Gulag Archipelago - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

If we got normies to read this book, they would come to realize that all they have ever been taught about Communism is completely false and turn their whole worldview upside down. Reading this book is life changing and one of the biggest redpills of all time. It's by far the best way to stop (((it))) spreading before it's to late. It literally ended communism in Russia and it can do the same here.

>Post your favorite excepts from the book (mini redpills) to spread across the web

>Gulag threads put shills in damage control

>links for the eBooks (give to everyone you know)

Book 1
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=44762876227474679778

Book 2
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=07861295243616014932

Book 3
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=44745410992765831517

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/d5InIwcWESk
freepdf.info/index.php?post/Lina-Juri-Under-the-Sign-of-the-Scorpion
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>At the conclusion of the conference, a tribute to Comrade Stalin was called for. Of course, everyone stood up (just as everyone had leaped to his feet during the conference at every mention of his name). ... For three minutes, four minutes, five minutes, the stormy applause, rising to an ovation, continued. But palms were getting sore and raised arms were already aching. And the older people were panting from exhaustion. It was becoming insufferably silly even to those who really adored Stalin.

>However, who would dare to be the first to stop? … After all, NKVD men were standing in the hall applauding and watching to see who would quit first! And in the obscure, small hall, unknown to the leader, the applause went on – six, seven, eight minutes! They were done for! Their goose was cooked! They couldn’t stop now till they collapsed with heart attacks! At the rear of the hall, which was crowded, they could of course cheat a bit, clap less frequently, less vigorously, not so eagerly – but up there with the presidium where everyone could see them?

Ah yes, Cold War propaganda

2.

>The director of the local paper factory, an independent and strong-minded man, stood with the presidium. Aware of all the falsity and all the impossibility of the situation, he still kept on applauding! Nine minutes! Ten! In anguish he watched the secretary of the District Party Committee, but the latter dared not stop. Insanity! To the last man! With make-believe enthusiasm on their faces, looking at each other with faint hope, the district leaders were just going to go on and on applauding till they fell where they stood, till they were carried out of the hall on stretchers! And even then those who were left would not falter…

>Then, after eleven minutes, the director of the paper factory assumed a businesslike expression and sat down in his seat. And, oh, a miracle took place! Where had the universal, uninhibited, indescribable enthusiasm gone? To a man, everyone else stopped dead and sat down. They had been saved!

3.

>The squirrel had been smart enough to jump off his revolving wheel. That, however, was how they discovered who the independent people were. And that was how they went about eliminating them. That same night the factory director was arrested. They easily pasted ten years on him on the pretext of something quite different. But after he had signed Form 206, the final document of the interrogation, his interrogator reminded him:

>“Don’t ever be the first to stop applauding.”

Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn is an important, powerful book. If you are interested in 20th Century history or interested in the future of humanity - this book is required reading. Although this book played a significant role in the dissolution of the Soviet Union, its primary importance is the message it proclaims to the present and to the future.

Its message transcends time and place: It reveals the weakness of human character and the strength of the human spirit. It demonstrates the dangers of powerful government, the fragileness of individual freedom, and the never-ending battle between them.

This book is a masterpiece. It is at once despairing and optimistic, tragedy and comedy. This is one of the most powerful books I have ever read. At times I was saddened by human cruelty. At other times I was amazed by acts of courage and determination. And at other times I simply laughed out loud.

This is the kind of book that forces you to look into your own heart and to think about how you can become a force for good in your world - at least it did that for me. I'll conclude with a quote from Volume Two: "The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being."

Gulag Audio book

Part 1/7 (the rest are easily found)

youtu.be/d5InIwcWESk

Let us try to list some of the simplest methods which break the will and the character of the prisoner without leaving marks on his body Let us begin with psychological methods.....

>1. First of all: night. Why is it that all the main work of breaking down human souls went on at night? Why, from their very earliest years, did the Organs select the night? Because at night, the prisoner, torn from sleep, even though he has not yet been tortured by sleepless-ness, lacks his normal daytime equanimity and common sense. He is more vulnerable.

>2. Persuasion in a sincere tone is the very simplest method. Why play at cat and mouse, so to speak? After all, having spent some time among others undergoing interrogation, the prisoner has come to see what the situation is. And so the interrogator says to him in a lazily friendly way: "Look, you're going to get a prison term whatever happens. But if you resist, you'll croak right here in prison, you'll lose your health. But if you go to camp, you'll have fresh air and sunlight. So why not sign right now?" Very logical. And those who agree and sign are smart, if _ if the matter concerns only themselves! But that's rarely so. A struggle is inevitable....

