When you realize the 2nd Amendment means jack-shit because the corrupt government has become far too powerful to...

>when you realize the 2nd Amendment means jack-shit because the corrupt government has become far too powerful to overthrow

Threadly reminder that:
1. Most military and police support the 2nd amendment
2. Drones and aircraft have to land at some point
3. 300,000,000 guns

Like any of that matters? The average American doesn't have armored vehicles and artillery.

Tell that to the goat herders in Afghanistan, I don't think they got the memo.

pic related

>The average American doesn't have armored vehicles and artillery.
neither did the insurgents in iraq and afghanistan.

We don't have armored cars, so turn in guns?

Wow, you're actually this retarded?

Kind of similar to saying that you don't have a working brain, so kys.

>ignores point 1 entirely

Reminder: The US Government has been fighting a war in Afghanistan for this entire century with nothing to show for it but trillions in wasted money and a population of heroin addicts.

>3

Actual figures may be upwards of 660,000,000. That 300 million number is like 20 years old. Note record rates of gun purchases every year. Record rates of CCW holders. Record rates of women and minorities jumping into the 2A fray. Tyrannical cucks are more cucked by the armed People than they can even understand.

We've been bombing cave dwelling goatfuckers in Afghanistan for 16 years and still haven't won. We've been bombing kebabs in Iraq for 14 years and still haven't defeated them. We've been dropping bombs on mudshits in Somalia since the fucking 90s and they're still going strong. Now bomb your own people on your own soil and try to crush that clusterfuck insurgency. Not to mention the sheer amount of US troops that would start executing their own commanding officers because they swore an oath to the country, not tyrannical globalist fucks in the Swamp.

>Implying not even 1% of the military will put fight in a resistance force to protect the 2nd amendment
Weak bait

>mfw people say to veterans "thank you for defending our country"

Same thread every hour. Mods blow

>Too powerful
>Sandnigger problem worse than ever

So, your logic goes like this:
>there are bad dudes in deep state
>some of those bad dudes have access to armed drones
>armed drones could be sent to kill you
>turn in your guns now because drones are bullet-proof
>wait for death

Genius.

tell this to the goatfuckers and somalian pirates

The slave mentality is strong in op. Do you want liberty or oppression

Plus the economy would go down the shitter hurting the elites pocket. An all out war would end in their demise

...

Every single rebellion since the US government was formed has ended in failure. The first one - the Whiskey Rebellion - happened at a time when the US was a nascent nation and the farmers involved actually had the same arms as the government, basically muskets. And they still lost. And guess who put them down? George fucking Washington.

All these threads seem to imply to me that the government has decided to straight-up go authoritarian. That is different than certain pockets of the population getting hit hard economically. That would symbolically be a call to arms on the populations part, and a whole lot of military desertions. That is if the people have no semblance of pride anymore, which would probably lead to their destruction by paid mercenaries. But think geo-politically and this just seems like a stupid idea

This
White privilege is the ability to scuttle our nation that we built at any time of our choosing
And when there is no law we will have our revenge on the paracites

STOP REPLYING TO THIS OLD AS FUCK BAIT

Which is easily solved by swarming a military base and confescating all of their armored vehicles and artillery. Not to mention that at least one base will have a majority or complete desertion rate and will bring all their equipment and possibly expertise to the rebellion.

>Russians wouldn't sell equiptment to American rebels
>Forgetting Afghanistan still hasn't really been defeated

You leftards really need to study. The 2nd Amendment is relevant today.

The original State Militia's split into two entities: the National Guard and the Unorganized Militia. The National Guard acts in various capacities: as regular Army reserves, as State military in times of rebellion and insurrection against the state, as emergency responders, and occasionally as a reserve workforce on public projects. The unorganized militia is comprised of all citizens usually between the ages of 16-65 that defend their state, city, and homes against all threats. The unorganized militia can be called up by governor's as reserves for the state's National Guard. If possible, these reserves get military weapons; most of the time they are to provide their own arms and equipment.

The same idea of defending the state is observed by the Constitution and State Constitutions in regards to the home owner when it comes to defending the homestead. The security of the state is only as good as the security in the poorest home in the smallest community. We cannot condone losses of that sort.

So, no. 2nd Amendment stays.

>the US government thinks it can get away with murdering 100+ million civilians

sure thing retard, sure thing

>better read version

Tell that to Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yet all these government worshiping niggers on the Left and Right keep telling you to give up your power to psychopaths child rapers.

Just because their all cuck faggots afraid of war doesn't mean war is not coming.

>when you mix up abstract and physical entities

>When you realize the failure of the US during Vietnam, and during the bay of pigs. So trying to crush a resistance group in the mainland united States would be almost impossible for its own government to do.

US institutions are not capable of waging a drawn-out war against their own chain of logistics and personnel.

laughable

They don't even have the ammo or the will power to kill off even 5% of us. The jew can't win vs the goy within the USA.

Even if the jew gave a weapon to every nigger and city slut they still couldn't win. It would be over before Xmis.

>implying cutting edge American military technology hasn't already been defeated by Vietnamese farmers and Sand Niggers armed with nothing but AK's and improvised traps and explosives.

really jarbled my marbles there OP

>sure lets bomb half the country!
>that certainly won't get us torn apart internationally
Who wants to rule a pile of rubble?

Vietnam

This is mentioned over and over... it’s starting to look like an explicit threat from the left. When and if we’re back in the drivers seat... we’re killing everyone

obviously bait, but imagine Vietnam but without a homeland staging area, and the enemy manpower is sapped directly out of your own. Imagine Nam but without the coastal artillery barrages, surgical airstrikes, and a constant influx of meat-shield replacements.

Reminder to sage all anti-Bill of Rights faggotry

there are several factors to consider of course but i do not believe that some poorly trained and equipped gun nuts armed with small firearms stands a chance against a well trained and well equipped army.

consider that even the most corrupt government will have supporters in the population, and considering how forgiving the american voters are of their representatives, it's not unlikely that the majority of the population would still support the government and its armed forces.

the civil war we would be looking at would be awfully one sided, at least until the rebel faction managed to attain heavier weapons. Rivaling nations would likely seek to gain from this conflict by taking a side, turning it into a proxy war. Rivaling nations could also seek to prolong the conflict to destabilize the status quo, much like Russia did in the time leading up to the invasion of Crimea. Unless the rebels manages to acquire heavy weapons from domestic sources, this "foreign aid" is another possible source. We should however consider the dangers of interfering too much with a nuclear nation and the possible consequences.

In fact, if we consider the issue of US as a nuclear power, the odds are that the global consensus would be to stand behind the US establishment. This would be the best way of containing any nuclear threats. As a result, the rebels would be utterly crushed much like the Syrian rebels in their recent civil war.

tl:dr op is right

I'll disprove this myth for you. 2nd amendment is mostly for killing jews and politicians. Jews and politicians cannot use drones and bombs against the domestic population because that would result in foreign countries selling off all our bonds. This would lead to a spike in govt funding rates, aka interest rates, which would cause the govt to become insolvent within 12 months since the US govt has to constantly borrow to finance old debt. The areas bombed would not be producing taxes for a long time so govt funding costs would be rising sharply while govt tax receipts were in decline. US govt cannot bomb itself or it will go bankrupt. Idle threat