Which one is less bad, Sup Forums?

Which one is less bad, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ъ#Final_yer_pre-1918
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>a shortage og necessities
>an excess of necessities

Really ignights the ole almonds.

the one where people can actually fucking eat bread

the latter is good because if enough people eat the thrown out bread then the stores will compensate. Socialism is when people starve because there is no food, capitalism is when food rots because no one wants to eat it.

Umm what the Fuck are you talking about

>one economy is doing so poorly, people have to line up to get free bread to avoid starvation

>one economy is doing so well, stores have to ability to throw away product because of how well they are doing

idk op you tell me im really stumped on this one

I think he might be mentally cucked

I ate stolen bread this morning, system didn’t collapse

What if he gets aroused when people are starving to death...

Socialism. If most of the developed world embargoed my country and stopped agriculture imports to my country we would collapse into despotism and starve too. Most of the failures of Socialism have been caused by ruthless trade, oil, and currency wars by capitalist countries. If the US was Socialist, indeed, if the US was fascist, it would succeed.

Russia was almost a complete backwater in 1917. It managed to industrialise, electrify, and bring itself up to some kind of world prominence by the 1960s. Once the Capitalists really ganged up on the Socialist states after the second war, Socialist countries stood no chance.

Civilisation is not an unredeemable failure because the Goths sacked Rome. Socialism is a far more noble system than Capitalism, which is actually the cause of most of our problems in the West today. It's Mosley's birthday, and I think we can learn a lot from his gentile-Socialism and hard-centrism.

A lot of stores donate their old bread to food kitchens. If you find a store which is throwing out good bread then contact the management and get them in contact with a food kitchen.

Hey guis! Would you rather starve or have an abundance of food?

Jews are worse.

They run the fed causing the poor to stay poor.

My country had rationing in the 1950s, but let me guess, that wasn't real capitalism?

People literally dumpster dive for bread every fucking day

might've had to do with coming out of getting your country demolished in a world war

Why would a store buy more bread than it needed on purpose? Wouldn't this just eat into their profit margins?

Slide thread.

Don't forget to sage.

Also, three spikelets law.

I wonder how many of them stores are Wallmart, I wonder the ratio of bread when comparing Wallmart:Everyoneelse?

ask venezuela

I'd rather not give people things they don't deserve, don't have a right to, and didn't earn.

We burn that bread in trash burners for extra electricity or use it as fertilizer if bio waste seperation is feasible. Capitalism doesn't waste if it doesn't have to.

The one where there's a shortage and people starve. The meme doesn't mention the lack of bread under socialism, just the line.

My literally retarded friend just posted this exact image on facebook, unironically. Are you an actual retard like him?

The one where you have more then just bread to eat

>Less food
>More food

Geez, i don't know user, maybe the one who at least allows me to feed myself?

Most places do donate extra food to homeless shelters and other food missions.

Problem is the homeless drive away people who actually deserve/need it.

Let's see. Too much bread, or too little? Hmm, which would be better? Gosh darn it, I just can't figure it out!

In a socialist utopia, people are lining up for bread, and bread is their sole source of nutrition. In a capitalist world, they don't buy as much bread because they have access to actual fucking foods like meats and veggies So it makes socialists sad to see food go to waste, when we live in a fucking surplus society. They'd rather starve, I guess.

capitalism is when food rots because no one wants to pay for it

Appearances. A fully stocked shelf looks better than an empty one

Why not both?

the one with less niggers

Just a guess since I've never been in a purchasing position for a company, but I assume they must negotiate certain quantities for certain rates, with larger quantities getting larger discounts.

So on a small-scale example if they ordered:
>1 loaf @ $2
>10 loaf @ $1.99 per
>100 loaf @ $1.96 per
>1000 loaf @ $1.84 per

etc. so there comes a point where if they order X amount, they'll reduce the cost per item so much that even throwing some percentage in the trash would still be more profitable than if they just ordered less.

Or so I'm guessing

Wow complete and utter stupidity.

Russia was a complete back water in 1960s too.

Socialism will work but xyz wasn't real socia....

...

>If there were no conflict between interests then my ideology would succeed.
No shit Sherlock, and if all the land was farmable then there would not be famines, right? You're a dumb fuck.

As usual, the first post is also the best post

upper image have orthography of Russian Empire.

>government and nation's economy
>one corporation and its budget
Just kill yourself, you fucking worthless human trash.

>The USSR failed because of
>ruthless trade
If refusing to buy dogshit quality is 'ruthless trade', then, yes. In reality, the USSR couldn't even, for example, make enough cars to fulfill domestic demand, let alone foreign. Not that there was any demand for 1950s cars in 1960, let alone in 1980
>oil
Nigga what, the USSR was completely self sufficient with regards to oil
>currency wars
The ruble wasn't even available for trade, just like the Chinese yuan or the Cuban peso isn't. It's a popular thing for communists

Try again Jeremy

...

>I really am low on fuel and I find it hard to get fuel for my car
vs
>I have so much fucking fuel that all of it can't fit in the entirety of my car

That would only leave me with less doubt that he's a communist

Which letter(s)? The ъ is still used, isn't it?

The reason why there's a bread line is because there's bread at the end of the line.

If there wasn't any bread at the end of the line, what are those people standing in line for?

Sad I have to walk you through basic logic like a fucking Middle School teacher. Fashits are the most pathetic beings on the planet

Most people in most capitalist countries are malnourished, like India, Phillipines, etc. Even in Appalachia, Missisippi Delta in USA has high rates of malnutrition.

after soviet reform this letter was removed from ends of the words.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ъ#Final_yer_pre-1918

I see, cпacибo!