>3. Foul language is not a clever method, but it can have a powerful impact on people who are well brought up, refined, delicate. I know of two cases involving priests, who capitulated to foul language alone. One of them, in the Butyrki in 1944, was being interrogated by a woman. At first when he'd come back to our cell he couldn't say often enough how polite she was. But once he came back very despondent, and for a long time he refused to tell us how, with her legs crossed high, she had begun to curse. (I regret that I cannot cite one of her little phrases here.)

>4 Psychological contrast was sometimes effective: sudden reversals of tone, for example. For a whole or part of the interrogation period, the interrogator would be extremely friendly, addressing the prisoner formally by first name and patronymic, and promising everything. Suddenly he would brandish a paperweight and shout: "Foo, you rat! I'll put nine grams of lead in your skull!" And he would advance on the accused, clutching hands outstretched as if to grab him by the hair, fingernails like needles. (This worked very, very well with women prisoners.)

Or as a variation on this: two interrogators would take turns. One would shout and bully. The other would be friendly, almost gentle. Each time the accused entered the office he would tremble-which would it be? He wanted to do everything to please the gentle one because of his different manner, even to the point of signing and confessing to things that had never happened

>5 Preliminary humiliation was another approach. In the famous cellars of the Rostov-on-the-Don GPU (House 33), which were lit by lenslike insets of thick glass in the sidewalk above the former storage basement, prisoners awaiting interrogation were made to lie face down for several hours in the main corridor and forbidden to raise their heads or make a sound. They lay this way, like Moslems at prayer, until the guard touched a shoulder and took them off to interrogation. Another ease: At the Lubyanka, Aleksandra O_-va refused to give the testimony demanded of her. She was transferred to Lefortovo. In the admitting office, a woman jailer ordered her to undress, allegedly for a medical examination, took away her clothes, and locked her in a "box" naked. At that point the men jailers began to peer through the peephole and to appraise her female attributes with loud laughs. If one were systematically to question former prisoners, many more such examples would certainly emerge. They all had but a single purpose: to dishearten and humiliate

>6. Any method of inducing extreme confusion in the accused might be employed. Here is how F. I. V. from Krasnogorsk, Moscow Province, was interrogated. {This was reported by I. A. P__ev.} During the interrogation, the interrogator, a woman, undressed in front of him by stages (a striptease!), all the time continuing the interrogation as if nothing were going on. She walked about the room and came close to him and tried to get him to give in. Perhaps this satisfied some personal quirk in her, but it may also have been cold-blooded calculation, an attempt to get the accused so muddled that he would sign. And she was in no danger. She had her pistol, and she had her alarm bell.

>7. Intimidation was very widely used and very varied. It was often accompanied by enticement and by promises which were, of course, false. In 1924: "If you don't confess, you'll go to the Solovetsky Islands. Anybody who confesses is turned loose." In 1944: "Which camp you'll be sent to depends on us. Camps are different. We've got hard-labor camps now. If you confess, you'll go to an easy camp. If you're stubborn, you'll get twenty-five years in handcuffs in the mines!" Another form of intimidation was threatening a prisoner with a prison worse than the one he was in. "If you keep on being stubborn, we'll send you to Lefortovo" (if you are in the Lubyanka), "to Sukhanovka" (if you are at Lefortovo). "They'll find another way to talk to you there." You have already gotten used to things where you are; the regimen seems to be not so bad; and what kind of torments await you elsewhere? Yes, and you also have to be transported there. . . . Should you give in?

Intimidation worked beautifully on those who had not yet been arrested but had simply received an official summons to the Bolshoi Dom-the Big House. He (or she) still had a lot to lose. He (or she) was frightened of everything-that they wouldn't let him (or her) out today, that they would confiscate his (or her) belongings or apartment. He would be ready to give all kinds of testimony and make all kinds of concessions in order to avoid these dangers. She, of course, would be ignorant of the Criminal Code, and, at the very least, at the start of the questioning they would push a sheet of paper in front of her with a fake citation from the Code: "I have been warned that for giving false testimony _ five years of imprisonment." (In actual fact, under Article 95, it is two years.) "For refusal to give testimony-five years . . ." (In actual fact, under Article 92, it is up to three months.) Here, then, one more of the interrogator's basic methods has entered the picture and will continue to re-enter it.

