/mng/- monarchism general

Let's take a break from this democratic bullshit and get comfy, lads. Thread for appreciation and discussion of the political ideology of Monarchism.

A FAQ on monarchies:

>What is the difference between a dictatorship and a monarchy?
Legitimacy. Dictatorship usurps the power by force or a coup d'etat with no real legitimacy, whereas monarchy is justified by divine right, a constitution, heritage, or social contract.

Types of monarchies:

>parlamentary
>constitutional
>absolute
>enlightened despotism
>polish sejm
>elective
>hederitary

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=M48Nmmyl2nA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Monarchy is just the Leftist centralization of Feudalism

bump for hoppe

Future King

Who would want a bunch of entitled cunts ruling over you like peasentry. Get fucked. Atleast in a democracy there is half a fucking chance you can get a Trump like candidate in now and again.

Democracy is just an ad populum fallacy, faggot. Have fun voting for Kike puppets till you are dead.

No. Monarchism is basically the reason why your country exists and why Europe was the mightiest force in the world. It has nothing to do with leftism. Get real.

>>>>>>>>>>>>monarchism is leftie

bump

>Monarchism being leftist
>Feudalism being bad
>Canadian """education"""

Maza has been assasinated by venezuela-pablemos-kirchner plot against him when he was at Argentina.

You read it here first. It's happening

>(((democracy)))
The only form of democracy I support is an aristocratic republic, anything else is pretty much just two parties of rich kikes trying to sell off chunks of the nation faster than the other side can.

Looks like an inbred anglo piece of shit

>mfw its real

desu, feudalism would be a step in the right direction.
but a monarch is cool too

so here are some good questions to get this thread going

what is the least violent way of a republic reforming into a monarchy?
let's say one wanted monarchism within the USA, a country with no monarchist history. how would it be done?

what if the royal family was kike controlled and no legitimate pretenders existed, how would you get another family on the throne?
without violence again, of course

you don't solve things without violence.

Ha.

This.
The largest argument against monarchy is Nicucklai II, though. We had 70 years of commie government because of that nigger.

Monarchy is better than Republicanism, Feudalism is better than Monarchy, and roving bands of Warriors pillaging at will is better than Feudalism.

Finally, the ideal state of civilization is one group of warriors genociding a weaker tribe and taking their shit.

From here we enter meta-civilization, for example being a solitary Tiger hunter is superior to being a faggotty wolf pack member.

If you want to really get at the ultimate state of being, a pure lightning strike, born from a storm and shortlived but immensely destructive, is on a higher tier yet.

Then there are events such as supernovae and black hole collisions, with, finally, the ultimate state of reality being the Big Bang, since when all matter has degraded to lower states.

what a great non-answer

Wouldn't say that he was a bad king. I mean what do you expect from WW1? That shit would have happened even if all of Europe would have been controlled by republics.

To be fair to Tsar Nicholas, WW1 as a whole was a mistake.

the answer is:you can vote in a monarch party
you can't vote in new family, you need revolution.
sure it CAN happen where a monarch MIGHT step down when a peoples delegation meets with terms, but they won't
but this is a brainlet their exercise if what ifs

On first question, just look at Napoleon. Even if he was an enlightement nigger, he is the perfect example of how to do it.
>country at internal and external war
>factions fighting for power in the democracy
>inestability over 120%
>use this on your favour to unite all under yourself
>declare yourself dictator
>declare yourself emperor then
Perfect example

yeah the only problem is it was very situational and required a lot of violence

today's society is heavily pacified and violence would create a lot of distrust

Nice fake news ahmed

Well, I agree to a point. Today's society is decadent, degenerating into anarchy and chaos. That is the time for a strong man to appear.It always happens with democracies.

So? He resolved it badly, the war had literally no benefits for Russia, he expected to shift people's attention from inner problems by "hey look! we're totally btfo'ing all those other countries so we're not bad at all", but the following failure had only marked the disorganization of the system.
>king
Also, he accepted Russia as multireligious state, created a literal commie parliament and gave his title to his traitor brother.

>That is the time for a strong man to appear.It always happens with democracies
You can draw a parallel with Alexander the Great. Just read Spengler really.

So, this is the power of Leaf education.

Nicky was a mediocre monarch but he did what he was supposed to by leading the troops personally. It was modernity that was the mistake.

An AI would make a better monarch than a human.

...

"The Jews are responsible for all of the world's wars"

...

Wait who is that?

our future King William V of England

Kek which African dictator gave him this welcome?

Noice

Tuvalu

...

...

