy being a slave
Literally you.

>Randlet

He would be much better than Trump even though Trump is more memable.

>Never said this.
You implied it.
>Money saved means the purchasing power of all other money in the economy goes up and people can buy more things
Equality must be encouraged (to a point) for the same reason the government must be limited; individuals (and their purchasing power) should have the ability to make their preferences clear, instead of having a small group of people (oligarchs or bureaucrats) take their decisions for them.

>Just that unemployment isn't "necessary" for free markets to work.
It is, a relatively "fluid" workforce is required for things to run smoothly, without it you would have production problems eventually.

How is free market capitalism compatible with nationalism and cultural conservatism? We are struggling with a global economy changing the material conditions an old culture existed on top of

Daily reminder the "Robber Barons" did nothing wrong.

>You implied it.
Nope.

>Equality must be encouraged (to a point) for the same reason the government must be limited; individuals (and their purchasing power) should have the ability to make their preferences clear, instead of having a small group of people (oligarchs or bureaucrats) take their decisions for them.
Sure.
What does this have to do with what we're talking about?
All I said was rich people NOT SPENDING their money allows for everyone else to buy more things.

>How is free market capitalism compatible with nationalism and cultural conservatism?
Japan does it quite well.

We need to abolish anti-trust laws, patents, copyright etc

This is what I'm watching right now.

youtube.com/watch?v=gm8ZJx_t7Oo

Rich people don't get rich by not spending their money. They invest in shit. Those investments are sometimes beneficial to society at large and sometimes they aren't. It's the government's job to make sure they are.

>It's the government's job to make sure they are.
It's the government that made them NOT invest in the first place by central banking and government interventions.

Why back during the gilded age was there massive investment for 3 decades and there was NO central bank?

Japan is not a Western country. It's free of postcolonial and Jim Crow drama. It has no guilt over the world wars. It has no issues with racialized class. It has no jews. Its a very old homogeneous country. Most of all, it rejects liberalism, which ancap is just a radical form of. It can't do we what have, combine liberal humanism with america filling the void of the British Empire

As far as I can tell the west needs to become illiberal and cater to its growing class of proles who are becoming rabid nationalists. I don't see ancap doing that

>spend entire life working hard to invent something
>your neighbor steals it from you and gets rich while you die in poverty
>yeah dude we need to abolish patents, copyright, etc.

>Most of all, it rejects liberalism
No, economically they embrace economic freedom for the most part.

>s far as I can tell the west needs to become illiberal and cater to its growing class of proles who are becoming rabid nationalists.
We need free markets and white nationalism PERIOD.

Why the fuck do you want white people to be poor slaves?

>I don't see ancap doing that
I'm not an ancap.

>>spend entire life working hard to invent something
>>your neighbor steals it from you and gets rich while you die in poverty
LOL WHY WOULD THIS EVER HAPPEN?

This already happened with copyright and patents.
Look what happened to Tesla.
He lost the copyright and had to destroy all of his work.
In a free market he would be able to compete with Edison.

Yeah that's why the hours dropped when computers rolled around! Oh, wait...

>Yeah that's why the hours dropped when computers rolled around! Oh, wait...
My point exactly.
They didn't drop.

If we had a free market with no central bank they would have dropped.

>WHY WOULD THIS EVER HAPPEN?

Because people are lazy and evil and would steal everything from you if it meant they could get ahead.

As I'm sure you know, liberalism is a lot more than just a bit of capitalism

That economic lobby may very well end up being the immigration lobby, by the way.

I don't want white people to be slaves. I want economic nationalism for a nativist working class, that's going to look socialist or corporatist to you. It's impossible to have a conservative, anti-materialist, anti-cosmopolitan ethno - state that practices a liberal form of capitalism. It would have protectionism, subsidized local industry, and family sybsidies.

The liberal form of capitalism libertarians want is incompatible with their nationalist social aims. We're losing the west because of plutocracy, world cities, large international corporations, and neoliberalism intersecting with humanism

>Because people are lazy and evil and would steal everything from you if it meant they could get ahead.
They can steal any idea they want, it doesn't mean they're going to do something successful with it.

Whichever company utilizes a new idea the best way for consumers is the one that should win.

>supporting globalism and nationalism at the same time
Ok faggot

>I want economic nationalism for a nativist working class, that's going to look socialist or corporatist to you.
It is socialist and corporatist, it ISN'T GOING TO FUCKING HELP THEM.