>8. The lie. We lambs were forbidden to lie, but the interrogator could tell all the lies he felt like. Those articles of the law did not apply to him. We had even lost the yardstick with which to gauge: what does he get for lying? He could confront us with as many documents as he chose, bearing the forged signatures of our kinfolk and friends-and it would be just a skillful interrogation technique.

Intimidation through enticement and lies was the fundamental method for bringing pressure on the relatives of the arrested person when they were called in to give testimony. "If you don't tell us such and such" (whatever was being asked), "it's going to be the worse for him_. You'll be destroying him completely." (How hard for a mother to hear that!) "Signing this paper" (pushed in front of the relatives) "is the only way you can save him" (destroy him).

An excerpt from "The Gulag Archipelago" ... on how to resist fascism & tyranny.

The lesson that is just as important today as it was half a century ago.

"During an arrest, you think since you are not guilty, how can they arrest you? Why should you run away? And how can you resist right then? After all, you’ll only make your situation worse; you will make it more difficult for them to sort out the mistake.

And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! We did not love freedom enough. Every man always has handy a dozen glib little reasons why he is right not to sacrifice himself."

My dad gave me this book when I asked him if he knew anything about communism for a school report I had to write. Years later I realize what he was doing.

“Unlimited power in the hands of limited people always leads to cruelty.”

Great man. Wish more Dads would do the same.

Bumping. Great thread OP

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

>“Totalitarianism is not only hell, but all the dream of paradise-- the age-old dream of a world where everybody would live in harmony, united by a single common will and faith, without secrets from one another. Andre Breton, too, dreamed of this paradise when he talked about the glass house in which he longed to live. If totalitarianism did not exploit these archetypes, which are deep inside us all and rooted deep in all religions, it could never attract so many people, especially during the early phases of its existence. Once the dream of paradise starts to turn into reality, however, here and there people begin to crop up who stand in its way. and so the rulers of paradise must build a little gulag on the side of Eden. In the course of time this gulag grows ever bigger and more perfect, while the adjoining paradise gets even smaller and poorer.”

>Their branch of service does not require them to be educated people of broad culture and broad views - and they are not. Their branch of service does not require them to think logically - and they do not. Their branch of service requires only that they carry out orders exactly and be impervious to suffering - and that is what they do and what they are. We who have passed through their hands feel suffocated when we think of the legion, which is stripped bare of universal human ideals.”

Based dad

>To outsmart you they thought up work squads—but not squads like the ones outside the camps, where everyone is paid his separate wage. Everything was so arranged in the camp that the prisoners egged one another on. It was like this: either you all got a bit extra or you all croaked. You're loafing you bastard—do you think I'm willing to go hungry just because of you? Put your guts into it, slob.”

REDPILL
>REDPILL
REDPILL

>If it were possible for any nation to fathom another people's bitter experience through a book, how much easier its future fate would become and how many calamities and mistakes it could avoid. But it is very difficult. There always is this fallacious belief: 'It would not be the same here; here such things are impossible.'

>Alas, all the evil of the twentieth century is possible everywhere on earth.”

>1.The prisoners were so famished that at Zarosshy Spring they ate the corpse of a horse which had been lying dead for more than a week and which not only stank but was covered with flies and maggots. At Utiny Goldfields the zeks [political prisoners; an abbreviation of z/k meaning in Russian zakliuchenny] ate half a barrel of lubricating grease, brought there to grease the wheelbarrows. At Mylga they ate Iceland moss, like the deer. And when the [mountain] passes were shut by snowdrifts, they used to issue three and a half ounces of bread a day at the distant gold fields, without ever making up for previous deficiencies. Multitudes of ‘goner’, unable to walk by themselves were dragged to work on sledges by other ‘goners’ who had not yet become quite so weak. Those who lagged behind were beaten with clubs and torn by dogs. Working in 50o below zero Fahrenheit [-45 o C], they were forbidden to build fires and warm themselves. (Thieves were allowed this).

