Soyboys are not a real thing. There have always been reedy, short guys with weak chins

If you put more than half the guys in this picture in a pair of bugman glasses, a Star Wars T-shirt, and skinny jeans, they'd look every bit as faggy as the soyboys of today.

There have always been guys with less testosterone. It's nothing new.

What has changed is culture and behavior. Even if you were a beanpole back in the 1940s, you were expected to act like a man. Faggotry was not endorsed by the culture. Look at Humphrey Bogart, for example - not exactly a chiseled Chad, but viewed as an exemplar of masculinity.

How you carry yourself is much more important than the genetic card you were dealt. If you talk like a man, walk like a man, and conduct yourself like a man, you will be viewed as masculine regardless of whether you're physically "manly."

I am 5'9, 150 pounds, and am very fresh-faced, yet people unfailingly categorize me as "masculine." It is part of my identity.

If you don't want people to see you as a soyboy, try changing your behavior in addition to your diet.

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11880595
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dingo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>I am 5'9, 150 pounds, and am very fresh-faced, yet people unfailingly categorize me as "masculine."

sure

...

sounds like something a soyboy would say

You don't want it to be true because it suggests you could solve your own problems rather than blaming them on your food.

Blaming soy is just Sup Forums's desperate attempt to avoid facing the reality that white men are inherently weaker and less masculine than the other races.

Here's a rugby team from 1939. Do they all look like high T Chads to y'all?

>You don't want it to be true because it suggests you could solve your own problems rather than blaming them on your food.

False, go to the gym and work out you scrawny man child

At no point in human history was 100% of the population muscular.

>False, go to the gym and work out you scrawny man child
Going to the gym is important, but working out alone will not earn you the respect of others.

I'm 5 feet 6 and weight 120 pounds, am I a soyboy?

That's just Anglo face for you

At no point, thus far.

They weren't gluttonous pigs back then.

The SoyBoy thing is more of a mindset, and quite frankly, it's been getting worse and worse.

2010, you're talking about absolute cucks here who're destroying their own nations to satisfy their legitimate cuck fetish. Women vote? Fuck that. These nu males cucks are a way bigger threat to our society.

Also, There's a big difference between old school nerds, and nu males soy boys.

This.
Look at Goebbels. He looked so threatening, aesthetic and had such presence even though he had the deformed body of a 12 years old. Meanwhile your average American football player is all bulked and chad like but looks like a total faggot wearing caps and ear piercings like niggers.

It;s the SoyBoy personality that's the problem. My best buddy is a 5'5ft skinny manlet, but he certainly isn't a SoyBoy in terms of persona. In fact he's quite the opposite.

unironically this my bong

>Also, There's a big difference between old school nerds, and nu males soy boys.
That's kinda my point, you know?

I'm just saying it's a difference of behavior and attitude.

But compared to today's young population historically a majority of young people weren't morbidly obese either.

No. Youre just dying. Fucking eat something man.

Yeah I don't mind this meme, as it generally discourages leftist behavior and rightly identifies them as being unmanly.

It is however, bullshit.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11880595
These recent studies in men consuming soyfoods or supplements containing 40--70 mg/d of soy isoflavones showed few effects on plasma hormones or semen quality. These data do not support concerns about effects on reproductive hormones and semen quality.

>1333:1 kill ratio against Nig Nogs in operation Dingo.
>Whites inferior
Ok. Back to your cuck porn.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dingo

Soy is only for the....

I think what's actually happening is that people with shit genetics who would have died as infants are surviving due to modern medicine.

By today's standard, yes

Yeah sorry. 5'5" here and it's not bullshit. A girl yesterday literally laughed at the idea of someone thinking I wasn't intense and focused AF.

>But muh height
Do something with it.

At a population and individual level, men are losing 1% of their testosterone every year.

The images you've posted might not look like it, but they likely all have much higher testosterone levels than men of today.

The characteristics of a soyboy isn't merely physical.

...

They all look healthy and clean cut as compared to bugmen. They may not be swole but if half the dudes nowday would look like this, we'd be better off

that's my point

OP made the most hilarious thread ever.

Literally all the pictures posted prove the bugman hypothesis

> am 5'9, 150 pounds, and am very fresh-faced, yet people unfailingly categorize me as "masculine.
pics or didn't happen

Pics of what? People categorizing me as masculine?

Pics of you, retard.

...

What would that prove? I've already acknowledged I do not have the most masculine appearance.

I think OP is right, our WW2 diet was minimal but it was healthy, pic is likely of upper class lads (not men) at a posh school. Average male height was 5'8", female 5'3", people were smaller. But they were obviously much more manly, there were no gender roles issues and very few women were "barren".
Yanks became massive due to huge amounts of cheap meat, unfortunately this is full of hormones to the extent that the giants are becoming trannies and soyboys.
Some hardship would sort us all out, the wars against Islam will help with that.

E A T M O R E
A
T

M
O
R
E