My niggers.
God save Hoppe.

...

expected from a leaf
>>/leftypol/
is the other way

thread theme
youtube.com/watch?v=M48Nmmyl2nA

>what is the least violent way of a republic reforming into a monarchy?
Napoleon III style

It's nice, but it's sang mostly by young women. If this thread gets an anthem it needs to be as resonant and powerful as the monarchs themselves.

nice

That's literally my plan. America is going to be a shitshow real soon, let's hope I can napoleon this hog.

...

HAHAHAHAHAHA

As a fellow Dutchman you'd have to agree that Napoleon destroying our Republic to install the Dutch fake royal house was one of the worst things that ever happened to our country no? Pic related.

>ywn live in a timeline with a united catholic british isles

forgot pic

How does it feel knowing you're surrendering like little bitches again Jean-Pierre-Marie-Francais?

>catholic
*blocks your path*

The problem with the European monarchies is that they are all so cucked now, look at Spain for example.

...

you are going to get this with democracy anyway though

Because real power is in the hands of parliament not the king. There is a ceremony in which after a party wins the election in Spain the king has to allow them to form a cabinet. If he for example doesn't give that right to the socialists they would simply create a new republic.

WE

Democracy is even worse, reminder :^)

>how would it be done?
Impossible without war.

Regardless, the USA will likely balkanize in our lifetime anyway, because the Jews have utterly destroyed any religious/cultural ties differing groups have with one another. A recently-imported Democrat voter has no loyalty to the ideals of this nation, and whites, who created this nation, are constantly told we should die and we are everything evil in the world. So "America" is basically a delusion shared only by aging Boomers. Most American Sup Forums posters grew up in a post-American age with a government and media overtly trying to exterminate them, so loyalty to nation is nil. Millennials who served in the military have loyalty only to other military and perhaps a small sliver of this dying concept of a country. But it's a concept that exists only in Western Christian tradition, which most orc races have no appreciation for.

SO, how do you get monarchy in America?
Balkanization, followed by consolidation into new governments. Usually this happens with a great deal of blood. If I have a loyal army of soldiers who kill for me and then I declare myself king, then I'm king. It's that simple, and that's the way all monarchies have started.

>Impossible without war.
you just need the army on your side and then coup the shit ouf of that d'etat

Napoleon III did this

>get elected
>wew I'm emperor now

the end

Not surprising, when you can literally rent the whole country.

The surviving heir to the Hohenzollern name is a sniveling soyboy who apologized on German television for the crime of his family existing. Imagine being the heir to Prussia and being that big of a faggot.

Kek it's fucking bizarre how I think about this too. The isles without the religious conflicts would be the best country on Earth

problem is, if you do that you have no legitimacy, which is why the monarchy was abolished right after Napoleon III

it was abolished because france was full of republican scum and the cuck lost a war and got humiliated

True, but he also cultivated that loyalty through being a capable general and winning the support of the troops who served him. So the next crop of aristocrats will likely have to be accomplished military men, as there is no other way in this cynical post-modern age to demonstrate legitimacy and personal integrity.

That's probably part of the reason the nations of the EU have their military funding cut to zero: To stop an inevitable coup.

Napoleon was overthrown for losing a war, which emboldened the enemies of the regime. Nothing else.

and if he was seen as legitimate, no one would have supported the Republicans after they overthrew him
that's my point

instead of having a meme fascist state as an intermediary, the proper route is having a stratocracy

from stratocracy we easily get to aristocracy

the republicans overthrew the legitimate monarch, the one after him and napoleon, republishit frogs didnt care about it at all

In a democracy we also have a bunch of entitled cunts ruling over the peasantry.

There are no monarchies in Europe anymore.

Why would you support this? Insular Christianity was God tier, and what the Church of Ireland was based upon, they essentially tried resurrecting the church of the twelve apostles.

Nice thread, bump

This thread has been a great idea, I'll make one a day maybe

Daily reminder that absolutism is doomed to fail.

everything is doomed to fail

WUZ

How can a monarch govern in an industrialized, high-information society? I mean technically.
Also can a secularized society sustain necessary reverence to a kings right to rule?

Monarchs are chosen by god.

They will light the path to success high tech or low.

Dude, I know.
I'm asking because we currently live in a secular, industrialized, high-information society.
I'm interested in how do we return to a societies with natural hierarchies? And is it even possible with the current techno-cultural framework, or does it all need to come falling down first?

If I was born in the 19th century I would've been a Loyalist for the Spanish Crown.

Would you rather have titled cunts, or entitled cunts.