>2. Karpunich himself also tried ‘cold drilling by hand’ with a steel drill six and a half feet [two meters] long, and hauling so-=called ‘peat’ )soil with broken stone and boulders) at 60 o below zero [-50 oC] on sledges to which four men were hitched (the sledges were made of raw lumber, and the boxes on top were made of raw slab); a fifth accompanied them, a thief-expediter, “responsible for the fulfillment of the plan”, who kept beating them with a stave. Those who did not fulfil the norm )and what does it mean – those who do not fulfill – because after all, the production of the 58’s [people convicted under the Criminal Code for ‘crimes against the state’] was always ‘stolen’ by the thieves) [They} were punished by the chief of the camp, Zeldin, in this way: In winter he ordered them to strip naked in the mine shaft. Poured cold water over them, and in this state they had to run to the compound; in summer they were forced to strip naked, their hands tied behind them to a common pole and they were left out, tied there, under a cloud of mosquitoes. (The guard was covered by a mosquito net.) Then, finally, they were simply beaten with a rifle butt and tossed inot an isolator….

This is literally a fiction book.

Sound effects.
>The accused is made to stand twenty to twentyfive feet away and is then forced to speak more and more loudly and to repeat everything. This is not easy for someone already weakened to the point of exhaustion. Or two megaphones are constructed of rolledup cardboard, and two interrogators, coming close to the prisoner, bellow in both ears: "Confess, you rat!" The prisoner is deafened; sometimes he actually loses his sense of hearing. But this method is uneconomical. The fact is that the interrogators like some diversion in their monotonous work, and so they vie in thinking up new ideas.

Tickling.
>This is also a diversion. The prisoner's arms and legs are bound or held down, and then the inside of his nose is tickled with a feather. The prisoner writhes; it feels as though someone were drilling into his brain.

Light effects
>involve the use of an extremely bright electric light in the small, white-walled cell or "box" in which the accused is being held-a light which is never extinguished. (The electricity saved by the economies of schoolchildren and housewives!) Your eyelids become inflamed, which is very painful. And then in the interrogation room searchlights are again directed into your eyes.

Here is another imaginative trick:
>On the eve of May 1, 1933, in the Khabarovsk GPU, for twelve hours-all night-Ghebotaryev was not interrogated, no, but was simply kept in a continual state of being led to interrogation. "Hey, you-hands behind your back!" They led him out of the cell, up the stairs quickly, into the interrogator's office. The guard left. But the interrogator, without asking one single question, and sometimes without even allowing Chebotaryev to sit down, would pick up the telephone: "`Take away the prisoner from 107!" And so they came to get him and took him back to his cell. No sooner had he lain down on his board bunk than the lock rattled: "Chebotaryev! To interrogation. Hands behind your back!" And when he got there: "Take away the prisoner from 107!"

>For that matter, the methods of bringing pressure to bear can begin a long time before the interrogator's office.

When boxes were in short supply
>they used to have another method. In the Novocherkassk NKVD, Yelena Strutinskaya was forced to remain seated on a stool in the corridor for six days in such a way that she did not lean against anything, did not sleep, did not fall off, and did not get up from it. Six days! Just try to sit that way for six hours!

>Then again, as a variation, the prisoner can be forced to sit on a tall chair, of the kind used in laboratories, so that his feet do not reach the floor. They become very numb in this position. He is left sitting that way from eight to ten hours.

>Or else, during the interrogation itself, when the prisoner is out in plain view, he can be forced to sit in this way: as far forward as possible on the front edge ("Move further forward! Further still!") of the chair so that he is under painful pressure during the entire interrogation. He is not allowed to stir for several hours. Is that all? Yes, that's all. Just try it yourself!

Punishment cells.
>No matter how hard it was in the ordinary cell, the punishment cells were always worse. And on return from there the ordinary cell always seemed like paradise. In the punishment cell a human being was systematically worn down by starvation and also, usually, by cold. (In Sukhanovka Prison there were also hot punishment cells.) For example, the Lefortovo punishment cells were entirely unheated. There were radiators in the corridor only, and in this "heated" corridor the guards on duty walked in felt boots and padded jackets. The prisoner was forced to undress down to his underwear, and sometimes to his undershorts, and he was forced to spend from three to five days in the punishment cell without moving (since it was so confining). He received hot gruel on the third day only. For the first few minutes you were convinced you'd not be able to last an hour. But, by some miracle, a human being would indeed sit out his five days, perhaps acquiring in the course of it an illness that would last him the rest of his life.

>There were various aspects to punishment cells-as, for instance, dampness and water. In the Chernovtsy Prison after the war, Masha G. was kept barefooted for two hours and up to her ankles in icy water -confess! (She was eighteen years old, and how she feared for her feet! She was going to have to live with them a long time.)