It's just going to make them slaves.

>anti-materialist
There's nothing wrong with materialism.
You can have nationalism with materialism you fucking retard.

>protectionism
It's like you retards WANT to be poor. Protectionism is fucking garbage.

>subsidized local industry, and family sybsidies.
Why not just abolish taxes on these people and allow them to live their lives in peace?

You're implying that if we had a free market, employers would put the added benefits back into their employees. This is hardly ever the case with added profits. Our productivity skyrocketed with the introduction of computers. Employers didn't see this as we don't need to be around as much, they saw it as we need to be more productive more of the time.

Anyone that doesn't support free markets and white nationalism deserves to be killed.

Why is a man not entitled to the rights to his own ideas? Without that we're no better than China.

Are you trying to say we have nationalized banks in America? Because if you are, then you are fucking retarded. The banks controlling the US government and using it as their tool is what we have.

The used to be incredibly protectionist, fuck outta here faggot

>BAWWWW WE SHOULD BE CRAZY ISOLATIONISTS
lol nobody agrees with that

All you need is total free trade AND ban all non-white immigration.
USA had this working perfectly until 1913.
It worked for over 150 years and made the greatest nation on earth, don't tell me it's impossible.

Totally inanalogous argument.

>You're implying that if we had a free market, employers would put the added benefits back into their employees.
With labour competition they are forced to.

>This is hardly ever the case with added profits.
Even if the firms don't raise their wages, they lower prices which benefits consumers.

>Our productivity skyrocketed with the introduction of computers
No it didn't.
America isn't manufacturing shit anymore.
American productivity has gone DOWN thanks to central banking that's why wages have stagnated.

Why not take your ideology to its conclusion and abolish all nation-states?

>Are you trying to say we have nationalized banks in America?
Of course we do you fucking idiot.
What do you think the federal reserve is?
>hurrr it's a private bank
A "private" bank that was created by the government and given total government monopoly on currency creationist and interest rates.

>The used to be incredibly protectionist
Some points in american history yes, but people fought against it, especially the south.
Tariffs fucked over the united states. We would have been even richer without them.

because the conclusion of my ideology is a free market that bans all non-white immigration.

Do you have an actual argument?

because without idiotic state regulations hiring two part time workers would cost the same as hiring one full time worker. so you could just decide to work part time if you don't need/want the extra money a full time job brings.
if you don't have to give 50% of your income to your state you could turn your current full time job into a part time job and have 0 difference in income. and that's just now and doesn't account for an extremely more vivid economy which is not held back by state regulation.
no regulation, no taxes = everything gets cheaper. your income allows you to buy so much more.
it's funny how people cry for state regulation to keep their slave wages because they are too afraid to trust in themselves.

Yes, your ideas make no sense. Why wouldn't capital want to erode artificial borders? Why would individualism end at a boundary? How would we sell libertarians on cultural nationalism?

Your ideas are just selectively picking from liberal philosophy because you like a certain time period in American history that is no longer possible. You want to protect a culture against an economic force of history while trying to retool it for your own use

Productivity increases are nonlinear. If everybody is suddently twice as efficient and we all work 80 hour work weeks, we'd save 40 hours. If we had 40 hour work weeks, we've saved 20 hours. Additionally some of the increased productivity is realized in other ways like the declining labor participation rate, increased overhead with positive nonlocal consequences, better quality, and yes, sometimes waste. It would be foolish to pretend we haven't benefited at all from automation.

Anons please don't kill people or advocate for killing people

>Regulated economy.
Literally one of the reasons we're in trillions of dollars of debt right this second. Kindly fucking neck yourself.

>I need Hitler to put me in a chastity belt because I'm too much of a degenerate to stop myself from consuming jew porn

Productivity != manufacturing

You seem to speak of fondness for the gilded age

>Diet Ron
no thanks. he's already starting to flip-flop as far as the PATRIOT Act was concerned, its only a matter of time before he becomes the next Mitt Romney..
was nice while it lasted tho. I hope he gets the senate to stop acting retarded about the healthcare they all-the-sudden no longer have a problem with

Most of the automation happens in OTHER COUNTRIES

What does USA produce?
Almost nothing.

relax its just a strong way of getting our point across

(((Corporatism)))

>You seem to speak of fondness for the gilded age
I do because the gilded age was based.

USA doesn't really produce anything anymore.