It's OK to be gay

It's OK to be gay.

Other urls found in this thread:

biblehub.com/leviticus/18-22.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=9VkmLUUev20
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Sage

too late faggot

no it isn't. its ok to self improve.

Its not OK to be Australian

> it's okay if you can't into math
Is this the real reason government is so keen?

No it's not

You faggots have gone one step too far now and have enraged Muslims and Christians all over this country.

You've brought this on yourself

> tfw Number Equality
> 49% of votes sent out came back yes

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, or questioning your sexuality?

discord gg/zamwgsS

funny if the mudslimes in melbourne chimp out.

Go to pass ssm in parliament
30 / 150 not even interested
72 / 150 vote yes
48 / 150 vote no

> 90/ 150 voted yes!

bump

>It's OK to be gay.
And it's just as OK to be schizophrenic.

>It's OK to be gay.
It's OK to have downs syndrome.

Marry me OP

The Vote was rigged

> tfw kind of prepared to let non-legally binding survey just below pass slip IF it really was only a few 100,000 short...
> but it's all bloody anonymous, lacking critically basic stats

> parliament also being jigged around to further "guarantee" safe passage

Who will hide you from the wrath to come?

biblehub.com/leviticus/18-22.htm

How will you escape His judgement on the Day of the Lord?

"'Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.

...

Has anyone from the left noticed the only areas in melb and syd that voted no are muslim enclaves or is it just going to be a mystery?

This is your song then best part around 0:32:
youtube.com/watch?v=9VkmLUUev20

Its ok to be NEET

One of the funniest/saddest things i found was the One in Ten (claim), Seems to be based on Rate of aids in gays..?

1 in 10 is an old estimate for rate of aids, if 1 in 100 has aids / 1 in 10 gay with aids - > 1 in ten gay?

Turns out 3 in 100 is a better guess for rate of gay / so it's probably 1 in 3 gays with aids?

> 2012-2013

> An update on the above study; it employs the same methodology, has a larger sample (20,055 respondents),[14] and a broader respondent age range (16–69). The study found that 96.5% of the entire sample (or 96.8% of the men and 96.3% of the women) identified as heterosexual, a drop from the 2003 findings (97.5%).[15]

The Levites are all gone. This was a rule for Levites. Know the word.

So you say, so 60% of the population (of those who voted) say.
I am going to be laffing when all the straight couples who voted yes are having to share honeymoon accommodation with a gay couple next door to their room engaging in wild and glorious buttsex and have the gayness literally thrust in their faces, and having to explain to very young children why Bob and Blake are kissing on each other in a park public wedding ceremony.
I am also going to enjoy when the radical far left start pushing for polygamous and polyamorous marriage and people getting all tied up in knots trying to logic their way through it.

>muh slibbery slobe

bump

Well how do you define marriage and what is the purpose of it? Polygamy is quite common amongst African, Aboriginal and Muslim communities/tribes. Who gets to decide what the laws shall be dictating what marriage is? According to whom?

>implying the slope isn't slippery

With canada and california being living examples. The slippery slope is indeed a valid criticism.

shut up you fat nigger

go to west sydney and say that.

this thread doubles as a daily reminder australia is kill

bump!