I'm all for discrediting communism, but how do we know this book isn't bullshit like pic related?

Lefty will probably read guam books instead

Fake stuff made up by a nazi apologist. This book shouldn't be used as a source

Well don't just say muh fake. Fucking prove it.

Pro tip: you can't

Pictures by Danzig Baldaev, a retired Soviet prison guard. Depictions of the Soviet genocide.

...

...

...

...

...

Haven't read yet but just wanted to say cheers for uploading lad. Been wanting to read this for a while.

...

You're welcome mate. I will be doing Cancer Ward by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn tomorrow. Another great read that just missed out on the Nobel Piece Prize to the Gulag Archipelago.

Top. I'll keep an eye out for it.

Good on you OP. These regular threads actually convinced me, I ordered the book yesterday.

Glad to help. Even one person at a time makes a difference.

So we're to believe in holocausters, pedal-powered brain bashing machines, portable gas vans, and pools of acid and spinning knives, which were described to us by hysterical prisoners and tortured guards, but we are not to believe in the accounts of prison camps given by the guards of the camps under zero duress, or from survivors of the camps who repeat them in a rational and calm manner?

If the book contained stories of instant starvation machines that sucked all of the fat out of the gulag inmates' bellies or electrified floors or some shit like that you might have a point, but none of this is particularly outlandish or gruesome, it's just a really shitty prison system where communist rats treated people like garbage.

And people say we're the revisionists!

That is why Israel and her Jew supporters keep screaming Holocau$t™ to divert attention from THEIR crimes.

Another good read is "Under the Sign of the Scorpion" by Juri Lina.

freepdf.info/index.php?post/Lina-Juri-Under-the-Sign-of-the-Scorpion

This actually seems like a good Idea. Most schools I’ve been to either completely avoid the subject of Russian genocides despite having two projects on the holocaust, which even if we go off incredibly (((over exaggerated))) estimates was still far less impacting, in a single year. Most boomers or boomlets either don’t understand what the commies actually are and if people can see their actions and roots in nihilism, maybe they won’t be stupid enough to vote for a “democratic” socialist. Speaking of the holocaust, you know what really red pilled me? Reading mein kampf for a source for one of those faggy projects.

WORK OF FICTION

>hur, everything’s a spook except when it proves my argument right even though I never actually elaborate why

It's literally a fiction book.

>genocide.
I don't think you know what that word means.

>Most schools I’ve been to either completely avoid the subject of Russian genocides
Have you literally never attended a history class?

>Solzhenytsin
That lastname alone makes all the commiefags here chimpout, good post OP.

>Speaking of the holocaust, you know what really red pilled me? Reading mein kampf for a source for one of those faggy projects.
How did that redpill you?

Because you might as well have said Conquest. Mi6 agents aren't viable sources.

Indeed. I never even knew the Gulags existed or that what a Communist was until I researched for myself. I think conservative e-celebs need to get on the bandwagon more as well. The only man constantly speaking out on it and has made literally millions aware of Soviet Russia is Jordan Peterson.

It is actually quiet a simple concept.

>I never even knew the Gulags existed
Every country had penal labour at that time. Your education was just shit.

In that case you'd know the Soviets weren't guilty of it.

Reminder this book has very little actual evidence and is based on folklore tales and his own personal experience.

If you doubt the holocaust even a little you gotta doubt the 6 gorilllian Gulags cold war propaganda

The Soviets targeted Christians and murdered them, that's genocide. You don't need to kill off every single member of the group for it to be genocide (jews still exist ya know)

...

you wish, lunatic

All from a guy whole who called the Nazi invasion of Ukraine a liberation, praised the Tsar, and gave speeches for the HOUAA. Very reliable.

This is literally an argument for the second amendment. Reminder that every tyrant, from Hitler to Pol Pot, started by disarming citizens.

...

Loaded point. 20 million christians? Where does you 20 million figure from and how do you know they were all christians?

>Jewish communists
Heck muh scawy jewish conspiwacies

Except Hitler only disarmed the Jews, who had declared themselves enemies of the Reich

It's the end game of the EU army as well.

Capitalism starves 6-7 million a death each year and makes fun of other systems for having famines.

Hitler expressed desire to exterminate jews prior to coming to power.

You should translate it, you know, don't just post it.

