Why is Britain the only European country that had colonies that turned out to be successful countries?

Why is Britain the only European country that had colonies that turned out to be successful countries?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latitudinarian
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>implying britain isn't a german colony

Anglo masterace

They exterminated the natives instead of fucking them.

This.

Latitudinariansim; the Christians with bishops ran the cities, whilst the Christians without—Congregationalists, very aggrssive—pioneered and swept the indigenous away with cleansing and conversion.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latitudinarian

It's not.

Really? Last I checked Maori's still exist, Native Canadians and Americans still exist, in fact they were granted better rights than the colonists...

Oh wait no no you're confusing us with Belgium! Cute but wrong, when you step out of line you end up like the Tasmanian's. Don't step out of line please.

In fairness, we fucked up Rhodesia, and South Africa is pretty much exactly a nation descended into third-world violence and corruption.

>granted better rights than the colonists

> Native Canadians and Americans still exist
Speaking for American Indians, yes, they do exist, but we definitely gave them a harsh demographic whacking. Paco is not completely wrong in the US's case.

Would Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Malawi, Lesotho, Swaziland, South Africa, Jamaica, Belize, India, Pakistan, Burma, and Palestine be considered on this list of yours?

I never said all of Britain’s former colonies are successful countries.

It's in our genes

This is more of a "When you're run by Anglos, you're successful" and still rings true with those countries when they were run by Anglos.

If you're getting fucked in a war, you surrender. If you don't surrender, you get fucked out of existence and it's your own fault.

Because they didnt race mix with their colonies native population. As simple as that.

>successful
>cucked, lgbt-ed, white guilted, overrun by immigrants, etc

well

Pax Britannica and Pax Romana were pretty damn solid policies (killing pirates and savages, keeping the peace with other empires, etc.) for the time, unfortunately those days are over and now we are left with the shitshow of the shift in power because of WW2. I wouldn’t mind having Britain’s Monarchy actually do something about our incompetent PM though, they do have the power according to the BNA Act and Statute of Westminster.

England used the logic of the Navy to restructure their government into a super-efficient war machine.

India =/= successful.

>EU-flag

>ireland
>not violent

this desu

Thank god for that little stretch of water separating us from the rest of you fucks.

what actually happened is that the population density of natives in these areas was really low (semi-nomadic and nomads tend be that way), where as with the Spanish they had to deal with Agriculture civilizations with high populations, meaning there were lot more natives. The fucking of that created mestizos manfiests itself in the north via people who swear they are 1/16 Cherokee.

In the hearts of the Incan and mesoamerican civilizations you still have high quantities of pureblood natives

to be fair when you are run by Europeans you are successful is the rule that runs true

Mexican was on the right path, but missed the mark by a bit.
You guys didn't mix with the natives, even if you didn't wipe them off the earth, you prevented yourselves from becoming subhumans.

Nope. Name a Spanish, French or Belgian colony you'd want to live in.

Are they still ran by the European colonizer country? Spain's colonies were top shit before the revolutions and abandonment.

>Spain's colonies were top shit before the revolutions and abandonment.
Nah.

The Swedish colony of binland is preddy comfty tbqh

Argentina was on a damn good course before the second world war. Should've become a superpower really.

Brits are better at long-term planning.
France, Portugal, and Spain just wanted to get rich very quickly, so they exploited their colonies but didn't bother setting up the proper institutions or infrastructure to guarantee stability and loyalty to the mother nation.

And after WW2 they took in mestizos from all over LatAm and turned into a mestizo shithole. Same story as California
Argetina was one of the last to be colonized by the spanish IIRC

You don't have any idea of what are you talking about, mate.

t. mestizo

Brits are the ugliest fattest and most retarded and ignorant people in Europe

prove me wrong inselaffe protip you cant

>meme flag
We have a mongrel lolbertarian here.
Bet you think Penn Jillette is an intellectual heavyweight, huh?

Germany.

Get outta here nigger

1. Britain doesn't fuck the natives
2. Britain doesn't take over nigger infested shitholes, and if they do they get rid of them

Simple answer to that question:

The colonies that turned out successful on their own were those were the natives died of diseases the whites brought with them.

That meant those cononies were prodominantly white at the time of the independence from the European overlords.