Why don't we have a wiki full of nothing but lists of people in rows including (((their))) ethnicity and religion? Why don't we expose the facts instead of debating what the facts mean? These lists BY THEMSELVES would be sufficient if properly produced. A picture with a blue star of david on it means nothing. You need sources.
Proposed Lists: Shooter list Celebrity molester list CNN anchors and co-anchors list MSBC anchors and co-anchors list Fox news anchors and co-anchors list chief editors of major newspapers list congress members who sponsored NAFTA list congress members who sponsored ACA list chairman of the FED since 1850 list secretary of the treasury since 1850 list
Steps you can help take in this thread: *Volunteer to begin compiling a list in excel/etc *Share links to google doc spreadsheets for lists *Suggest links to alternative wiki sites to put the content on *Develop a pastebin that supports wiki formatted articles and editing *If contributing to a list, convert references to archive links that protect proof
Suggested list columns for people volunteering work: LastName | Firstname | Photo | Ethnicity | Religion | Quote Last Name(so lists including work by diff people can be merged) Name(hyperlinked out to (((wikipedia))) or other site with an article on the person) Photo(as a hyperlinked embed from some other site) Ethnicity(African|Asian|Celtic|Native|Semitic|Slavic|Other) - hyperlinked to proof Religion(Athiest|Christian|Jewish|Muslim|Other) - hyperlinked to proof Quote - something truly insipid they said, hyperlinked if possible to proof
If you'd like to contribute, just say "I'm In" in the thread and put whatever you feel like putting in the document.
Nathan King
I like lists.
Have you thought about how data is verified well enough to be useful or how you will stop vandals?
Asher Rogers
Bump
Camden King
As long as we don't get shoa'd...
Verifying data: We link to supporting evidence. Evidence includes archived twitter comments, articles, etc. Vandals: The vandals cannot be stopped, they sacked rome 7 times already. Protecting the lists from malicious edits: ad-hoc volunteer effort including collaborative editors for accuracy, final revisions contributed to read-only spreadsheet urls, urls replaced with new revisions as needed.
Andrew Flores
Should add salaries and net worth of possible as well.
Can make it "about" salary but with race and ethnicity as a footnote for dissemination
Carter White
It's not impossible to extend the effort to include listing every single forbes 500 company and showing (((their))) influence and disproportionate pay, but that's biting off a lot.
the goal of this operation isn't to show such things anyway. Our goal at this point is simply to prove it's (((them))).
Logan Morales
Sounds very labor intensive. And the idea of just ignoring trolls a bit optimistic.
Logan Thomas
All work is labor intensive. Do you want to fight (((them))) or just shitpost? Are you a rational person or a shit slinging monkey? I'm perfectly willing to believe you're the latter and jews are the former.
Undertaking any great project involves breaking it into tasks and steps.
The tasks are: Make a list Fact-Check a list Archive the sources in a list and update them to point to the archive Put multiple people's lists together Run a website that displays lists nicely Protect a webserver from being shoa'd for hosting lists *each of these tasks is difficult, but not impossible. A few days work at worst.
John Miller
Yeah once the base list is made additions can be made anytime
Camden Jones
*People on Sup Forums are like dogs.
They get morsels of gristle(sauce) and they yammer for hours, but very few of them really put the work into creating it. The most they have usually ever done is dig for bones. And the bones have to have the potential to be juicy. Very juicy. Documenting (((them))) has no juice in it, only jews.
They see one cat meowing at them(slide, bant thread) and they bark endlessly(incl "redpills"- it's basically just urinating to mark territory). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steps in task 1: Make a list
Open your google docs or excel online and put in the header fields. Name your document what you're going to research. Start with wikipedia, and from there go to search engines looking for articles. Don't get sidetracked. Fill your list with names and pictures. Once you have a list of everyone who is in the list, begin searching for the evidence to support their ethnicity and religion. Don't worry about finding quotes for now, but include the field.
David Ortiz
Steps in task : Fact-Check a list
Follow each of the hyperlinked claims about each person and verify the hyperlink points to one of : Reputable news source Wikipedia Other reputable site
If the link isn't verifiable/reputably sourced, find another source to replace it with. For the sake of speed, the first time something is claimed it might not need to be totally reputable, but before the final publishing it needs to be.
Isaac Watson
>Are you a rational person or a shit slinging monkey? The former. Hence I'm not keen on monkey work.
Think division of labor.
Ian Wood
Steps in task: Archive the sources
Follow each reputable url and archive it, then replace the url to the archive url.
Nicholas Russell
Steps in task 4: put multiple people's lists together
Sorting by last name, copy all of the rows into one document and collate, then scan vertically for redundancy and prune redundant entries.
Blake Smith
create a wiki on editthis.info or other sites. We will help you out
Zachary Green
Step 5/6: run a website that displays lists nicely/protect lists from being shoa'd 1: Upload the collated, verified, nicely formatted lists to multiple wikipedia clones inc: Rationalwiki infogalactic etc 2: Run the spreadsheets through a csv - html converter and put them on: anonymous html pasting sites secure hosting sites etc
3: Create a list showing where the other lists were uploaded to and when
4: reupload/prune hosts that don't support the truth
Matthew Collins
Didn't someone make an app like this once. Surely getting hold of the data from that would save lots of time.
Dylan Davis
Looking into it right now based user! Thank you!
Eli Fisher
Get on that, ill copy and paste.
Daniel Myers
Thanks, I put it into the list of alternative wikis. However, it's still just a wiki alternative. We don't know if (((they))) run it yet.
Tyler Taylor
I think you're right.
This is a bit too much to bite off. OK.
Let's prune this down to JUST shooters and celeb molesters.
It's a pretty huge repository of upper management and journalists for each of the organizations. Take a look at the works cited at the bottom of each, and you'll see that each claim about each of them being Jewish is very well substantiated.
James Hall
I will link those into the master doc for later efforts