Things reactionaries say that would be awesome if they were true

No, he wanted to relocate them, and sent tens of thousands of them to Palestine until the war broke out. With all their belongings intact (or rather converted to money, but whatever).

Show proofs.

Not true but even if it was that doesn't justify forcibly deporting scores of your own citizens.

Pictures speak louder than words.

Pure cold war propaganda, which was written by nazi apologist. Go fuck yourself, OP.

>normies reading 2000 pages of anything

It is 100%, the Haavara agreement is not revisionism in the slightest. Just look it up you useless faggot.

>doesn't justify forcibly deporting scores of your own citizens.
Jews are only citizens of their own tribe, they never assimilate, they never learn.

>Pure cold war propaganda, which was written by nazi apologist. Go fuck yourself, OP.

Prove it with one reliable sauce, instead of deflecting with buzzwords.

>Gulag threads put shills in damage control

>It is 100%, the Haavara agreement is not revisionism in the slightest
Undeniably. Proving once more that zionists and Nazis are aligned in their anti-semitism.

German Jews were German. They weren't some foreign monolith regardless of how many times some nutcase raved about it in his prison book.

Name 1 country that has ever called itself communist that has not ended up starving the entire nation?

"If I am ever really in power, the destruction of the Jews will be my first and most important job. As soon as I have power, I shall have gallows after gallows erected, for example, in Munich on the Marienplatz-as many of them as traffic allows. Then the Jews will be hanged one after another, and they will stay hanging until they stink. They will stay hanging as long as hygienically possible. As soon as they are untied, then the next group will follow and that will continue until the last Jew in Munich is exterminated. Exactly the same procedure will be followed in other cities until Germany is cleansed of the last Jew!" (quoted in John Toland, Adolf Hitler. London: Book Club Associates, 1977, p.116)

The ultimate red pill is actually the 200 Years Together by the same author, but good luck getting an english translation of that.

>German Jews were German
No. Not culturally, genetically, spiritually. Nothing German about them at all. They were as German as some Islamic nutcase is British.

All of them. If anything, socialist policies always reverse and end famine in areas where famine and starvation were the norm for centuries; the Russian and Chinese empires for example.

That isn't how "German" is defined. Again, people and nations aren't monoliths.

How can i prove something that doesn't existed? In any case, during this "genocide" USSR population only grew, and number of people executed by NKVD during this time was only around a few ten thousands. Also, GULAG prisoners built cities and worked on Great Communist Constructions. If anything, GULAG did only good to USSR.

Source: some notes on a napkin and David Irving. Wait, is David Irving a legit source in your opinion now? So gas chambers didn't exist?
Also, a rant Hitler did as a nobody in a beerhall in 1920 is not proof of anything. If I became Chancellor my policies wouldn't be "gas the kikes race war now" which is what I write on here

Gulag labour was no different to literally any other penal labour in any other country.

Force feeding nutrient mix through a nostrel to a prisoner, who declared hunger-strike...
According to laws of soviet humanism you can only put a bullet through the back of the head if the victim has the temperature of 36,6-37 C...
No text
I'm am english, french, american, japanese, italian, german and somebody else's spy...
Taking a prisoner, who lost his life in a game of cards, out to the frost.
- Sprinkle him with holy water, so he'd have better life beyond, and I'll pour some snow on him, so the warden wouldn't find/see (jargon) him...
"Spliting the skull" of an "enemy of the people" for not agreeing to log the daily work he's done as other prisoners'.
As soon as we get his "ass" (jargon) cleaned he'll quickly remember how he harmed the Soviet governmnet and the party with his cybernetics in his R&D institute...
Sending the "dead" (jargon) to populate the Arctic Ocean - drowning the frozen dead prisoners in the ice hole of a siberian river.

t. Hasan Ummayid, true Briton.

>Again, people and nations aren't monoliths.
Strawman. Jews have proved themselves to be enemies of their host nation time after time.

>Capitalism starves
No, you fool. The countries today with serious starvation problems are all Socialist failed states. Capitalism doesn't starve people to death, it actually produces a massive surplus of food, the primary issue is distribution, and the fact that dumping food on a starving population increases birthrates thus making the problem worse.

Vietnam

Am I reading right when you say that no communist country has ever made their population starve?


>You do realize the poverty rate in Venezuela is around 82% and inflation at 500% (Bunny's are not cute pets)

>eat rats to not starve
Great pick.

Those fucking mistakes. I'm disgusted with myself.