If iq is so special why asian don't have develope anything, and the modern world is basically made by europeans?

if iq is so special why asian don't have develope anything, and the modern world is basically made by europeans?

Because the West limits "the state"
You should know, you dumbass Anarchist.
Too bad 'Anarchism' is another Jew variation of Jew communism because you're too stupid to understand freedom, rights, and limited state and corporate power.

Firstly fake and gay, secondly name languages and religion eupropean came up with
Inb4 Welsh

You have to not be lazy.
Asians are smart, but lazy.

The Nobel Awards number in this century
#1 America
#2 Japan

What is Japan?

They both spit in the face of nature itself. Level all mountains, fill all valleys, sacrifice anything valuable to the false god of equality. Bunch of degenerates.

China's numbers are kind of fudged because they test in the big cities, not the horde of 1 billion chinks in south and west

High IQ by itself doesn't amount to much. You need creativity along with intelligence.

IQ isn't everything. A person with high IQ who otherwise has no originality isn't going to accomplish anything at all, just sit there being an autistic mensa. Whereas people with less but still somewhat high or just above average IQ but with more creativity and drive accomplish much more. Therefore higher average IQ Asians with less accomplishment.

asians have slightly higher average iq but the white iq bell curve is less narrow

this results in more white geniuses who drive innovation

China, the intellectual powerhouse of East Asia, has been fucked for the past two centuries. Qing failed to modernize like Japan and was fucked over by foreign powers for five decades, followed by decades of civil war. Then communism took another four decades away from them. Thanks to Deng that's turning around.

>> canadians have higher iqs than americans

Top kek nigga top kek

Because Asians have the highest average IQ but whites have a higher total number of individuals in the genius IQ range. And geniuses are the people, the only people, who really advance the technological and philosophical prowess of society. So yeah.

Intelligence is the ability to decipher the abstract and apply it to situations in a way that is beneficial in some way.

Being able to decipher the abstract is inherently creative

Ideology.
The East Asians are God-Tier intelligent.
Look up how much of tech was invented by the Asians especially Chinese.
They are exclusionary, the idea in China for 4000 years was 'WE are so great, the rest of the world will want to come to us and learn from us.'
As opposed to European ideology 'We great, need more clay'

Asians lie on these kinds of tests, it's actually an organized effort by the state so that their population would seem smarter. It's actually part of their culture, make everything about them seem better when in fact the reality is totally different.

Dumb poo just mad because closest toilet is further away than closest curry shop

Funny part, but it's actually thanks to commerce and multi-culturalism (or at least trade of information). The chinese were generations ahead in terms of goverment, and technology.
But the pharisees ((merchants)) invented letters, and we adopted them, making communication a lot easier for everyone.
Also the himalayas made the country quite divided from our "world".

Same reason their aren't any classic Asian composers. They just better current shit instead of making their own shit. Way easier in most cases

No they don't.

Pic related. Japan and Korea in particular punch well above their weight.

China - 1.3 billion
US - 320 million
Japan - 125 million
S. Korea - 50 million

We have a shit ton more minorites. Watch this shit change after Trudeau imports gorrilians of niggers after Lake Chad dries up

>patent scams

Is dumb round-eye fall for it Everytime

Because IQ doesn't equal intellectual. Europeans are intellectual and inguinuitive. High IQ Asian means ability to process and learn fast. This is why we invent and they are the first to duplicate, because they are good at learning what has already been learned where as we are good at discovering

For almost 800 years Europeans had existed in small states fighting each other in a constant arms race that had made them develop some of the most effective fighting forces, administrative techinques, and education systems, meanwhile the Asians and other non european empires were gigantic behemoths just mostly just sat on their asses for 100s of years at a time. So when the euros began fighting nations outside of continent they where at a whole different level and pillaged everything. You can see this pattern with almost every successoul state, even those outside Europe, like the mongols who before their empire where just a bunch of small tribes constantly fighting for power, pillaging the world's greatest power china, and after they united they used everything they learned over the last 1000 years to conquer almost all of asia. Then there's the Japs who were the most successful state and fighting force in asia and who for 100s of years fought as 100 of tiny little states and warlords. I think you get the point.

Europe has more influence than asia does

Because breakthroughs are made by the exceptional not the average.

>Being able to decipher the abstract is inherently creative
No it isn't. Its deciphering others abstractions. Creation is creating new abstractions.