If the USA government and the deep state keep making all this "false flag" incidents why were they unable to plant...

If the USA government and the deep state keep making all this "false flag" incidents why were they unable to plant weapons of mass destruction on Iraq?
You would think it would have been very easy to do considering they plan all this sophisticated plots on their home soil, and also considering all the lying they did beforehand saying that they did have them. They had the motive and the means but decided not to do it?
>checkmate conspiratards

>putting weapons anywhere near sand people

they could have shipped them in after the occupation. keep the masses waiting for a bit and then bam! thebig reveal.

Better to go with absence of evidence rather than plant something that could potentially come back to the actual source.

For example of this see what happened when the Bush admin sent anthrax into the U.S. postal service to kill and silence opposition. The anthrax was eventually sourced to come from a U.S. facility and the alleged suspect "killed" himself before the investigation could go any further.

>unable to plant
It wasn't a matter of planting, it was a matter of proving whether or not they still had them/had acquired more. We know they have at minimum gas weapons in their conflict with Iran, and we know they used them on the Kurdish populations of Iraq.

We didn't know if they had any more, and used it as an additional reason to invade on top of the previous conflict in Kuwait.

>Better to go with absence of evidence rather than plant something that could potentially come back to the actual source.
This is reasonable, but they could have just destroyed them before anyone had the chance to investigate claiming to be doing it for the sake of peace. An example of this could be Osama's body.

>For example of this see what happened when the Bush admin sent anthrax into the U.S. postal service to kill and silence opposition. The anthrax was eventually sourced to come from a U.S. facility and the alleged suspect "killed" himself before the investigation could go any further.
that's really interesting, have any good source on that to read more?

> it was a matter of proving whether or not they still had them/had acquired more

if they were intended on doing that, and didn't find any, why not just plant them? It's true they had used chemical weapons before in the past so it would have been even easier to modify some facility to make it seem like production was still going on.

nonsence.

It costs more money to shp millitary equptiment back to the US then it doe to make new equiptment and ship it to the next war. This is why we nation build. We go over and set up an army then sell them all the shit we shipped over there. After afganistan we had thousands of hummers and other APC sitting over there with no nation built to sell them too. Bush sat down at thanks giving dinner one year talking with his dad about sudam had made him look like an asshole when he was president and W decided hed go after him. They made all the shit up about WMD's its all but accepted. Saddam agreed to destroy all those weapons to stay in power years before with UN inspectors present.
Iraq was a deep state ploy for nothing other than convenience and pride, now we have a nation filled with radicals that we wont water board or even talk sternly too when saddam would have just killed them.

The motive of the "bad intelligence" of WMD was to get the ball rolling on Arab Springs.

If you look at Bush 43 and Obama's presidency, they were very similar. Bush would open to door to something, and Obama would bust it down...

Bush started the Arab Springs to remove a contained dictator in Saddam Hussein, who was actually keeping the peace for the most part...end result being the removal or death of Middle Eastern Christians.

When Obama took office, he picked up that baton and ran to Egypt to remove Mubarak, then Libya to remove Gaddafi...both peace keeping liberals, all replace with hardcare Islamic extremists, and ISIS birthed between the two presidents.

*both peace keeping dictators

Maybe they did, and they got stolen?

If I'm understanding you correctly what you are saying is that the "deep players" tricked the government to invade to make them look more imperialistic in an effort to get the ball rolling on the arab spring, thus destabilizing the region and simultaneously getting rid of dictators they didn't like.
Interesting theory, so the never finding the wmds was an intentional blunter.

They had achieved what they wanted why would they potentially incriminate themselves?

I remember (not very well) hearing somethig similar to this, it claimed they were stolen and transported to Syria. Do you know more about this, or just some wild speculation?

>tfw they really thought weapons were there since they provided them

I would say for political capital back home. The Iraq war was probably the main reason why Obama was elected. Not saying it would have been different if the weapons would have been found, but it sure would have made the whole thing more palatable in the public's mind.

The WMDs never mattered, the goal is to topple any government in the middle east that doesn't play ball with the US/Israel/Saud.

Clearly there was no need, moot point. And 9/11, which was a false flag despite the real deaths, was all they needed for convincing the nation.

Yes.

It was the plan all along. Just look at the aftermath. Though I would say that the 43rd administration was not tricked, they were well aware of the mission, the Bush family is one of the most evil that ever lived.

Mubarak and Gaddafi are worlds apart. They don't even share the same planes of existence.

There were WMDs, but they are American made so they were destroyed and covered up.

Exactly. Bill Clinton can't get a fucking blow job without the world knowing. Only a fucking idiot would believe all these shootings are somehow Government related.

How do you think they were acquired? Considering the previous gulf war.

Nuclear and biological weapons can be traced to their place of manufacture. They would have had to steal the wmd from another country first. Take the anthrax attacks after 9/11. Traced to a DOD lab, and immediately memory holed. Ooops

Because nukes were never really part of their objective, they went in to the middle east to rob ancient temples of alien archeo-tech. Oil, dictators, all just distraction too.

We gave them to him. Duh.
Not even sold...free. Gratis.

Guess this makes sense, and destroying them before they could have been reviewed would have been almost impossible I gather. They went with a bad lie though, but to their credit it still worked.

So they still had them from the Iran conflict?